Angle's Angle vs. Reid's Reactionism "by Kate Evans"

Angle's Angle vs. Reid's Reactionism "by Kate Evans"

If nothing else, Democrats are consistent.

Their consisistency in this case can be traced back at least to 1964. Prior to that, Dwight Eisenhower was treated somewhat benignly and was merely called a dolt. By ’64, Democrats had moved on to their current demonization tactic and Barry Goldwater was labeled an extremist who planned to blow up the planet. Ditto with Ronald Reagan. With slight variations, ditto Sarah Palin, ditto Christine O’Donnell and ditto Sharon Elaine Angle.

Now, in the stretch drive to November 2nd and with Angle running at 50% to Harry Reid’s 46% according to the latest Rasmussen poll, Reid’s storm troopers are bound to intensify radical, extremist charges against the Republican candidate who can in large part credit ROCPAC, a nascent Political Action Committee, for winning that nomination last June against Sue Lowden.

Today, thanks to her stance as a leading opponent of Obamacare, Angle may almost be considered the poster child for the GOP surge in popularity over recent months at the same time public opposition has grown immeasurably.

How best could Reid and his Democrats do battle against Angle? Why, by calling her an extremist, of course.

But, who is really the radical, who the extremist? . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=2134)