Gays on the Attack and under Attack
Few people would contest the fact that homosexuals have made enormous strides over the last forty years in gaining both acceptablility in America’s straight world, advances unimaginable prior to the Stonewall Riots in 1969.
Those upheavals in New York City’s Greenwich Village in turn led homosexuals to promote the misnomer “gay” and emboldened them to successfully intimidate the American Psychiatric Association into changing its long-standing diagnosis of homosexuality as a deviant mental illness in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders to a variation on the norm.
Forced re-definitions rarely result in alterating realities.
Still, especially in the last decade, gays have succeeded in changing reality and making themselves very visible, if not normal.
. They have become virtual staples on television sitcoms and have evolved into an almost-obsessive subject on crime shows such as NBC’s “Law and Order.”
. They have won the right to marry in six states and have been integrated into the United States military.
. They have won the right to adopt babies and young children in some states despite evidence those kids are often sexually abused.
. They have a president who has vowed to repeal the Defense of Marriage Act and who has filled his administration with more outed gays than you could shake a feather boa at.
. They sponsor Gay Pride Weeks and gay parades in a number of cities, weeks and parades filled with obscene public exhibitionism and campaigns to seduce young people into their aberrant lifestyle.
(All of the above have been detailed and documented in earlier posts on this blogsite.)
When Barack Hussein Obama’s Justice Department announced last Friday that it would not defend a case involving a constitutional challenge to same-sex mariages, the DoJ virtually assured the nation that DOMA will be repealed should Obama win a second term. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=13681.)
Showing posts with label gays. homosexuals. Show all posts
Showing posts with label gays. homosexuals. Show all posts
Monday, February 20, 2012
Thursday, January 19, 2012
When the Bullied Become the Bulliers
When the Bullied Become the Bulliers
Bullying in schools, a problem as old as schools, has become the most grievous sin that could be committed, worse than cheating on tests, fighting, and engaging in illicit acts, all of which commonly occur.
Teachers seducing students still ranks higher on the serious scale but bullying is now considered the most damnable offense a student can commit, so vile that the bullied are now being allowed the right to bully as reparation.
The anti-bullying campaign in America has been fostered by no less than the president of the United States and his wife who warned of the destructive consequences of bullying and co-hosted a White House Conference on Bullying Prevention last year.
There have been no White House conferences on the subject of the dire state of American education so, obviously, bullying is a far more critical concern.
Obviously, too, the administration is more concerned over a particular type of bullying than about bullying in general, about geeks being stuffed into lockers or jocks intimidating nerds. The tip-off as to the gay focus of Barack Hussein Obama’s campaign was his bizarre appointment of a homosexual activist and facilitator of child sexual predation, Kevin Jennings, as his “safe schools czar.”
(See “Kevin Jennings and ‘Safe Schools,’ ” http://bit.ly/pcAMPH, and “School Gays Are Busting Out All Over,” http://bit.ly/A7QZTB.)
Bullying has now come full circle as the subjects of Obama and Jennings’ safety have developed into the bulliers.
Public school administrators, never known for their courage or intellect–most went into administration because they couldn’t teach–have been quick to endorse and enforce NEA and Obamian dictates on bullying since to do otherwise would threaten their sinecures.
As a result, we have witnessed countless instances of schools enforcing so-called zero tolerance when it comes to assumed intolerance toward gay students and boundless tolerance of a politically-correct tyrrany by the assumed oppressed.
The latest absurdity happened at Shawano High School in Wisconsin. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=12177.)
Bullying in schools, a problem as old as schools, has become the most grievous sin that could be committed, worse than cheating on tests, fighting, and engaging in illicit acts, all of which commonly occur.
Teachers seducing students still ranks higher on the serious scale but bullying is now considered the most damnable offense a student can commit, so vile that the bullied are now being allowed the right to bully as reparation.
The anti-bullying campaign in America has been fostered by no less than the president of the United States and his wife who warned of the destructive consequences of bullying and co-hosted a White House Conference on Bullying Prevention last year.
There have been no White House conferences on the subject of the dire state of American education so, obviously, bullying is a far more critical concern.
Obviously, too, the administration is more concerned over a particular type of bullying than about bullying in general, about geeks being stuffed into lockers or jocks intimidating nerds. The tip-off as to the gay focus of Barack Hussein Obama’s campaign was his bizarre appointment of a homosexual activist and facilitator of child sexual predation, Kevin Jennings, as his “safe schools czar.”
(See “Kevin Jennings and ‘Safe Schools,’ ” http://bit.ly/pcAMPH, and “School Gays Are Busting Out All Over,” http://bit.ly/A7QZTB.)
Bullying has now come full circle as the subjects of Obama and Jennings’ safety have developed into the bulliers.
Public school administrators, never known for their courage or intellect–most went into administration because they couldn’t teach–have been quick to endorse and enforce NEA and Obamian dictates on bullying since to do otherwise would threaten their sinecures.
As a result, we have witnessed countless instances of schools enforcing so-called zero tolerance when it comes to assumed intolerance toward gay students and boundless tolerance of a politically-correct tyrrany by the assumed oppressed.
The latest absurdity happened at Shawano High School in Wisconsin. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=12177.)
Sunday, January 8, 2012
The Advantages of Having Friends in High Places
The Advantages of Having Friends in High Places
Call them friends in high places or connections or contacts, knowing people with influence in positions to grease the skids for jobs, perks, or to just plain help you out is an inestimable advantage in America. In turn, when political friends come through, it translates into votes for the politicians.
Forget qualifications, education, merit, or need. Nothing is more beneficial than knowing someone with some pull to get you what you want. And, who has more pull than the current resident of the White House?
Unions have been calling in their chits ever since they blindly–or not so blindly, considering the benefits they reaped– supported the passage of the Obamacare abomination. They have been reaping ever since in the form of wholesale waivers from the onerous burdens of the Democrat-sponsored 2009 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, the law VP Biden called “a big f*cking deal.”
Over the last six months alone, 543,812 union members have joined federal employees, Congress, and the president in being exempted from Obamacare, a number dwarfed by the millions of unionistas granted exemptions prior to last June when Obamians allegedly turned off the exemption spigot after it came under public scrutiny.
See “Obama’s Selective Waivers and Exemption’s."
Reliable friends in high places may retreat but, if they’re truly dependable and know where their bread is buttered and with an election approaching, they continue their friendship.
Other deep-dyed Friends of Obama are his huge cadre of federal employees.
Their president saw fit to cut tens of thousands from the ranks of America’s military, forces missioned to defend and protect the nation, yet found it within his generous heart in the midst of the Great Recession to propose a salary increase for federal workers.
Albeit a modest raise of 0.5%, it’s far more than America’s millions of unemployed and underemployed will receive. Before their raise, the average civilian federal worker was raking in $75,296 plus benefits valued at $28,323 versus average $46,326 salaries and vanishing bennies in the private sector.
Now the people who don’t answer their phones in Washington will be getting a few thou extra to not answer their phones.
The 1939 Hatch Act prohibited federal employees from engaging in partisan political activities, a restriction lifted in 1993 after three union leaders were accused of violations. The result? Federal employes are no longer precluded from contributing to political campaigns or from working on behalf of their favorite politicians.
Who was it called them civil servants? They’re more like a civilian army under the command of the man who pays them.
In addition to that army of 2.1 worker bees and his union armies of millions more, a third contingent of those owing a deep debt of gratitude to their executive friend in the Oval Office is the Gay Lobby.
Homosexuals owe Obama Big Time . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=12050.)
Call them friends in high places or connections or contacts, knowing people with influence in positions to grease the skids for jobs, perks, or to just plain help you out is an inestimable advantage in America. In turn, when political friends come through, it translates into votes for the politicians.
Forget qualifications, education, merit, or need. Nothing is more beneficial than knowing someone with some pull to get you what you want. And, who has more pull than the current resident of the White House?
Unions have been calling in their chits ever since they blindly–or not so blindly, considering the benefits they reaped– supported the passage of the Obamacare abomination. They have been reaping ever since in the form of wholesale waivers from the onerous burdens of the Democrat-sponsored 2009 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, the law VP Biden called “a big f*cking deal.”
Over the last six months alone, 543,812 union members have joined federal employees, Congress, and the president in being exempted from Obamacare, a number dwarfed by the millions of unionistas granted exemptions prior to last June when Obamians allegedly turned off the exemption spigot after it came under public scrutiny.
See “Obama’s Selective Waivers and Exemption’s."
Reliable friends in high places may retreat but, if they’re truly dependable and know where their bread is buttered and with an election approaching, they continue their friendship.
Other deep-dyed Friends of Obama are his huge cadre of federal employees.
Their president saw fit to cut tens of thousands from the ranks of America’s military, forces missioned to defend and protect the nation, yet found it within his generous heart in the midst of the Great Recession to propose a salary increase for federal workers.
Albeit a modest raise of 0.5%, it’s far more than America’s millions of unemployed and underemployed will receive. Before their raise, the average civilian federal worker was raking in $75,296 plus benefits valued at $28,323 versus average $46,326 salaries and vanishing bennies in the private sector.
Now the people who don’t answer their phones in Washington will be getting a few thou extra to not answer their phones.
The 1939 Hatch Act prohibited federal employees from engaging in partisan political activities, a restriction lifted in 1993 after three union leaders were accused of violations. The result? Federal employes are no longer precluded from contributing to political campaigns or from working on behalf of their favorite politicians.
Who was it called them civil servants? They’re more like a civilian army under the command of the man who pays them.
In addition to that army of 2.1 worker bees and his union armies of millions more, a third contingent of those owing a deep debt of gratitude to their executive friend in the Oval Office is the Gay Lobby.
Homosexuals owe Obama Big Time . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=12050.)
Friday, January 6, 2012
Galloping Marxism in Our Schools
Galloping Marxism in Our Schools
Karl Heinrich Marx was a brilliant man. The sage co-founder of one of the two principal social scouges of the twentieth century knew the surest path to godless tyranny was centralized control of schools, colleges, and universities.
Marx recognized Communism-Marxism’s critical need to propagandize the young in order to rid them of anti-proletariat ideas inculcated by parents and churches and for public schools to adopt curricula that denies God, morality, traditional family values, the concept of private ownership of property, and to stoke class warfare.
If any of that sounds familiar, it should. America is experiencing Marxism-in-action today as seen not only in tax policies but in the widespread, leftist radicalism on college campuses and public schools becoming hotbeds of social brainwashing to complement the deteriorization of standards and learning.
We are seeing the patently unconstitutional intrusion of the federal government into local education with dictates, mandates, and oversights by the U.S. Department of Education as it rapidly centralizes control of American education.
We are witnessing the leftist National Education Association busily engaged in discouraging parental choice and home-schooling and fully endorsing those federal intrusions while pushing for inclusion and diversity instead of more effective education.
We are burdened with local districts too feckless to denounce governmental encroachments and administrators too imbued with liberal doctrine to resist the leftward lurch toward the Marxist ideals embraced by our president.
To be sure, there were unmistakable signs of controlled centralization- indoctrination long before the election of Barack Hussein Obama.
Since 2009, however, those signs have developed into a full-blown tsunami of Marxist doctrinaires and godless subversives acting under the guise of educators, all of whom were committed adherents to Obama’s twisted Marxist philosophy, many of whom signed on to his carefully-designed cult of personality.
At first, it was comical when schools like one in Hempstead, New York re-named themselves after Obama even before he was elected. Another in Asbury Park, New Jersey did likewise, before it was closed last July.
Throughout the nation, countless schools, localities, school districts, and streets changed names in honor of someone whose primary claim to fame was his (partial) blackness, whose father was a Marxist, and who has governed as if he dreams the collectivist dreams of his father.
Indoctrination of children comes in many colors. One favorite ploy is the use of songs.
A classic was the ditty composed by a black New Jersey teacher in 2009 who forced her class to sing a paean to their new god. Its unmemorable lyrics included, Mmm, mmm, mm!/Barack Hussein Obama/He said that all must lend a hand/To make this country strong again. . .” It gets worse with, ”Mmm, mmm, mm!/ Barack Hussein Obama/Yes!”
The parody is a vast improvement: “Mmm, mmm, mm!/Barack Hussein Obama/He said we must pay the man/To make this country strong again/Taking your money doesn’t matter/’cause we know He can spend it better. . .”
That song is old hat now. Obamamarxists have expanded their musical vistas to incorporate anarchic elements in their efforts to undermine values and seduce children into believing chaos and revolution were superior to order and civilized behavior. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=12029.)
Karl Heinrich Marx was a brilliant man. The sage co-founder of one of the two principal social scouges of the twentieth century knew the surest path to godless tyranny was centralized control of schools, colleges, and universities.
Marx recognized Communism-Marxism’s critical need to propagandize the young in order to rid them of anti-proletariat ideas inculcated by parents and churches and for public schools to adopt curricula that denies God, morality, traditional family values, the concept of private ownership of property, and to stoke class warfare.
If any of that sounds familiar, it should. America is experiencing Marxism-in-action today as seen not only in tax policies but in the widespread, leftist radicalism on college campuses and public schools becoming hotbeds of social brainwashing to complement the deteriorization of standards and learning.
We are seeing the patently unconstitutional intrusion of the federal government into local education with dictates, mandates, and oversights by the U.S. Department of Education as it rapidly centralizes control of American education.
We are witnessing the leftist National Education Association busily engaged in discouraging parental choice and home-schooling and fully endorsing those federal intrusions while pushing for inclusion and diversity instead of more effective education.
We are burdened with local districts too feckless to denounce governmental encroachments and administrators too imbued with liberal doctrine to resist the leftward lurch toward the Marxist ideals embraced by our president.
To be sure, there were unmistakable signs of controlled centralization- indoctrination long before the election of Barack Hussein Obama.
Since 2009, however, those signs have developed into a full-blown tsunami of Marxist doctrinaires and godless subversives acting under the guise of educators, all of whom were committed adherents to Obama’s twisted Marxist philosophy, many of whom signed on to his carefully-designed cult of personality.
At first, it was comical when schools like one in Hempstead, New York re-named themselves after Obama even before he was elected. Another in Asbury Park, New Jersey did likewise, before it was closed last July.
Throughout the nation, countless schools, localities, school districts, and streets changed names in honor of someone whose primary claim to fame was his (partial) blackness, whose father was a Marxist, and who has governed as if he dreams the collectivist dreams of his father.
Indoctrination of children comes in many colors. One favorite ploy is the use of songs.
A classic was the ditty composed by a black New Jersey teacher in 2009 who forced her class to sing a paean to their new god. Its unmemorable lyrics included, Mmm, mmm, mm!/Barack Hussein Obama/He said that all must lend a hand/To make this country strong again. . .” It gets worse with, ”Mmm, mmm, mm!/ Barack Hussein Obama/Yes!”
The parody is a vast improvement: “Mmm, mmm, mm!/Barack Hussein Obama/He said we must pay the man/To make this country strong again/Taking your money doesn’t matter/’cause we know He can spend it better. . .”
That song is old hat now. Obamamarxists have expanded their musical vistas to incorporate anarchic elements in their efforts to undermine values and seduce children into believing chaos and revolution were superior to order and civilized behavior. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=12029.)
Friday, October 21, 2011
The Many Faces of Domestic Terrorism
The Many Faces of Domestic Terrorism
The incidence of domestic terrorism in America, the commission or threat of violence against civilians by political, religious, or other ideological fanatics, actually pre-dates the establishment of the United States.
Domestic terrorism has many faces, all of them ugly, all of it carried out by U.S. citizens.
Defined by the FBI in 1994 as,”the unlawful use of force or violence, committed by a group(s) of two or more individuals, against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives,” that definition of domestic terrorism was expanded by the Patriot Act to incorporate actions of “mass destruction, assassination, and kidnapping occurring within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States.”
The British may have construed the Boston Tea Party as domestic terrorism even before the term existed. However, most of us are more familiar with contemporary incidents, those perpetrated by the KKK, the Black Liberation Army, the Jewish Defense League, the Weather Underground, the Unabomber, the Fort Hood Muslim, and the deadliest of all, the 1995 Oklahoma City bombers.
Depending on one’s sociopolitical perspectives, almost any domestic crime can be considered an example of domestic terrorism.
Thus, the 2009 senseless murder of the abortionist Dr. George Tiller by Scott Roeder, a man crazed by the inhumanity of late term abortions, has been termed by some as domestic terrorism. Conversely and perversely, gays who proudly attack a gathering of normal people with bricks are accorded an MSM pass. (http://tiny.cc/ifhnt)
Go figure.
On the other hand, transparent efforts at coercion by the Wall Street Occupiers, efforts clearly aimed at intimidating our government and civilian population “in furtherance of political or social objectives” aren’t being classified as terroristic by our governments or by the mainstream media.
If violence and murder constitute the requisite distinctions in determining what is and what is not domestic terrorism, what of the threat of violence and murder posed “in furtherance of political or social objectives”?
No murders by the OWS protestors have been reported so far but widespread violence has been committed against the public weal and against public sensibilities, overt threats have been directed toward individuals, institutions, and Jews in general, and rapes, thefts, and clashes with police. . . (Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=5758.)
The incidence of domestic terrorism in America, the commission or threat of violence against civilians by political, religious, or other ideological fanatics, actually pre-dates the establishment of the United States.
Domestic terrorism has many faces, all of them ugly, all of it carried out by U.S. citizens.
Defined by the FBI in 1994 as,”the unlawful use of force or violence, committed by a group(s) of two or more individuals, against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives,” that definition of domestic terrorism was expanded by the Patriot Act to incorporate actions of “mass destruction, assassination, and kidnapping occurring within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States.”
The British may have construed the Boston Tea Party as domestic terrorism even before the term existed. However, most of us are more familiar with contemporary incidents, those perpetrated by the KKK, the Black Liberation Army, the Jewish Defense League, the Weather Underground, the Unabomber, the Fort Hood Muslim, and the deadliest of all, the 1995 Oklahoma City bombers.
Depending on one’s sociopolitical perspectives, almost any domestic crime can be considered an example of domestic terrorism.
Thus, the 2009 senseless murder of the abortionist Dr. George Tiller by Scott Roeder, a man crazed by the inhumanity of late term abortions, has been termed by some as domestic terrorism. Conversely and perversely, gays who proudly attack a gathering of normal people with bricks are accorded an MSM pass. (http://tiny.cc/ifhnt)
Go figure.
On the other hand, transparent efforts at coercion by the Wall Street Occupiers, efforts clearly aimed at intimidating our government and civilian population “in furtherance of political or social objectives” aren’t being classified as terroristic by our governments or by the mainstream media.
If violence and murder constitute the requisite distinctions in determining what is and what is not domestic terrorism, what of the threat of violence and murder posed “in furtherance of political or social objectives”?
No murders by the OWS protestors have been reported so far but widespread violence has been committed against the public weal and against public sensibilities, overt threats have been directed toward individuals, institutions, and Jews in general, and rapes, thefts, and clashes with police. . . (Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=5758.)
Wednesday, September 28, 2011
The Gay Seduction of 10 Year Olds
The Gay Seduction of 10 Year Olds
Some things are better left unsaid and unelucidated. Among them are details on which Hollywood starlet is sleeping with which director, why Ashton Kutcher married Demi Moore–and sensationalized tripe on the sex lives of 10 year old girls.
The Gay Lobby, however, wants everything elucidated and out there when it comes to what segment of the population it is in process of seducing lately in hopes that more kids will do it, try it, because, as per the newest homosexual catchphrase, “It gets better.”
(See http://bit.ly/oOGDIl for further information on the import of how life allegedly “gets better” for youngsters who are hit on by gay adult predators– as told from the vantage point of degenerate homosexual activist, Dan Savage.)
Now 10 year old tomboyish girls come to the realization, at least in the unhinged perceptions of some film writers and producers, that “it gets better.” And thus we have the multi-award-winning “Tomboys,” a French film by Parisian Celine Sciamma.
Dispense with the antiquated idea that tomboys are only young girls who reject dolls and frilly dresses in favor of footballs and dirt encrusted Levis which, nowadays, isn’t all that unusual anyway. Based on the trailers, Sciamma’s movie incorporates scenes of similar, innocuous gender-blending but merely as background for more salacious content.
Sciamma also features in her seamy yet critically-acclaimed cinematic excursion into predatory child exploitation is the story of a confused, re-located child who finds comfort and sexual release in lesbianism and a self-constructed Play-Doh dildo.
A convicted serial deviate couldn’t make this stuff up! . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=5579.)
Some things are better left unsaid and unelucidated. Among them are details on which Hollywood starlet is sleeping with which director, why Ashton Kutcher married Demi Moore–and sensationalized tripe on the sex lives of 10 year old girls.
The Gay Lobby, however, wants everything elucidated and out there when it comes to what segment of the population it is in process of seducing lately in hopes that more kids will do it, try it, because, as per the newest homosexual catchphrase, “It gets better.”
(See http://bit.ly/oOGDIl for further information on the import of how life allegedly “gets better” for youngsters who are hit on by gay adult predators– as told from the vantage point of degenerate homosexual activist, Dan Savage.)
Now 10 year old tomboyish girls come to the realization, at least in the unhinged perceptions of some film writers and producers, that “it gets better.” And thus we have the multi-award-winning “Tomboys,” a French film by Parisian Celine Sciamma.
Dispense with the antiquated idea that tomboys are only young girls who reject dolls and frilly dresses in favor of footballs and dirt encrusted Levis which, nowadays, isn’t all that unusual anyway. Based on the trailers, Sciamma’s movie incorporates scenes of similar, innocuous gender-blending but merely as background for more salacious content.
Sciamma also features in her seamy yet critically-acclaimed cinematic excursion into predatory child exploitation is the story of a confused, re-located child who finds comfort and sexual release in lesbianism and a self-constructed Play-Doh dildo.
A convicted serial deviate couldn’t make this stuff up! . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=5579.)
Wednesday, September 21, 2011
A Remembrance: Jesse Dirkhising Would Be 25
A Remembrance: Jesse Dirkhising Would Be 25
Jesse William Dirkhising of Prairie Grove, Arkansas was a child of just 13 years when he met his untimely death on September 26th, 1999at the hands of Davis Don Carpenter and Joshua Brown. The tragedy of Jesse’s unspeakably violent murder goes far beyond his passing and the ignominious nature of how he suffered in the process.
The tragedy encompasses society’s disregard for his death when it happened and its failure to remember him and his life after.
The brutality of Jesse’s sadistic torture and murder by the perverted homosexuals Carpenter and Brown wasn’t salved by their convictions and sentences of life imprisonment. The passage of 12 years hasn’t provided any degree of closure, as if that currently-popular term ever has any meaning.
If anything, the continued, studied indifference of the mainstream media toward his death only exacerbates the wounds.
I try to pay annual deference to the memory of Jesse Dirkhising not because it will arouse the MSM to accord his murder retrospective acknowledgement but because he deserves some recognition in a world which would have made him a cause célèbre had his homicide been an act which society abhorred as much as that committed against other innocent victims.
Such a cause was Matthew Shepard.
Shepard’s vicious killing the previous year by two drunken sots in Wyoming evoked media attention the likes of which has rarely been witnessed and resulted in passage of “hate crime” legislation in Washington which now bears Shepard’s name. Jesse’s far more horrific murder gained barely a mention. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=5523.)
Jesse William Dirkhising of Prairie Grove, Arkansas was a child of just 13 years when he met his untimely death on September 26th, 1999at the hands of Davis Don Carpenter and Joshua Brown. The tragedy of Jesse’s unspeakably violent murder goes far beyond his passing and the ignominious nature of how he suffered in the process.
The tragedy encompasses society’s disregard for his death when it happened and its failure to remember him and his life after.
The brutality of Jesse’s sadistic torture and murder by the perverted homosexuals Carpenter and Brown wasn’t salved by their convictions and sentences of life imprisonment. The passage of 12 years hasn’t provided any degree of closure, as if that currently-popular term ever has any meaning.
If anything, the continued, studied indifference of the mainstream media toward his death only exacerbates the wounds.
I try to pay annual deference to the memory of Jesse Dirkhising not because it will arouse the MSM to accord his murder retrospective acknowledgement but because he deserves some recognition in a world which would have made him a cause célèbre had his homicide been an act which society abhorred as much as that committed against other innocent victims.
Such a cause was Matthew Shepard.
Shepard’s vicious killing the previous year by two drunken sots in Wyoming evoked media attention the likes of which has rarely been witnessed and resulted in passage of “hate crime” legislation in Washington which now bears Shepard’s name. Jesse’s far more horrific murder gained barely a mention. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=5523.)
America's Politically-Correct Gay Military
America's Politically-Correct Gay Military
. . . All that aside, and it shouldn’t be put too far aside in view of the unremitting campaign by gays, lesbians, bi-sexuals, and trans-sexuals to convince America of their normality, it’s a whole new day for the armed forces of the United States of America! Gays are usually focused on children but this new day celebrates adults.
After extensive studies and a manipulated survey of the troops, despite vehement objections and compelling evidence contradicting the survey’s validity, as of September 20th, 2011 homosexuals will be permitted to openly serve in the Army, Navy, Marines and Coast Guard.
As Army Lieutenant Colonel Robert Maginnes (Ret.) pointed out, the “consequences could be significant, but the American public has no clue because because the 111th Democrat-controlled Congress repealed the ban [on gays in our military] in a “lame-duck” session without hearing a single dissenting view.”
That ban, that law, 10 U.S.C. § 654, aka the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy, in place for 18 years ever since Bill Clinton followed the advice of Dick Morris and pushed for its passage in 1993 in order to appear a moderate on the issue, had grated on the homosexual community for almost two decades.
With Republicans slated to take control of the House of Representatives in 2011, gays knew it was time to call in all their Democrat chits and Democrat supporters so they could “integrate” the armed forces with homosexuals.
Maginnes, who now serves as a media national security adviser/analyst, detailed the not-unforeseen, not-unintended but ignored realities, consequences, and potential repercussions of repealing DADT in ”Congress Ignored Perils of Lifting Military’s Gay Ban.”
Primary ignored realities are the majority opposition from the troops, high rates of STDs among homosexuals, and the inherent pitfalls of gays showering and bunking with same-gender personnel, the equivalent of men and women sharing baths and bedrooms.
The consequences of that ignorance should have been apparent even to politicians, even to Democrat politicians. But there are more . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=5512.)
. . . All that aside, and it shouldn’t be put too far aside in view of the unremitting campaign by gays, lesbians, bi-sexuals, and trans-sexuals to convince America of their normality, it’s a whole new day for the armed forces of the United States of America! Gays are usually focused on children but this new day celebrates adults.
After extensive studies and a manipulated survey of the troops, despite vehement objections and compelling evidence contradicting the survey’s validity, as of September 20th, 2011 homosexuals will be permitted to openly serve in the Army, Navy, Marines and Coast Guard.
As Army Lieutenant Colonel Robert Maginnes (Ret.) pointed out, the “consequences could be significant, but the American public has no clue because because the 111th Democrat-controlled Congress repealed the ban [on gays in our military] in a “lame-duck” session without hearing a single dissenting view.”
That ban, that law, 10 U.S.C. § 654, aka the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy, in place for 18 years ever since Bill Clinton followed the advice of Dick Morris and pushed for its passage in 1993 in order to appear a moderate on the issue, had grated on the homosexual community for almost two decades.
With Republicans slated to take control of the House of Representatives in 2011, gays knew it was time to call in all their Democrat chits and Democrat supporters so they could “integrate” the armed forces with homosexuals.
Maginnes, who now serves as a media national security adviser/analyst, detailed the not-unforeseen, not-unintended but ignored realities, consequences, and potential repercussions of repealing DADT in ”Congress Ignored Perils of Lifting Military’s Gay Ban.”
Primary ignored realities are the majority opposition from the troops, high rates of STDs among homosexuals, and the inherent pitfalls of gays showering and bunking with same-gender personnel, the equivalent of men and women sharing baths and bedrooms.
The consequences of that ignorance should have been apparent even to politicians, even to Democrat politicians. But there are more . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=5512.)
Saturday, September 3, 2011
And You STILL Don't Believe Homosexuals Are Seducing Your Kids?
And You STILL Don't Believe Homosexuals Are Seducing Your Kids?
To the point of redundancy, I’ve posted information regarding the insidious efforts of the “homosexual community,” the self-described “gay lobby,” to beguile American youths into believing the gay lifestyle, life as a homosexual, was nothing more or less than an alternative choice instead of the disturbed, aberrant life path it is.
With gay parades, gay weeks, and concerted media efforts to convince kids that they and eons of societal repugnance are wrong and that current politically-incorrect beliefs are bigoted, homosexuals and their gay and LGBT lobbies have been tirelessly attempting to seduce children as young as twelve into blind acceptance of homosexuality as merely a variation on the norm, something they should look into.
MassResistance.com has devoted years to exposing homosexual intentions and their accumulating successes including their new wrinkle, gaining acceptability under the guise of campaigning against bullying.
That wrinkle has now spread to the world of sports, particularly the Boston Red Sox.
In July, the Bosox released what the franchise described as a public service announcement in the form of a video titled, “It Gets Better.” The video features a number of Boston players, manager Terry Francona, and some professedly-gay tweens, all lecturing on the evils of bullying and intolerance and encouraging homosexual kids not to worry because it gets better.
The video itself is harmless enough on the surface, until the viewer understands some history and the import of the antecedent of the pronoun “it” as conceived by the video’s creator, a vile, homosexual activist named Dan Savage.
Savage intended “it” to refer to life as a homosexual after a youngster has been hit on and seduced by an adult gay predator such as, just perhaps, Dan Savage.
Disenchanted, dysfunctional Catholic Savage, cleansed by Wikipedia as “an American author, media pundit, journalist, and newspaper editor,” ostensibly established the “It Gets Better” project as a resource for troubled kids but it actually serves as an adjunct to his other enterprises. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=5337)
To the point of redundancy, I’ve posted information regarding the insidious efforts of the “homosexual community,” the self-described “gay lobby,” to beguile American youths into believing the gay lifestyle, life as a homosexual, was nothing more or less than an alternative choice instead of the disturbed, aberrant life path it is.
With gay parades, gay weeks, and concerted media efforts to convince kids that they and eons of societal repugnance are wrong and that current politically-incorrect beliefs are bigoted, homosexuals and their gay and LGBT lobbies have been tirelessly attempting to seduce children as young as twelve into blind acceptance of homosexuality as merely a variation on the norm, something they should look into.
MassResistance.com has devoted years to exposing homosexual intentions and their accumulating successes including their new wrinkle, gaining acceptability under the guise of campaigning against bullying.
That wrinkle has now spread to the world of sports, particularly the Boston Red Sox.
In July, the Bosox released what the franchise described as a public service announcement in the form of a video titled, “It Gets Better.” The video features a number of Boston players, manager Terry Francona, and some professedly-gay tweens, all lecturing on the evils of bullying and intolerance and encouraging homosexual kids not to worry because it gets better.
The video itself is harmless enough on the surface, until the viewer understands some history and the import of the antecedent of the pronoun “it” as conceived by the video’s creator, a vile, homosexual activist named Dan Savage.
Savage intended “it” to refer to life as a homosexual after a youngster has been hit on and seduced by an adult gay predator such as, just perhaps, Dan Savage.
Disenchanted, dysfunctional Catholic Savage, cleansed by Wikipedia as “an American author, media pundit, journalist, and newspaper editor,” ostensibly established the “It Gets Better” project as a resource for troubled kids but it actually serves as an adjunct to his other enterprises. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=5337)
Saturday, August 20, 2011
Pederasty and Pedophilia Codified by the APA
Pederasty and Pedophilia Codified by the APA
In case no one has noticed, there seems to be an inordinate interest in celebrities and in pedophilia on the internet. Information on Hollywood and its “stars” has long attracted attention but the pedo attraction has long been confined to fans of sick porno websites.
Not anymore.
On the day I posted “Hooray for Hollywood Pedophiles?” (http://bit.ly/r95ILx), concerning a Corey Feldman expose’ on rampant perversion involving “vultures” in Tinseltown who prey on child actors, traffic to this blogsite increased by almost 400%, not indisputable evidence of widespread popularity of my site but clear proof that all lecherous vultures aren’t in the movie-making biz.
It’s now come to light that the perversion is not confined to Hollywood–as if it ever were.
A highly prestigious medical organization is in process of endorsing, normalizing, and seeking to legalize grossly abnormal and currently illegal acts of adults having sex with children.
The pederastic National Association of Man/Boy Love Association, NAMBLA, and the former homosexual Obama administration “Safe Schools” czar, Kevin Jennings, must be positively ecstatic over the move by the American Psychiatric Association, the APA.
Though still regarded as the virtual bible of shrinks, said APA terminally discredited itself and its DSM, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, almost 40 years ago when it caved under unrelenting pressure from homosexuals to revise the DSM and change its diagnosis of homosexuality from “an abnormal mental disorder” to, well, just a matter of inclinational taste.
(See “Nature or Nurture,” http://bit.ly/pr6dfb, as well as various other pieces on the subject of the APA and how it has transformed psychiatry into pop-science on demand. It’s entirely plausible that the same disordered group which pressured the APA into altering a long-established diagnosis in 1973 now controls the APA.)
It wouldn’t be a stretch to believe that retreat from defending and defining normality to normalizing abnormality may very well represent one of the primary bases for the Western world’s disintegration, a moral disintegration to complement our economic and societal decline.
In 2011, under a somewhat different, also politically-correct pressure, the APA has caved once again.
This time the shrinks in charge are striving to accommodate Muslim inclinations to bugger kids . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=5246)
In case no one has noticed, there seems to be an inordinate interest in celebrities and in pedophilia on the internet. Information on Hollywood and its “stars” has long attracted attention but the pedo attraction has long been confined to fans of sick porno websites.
Not anymore.
On the day I posted “Hooray for Hollywood Pedophiles?” (http://bit.ly/r95ILx), concerning a Corey Feldman expose’ on rampant perversion involving “vultures” in Tinseltown who prey on child actors, traffic to this blogsite increased by almost 400%, not indisputable evidence of widespread popularity of my site but clear proof that all lecherous vultures aren’t in the movie-making biz.
It’s now come to light that the perversion is not confined to Hollywood–as if it ever were.
A highly prestigious medical organization is in process of endorsing, normalizing, and seeking to legalize grossly abnormal and currently illegal acts of adults having sex with children.
The pederastic National Association of Man/Boy Love Association, NAMBLA, and the former homosexual Obama administration “Safe Schools” czar, Kevin Jennings, must be positively ecstatic over the move by the American Psychiatric Association, the APA.
Though still regarded as the virtual bible of shrinks, said APA terminally discredited itself and its DSM, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, almost 40 years ago when it caved under unrelenting pressure from homosexuals to revise the DSM and change its diagnosis of homosexuality from “an abnormal mental disorder” to, well, just a matter of inclinational taste.
(See “Nature or Nurture,” http://bit.ly/pr6dfb, as well as various other pieces on the subject of the APA and how it has transformed psychiatry into pop-science on demand. It’s entirely plausible that the same disordered group which pressured the APA into altering a long-established diagnosis in 1973 now controls the APA.)
It wouldn’t be a stretch to believe that retreat from defending and defining normality to normalizing abnormality may very well represent one of the primary bases for the Western world’s disintegration, a moral disintegration to complement our economic and societal decline.
In 2011, under a somewhat different, also politically-correct pressure, the APA has caved once again.
This time the shrinks in charge are striving to accommodate Muslim inclinations to bugger kids . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=5246)
Monday, August 1, 2011
Unintended Consequences in the Military and at NASA
Unintended Consequences in the Military and at NASA
When any governmental entity is involved, the line between intended and unintended consequences can be extremely fine, indeed.
Take, for example, the consequences of the repeal of the military’s DADT, the Don’t Ask Don’t Tell policy which required homosexuals in the Armed Services not to advertise their sexual inclinations in return for the military’s not inquiring, inquiries which could have resulted in their expulsion.
After extensive study of the deleterious effects outed gays would have on our troops and despite widespread opposition from Marines and combat forces in general, military powers-that-be in the Pentagon–predominantly ambitious officers who wouldn’t want to be perceived as opposing political directives–are set to officially lift the gay ban next month.
If gay agitators get their way, acceptance of homosexuals, turning blind eyes to their proclivities, not “telling” on them will not only become politically passe’ but de rigueur in the services via active recruitment.
The intended consequences being strategized by the LGBT set probaby isn’t exactly what the military intended.
According to the Washington Times, ”An underground gay group in the military wants recruiters to reach out to the gay community in the same way they target blacks, Hispanics and women.” The group, Outserve, representing some 4,000 homosexuals currently serving, is planning what the Times calls a “coming out party” in October in Vegas and wants the military to be on hand.
As one still-closeted Air Force officer put it, “The DoD regularly attends public events to recruit, and we believe they should be at Pride events next year around the country to let the gay community know the opportunities to serve their nation.” As one conservative commentator sees the agitation, it’s all part and parcel of what gay activists do: Push the envelope to the breaking point.
Robert Knight keenly observed, “No one should be surprised at what will be an increasingly shrill set of demands to use the military as an endorsing agency for homosexual activism.” . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=5148)
When any governmental entity is involved, the line between intended and unintended consequences can be extremely fine, indeed.
Take, for example, the consequences of the repeal of the military’s DADT, the Don’t Ask Don’t Tell policy which required homosexuals in the Armed Services not to advertise their sexual inclinations in return for the military’s not inquiring, inquiries which could have resulted in their expulsion.
After extensive study of the deleterious effects outed gays would have on our troops and despite widespread opposition from Marines and combat forces in general, military powers-that-be in the Pentagon–predominantly ambitious officers who wouldn’t want to be perceived as opposing political directives–are set to officially lift the gay ban next month.
If gay agitators get their way, acceptance of homosexuals, turning blind eyes to their proclivities, not “telling” on them will not only become politically passe’ but de rigueur in the services via active recruitment.
The intended consequences being strategized by the LGBT set probaby isn’t exactly what the military intended.
According to the Washington Times, ”An underground gay group in the military wants recruiters to reach out to the gay community in the same way they target blacks, Hispanics and women.” The group, Outserve, representing some 4,000 homosexuals currently serving, is planning what the Times calls a “coming out party” in October in Vegas and wants the military to be on hand.
As one still-closeted Air Force officer put it, “The DoD regularly attends public events to recruit, and we believe they should be at Pride events next year around the country to let the gay community know the opportunities to serve their nation.” As one conservative commentator sees the agitation, it’s all part and parcel of what gay activists do: Push the envelope to the breaking point.
Robert Knight keenly observed, “No one should be surprised at what will be an increasingly shrill set of demands to use the military as an endorsing agency for homosexual activism.” . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=5148)
Thursday, July 21, 2011
DADT Is Dead, DOMA Is Next
DADT Is Dead, DOMA Is Next
The eminently-transparent President Barack Hussein Obama has never attempted to conceal his eminently-obvious predilection toward the homosexual community, one of his staunchest constituencies–except during election cycles.
In 2008, he devoutly–ok, not devoutly but straightforwardly–professed his belief in the sanctity–ok, not the sanctity but the tradition–of marriage as an institution involving the union of one man and one woman, pretty much what most voters and most rational people on the planet believed.
Admittedly and to his credit, candidate Obama did publicly pledge to his gay friends that he would push for repeal of a related tradition, the Bill Clinton policy of the military not asking homosexuals if they were homosexual and homosexuals not saying they were homosexuals, better known as Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell or DADT.
President Obama and his lame duck Democrat congress succeeded in pushing through a repeal of DADT amid congressional chaos last December and gays were happy and gay, but not satisfied. That other gay-repugnant Clinton law, the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act, aka DOMA, remained on the books and homosexuals demanded it be removed.
Now, relatively few gays are militaristic and I’m guessing even fewer personally give much of damn whether homosexuals in the Army, Navy, Marines, and Coast Guard can’t be asked and can’t say what their sexual proclivities are but they insisted DADT be repealed on principle, the principle being they wanted their way.
They got it, even if the military–as fully anticipated–still has no clue on how to implement gay integration into the armed forces. Military and has petitioned for and has been accorded more time to effect implementation of the new policy.
Next on the gay agenda is dumping DOMA, . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=5054)
The eminently-transparent President Barack Hussein Obama has never attempted to conceal his eminently-obvious predilection toward the homosexual community, one of his staunchest constituencies–except during election cycles.
In 2008, he devoutly–ok, not devoutly but straightforwardly–professed his belief in the sanctity–ok, not the sanctity but the tradition–of marriage as an institution involving the union of one man and one woman, pretty much what most voters and most rational people on the planet believed.
Admittedly and to his credit, candidate Obama did publicly pledge to his gay friends that he would push for repeal of a related tradition, the Bill Clinton policy of the military not asking homosexuals if they were homosexual and homosexuals not saying they were homosexuals, better known as Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell or DADT.
President Obama and his lame duck Democrat congress succeeded in pushing through a repeal of DADT amid congressional chaos last December and gays were happy and gay, but not satisfied. That other gay-repugnant Clinton law, the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act, aka DOMA, remained on the books and homosexuals demanded it be removed.
Now, relatively few gays are militaristic and I’m guessing even fewer personally give much of damn whether homosexuals in the Army, Navy, Marines, and Coast Guard can’t be asked and can’t say what their sexual proclivities are but they insisted DADT be repealed on principle, the principle being they wanted their way.
They got it, even if the military–as fully anticipated–still has no clue on how to implement gay integration into the armed forces. Military and has petitioned for and has been accorded more time to effect implementation of the new policy.
Next on the gay agenda is dumping DOMA, . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=5054)
Sunday, June 26, 2011
Complements to Gay Marriage and Gay Pride
Complements to Gay Marriage and Gay Pride
It seems only appropriate to complement, not compliment, Friday’s passage of New York State’s deceptively-titled Marriage Equality Act and Sunday’s New York City’s Gay Pride Parade with some related news stories, one equally-bizarre.
For those unaware–and you really should try to keep up–New York’s Democrat Governor Andrew Cuomo late Friday eagerly affixed his signature to a law passed overwhelmingly by Democrat legislators, with aid, comfort, and votes furnished by four Republicans, which grants official approval for men to wed men, women to marry women, and God only knows what else in the Empire State.
The timing couldn’t have been better for homosexuals since passage of the law coincides with the annual Gay Pride Week culminating on Sunday with a parade which wrapped up in Greenwich Village where the gay liberation movement began.
As of this writing, news coverage on the parade is just coming in and what’s hit the MSM wires and local tv channels are the usual sanitized reports devoid of what goes on at such parades plus heaps of adulation poured on Cuomo for his coverage. The governor marched this year to much applause in preparation for his guaranteed run for the presidency in 2016 after locking up 2% of the electorate, the gay vote.
If the festivities were anything like previous gay parades and, after Democrats got their way and passed the Marriage Equality Act only days before, the parade probably surpassed homosexual excesses of the past.
Those excesses and what follows give added credibility to Archbishop Timothy Dolan’s dire analysis that the new law threatens “the cornerstones of civilization.”
See “Gays on Parade–Literally!” for some insight, including a video of a previous Gay Pride parade featuring, among other obscenities, Big Apple Dem politicians and a giant, green penis flailing onlookers, (http://bit.ly/l8RqxS)
One anticipated, intended consequence of passing the Marriage Equality Act was articulated by New York’s junior senator, Kirsten Gillibrand. She was “thrilled” with the new law but cautioned that, ”Our work is not done.” Having learned well her lessons from her mentor, New York’s senior senator Chuch Schumer, she indicated that congress will renew its efforts to repeal another bulwark of civilization, the Defense of Marriage Act, DOMA. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=4901)
It seems only appropriate to complement, not compliment, Friday’s passage of New York State’s deceptively-titled Marriage Equality Act and Sunday’s New York City’s Gay Pride Parade with some related news stories, one equally-bizarre.
For those unaware–and you really should try to keep up–New York’s Democrat Governor Andrew Cuomo late Friday eagerly affixed his signature to a law passed overwhelmingly by Democrat legislators, with aid, comfort, and votes furnished by four Republicans, which grants official approval for men to wed men, women to marry women, and God only knows what else in the Empire State.
The timing couldn’t have been better for homosexuals since passage of the law coincides with the annual Gay Pride Week culminating on Sunday with a parade which wrapped up in Greenwich Village where the gay liberation movement began.
As of this writing, news coverage on the parade is just coming in and what’s hit the MSM wires and local tv channels are the usual sanitized reports devoid of what goes on at such parades plus heaps of adulation poured on Cuomo for his coverage. The governor marched this year to much applause in preparation for his guaranteed run for the presidency in 2016 after locking up 2% of the electorate, the gay vote.
If the festivities were anything like previous gay parades and, after Democrats got their way and passed the Marriage Equality Act only days before, the parade probably surpassed homosexual excesses of the past.
Those excesses and what follows give added credibility to Archbishop Timothy Dolan’s dire analysis that the new law threatens “the cornerstones of civilization.”
See “Gays on Parade–Literally!” for some insight, including a video of a previous Gay Pride parade featuring, among other obscenities, Big Apple Dem politicians and a giant, green penis flailing onlookers, (http://bit.ly/l8RqxS)
One anticipated, intended consequence of passing the Marriage Equality Act was articulated by New York’s junior senator, Kirsten Gillibrand. She was “thrilled” with the new law but cautioned that, ”Our work is not done.” Having learned well her lessons from her mentor, New York’s senior senator Chuch Schumer, she indicated that congress will renew its efforts to repeal another bulwark of civilization, the Defense of Marriage Act, DOMA. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=4901)
Friday, June 24, 2011
Gays on Parade, Literally!
Gays on Parade, Literally!
Get your gay-est hats on, folks! There’s a big day coming up in New York City, a day you may want to put on your calendar–or maybe not.
Following on the heels of an even bigger day, the passage by the New York State legislature of a gay marriage bill Friday evening, homosexuals should be positively ecstatic and promise to make Sunday a day to remember.
The legalization of homosexual weddings in the Empire State, long-sought by Democrats and the gay lobby, was rushed to Democrat Governor Andrew Cuomo who signed the Marriage Equality Act into law in the dark of night.
Finally passed after decades of gay agitation and weeks of heated debate, and after 4 Republican state senators caved under pressure, the law joins New York with just 5 other states and D.C. in the unique position of conferring a legal imprimatur on homosexual marriage.
Gay couples hugged and wept with joy in the gallery.
Catholic Archbishop Timothy Dolan was far less sanguine and released a statement of his concerns which included these foreboding words: “We worry that both marriage and the family will be undermined by this tragic presumption of government in passing this legislation that attempts to redefine these cornerstones of civilization. Our society must regain what it appears to have lost–a true understanding of the meaning and the place of marriage, as revealed by God, grounded in nature, and respected by America’s foundational principles.” (http://cbsloc.al/iWkKuY)
However, what’s now passed is past and whether it’s prologue will be determined by the future. For now, let the gay games begin or, more precisely, continue.
There will be little if any weeping or worries about civilization this Sunday, what was once called the Lord’s Day, though there defiintely will be lots of hugging and other things.
Sunday will culminate the annual Gay Pride Week in N.Y.C., actually 8 days. but who’s counting, with a big parade and a “Pridefest” street fair starting at noon. Marchers will begin strutting their stuff at 36th Street and head down to Christopher Street in Greenwich Village for the annual Gay Pride rally and the annual “Dance on the Pier” on Hudson Street, near but not in the Hudson River.
Sad to say, at this juncture you have already missed the kick-off celebrations last Saturday with the annual rally at Central Park’s Summerstage and may have missed the annual “Rapture on the River: A Women’s Dance”. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=4885)
Get your gay-est hats on, folks! There’s a big day coming up in New York City, a day you may want to put on your calendar–or maybe not.
Following on the heels of an even bigger day, the passage by the New York State legislature of a gay marriage bill Friday evening, homosexuals should be positively ecstatic and promise to make Sunday a day to remember.
The legalization of homosexual weddings in the Empire State, long-sought by Democrats and the gay lobby, was rushed to Democrat Governor Andrew Cuomo who signed the Marriage Equality Act into law in the dark of night.
Finally passed after decades of gay agitation and weeks of heated debate, and after 4 Republican state senators caved under pressure, the law joins New York with just 5 other states and D.C. in the unique position of conferring a legal imprimatur on homosexual marriage.
Gay couples hugged and wept with joy in the gallery.
Catholic Archbishop Timothy Dolan was far less sanguine and released a statement of his concerns which included these foreboding words: “We worry that both marriage and the family will be undermined by this tragic presumption of government in passing this legislation that attempts to redefine these cornerstones of civilization. Our society must regain what it appears to have lost–a true understanding of the meaning and the place of marriage, as revealed by God, grounded in nature, and respected by America’s foundational principles.” (http://cbsloc.al/iWkKuY)
However, what’s now passed is past and whether it’s prologue will be determined by the future. For now, let the gay games begin or, more precisely, continue.
There will be little if any weeping or worries about civilization this Sunday, what was once called the Lord’s Day, though there defiintely will be lots of hugging and other things.
Sunday will culminate the annual Gay Pride Week in N.Y.C., actually 8 days. but who’s counting, with a big parade and a “Pridefest” street fair starting at noon. Marchers will begin strutting their stuff at 36th Street and head down to Christopher Street in Greenwich Village for the annual Gay Pride rally and the annual “Dance on the Pier” on Hudson Street, near but not in the Hudson River.
Sad to say, at this juncture you have already missed the kick-off celebrations last Saturday with the annual rally at Central Park’s Summerstage and may have missed the annual “Rapture on the River: A Women’s Dance”. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=4885)
Monday, June 20, 2011
Gays on the Verge of Marriage in N.Y.S..
Gays on the Verge of Marriage in New York
Call it same-sex marriage, gay marriage, or its misleading official title, the Marriage Equality Act, New York State is on the precipice of taking the plunge into the abyss of making gay marriage legal in the Empire State.
Prohibited either constitutionally or by statute in forty-one states, codified nationally by the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act, aka the Respect for Marriage Act, legalization efforts by well-financed homosexual activists have been on an unprecedented campaign to pressure New York legislators not to defend but rather to disrespect marriage for decades. The agitators failed as recently as 2009 but are on the verge of having their demands met this week.
Already passed by the Democrat-controlled Assembly, with new Democrat Governor Andrew Cuomo poised to affix his signature to the legislation as soon as it reaches his desk, the only stumbling block remains the Republican-controlled State Senate where intense pressure is being applied to influence the vote.
Stalling tactics succeeded last week in postponing that vote so last minute agitation to place the measure on the Senate docket is now at a crescendo with less than a week to go in the legislative session. That pressure resulted in Republicans caving on their political and moral principles; at this juncture, a single state senator stands between passage and defeat.
Before any Republican votes in favor of the “Marriage Equality Act,” a carefully-crafted euphemism for a “Marriage Debasement Act,” he or she should be required to view a video of homosexual activists in action. They are the same people now trying to scrap thousands of years of tradition and rational thought.
The video taken at a New York City “Gay Pride Parade” featured a “green devil” whipping the screaming crowd, which included children, with a giant penis, cross-dressing, buxomy transsexuals/transgenders, prancing, flower-bedecked, bra, speed-o and tutu-clad ”men” of various colors and nationalities, a float with a dozen semi-naked “men” advertising their “services” in a gay magazine, another pushing “lesbian night lifes,” yet another reputedly showed NYPD cops strutting their stuff.
Signs reading such uplifting advice as, “His Body, His Penis, His Choice,” and “Fuck safely. Use a Condom,” which condoms were liberally thrown into the adoring crowd, abounded in the parade.
Among the proud marchers were New York’s Democrat Senator Charles Schumer and the soon-to-be disgraced Dem, Rep. Anthony “Wiener” Weiner. The Dem Governor Cuomo will be there next year.
The entire 12-minute video . . .
(Read more and see the video at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=4839)
Call it same-sex marriage, gay marriage, or its misleading official title, the Marriage Equality Act, New York State is on the precipice of taking the plunge into the abyss of making gay marriage legal in the Empire State.
Prohibited either constitutionally or by statute in forty-one states, codified nationally by the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act, aka the Respect for Marriage Act, legalization efforts by well-financed homosexual activists have been on an unprecedented campaign to pressure New York legislators not to defend but rather to disrespect marriage for decades. The agitators failed as recently as 2009 but are on the verge of having their demands met this week.
Already passed by the Democrat-controlled Assembly, with new Democrat Governor Andrew Cuomo poised to affix his signature to the legislation as soon as it reaches his desk, the only stumbling block remains the Republican-controlled State Senate where intense pressure is being applied to influence the vote.
Stalling tactics succeeded last week in postponing that vote so last minute agitation to place the measure on the Senate docket is now at a crescendo with less than a week to go in the legislative session. That pressure resulted in Republicans caving on their political and moral principles; at this juncture, a single state senator stands between passage and defeat.
Before any Republican votes in favor of the “Marriage Equality Act,” a carefully-crafted euphemism for a “Marriage Debasement Act,” he or she should be required to view a video of homosexual activists in action. They are the same people now trying to scrap thousands of years of tradition and rational thought.
The video taken at a New York City “Gay Pride Parade” featured a “green devil” whipping the screaming crowd, which included children, with a giant penis, cross-dressing, buxomy transsexuals/transgenders, prancing, flower-bedecked, bra, speed-o and tutu-clad ”men” of various colors and nationalities, a float with a dozen semi-naked “men” advertising their “services” in a gay magazine, another pushing “lesbian night lifes,” yet another reputedly showed NYPD cops strutting their stuff.
Signs reading such uplifting advice as, “His Body, His Penis, His Choice,” and “Fuck safely. Use a Condom,” which condoms were liberally thrown into the adoring crowd, abounded in the parade.
Among the proud marchers were New York’s Democrat Senator Charles Schumer and the soon-to-be disgraced Dem, Rep. Anthony “Wiener” Weiner. The Dem Governor Cuomo will be there next year.
The entire 12-minute video . . .
(Read more and see the video at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=4839)
Monday, June 13, 2011
Adoption's Moral Implications
Adoption's Moral Implications
I’m no preacherman and less than qualified to be an arbiter of what’s moral in American society. I’m even less qualified to pass judgment and condemn immorality since that would be God’s prerogative. Is Anthony Weiner’s public display of his private parts immoral? He evidently doesn’t think so. Are gays adopting children acting morally? They seem to believe they are.
Who’s to say?
When our government takes active positions endorsing issues on which millions of Americans hold strong moral convictions, it would seem that people have both the right and responsibility to say something, to speak out. Such an issue is the question of whether children should be offered in adoption to avowed homosexuals, bi-sexuals, and transsexuals.
It’s incontestable that there are millions of American kids in desparate need of being welcomed into loving homes where they can be nurtured into adulthood as upstanding citizens who will lead happy, contented lives and contribute to society. What’s very disputable is whether those homes can be found with people whose private lives give rise to doubts as to their suitability for parenting.
Yes, we’re told that love makes a family and we’re told there are instances of gay parents who furnish stellar upbringing of adopted children but we’re told a lot of things. There is minimal information on how those kids fare later in life after growing up with two mommies or two daddies and a wealth of data that show one of each is most beneficial.
Current estimates indicate that 270,000 kids are living with same-sex couples; 65,000 are legally adopted. Would they be better off in foster care? That would depend on the gay care.
Celebrity homosexuals Neil Patrick Harris, Rosie O’Donnell, and Sir Elton John are among that latter group and they and their families get a great deal of press, and publicity, but what the future holds for those families is very much a mystery.
Less mysterious is what happens when the federal government intrudes itself into strictly local, social issues like adoption. Especially when that government is headed by the most “gay-friendly” president in American history, adoption devils are rooted in the details. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=4797)
I’m no preacherman and less than qualified to be an arbiter of what’s moral in American society. I’m even less qualified to pass judgment and condemn immorality since that would be God’s prerogative. Is Anthony Weiner’s public display of his private parts immoral? He evidently doesn’t think so. Are gays adopting children acting morally? They seem to believe they are.
Who’s to say?
When our government takes active positions endorsing issues on which millions of Americans hold strong moral convictions, it would seem that people have both the right and responsibility to say something, to speak out. Such an issue is the question of whether children should be offered in adoption to avowed homosexuals, bi-sexuals, and transsexuals.
It’s incontestable that there are millions of American kids in desparate need of being welcomed into loving homes where they can be nurtured into adulthood as upstanding citizens who will lead happy, contented lives and contribute to society. What’s very disputable is whether those homes can be found with people whose private lives give rise to doubts as to their suitability for parenting.
Yes, we’re told that love makes a family and we’re told there are instances of gay parents who furnish stellar upbringing of adopted children but we’re told a lot of things. There is minimal information on how those kids fare later in life after growing up with two mommies or two daddies and a wealth of data that show one of each is most beneficial.
Current estimates indicate that 270,000 kids are living with same-sex couples; 65,000 are legally adopted. Would they be better off in foster care? That would depend on the gay care.
Celebrity homosexuals Neil Patrick Harris, Rosie O’Donnell, and Sir Elton John are among that latter group and they and their families get a great deal of press, and publicity, but what the future holds for those families is very much a mystery.
Less mysterious is what happens when the federal government intrudes itself into strictly local, social issues like adoption. Especially when that government is headed by the most “gay-friendly” president in American history, adoption devils are rooted in the details. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=4797)
Sunday, June 12, 2011
"Uptightie Righties" and Gays
"Uptightie Righties" and Gays
I enjoy getting comments here and on various websites on which I re-post. Call me a masochist but I especially enjoy getting “hate mail” commentary.
First of all, comments show people are reading my posts and the hate mail proves some are being riled up, even incensed, by what I write which is a good thing since I only write the truth and they consequently prove they can’t handle the truth, to quote Col. Nathan R. Jessep.
By far, even exceeding the multitudinous compliments I count on one hand, most of the negative comments emanate from the homosexual community which take issue with factual reflections on what gays are up to in America.
In recent articles, I pointed out that outgoing Secretary of Defense Robert Gates suffered a brain lapse when he told a Marine in Afghanistan, in effect, that it was just too damned bad but Marines couldn’t opt of their enlistment because of the repeal of DADT. In another I cited a Gallup survey which showed that gays represent only a minimal percentage of 2-4% of Americans as opposed to what many Americans think.
In a third I referred to specific proof that homosexuals are targeting America’s youth but in the interests of decorus propriety, I didn’t detail the contents of a flier distributed to kids at a Bay State “youth pride” event on May 14th. One reader latched onto that propriety in ”Gay ‘Acceptance and Inclusion,’ ” (http://bit.ly/lkgQ2g)
“Dakotahgeo” wrote what cannot technically be described as hate mail but rather something more insidious, a calculated effort to discount and ridicule references made to government-supported homosexual activities in Massachusetts and thereby reduce the truth to calculated deception.
Dakotahgeo wrote, ”What I love about this particular blogspot is that while you uptighty righties spin your negative tales and stories regarding homosexuality, the pro GLBT Progressives are teaching right from wrong at a greater rate than you ever thought possible. They are not teaching the rightness or wrongness of being gay. They are teaching tolerance and respect for all people. . . and you boys are stuck. . . in a rut! It is almost embarrassingly. . . funny.” (Ellipses were Dakotageo’s.)
GLBT (Gay, Lesbian, Bi-sexual, Transgenders) “Progressives” are, in fact, not “teaching right from wrong” and, if “They are not teaching the rightness or wrongness of being gay,” they sure are making gay-ness seem . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=4782)
I enjoy getting comments here and on various websites on which I re-post. Call me a masochist but I especially enjoy getting “hate mail” commentary.
First of all, comments show people are reading my posts and the hate mail proves some are being riled up, even incensed, by what I write which is a good thing since I only write the truth and they consequently prove they can’t handle the truth, to quote Col. Nathan R. Jessep.
By far, even exceeding the multitudinous compliments I count on one hand, most of the negative comments emanate from the homosexual community which take issue with factual reflections on what gays are up to in America.
In recent articles, I pointed out that outgoing Secretary of Defense Robert Gates suffered a brain lapse when he told a Marine in Afghanistan, in effect, that it was just too damned bad but Marines couldn’t opt of their enlistment because of the repeal of DADT. In another I cited a Gallup survey which showed that gays represent only a minimal percentage of 2-4% of Americans as opposed to what many Americans think.
In a third I referred to specific proof that homosexuals are targeting America’s youth but in the interests of decorus propriety, I didn’t detail the contents of a flier distributed to kids at a Bay State “youth pride” event on May 14th. One reader latched onto that propriety in ”Gay ‘Acceptance and Inclusion,’ ” (http://bit.ly/lkgQ2g)
“Dakotahgeo” wrote what cannot technically be described as hate mail but rather something more insidious, a calculated effort to discount and ridicule references made to government-supported homosexual activities in Massachusetts and thereby reduce the truth to calculated deception.
Dakotahgeo wrote, ”What I love about this particular blogspot is that while you uptighty righties spin your negative tales and stories regarding homosexuality, the pro GLBT Progressives are teaching right from wrong at a greater rate than you ever thought possible. They are not teaching the rightness or wrongness of being gay. They are teaching tolerance and respect for all people. . . and you boys are stuck. . . in a rut! It is almost embarrassingly. . . funny.” (Ellipses were Dakotageo’s.)
GLBT (Gay, Lesbian, Bi-sexual, Transgenders) “Progressives” are, in fact, not “teaching right from wrong” and, if “They are not teaching the rightness or wrongness of being gay,” they sure are making gay-ness seem . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=4782)
Friday, June 3, 2011
Gay "Acceptance and Inclusion"
Gay "Acceptance and Inclusion"
Sally Green, vice-president and COO of the Richmond (VA) Federal Reserve Bank says the bank wanted to make a statement demonstrating its “commitment” by flying the rainbow flag emblematic of the homosexual movement underneath Old Glory. More specifically, Ms. Green stated, “We are flying the pride flag as an example of our commitment to the values of acceptance and inclusion” during gay-proclaimed “Gay Pride Month.”
Aside from the propriety of the Federal Reserve making commitments other than those related to banking, money, or the United States of America, the gay flag raises another another salient issue: Does the gay pride movement merit “acceptance and inclusion”?
I’m aware that posing such a query will immediately evoke accusations of intolerance, bigotry, and, my favorite taunt, homophobia, which in turn leads us to a second question, namely, should not those accepted and included abide by basic norms of conduct and behavior, norms which are not patently offensive to the vast majority of Americans?
And, no, I don’t refer there to what homosexuals do in the privacy of their boudoirs, in the back seats of their vehicles, or in back alleys, or whether they do them swinging from the rafters. Rather, I refer to what they do in public, in front of mixed audiences, and whom they are trying most to influence by their activities.
Virginia State Delegate Robert G. Marshall directed a letter to Richmond Fed President Jeffrey M. Lacker in which he pointed out that the homosexual behavior “celebrated” by the bank is a class six felony in Virginia, which should have been reason enough not to have flown the gay flag.
Marshall’s contention that the bank’s action “undermines the American economy” is debatable but his view that, “You want the American people to trust your [judgment] in economic matters when your spokesperson celebrates an attack on public morals?” (http://bit.ly/lT07vY) is well-taken but largely irrelevant.
Invoking morality and, by inference, religion, merely clouds the issues of “acceptance and inclusion” of the homosexual community since morality is open to interpretation and Americans profess a variety of religious beliefs. Even though most people would agree with Marshall and the other flag protestors and most religions condemn homosexual conduct, there are more fundamental reasons to oppose the flag, chiefly the physical and emotionally corruptive influence of gay activists on America’s youth.
I have often–too often–written about this subject and, frankly, it gets tedious. Fortunately, MassResistance.com never gets tired monitoring and exposing legislative and private corruption in the Bay State where activities of lesbian, gay, bi-sexual, transgendered, and “questioning” groups are not only condoned by the government but facilitated and financially sponsored by the commonwealth.
The latest gay news from Massachusetts is all good, for gays in Massachusetts, not so good for anyone else, especially if Massachusetts is a bellwether for other states in the union.
MassResistance.com reports that this year’s annual Youth Pride Day “celebration” in Boston outdid itself in exhibitionist gay seduction of young people. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=4731)
Sally Green, vice-president and COO of the Richmond (VA) Federal Reserve Bank says the bank wanted to make a statement demonstrating its “commitment” by flying the rainbow flag emblematic of the homosexual movement underneath Old Glory. More specifically, Ms. Green stated, “We are flying the pride flag as an example of our commitment to the values of acceptance and inclusion” during gay-proclaimed “Gay Pride Month.”
Aside from the propriety of the Federal Reserve making commitments other than those related to banking, money, or the United States of America, the gay flag raises another another salient issue: Does the gay pride movement merit “acceptance and inclusion”?
I’m aware that posing such a query will immediately evoke accusations of intolerance, bigotry, and, my favorite taunt, homophobia, which in turn leads us to a second question, namely, should not those accepted and included abide by basic norms of conduct and behavior, norms which are not patently offensive to the vast majority of Americans?
And, no, I don’t refer there to what homosexuals do in the privacy of their boudoirs, in the back seats of their vehicles, or in back alleys, or whether they do them swinging from the rafters. Rather, I refer to what they do in public, in front of mixed audiences, and whom they are trying most to influence by their activities.
Virginia State Delegate Robert G. Marshall directed a letter to Richmond Fed President Jeffrey M. Lacker in which he pointed out that the homosexual behavior “celebrated” by the bank is a class six felony in Virginia, which should have been reason enough not to have flown the gay flag.
Marshall’s contention that the bank’s action “undermines the American economy” is debatable but his view that, “You want the American people to trust your [judgment] in economic matters when your spokesperson celebrates an attack on public morals?” (http://bit.ly/lT07vY) is well-taken but largely irrelevant.
Invoking morality and, by inference, religion, merely clouds the issues of “acceptance and inclusion” of the homosexual community since morality is open to interpretation and Americans profess a variety of religious beliefs. Even though most people would agree with Marshall and the other flag protestors and most religions condemn homosexual conduct, there are more fundamental reasons to oppose the flag, chiefly the physical and emotionally corruptive influence of gay activists on America’s youth.
I have often–too often–written about this subject and, frankly, it gets tedious. Fortunately, MassResistance.com never gets tired monitoring and exposing legislative and private corruption in the Bay State where activities of lesbian, gay, bi-sexual, transgendered, and “questioning” groups are not only condoned by the government but facilitated and financially sponsored by the commonwealth.
The latest gay news from Massachusetts is all good, for gays in Massachusetts, not so good for anyone else, especially if Massachusetts is a bellwether for other states in the union.
MassResistance.com reports that this year’s annual Youth Pride Day “celebration” in Boston outdid itself in exhibitionist gay seduction of young people. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=4731)
Friday, May 27, 2011
Barney and His Friends
Barney and His Friends
Barney has lots of friends. No, not the purple, cartoon Barney but the ethically-challenged, cartoonish Barney, as in Frank. The inimitable Michelle Malkin calls them “Barney Frank’s Friends with Benefits” and they sure do benefit from their, umm, relationship with the homosexual congressman from Massachusetts’ 4th cd.
Rep. Frank adds a whole new dimension to the term “teflon man.” He seems to get away with more things–ethical, moral, and borderline criminal things–than any individual in Washington principally because he is homosexual and his peers dare not touch him, literally or figuratively speaking. Representing a district which includes uber-liberal bastions, the University of Dartmouth and Hillary Clinton’s alma mater, Wellesley College, doesn’t hurt, either; they consistently and blindly send him back to Congress whatever he does, or doesn’t do.
The most powerful homosexual in D.C., thanks to the House seniority system and to his position as former Chairman and now ranking Democrat on the Financial Services Committee, another of Frank’s machinations has come home to roost. I would say it bit him on the arse but that image could unduly arouse Barney.
Even the Boston Herald took a potshot at Barney in its story headlined, “Barney Frank Knocked on His Fannie,” which details the latest scandal to hit the newswires, Barney’s greasing the skids into a lucrative job for his long-time “companion,” (gay lover), Herb Moses, back in 1991.
The unabashed and proud Barney, who is rarely abashed or humble under any circumstances, . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=4603)
Barney has lots of friends. No, not the purple, cartoon Barney but the ethically-challenged, cartoonish Barney, as in Frank. The inimitable Michelle Malkin calls them “Barney Frank’s Friends with Benefits” and they sure do benefit from their, umm, relationship with the homosexual congressman from Massachusetts’ 4th cd.
Rep. Frank adds a whole new dimension to the term “teflon man.” He seems to get away with more things–ethical, moral, and borderline criminal things–than any individual in Washington principally because he is homosexual and his peers dare not touch him, literally or figuratively speaking. Representing a district which includes uber-liberal bastions, the University of Dartmouth and Hillary Clinton’s alma mater, Wellesley College, doesn’t hurt, either; they consistently and blindly send him back to Congress whatever he does, or doesn’t do.
The most powerful homosexual in D.C., thanks to the House seniority system and to his position as former Chairman and now ranking Democrat on the Financial Services Committee, another of Frank’s machinations has come home to roost. I would say it bit him on the arse but that image could unduly arouse Barney.
Even the Boston Herald took a potshot at Barney in its story headlined, “Barney Frank Knocked on His Fannie,” which details the latest scandal to hit the newswires, Barney’s greasing the skids into a lucrative job for his long-time “companion,” (gay lover), Herb Moses, back in 1991.
The unabashed and proud Barney, who is rarely abashed or humble under any circumstances, . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=4603)
Tuesday, May 3, 2011
Kevin Jennings and "Safe Schools"
Kevin Jennings and "Safe Schools"
How much am I offered for this fine African specimen? All negroes move to the back of the bus! If you’re gay, you’re fired!
Kevin Jennings, America’s “Safe Schools Czar,” officially President Obama’s assistant deputy secretary of the Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools, unofficially government deviant, is as out of place safeguarding schools as Sheriff Bull Connor or David Duke would have been on a Civil Rights panel or Adolph Hitler as a guess lecturer in Jewish studies.
Jennings gave a lecture in which he equated slavery and racial segregation to alleged discrimination against homosexuals. Civil Rights pioneers must wonder how many gays have been sold, lynched, and sent to the backs of buses.
Jennings doesn’t wonder at all. He’s convinced that homosexuals are the modern equivalent of slaves and their treatment the contemporary equivalent of what African-Americans endured during slavery and KKK and Jim Crow days. At least that’s what he told Maryland high school students. How any of his lies relate to the mission of his office is questionable.
Jennings has an interesting resume’.
A former Massachusetts teacher and author of One Teacher in Ten, he admitted to counseling a 16 year old boy to wear a condom when engaging in homosexual sex acts with an adult predator. He is the proud founder of the Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Education Network, GLSEN, which is little involved with heterosexuals but which ”has played an integral role in promoting homosexuality and pushing a pro-homosexual agenda in America’s schools.” He wrote a laudatory foreward for a book, Queering Elementary Education: Advancing the Dialogue About Sexualities and Schooling. He is also an unrepentant alcohol and drug abuser: http://bit.ly/8OpOI8
Jennings was an obvious pick for a gay-friendly president . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=4312)
How much am I offered for this fine African specimen? All negroes move to the back of the bus! If you’re gay, you’re fired!
Kevin Jennings, America’s “Safe Schools Czar,” officially President Obama’s assistant deputy secretary of the Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools, unofficially government deviant, is as out of place safeguarding schools as Sheriff Bull Connor or David Duke would have been on a Civil Rights panel or Adolph Hitler as a guess lecturer in Jewish studies.
Jennings gave a lecture in which he equated slavery and racial segregation to alleged discrimination against homosexuals. Civil Rights pioneers must wonder how many gays have been sold, lynched, and sent to the backs of buses.
Jennings doesn’t wonder at all. He’s convinced that homosexuals are the modern equivalent of slaves and their treatment the contemporary equivalent of what African-Americans endured during slavery and KKK and Jim Crow days. At least that’s what he told Maryland high school students. How any of his lies relate to the mission of his office is questionable.
Jennings has an interesting resume’.
A former Massachusetts teacher and author of One Teacher in Ten, he admitted to counseling a 16 year old boy to wear a condom when engaging in homosexual sex acts with an adult predator. He is the proud founder of the Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Education Network, GLSEN, which is little involved with heterosexuals but which ”has played an integral role in promoting homosexuality and pushing a pro-homosexual agenda in America’s schools.” He wrote a laudatory foreward for a book, Queering Elementary Education: Advancing the Dialogue About Sexualities and Schooling. He is also an unrepentant alcohol and drug abuser: http://bit.ly/8OpOI8
Jennings was an obvious pick for a gay-friendly president . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=4312)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)