Gays Versus Normality

Gays Versus Normality

Except for the deep satisfaction that comes from being demonstrably correct, there’s no upside to criticizing certain groups and people in America.




Say something negative concerning African-Americans or the president and you’re immediately branded a racist no matter how true and verifiable the critique. Say anything critical of homosexuals and you’re castigated as a hateful, homophobic Neanderthal despite the accuracy of the criticism.



However, the truth shall set you free so I’ll say and write it anyway: Gays despise normality.



Virtually everything I’ve read and seen about the homosexual community in the gay-friendly MSM depicts homosexuals as an oppressed minority who simply seek acceptance and recognition as normal people with different sexual proclivities who are misunderstood by heterosexuals.



Nothing could be farther from reality, at least for leaders in the lesbian-gay-bisexual-transgendered (LGBT) movement who dictate the gay agenda.



If gays simply sought acceptance and recognition, why would they actively recruit, stage outrageous displays, and try to stifle straights when they voice their disagreement?



For example, why does the LGBT sponsor annual days of silence in schools and gay weeks where kids are encouraged to try the gay lifestyle? Why do they promote annual gay parades and other festivities where homosexuals exhibit themselves in half-naked costumes and engage in outrageously gross behaviors? Why do they push for gay days at amusement parks where they intentionally make themselves a seperate minority?



(See previous posts on all of the above.)



Such activities only accomplish shock and disgust, not acceptance and inclusion in the mainstream of society. They serve to reinforce common perceptions that gays are far from what they assert, namely just a variation on the norm.



Long before President Barack Hussein Obama’s sudden, election year “evolution” on same-sex marriage, gays had been making huge inroads within the entertainment, mass media, and other very public industries. Representing an infinitesimal 2% of our population, for some reason, homosexuals are disproportionately represented in every field from sitcoms to politics to cable news.



As for very plausible reasons? Think political correctness and gay dominance in the entertainment industry.



It may have taken his daughters to convince Obama of the moral and societal rectitude of men marrying men and women marrying women . . .


(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=24771.)

Smile! It's Transgender Awareness Week!

Smile! It's Transgender Awareness Week!

No one really knows who first said, “Those whom the gods wish to destroy they first make mad” but, if there’s any validity to the sentiment, there are clear signs of madness in society today. One proof is this week, “Transgender Awareness Week.”

For a change I’m not referring to the Occupy Wall Street loonies or sex-addled Penn State coaches or Nancy Pelosi but to people who decide they don’t like their penises or vaginas and either have their male members lopped off or female parts supplemented with male organs.

They’re called “transgenders.” They can also be called disturbed. When their enablers are parents of young children, they should be prosecuted for child abuse as surely as PSU’s Jerry Sandusky.

Transgendering seems to be all the rage in some, fortunately limited, quarters but perhaps the worst feature of the anomaly is the support and encouragement granted them by the mainstream media and Democrat politicians.

Forty-two year old Chaz, (formerly Chastity), Bono is only the most recent instance of MSM lionizing transgenders. However, Chaz/Chastity was an adult when he transformed himself from female to male and even if he can’t dance very well he was entitled to enjoy his self-mutilation to his heart’s content.

Sarah and Bill Tyler were adults as well though they didn’t act that way when they succumbed to the pressures exerted on them by their four year old, Danaan, born Dana.

When he was all of two, Dana began insisting he wasn’t really a boy, by four he was denouncing God for burdening him with a penis and threatened to cut it off. By six, he talked about hanging himself and told his parents, ”I don’t think God is so great because God made a mistake when he made me.”

Little Dana claimed he was being bullied at school, although his parents sending him to school lugging a princess backpack and lunchbox may have been a factor in that teasing. When he insisted on wearing high-heeled slippers, they bought him high-heeled slippers.

Isn’t that what all parents do, give their children everything they demand?

To the Tylers’ rescue came none other than the biggest flamer on cable television “news,” Anderson Cooper, famously known for his lasciviously-gay remark denigrating the Tea Party movement and relating it to his own homosexual practice of “teabagging.”

Well, Cooper isn’t exactly known for that comment since CNN accepted his apology and rewarded him with his own show.

In any event, Cooper featured the Tylers on his newest show in a special edition titled, “Children & Teens Caught in the Wrong Bodies,” a subject to which Cooper could probably relate.

Diagnosed with “gender identity disorder,” a disturbance newly-concocted to explain situations shrinks can’t explain, Danann is now living her life as a girl and her mother feels, “I have a little girl that needs to be a little girl.”

It’s good that everyone’s happy. Let’s see what they think ten or twenty years from now when the Tyler’s spoiled, indulged child confronts the real world and discovers she can’t always get her own way, or that being a boy wasn’t all that bad.

In view of the facts the Tylers were distraught and confused, consulted their homosexual friends, and hailed from Orange County, California, they can almost be forgiven for permitting a very young child dictate decisions that will affect the rest of her life.

Less forgivable are the actions of Massachusetts Democrats who rammed a bill through that state’s legislature which will affect every school, workplace, accommodation, and institution in the Bay State. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=5994.)

School Gays Are Bustin' Out All Over!

School Gays Are Bustin' Out All Over!

I bet you thought June was “Gay Pride Month.” Well, it is, as declared by President Barack Hussein Obama originally in 2009 and re-dedicated as such in 2010 and 2011. But June is hardly the only “gay month” and should be distinguished from ”LGBT History Month,” which was first celebrated in 1994.

June was chosen as Gay Pride Month since the homosexual ascendancy in the United States began in June, 1969 with the Stonewall riots. October was selected as LGBT History Month because “National Coming Out Day” falls on October 11th and the first gay march on Washington occurred in October, 1979.

Got all that? If not, try to keep up, okay!

Union High School special ed teacher Vicki Knox couldn’t have forgotten the gay significance of October since school signs posters declaring this month ”Lesbian Gay Bi Transgender History Month” reminded her every day.

Mrs. Knox, a devout Christian, made the mistake of foolishly exercising her First Amendment right of free speech regarding her views on the evils of homosexuality on a very public venue, Facebook, and was suspended by Union High and may lose her job because of alleged homophobia.

Knox’s comments may not have provoked retaliation as much as the growing Facebook comment thread although she apparently did get more strident in expressing her unforgivable beliefs that, as she said, ”Homosexuality is a perverted spirit that has existed from the beginning of creation. I do not pretend to know ALL things. Nor do I pretend not to have biases, failings and faults. But I know sin and it breeds like cancer!”

Apparently, too, in our perverse, diverse, politically-correct society, religiosity and free speech mean nil as contrasted with the rights of homosexuals everywhere to campaign for both acceptance and recruits.

There’s no evidence dozens of students in the audience at Hartford Public High School in Connecticut gave much thought to religion or civil rights but they did react politically incorrectly when they stormed out of “Zanna, Don’t!” a musical sponsored by Greater Hartford’s Quest, an LGBT advocacy group ostensibly concerned about bullying in schools.

The Hartford Courant described the play as depicting “a reverse world in which straight people are outcasts and the most popular boy in school is the flamboyant star of the chess team . . . [and] the lowly football captain turns out to be a closet heterosexual.”

The Courant reporter, Vanessa De La Torre, also characterized the liplock between two male characters that provoked the storm-out as “a peck on the lips.” As pictures reveal, Ms. De La Torre doesn’t seem to know the difference . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=5776.)

And You STILL Don't Believe Homosexuals Are Seducing Your Kids?

And You STILL Don't Believe Homosexuals Are Seducing Your Kids?

To the point of redundancy, I’ve posted information regarding the insidious efforts of the “homosexual community,” the self-described “gay lobby,” to beguile American youths into believing the gay lifestyle, life as a homosexual, was nothing more or less than an alternative choice instead of the disturbed, aberrant life path it is.

With gay parades, gay weeks, and concerted media efforts to convince kids that they and eons of societal repugnance are wrong and that current politically-incorrect beliefs are bigoted, homosexuals and their gay and LGBT lobbies have been tirelessly attempting to seduce children as young as twelve into blind acceptance of homosexuality as merely a variation on the norm, something they should look into.

MassResistance.com has devoted years to exposing homosexual intentions and their accumulating successes including their new wrinkle, gaining acceptability under the guise of campaigning against bullying.

That wrinkle has now spread to the world of sports, particularly the Boston Red Sox.

In July, the Bosox released what the franchise described as a public service announcement in the form of a video titled, “It Gets Better.” The video features a number of Boston players, manager Terry Francona, and some professedly-gay tweens, all lecturing on the evils of bullying and intolerance and encouraging homosexual kids not to worry because it gets better.

The video itself is harmless enough on the surface, until the viewer understands some history and the import of the antecedent of the pronoun “it” as conceived by the video’s creator, a vile, homosexual activist named Dan Savage.

Savage intended “it” to refer to life as a homosexual after a youngster has been hit on and seduced by an adult gay predator such as, just perhaps, Dan Savage.

Disenchanted, dysfunctional Catholic Savage, cleansed by Wikipedia as “an American author, media pundit, journalist, and newspaper editor,” ostensibly established the “It Gets Better” project as a resource for troubled kids but it actually serves as an adjunct to his other enterprises. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=5337)

Adoption's Moral Implications

Adoption's Moral Implications

I’m no preacherman and less than qualified to be an arbiter of what’s moral in American society. I’m even less qualified to pass judgment and condemn immorality since that would be God’s prerogative. Is Anthony Weiner’s public display of his private parts immoral? He evidently doesn’t think so. Are gays adopting children acting morally? They seem to believe they are.

Who’s to say?

When our government takes active positions endorsing issues on which millions of Americans hold strong moral convictions, it would seem that people have both the right and responsibility to say something, to speak out. Such an issue is the question of whether children should be offered in adoption to avowed homosexuals, bi-sexuals, and transsexuals.

It’s incontestable that there are millions of American kids in desparate need of being welcomed into loving homes where they can be nurtured into adulthood as upstanding citizens who will lead happy, contented lives and contribute to society. What’s very disputable is whether those homes can be found with people whose private lives give rise to doubts as to their suitability for parenting.

Yes, we’re told that love makes a family and we’re told there are instances of gay parents who furnish stellar upbringing of adopted children but we’re told a lot of things. There is minimal information on how those kids fare later in life after growing up with two mommies or two daddies and a wealth of data that show one of each is most beneficial.

Current estimates indicate that 270,000 kids are living with same-sex couples; 65,000 are legally adopted. Would they be better off in foster care? That would depend on the gay care.

Celebrity homosexuals Neil Patrick Harris, Rosie O’Donnell, and Sir Elton John are among that latter group and they and their families get a great deal of press, and publicity, but what the future holds for those families is very much a mystery.

Less mysterious is what happens when the federal government intrudes itself into strictly local, social issues like adoption. Especially when that government is headed by the most “gay-friendly” president in American history, adoption devils are rooted in the details. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=4797)

When Is a Violent, Sexual Assault not a Violent, Sexual Assault?

When Is a Violent, Sexual Assault not a Violent, Sexual Assault?

When is a violent, sexual assault not a violent, sexual assault? Why, when the assault is committed by a protected species, of course!

The powerful LGBT Lobby, which stands for the lesbians, gays, bisexuals, transgenders and which sometimes throws in a “Q” in its designated acronym for “Queer” and “Questioning” to encompass as many people, especially sexually confused young people as possible, agitated for and received legally protected status.

That protection is afforded the LGBT(Q)’s in the nation according to federal law which also incorporates blacks, hermaphrodites, Mormons, Ugandans, anyone over 40, cross dressers, and veterans, a goodly chunk of Americans.

Related but different legislation in covered many, not all, of those groups under “hate crimes” which are defined ”as a violent act causing death or bodily injury because of the actual or perceived race, color, religion, national origin, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity or disability of the victim.”

Little agitation for the law, seconded by the United Nations, came from religious or nationality groups or the disabled who were thrown into that thought crime mix to make the legislation more palatable and seem as if it weren’t catering to the LGBT(Q) set, which it was.

Noteworthy in what is called the Matthew Shepard Act is the provision that enables federal authorities to intervene in alleged hate crimes that local enforcement authorities choose not to pursue and mandates FBI involvement in statistically tracking alleged gender and gender identity (B and T) crimes.

All of that brings us to a school bus in Kellogg, Idaho, a 17 year old high school softball player, and three teammates who may or may not have had gender identity issues but who clearly engaged in, if not a hate crime under current definitions, a sex crime and possibly a reverse lesbian sex crime committed out of anything but love . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=4533)

Musings on Denationalizing, Toilets, and Fighting Obama

Musings on De-nationalizing, Toilets, and Fighting Obama

Random thoughts on totally unrelated news items also unrelated to Tucson:

HAITI: Some nations just shouldn’t be nations and Haiti is at the top of that list. . .

TOILETS: I had always thought toilets, potties, loos, water closets were just places to do your business and begone. Not anymore, at least not in Brazil where they have become a cause of great contention . . .

FIGHTING OBAMA: Ultimate Fighting Champion Jacob Volkmann wasn’t serious when he said after a New Year’s Day victory that he would like to fight Obama next. ”He’s not too bright,” Volkmann opined . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=3378

Gay Father's Day

Gay Father's Day

Continuing payback to the homosexual community for its support in his campaign for the presidency, Barack Obama issued a proclamation on May 28th, 2010 declaring June to be “Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Pride [LGBT] Month.”

In that proclamation, he made special mention of the nation’s duty to accept gays since “Our Nation draws its strength from our diversity, with each of us contributing to the greater whole. By affirming these rights and values, each American benefits from the further advancement of liberty and justice for all.”

He concluded by saying, “I call upon all Americans to observe this month by fighting prejudice and discrimination in their own lives and everywhere it exists:” http://bit.ly/dxFts7

If the words in that proclamation didn’t cause a lump to well up in your throat or didn’t inspire people to take a gay to lunch or to launch a celebratory parade with chants of, “Truth, Justice, and the American Way,” it must be because you’re un-American for believing homosexuals are sick people. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1747)

LGBT Pride and Shame

LGBT Pride and Shame

In case anyone missed it, for the second year in a row President Barack Hussein Obama has issued a presidential proclamation declaring June to be “Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender Pride Month.”

Carrying the same weight as Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation freeing the slaves in 1863, Obama’s LGBT Pride Proclamation concludes with these stirring words: “NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim June 2010 as Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Pride Month. I call upon all Americans to observe this month by fighting prejudice and discrimination in their own lives and everywhere it exists.”

Additional Excerpts:

. As Americans, it is our birthright that all people are created equal and deserve the same rights, privileges, and opportunities.

. LGBT Americans have enriched and strengthened the fabric of our national life.

. We must give committed gay couples the same rights and responsibilities afforded to any married couple, and repeal the Defense of Marriage Act. We must protect the rights of LGBT . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1716)

Obama's Gay Agenda

Obama’s Gay Agenda

“President Barack H. Obama is poised to be the most pro-homosexual chief executive in history:” (http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=42233)

“While we have come a long way since the Stonewall riots in 1969, we still have a lot of work to do. Too often, the issue of LGBT rights is exploited by those seeking to divide us. But at its core, this issue is about who we are as Americans. It’s about whether this nation is going to live up to its founding promise of equality by treating all its citizens with dignity and respect.”– Barack Obama, June 1, 2007

Faithful to that promise of candidate Barack Obama, President Barack Hussein Obama has begun dismantling America’s social foundations with plans to repeal the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) as well as changing other established policies with regard to the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgendered (LGBT) communities. These are outlined in a detailed posting on the White House website: http://www.whitehouse.gov/agenda/civil_rights/.

Headed with the above 2007 quotation by Obama, under the category, “Support for the LGBT Community,” the plan incorporates efforts to:

Expand Hate Crimes Statutes: . . . President Obama cosponsored legislation that would expand federal jurisdiction to include violent hate crimes perpetrated because of race, color, religion, national origin, sexual orientation, gender identity, or physical disability. . .

Fight Workplace Discrimination: President Obama supports the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, and believes that our anti-discrimination employment laws should be expanded to include sexual orientation and gender identity. . .

Support Full Civil Unions and Federal Rights for LGBT Couples: President Obama supports full civil unions that give same-sex couples legal rights and privileges equal to those of married couples. Obama also believes we need to repeal the Defense of Marriage Act . . .

Oppose a Constitutional Ban on Same-Sex Marriage: President Obama...

(Read the rest of this article at http://genelalor.com/.)