DADT Is Dead, DOMA Is Next
The eminently-transparent President Barack Hussein Obama has never attempted to conceal his eminently-obvious predilection toward the homosexual community, one of his staunchest constituencies–except during election cycles.
In 2008, he devoutly–ok, not devoutly but straightforwardly–professed his belief in the sanctity–ok, not the sanctity but the tradition–of marriage as an institution involving the union of one man and one woman, pretty much what most voters and most rational people on the planet believed.
Admittedly and to his credit, candidate Obama did publicly pledge to his gay friends that he would push for repeal of a related tradition, the Bill Clinton policy of the military not asking homosexuals if they were homosexual and homosexuals not saying they were homosexuals, better known as Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell or DADT.
President Obama and his lame duck Democrat congress succeeded in pushing through a repeal of DADT amid congressional chaos last December and gays were happy and gay, but not satisfied. That other gay-repugnant Clinton law, the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act, aka DOMA, remained on the books and homosexuals demanded it be removed.
Now, relatively few gays are militaristic and I’m guessing even fewer personally give much of damn whether homosexuals in the Army, Navy, Marines, and Coast Guard can’t be asked and can’t say what their sexual proclivities are but they insisted DADT be repealed on principle, the principle being they wanted their way.
They got it, even if the military–as fully anticipated–still has no clue on how to implement gay integration into the armed forces. Military and has petitioned for and has been accorded more time to effect implementation of the new policy.
Next on the gay agenda is dumping DOMA, . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=5054)
Showing posts with label gay marriage. Show all posts
Showing posts with label gay marriage. Show all posts
Thursday, July 21, 2011
Sunday, June 26, 2011
Complements to Gay Marriage and Gay Pride
Complements to Gay Marriage and Gay Pride
It seems only appropriate to complement, not compliment, Friday’s passage of New York State’s deceptively-titled Marriage Equality Act and Sunday’s New York City’s Gay Pride Parade with some related news stories, one equally-bizarre.
For those unaware–and you really should try to keep up–New York’s Democrat Governor Andrew Cuomo late Friday eagerly affixed his signature to a law passed overwhelmingly by Democrat legislators, with aid, comfort, and votes furnished by four Republicans, which grants official approval for men to wed men, women to marry women, and God only knows what else in the Empire State.
The timing couldn’t have been better for homosexuals since passage of the law coincides with the annual Gay Pride Week culminating on Sunday with a parade which wrapped up in Greenwich Village where the gay liberation movement began.
As of this writing, news coverage on the parade is just coming in and what’s hit the MSM wires and local tv channels are the usual sanitized reports devoid of what goes on at such parades plus heaps of adulation poured on Cuomo for his coverage. The governor marched this year to much applause in preparation for his guaranteed run for the presidency in 2016 after locking up 2% of the electorate, the gay vote.
If the festivities were anything like previous gay parades and, after Democrats got their way and passed the Marriage Equality Act only days before, the parade probably surpassed homosexual excesses of the past.
Those excesses and what follows give added credibility to Archbishop Timothy Dolan’s dire analysis that the new law threatens “the cornerstones of civilization.”
See “Gays on Parade–Literally!” for some insight, including a video of a previous Gay Pride parade featuring, among other obscenities, Big Apple Dem politicians and a giant, green penis flailing onlookers, (http://bit.ly/l8RqxS)
One anticipated, intended consequence of passing the Marriage Equality Act was articulated by New York’s junior senator, Kirsten Gillibrand. She was “thrilled” with the new law but cautioned that, ”Our work is not done.” Having learned well her lessons from her mentor, New York’s senior senator Chuch Schumer, she indicated that congress will renew its efforts to repeal another bulwark of civilization, the Defense of Marriage Act, DOMA. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=4901)
It seems only appropriate to complement, not compliment, Friday’s passage of New York State’s deceptively-titled Marriage Equality Act and Sunday’s New York City’s Gay Pride Parade with some related news stories, one equally-bizarre.
For those unaware–and you really should try to keep up–New York’s Democrat Governor Andrew Cuomo late Friday eagerly affixed his signature to a law passed overwhelmingly by Democrat legislators, with aid, comfort, and votes furnished by four Republicans, which grants official approval for men to wed men, women to marry women, and God only knows what else in the Empire State.
The timing couldn’t have been better for homosexuals since passage of the law coincides with the annual Gay Pride Week culminating on Sunday with a parade which wrapped up in Greenwich Village where the gay liberation movement began.
As of this writing, news coverage on the parade is just coming in and what’s hit the MSM wires and local tv channels are the usual sanitized reports devoid of what goes on at such parades plus heaps of adulation poured on Cuomo for his coverage. The governor marched this year to much applause in preparation for his guaranteed run for the presidency in 2016 after locking up 2% of the electorate, the gay vote.
If the festivities were anything like previous gay parades and, after Democrats got their way and passed the Marriage Equality Act only days before, the parade probably surpassed homosexual excesses of the past.
Those excesses and what follows give added credibility to Archbishop Timothy Dolan’s dire analysis that the new law threatens “the cornerstones of civilization.”
See “Gays on Parade–Literally!” for some insight, including a video of a previous Gay Pride parade featuring, among other obscenities, Big Apple Dem politicians and a giant, green penis flailing onlookers, (http://bit.ly/l8RqxS)
One anticipated, intended consequence of passing the Marriage Equality Act was articulated by New York’s junior senator, Kirsten Gillibrand. She was “thrilled” with the new law but cautioned that, ”Our work is not done.” Having learned well her lessons from her mentor, New York’s senior senator Chuch Schumer, she indicated that congress will renew its efforts to repeal another bulwark of civilization, the Defense of Marriage Act, DOMA. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=4901)
Friday, June 24, 2011
Gays on Parade, Literally!
Gays on Parade, Literally!
Get your gay-est hats on, folks! There’s a big day coming up in New York City, a day you may want to put on your calendar–or maybe not.
Following on the heels of an even bigger day, the passage by the New York State legislature of a gay marriage bill Friday evening, homosexuals should be positively ecstatic and promise to make Sunday a day to remember.
The legalization of homosexual weddings in the Empire State, long-sought by Democrats and the gay lobby, was rushed to Democrat Governor Andrew Cuomo who signed the Marriage Equality Act into law in the dark of night.
Finally passed after decades of gay agitation and weeks of heated debate, and after 4 Republican state senators caved under pressure, the law joins New York with just 5 other states and D.C. in the unique position of conferring a legal imprimatur on homosexual marriage.
Gay couples hugged and wept with joy in the gallery.
Catholic Archbishop Timothy Dolan was far less sanguine and released a statement of his concerns which included these foreboding words: “We worry that both marriage and the family will be undermined by this tragic presumption of government in passing this legislation that attempts to redefine these cornerstones of civilization. Our society must regain what it appears to have lost–a true understanding of the meaning and the place of marriage, as revealed by God, grounded in nature, and respected by America’s foundational principles.” (http://cbsloc.al/iWkKuY)
However, what’s now passed is past and whether it’s prologue will be determined by the future. For now, let the gay games begin or, more precisely, continue.
There will be little if any weeping or worries about civilization this Sunday, what was once called the Lord’s Day, though there defiintely will be lots of hugging and other things.
Sunday will culminate the annual Gay Pride Week in N.Y.C., actually 8 days. but who’s counting, with a big parade and a “Pridefest” street fair starting at noon. Marchers will begin strutting their stuff at 36th Street and head down to Christopher Street in Greenwich Village for the annual Gay Pride rally and the annual “Dance on the Pier” on Hudson Street, near but not in the Hudson River.
Sad to say, at this juncture you have already missed the kick-off celebrations last Saturday with the annual rally at Central Park’s Summerstage and may have missed the annual “Rapture on the River: A Women’s Dance”. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=4885)
Get your gay-est hats on, folks! There’s a big day coming up in New York City, a day you may want to put on your calendar–or maybe not.
Following on the heels of an even bigger day, the passage by the New York State legislature of a gay marriage bill Friday evening, homosexuals should be positively ecstatic and promise to make Sunday a day to remember.
The legalization of homosexual weddings in the Empire State, long-sought by Democrats and the gay lobby, was rushed to Democrat Governor Andrew Cuomo who signed the Marriage Equality Act into law in the dark of night.
Finally passed after decades of gay agitation and weeks of heated debate, and after 4 Republican state senators caved under pressure, the law joins New York with just 5 other states and D.C. in the unique position of conferring a legal imprimatur on homosexual marriage.
Gay couples hugged and wept with joy in the gallery.
Catholic Archbishop Timothy Dolan was far less sanguine and released a statement of his concerns which included these foreboding words: “We worry that both marriage and the family will be undermined by this tragic presumption of government in passing this legislation that attempts to redefine these cornerstones of civilization. Our society must regain what it appears to have lost–a true understanding of the meaning and the place of marriage, as revealed by God, grounded in nature, and respected by America’s foundational principles.” (http://cbsloc.al/iWkKuY)
However, what’s now passed is past and whether it’s prologue will be determined by the future. For now, let the gay games begin or, more precisely, continue.
There will be little if any weeping or worries about civilization this Sunday, what was once called the Lord’s Day, though there defiintely will be lots of hugging and other things.
Sunday will culminate the annual Gay Pride Week in N.Y.C., actually 8 days. but who’s counting, with a big parade and a “Pridefest” street fair starting at noon. Marchers will begin strutting their stuff at 36th Street and head down to Christopher Street in Greenwich Village for the annual Gay Pride rally and the annual “Dance on the Pier” on Hudson Street, near but not in the Hudson River.
Sad to say, at this juncture you have already missed the kick-off celebrations last Saturday with the annual rally at Central Park’s Summerstage and may have missed the annual “Rapture on the River: A Women’s Dance”. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=4885)
Sunday, May 1, 2011
Father Pfleger, Gay Marriage, College Sadomasochism
Father Pfleger, Gay Marriage, College Sadomasochism
FATHER MICHAEL PFLEGER: A year after receiving “a lifetime achievement award” from the Catholic Church, a bizarre award if there ever were one, Father Pfleger has been suspended from his pastoral duties at St. Sabina’s parish.
Francis Cardinal George, Archbishop of Chicago who had been incredibly indulgent toward the radical, racist Pfleger in the past, had finally had enough of his antics after Pfleger went public with an announcement that he would defy Cardinal George and leave the Church if assigned anywhere but St. Sabina’s. The cardinal saved him the trouble by ousting him from the parish.
Forestalling any Pfleger guff, the cardinal made it clear that Pfleger had caused his own problems and effectively advised the priest that if he wished to cease being a priest and depart he shouldn’t let the church doors hit him in the rear.
See Cardinal George’s letter to Pfleger here http://bit.ly/lr2v0n.
Why it took so long to bounce a priest who is pro-abortion and pro-gay marriage, who is buddies with Revs. Jeremiah “God Damn America” Wright, black racist Louis “Calypso Louie” Farrakhan, and Al Sharpton, and who is suspected of serial pedophilia is mystifying. For a summary of Pfleger’s less-than-priestly activities, and the reasons Michelle Malkin characterized him as “Obama’s white cheerleader,” click here: http://bit.ly/iUFEVP
The Church is well rid of him.
GAY MARRIAGE: Another church, the Church of England, and the Lord Bishop of London, Richard Chartres, made a statement against homosexual marriage at Friday’s royal wedding of Kate Middleton and Prince William. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=4270)
FATHER MICHAEL PFLEGER: A year after receiving “a lifetime achievement award” from the Catholic Church, a bizarre award if there ever were one, Father Pfleger has been suspended from his pastoral duties at St. Sabina’s parish.
Francis Cardinal George, Archbishop of Chicago who had been incredibly indulgent toward the radical, racist Pfleger in the past, had finally had enough of his antics after Pfleger went public with an announcement that he would defy Cardinal George and leave the Church if assigned anywhere but St. Sabina’s. The cardinal saved him the trouble by ousting him from the parish.
Forestalling any Pfleger guff, the cardinal made it clear that Pfleger had caused his own problems and effectively advised the priest that if he wished to cease being a priest and depart he shouldn’t let the church doors hit him in the rear.
See Cardinal George’s letter to Pfleger here http://bit.ly/lr2v0n.
Why it took so long to bounce a priest who is pro-abortion and pro-gay marriage, who is buddies with Revs. Jeremiah “God Damn America” Wright, black racist Louis “Calypso Louie” Farrakhan, and Al Sharpton, and who is suspected of serial pedophilia is mystifying. For a summary of Pfleger’s less-than-priestly activities, and the reasons Michelle Malkin characterized him as “Obama’s white cheerleader,” click here: http://bit.ly/iUFEVP
The Church is well rid of him.
GAY MARRIAGE: Another church, the Church of England, and the Lord Bishop of London, Richard Chartres, made a statement against homosexual marriage at Friday’s royal wedding of Kate Middleton and Prince William. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=4270)
Sunday, March 13, 2011
The States of Maine and Marriage
The States of Maine and Marriage
Two widely disparate topics, Maine and marriage, may be more closely related than appears at first glance. They are linked by payoffs.
The state of Maine, not usually in the news this time of year for anything other than what its RINO Republicans are up to in Washington or record cold snaps, has gained a new distinction as the first state to win an Obamacare waiver from HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius.
Maine thus joins an increasingly unselective group of 1,040–as of Thursday–including McDonalds, the Service Employees International Union, Teamsters, UFCW, Steelworkers, Communications Workers of America, United Federation of Teachers, public sector unions, and numerous local school disricts encompassing 2.5 million Americans–as of Thursday.
Maine and the other elites are exempted from the onerous and expensive regulations imposed on the rest of us schleps, which onerousness and expense increase with every new waiver since the whole concept of Obamacare was predicated on sharing the costs. The fewer the participants, which numbers shrink with every waiver, the higher their costs.
As always with this administration, there’s a proffered excuse, in the case of the Pine Tree State, a threat by a major insurer, MEGA Life and Health, to “withdraw from the market altogether if the federal requirement remained in place:” http://tiny.cc/91ftl
The unannounced threat posed by many of the other exemptees, and virtually all of the waivered unions, is to withdraw from supporting Obama in 2012. No fool he, the president knows where his bread is buttered and where his political contributions come from. He took the state in ’08 with 57.71% of the vote, a difference of 126,650 votes.
The president also knows who won’t be sending him big bucks . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=3868)
Two widely disparate topics, Maine and marriage, may be more closely related than appears at first glance. They are linked by payoffs.
The state of Maine, not usually in the news this time of year for anything other than what its RINO Republicans are up to in Washington or record cold snaps, has gained a new distinction as the first state to win an Obamacare waiver from HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius.
Maine thus joins an increasingly unselective group of 1,040–as of Thursday–including McDonalds, the Service Employees International Union, Teamsters, UFCW, Steelworkers, Communications Workers of America, United Federation of Teachers, public sector unions, and numerous local school disricts encompassing 2.5 million Americans–as of Thursday.
Maine and the other elites are exempted from the onerous and expensive regulations imposed on the rest of us schleps, which onerousness and expense increase with every new waiver since the whole concept of Obamacare was predicated on sharing the costs. The fewer the participants, which numbers shrink with every waiver, the higher their costs.
As always with this administration, there’s a proffered excuse, in the case of the Pine Tree State, a threat by a major insurer, MEGA Life and Health, to “withdraw from the market altogether if the federal requirement remained in place:” http://tiny.cc/91ftl
The unannounced threat posed by many of the other exemptees, and virtually all of the waivered unions, is to withdraw from supporting Obama in 2012. No fool he, the president knows where his bread is buttered and where his political contributions come from. He took the state in ’08 with 57.71% of the vote, a difference of 126,650 votes.
The president also knows who won’t be sending him big bucks . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=3868)
Friday, February 25, 2011
America Blowing in the Impeachment Wind
America Blowing in the Impeachment Wind
The lyrics of Bob Dylan’s 1963 ambiguous anti-war song of protest, “Blowin’ in the Wind,” conclude with the lines, “The answer, my friend, is blowin’ in the wind/The answer is blowin’ in the wind.” Regrettably, although Dylan posed some questions, he never provided any answers to the satisfaction of my obtuse mind.
It’s all the more regrettable since, if Dylan’s mind hadn’t been boiled in drugs, he would still be rambling on today and could tell us the answer when there are more winds blowing than ever before in American history.
Those winds are blowing everywhere in 2011, winds of war in the Mideast, winds of upheaval in America’s schools and streets, winds of despair and confusion in America’s economy and stock market, winds of change in Washington that only President Obama’s most ardent acolytes could ever have foreseen.
One can’t help but think that today’s winds, if not all orchestrated and manipulated from Washington, are being cultivated and fanned by the Obama administration to accomplish its near and short term goals of Obama’s re-election followed by Obama’s ultimate change, the transformation of America into the dream of his father and of his mentor, Saul Alinsky.
The precise nature of that dream has yet to be revealed although we know it involves a socialistic “workers’ paradise” predicated on a nightmarish existence in which a tyrannical Big Barack and his minions call all the shots. A rudimentary rule for any tyrant is to dictate designated exceptions in laws or to order by executive fiat an existing law null and void.
The administration’s latest effort in that regard was to undermine the rule of law in the country by “deciding” not to defend an established statute, the Defense of Marriage Act, DOMA.
That action, or inaction, was not only an abrogation of Constitutional mandates but also a reinforcement of a precedent previously set when Obama’s Attorney General Eric Holder “decided” that civil rights laws and penalties only attach to white people and not to black revolutionaries in the New Black Panther Party.
When the Obama administration announced on Wednesday that it had withdrawn its legal support for DOMA and stated that the law is unconstitutional and therefore the Justice Department is under no obligation to defend it, Obama and Holder effectively threw out a law on the books for 15 years. Hypocritically contending he was still “grappling” with the concept of gay marriage instead of forthrightly admitting he was actually catering to the demands of his gay constituency, the Grappler in Chief thus assumed the role of a one-man Supreme Court.
Chief DoJ lackey, AG Holder, explained the president’s position . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=3726)
The lyrics of Bob Dylan’s 1963 ambiguous anti-war song of protest, “Blowin’ in the Wind,” conclude with the lines, “The answer, my friend, is blowin’ in the wind/The answer is blowin’ in the wind.” Regrettably, although Dylan posed some questions, he never provided any answers to the satisfaction of my obtuse mind.
It’s all the more regrettable since, if Dylan’s mind hadn’t been boiled in drugs, he would still be rambling on today and could tell us the answer when there are more winds blowing than ever before in American history.
Those winds are blowing everywhere in 2011, winds of war in the Mideast, winds of upheaval in America’s schools and streets, winds of despair and confusion in America’s economy and stock market, winds of change in Washington that only President Obama’s most ardent acolytes could ever have foreseen.
One can’t help but think that today’s winds, if not all orchestrated and manipulated from Washington, are being cultivated and fanned by the Obama administration to accomplish its near and short term goals of Obama’s re-election followed by Obama’s ultimate change, the transformation of America into the dream of his father and of his mentor, Saul Alinsky.
The precise nature of that dream has yet to be revealed although we know it involves a socialistic “workers’ paradise” predicated on a nightmarish existence in which a tyrannical Big Barack and his minions call all the shots. A rudimentary rule for any tyrant is to dictate designated exceptions in laws or to order by executive fiat an existing law null and void.
The administration’s latest effort in that regard was to undermine the rule of law in the country by “deciding” not to defend an established statute, the Defense of Marriage Act, DOMA.
That action, or inaction, was not only an abrogation of Constitutional mandates but also a reinforcement of a precedent previously set when Obama’s Attorney General Eric Holder “decided” that civil rights laws and penalties only attach to white people and not to black revolutionaries in the New Black Panther Party.
When the Obama administration announced on Wednesday that it had withdrawn its legal support for DOMA and stated that the law is unconstitutional and therefore the Justice Department is under no obligation to defend it, Obama and Holder effectively threw out a law on the books for 15 years. Hypocritically contending he was still “grappling” with the concept of gay marriage instead of forthrightly admitting he was actually catering to the demands of his gay constituency, the Grappler in Chief thus assumed the role of a one-man Supreme Court.
Chief DoJ lackey, AG Holder, explained the president’s position . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=3726)
Thursday, February 3, 2011
Two Sad Jokes: A Marriage and Color-Blindness
Two Sad Jokes: A Marriage and Color-Blindness
Two vastly different stories, one involving abandonment of a marriage, one involving abandonment of the First Amendment, both linked by failed promises.
The National Enquirer which prints a lot of news the New York (PC) Times doesn’t deem fit to print, such as anything liberals find unflattering, has just revealed that the only child of Hillary Rodham and Bill Clinton, Chelsea Victoria Clinton Mezvinsky, has been dumped by her hubby of six months, former Wall Street wannabe mogul, Marc Mezvinsky. He opted out of moguldom and now apparently out of marriage in favor of becoming a ski bum in Jackson Hole.
Aptly named after the swinging Chelsea section of London, Chelsea Clinton Mezvinsky’s parentage seems to have had little or no influence on hubby Marc or on the couple’s marital pleges. He, allegedly, kicked the former presidential first daughter to the curb after a dispute over procreating a former-presidential-first-daughter-grandchild: http://tiny.cc/zkcwx
If all true, it’s hard to say who’s the winner and who’s the loser in all this: Momma Hillary who professed to wanting a grandchild more than the presidency, Chelsea who reportedly now wants an annulment, Daddy Bubba who probably doesn’t give a flying sheat about any of it, or Marc.
I’d have to award winner status to Marc and the rest of the Clinton rabble can scrabble for the remains of losership.
A definite winner is James E. Graves, Mississippi Supreme Court justice who has been renominated by President Obama for a spot on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. In view of his record, Graves’ renomination can only be seen as a transparent effort by the president to reinforce his joke of promising to institute a post-racial, color-blind new America. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=3556)
Two vastly different stories, one involving abandonment of a marriage, one involving abandonment of the First Amendment, both linked by failed promises.
The National Enquirer which prints a lot of news the New York (PC) Times doesn’t deem fit to print, such as anything liberals find unflattering, has just revealed that the only child of Hillary Rodham and Bill Clinton, Chelsea Victoria Clinton Mezvinsky, has been dumped by her hubby of six months, former Wall Street wannabe mogul, Marc Mezvinsky. He opted out of moguldom and now apparently out of marriage in favor of becoming a ski bum in Jackson Hole.
Aptly named after the swinging Chelsea section of London, Chelsea Clinton Mezvinsky’s parentage seems to have had little or no influence on hubby Marc or on the couple’s marital pleges. He, allegedly, kicked the former presidential first daughter to the curb after a dispute over procreating a former-presidential-first-daughter-grandchild: http://tiny.cc/zkcwx
If all true, it’s hard to say who’s the winner and who’s the loser in all this: Momma Hillary who professed to wanting a grandchild more than the presidency, Chelsea who reportedly now wants an annulment, Daddy Bubba who probably doesn’t give a flying sheat about any of it, or Marc.
I’d have to award winner status to Marc and the rest of the Clinton rabble can scrabble for the remains of losership.
A definite winner is James E. Graves, Mississippi Supreme Court justice who has been renominated by President Obama for a spot on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. In view of his record, Graves’ renomination can only be seen as a transparent effort by the president to reinforce his joke of promising to institute a post-racial, color-blind new America. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=3556)
Saturday, November 20, 2010
The Death of Virginity
The Death of Virginity
Anyone recall the last British royal wedding? Not the extravagant 1981 spectacle itself but the humiliation visited upon the barely 20year old fellow royal and presumptive future Princess of Wales, Diana Frances née Spencer, prior to the nuptials in St. Paul’s Cathedral?
The palace royals insisted Diana be inspected, examined–Americans would say, checked out–to insure she was a true, hymenally-intact, unspoiled, unstained, bona-fide virgin before they would allow her into the rarified, royal inner circle and into the marital bed of the presumptive, future King of England, the 31 year old Bonnie Prince Charlie, the Prince of Wales, whose other titles would fill up half this page and whose previous sexual liaisons mattered not a whit.
Diana passed the virgin test and the royal couple was united, a unity that was soon disunified by a prince who apparently only wanted a princess to procreate heirs but who, in his heart of hearts had long longed for a slightly-older, horse-faced woman named Camilla Parker Bowles, the Duchess of Cornwall.
The jolly Prince Charlie’s recorded chief desire in life was to serve as Camilla’s tampon.
Any chance of an Oedipal complex on top of your other complexes there, Charlie?
In any event, to her ultimate regret and after latching on to multiple, post-divorce, . . .
(read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=2740)
Anyone recall the last British royal wedding? Not the extravagant 1981 spectacle itself but the humiliation visited upon the barely 20year old fellow royal and presumptive future Princess of Wales, Diana Frances née Spencer, prior to the nuptials in St. Paul’s Cathedral?
The palace royals insisted Diana be inspected, examined–Americans would say, checked out–to insure she was a true, hymenally-intact, unspoiled, unstained, bona-fide virgin before they would allow her into the rarified, royal inner circle and into the marital bed of the presumptive, future King of England, the 31 year old Bonnie Prince Charlie, the Prince of Wales, whose other titles would fill up half this page and whose previous sexual liaisons mattered not a whit.
Diana passed the virgin test and the royal couple was united, a unity that was soon disunified by a prince who apparently only wanted a princess to procreate heirs but who, in his heart of hearts had long longed for a slightly-older, horse-faced woman named Camilla Parker Bowles, the Duchess of Cornwall.
The jolly Prince Charlie’s recorded chief desire in life was to serve as Camilla’s tampon.
Any chance of an Oedipal complex on top of your other complexes there, Charlie?
In any event, to her ultimate regret and after latching on to multiple, post-divorce, . . .
(read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=2740)
Friday, March 26, 2010
The Gay Passion of Christ
The Gay Passion of Christ
If anyone doubts that the Gay Lobby with all its acronymic sub- organizations such as NAMBLA, GLSEN, GLBT, GLAAD, LAMBDA, PFLAG, et al., are not intent on simply gaining acceptance and equal rights but dominance in the normal world, think again.
With dominance, they would have their pick of new, young recruits.
Time and again gays have demonstrated a public and utter contempt for the belief systems and traditions of heterosexuals in an attempt to destroy those beliefs and tear down those traditions, tactics that put the lie to any notions that heterosexual parity is their goal.
The latest shameful travesty is about to occur in Stephenville, Texas, home to Tarleton State University where students are preparing to present a special Easter treat centering on “The King of Queers,” Jesus Christ. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1590)
If anyone doubts that the Gay Lobby with all its acronymic sub- organizations such as NAMBLA, GLSEN, GLBT, GLAAD, LAMBDA, PFLAG, et al., are not intent on simply gaining acceptance and equal rights but dominance in the normal world, think again.
With dominance, they would have their pick of new, young recruits.
Time and again gays have demonstrated a public and utter contempt for the belief systems and traditions of heterosexuals in an attempt to destroy those beliefs and tear down those traditions, tactics that put the lie to any notions that heterosexual parity is their goal.
The latest shameful travesty is about to occur in Stephenville, Texas, home to Tarleton State University where students are preparing to present a special Easter treat centering on “The King of Queers,” Jesus Christ. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1590)
Friday, February 19, 2010
Elton John: Confession of a Gay Predator
Elton John: Confession of a Gay Predator
Why is it that some minority groups are permitted to take umbrage at supposed slights but that any of their retaliatory measures are denied to the majority?
New York’s Governor-by-accident David Patterson is one of the latest in a long line of African Americans to invoke the R-word when situations devoid of any racist intent lead friend and foe alike to lambaste their activities and their only defense is to cry, “Racism!”
It’s a tried and true tactic characteristic of those in the civil rights movement for as long as there has been a civil rights movement.
Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, even Martin Luther King, Jr. have pulled out the old race card for the purpose of deflecting attention away from themselves and onto whites for the purpose of stirring guilt in non-African Americans and to thereby gain a measure of victimhood with its concomitant freedom from responsibility and accountability.
That art of deflection and arousing guilt has been adopted by a new and powerful minority, those in the gay community, which helps enable them to get away with virtual murder.
Having established that they have been unjustly denied their rights for eons, they have gained the sympathies of large numbers of heterosexuals who seem willing now to over-compensate by allowing gays to do and say whatever they please, to do things and say things that just a generation ago would not have been tolerated from anyone.
Cases in point are the vicious attacks of gadabout gay Perez Hilton on anti-gay marriage Miss America, Carrie Prejean and “American Idol,” Adam Lambert’s outrageous, gay conduct at last year’s American Music Awards
Lambert attributed America’s disgust to the fact, “I am a gay male:” http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1346
Add to those the annual gay pride demonstrations in places such as Boston, San Francisco, New York and various other locales in which homosexuals strut their stuff, engage in exhibitionism, and seduce America’s vulnerable youth to their sick lifestyle.
Gays have misinterpreted a degree of acceptance for agreement to licentiousness and license.
The latest gay outrage comes in an article in the UK’s The Sun titled, “Elton: Jesus Was a Gay Lord.” . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1511)
Friday, August 21, 2009
Rush Offends Gays! Gasp!
Rush Offends Gays! Gasp!
I’ve often said Rush Limbaugh is a bombastic, egotistical, hypocritical, disputatious blowhard. However, he’s our very conservative bombastic, egotistical, hypocritical, disputatious blowhard, and he happens to be correct virtually always in his arguments.
His negative traits may detract from Rush’s overall persona but they have no bearing on his facts and presentation of what he calls “essential truths” and are unrelated to his credibility and accuracy.
For example, as an intermittent but regular listener for 20+ years to the thrice-married Limbaugh, I have never heard him defend or deny his multi-marriages nor to badmouth his exes in any way.
In fact, he speaks very kindly of the fair gender. Whatever his difficulties with maintaining a stable marital union are beyond my ken, and beyond my interest. His prodigious ego or his various wives’ ambitions may be major factors, but what do I know?
He would be grossly hypocritical should he express support for the sanctity of marriage, which he doesn’t, even if he cannot be lauded as a paragon of marital fidelity.
His negative commentaries on gay marriages, however, though attacked by homosexuals as hypocrisy, are entirely within the realm of fair game since gay marriage is such an obvious transgression of natural law, and of common sense.
By far the favorite whipping boy of the Left, Limbaugh is under attack once again, this time for an off-hand yuk about our homosexual brethren.
In reaction to glibly-gay Rep. Barney Frank’s sarcastic response to a town haller questioner asking, “On what planet do you spend most of your time?” Rush punned that, ”Isn’t it an established fact that Barney Frank himself spends most of his time living around Uranus?”
I thought it was a pretty funny, and true, retort by Limbaugh.
As for poking fun at Rep. Frank, I’m sure Barney has been poked before, so he should be used to it. Gays, however, were offended by the joke for some reason.
Tsk, tsk.
Official and semi-official expressions of offense were amusing enough but those who commented on the Huffington Post story were positively riotous and the comments by the commenters said far more about them than they did about Rush: http://bit.ly/11mf02.
Those comments included these gems: . . .
(Read the rest at http://genelalor.com)
Sunday, April 5, 2009
Gay Marriage Quiz
“Okay, get your thinking hats on, class, please, because we have a little quiz today and let’s have no cheating, borrowing answers, or conferencing. It’s an easy quiz, just one question, and those of you who have kept up on current affairs–and not the affairs in Hollywood or on Desparate Housewives–should do just fine if you’ve been paying attention to the world around you.”
Sounds of discontent begin.
“Ok, here we go. You will have more than enough time to pose queries and then 10 seconds from the time I finish asking the question and the end of the Q&A to write your answer. And stop the complaining that 10 seconds isn’t enough time. The quiz requires only a simple ‘yes’ or ‘no’ response.
“The one question is, and wait until I finish asking it before you interrupt, please: Has any state in the United States of America ever approved by a constitutional, popular vote the legalization of marriages of people of the same gender? Yes or no?”
Suzie at once raises her hand and blurts out, “You never said we had to know this for a test!”
“Well, no, Suzie, but this isn’t a test, it’s just a quiz.”
“Yeah, but still, it’s no fair,” Suzie adds as she folds her arms in indignation and murmurs of agreement filter through the room.
“What do you mean by, ‘constitutional, popular vote,’ anyways?” Johnny blurts out. “What’s so popular about voting?”
“No, Johnny, ‘popular’ there refers to ‘reflecting the will of the people,’ not ‘popularity’ as with rock stars, for example.”
Johnny harrumphs.
“Any other questions?”
“Yeah, Teach, ah got a question,” Lionel chimes in. “What about this constitution thing, huh? I mean, what’s dat got to do with it? Who cares what some old White dudes wrote down thousands of years ago?”
Encouraged by a smattering of tepid applause, Lionel goes on. “I mean, if some sistah and some other sistah or some brutha and some other brutha wanna make hookin’ up all legal and whatevah, why not let them be happy? Ya know what ah mean?”
Lionel returns to his seat to another smattering.
“Umm, Lionel, I know what you mean, I think, but first of all, it was hundreds, not thousands, of years ago, 1787, to be precise, and . . .”
“Wait, what’s all this have to do with the quiz?” Dwight asks.
“Good point, Dwight, and if there are no other questions, the 10 second answering time begins now.”
“Wait, wait, hold up, please! How much will this count toward our final average?” Suzie blurts out.
In the event it wasn’t obvious, that dialogue never actually happened verbatim although in one way or another it may well be the topic of discussion in many a classroom over the next week or so given the most recent trashing of America’s Constitution by the Iowa Supreme Court: http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97B1TH80&show_article=1.
Once again, a judicial entity has superseded the authority and the right of the American people to determine who is legally entitled to marry whom in an ostensible democratic republic.
This issue of homosexual marriage seems to have a life of its own. Voted down by popular vote in California last November when Left Coasters resoundingly, and surprisingly, endorsed this simple 14 word amendment to its constitution, “Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California,” one would have thought the case was closed.
Not by a long shot.
Even though the vote was 52.3% to 47.7% against the gay agenda, in one of the most liberal states in the nation, that expression of the majority will of the people only ignited homosexual activists who then resorted to heated demonstrations, rioting, threats of violence, and even death threats to get their way.
(See “Homosexuals Resort To (More) Threats of Violence,” http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=745, for details and links to those efforts at intimidation.)
Undeterred by that defeat, and preceding it, homosexuals have also been resorting to liberal state courts as a remedy. . .
(Read the rest at http://genelalor.com/)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)