Pederasty and Pedophilia Codified by the APA

Pederasty and Pedophilia Codified by the APA

In case no one has noticed, there seems to be an inordinate interest in celebrities and in pedophilia on the internet. Information on Hollywood and its “stars” has long attracted attention but the pedo attraction has long been confined to fans of sick porno websites.

Not anymore.

On the day I posted “Hooray for Hollywood Pedophiles?” (http://bit.ly/r95ILx), concerning a Corey Feldman expose’ on rampant perversion involving “vultures” in Tinseltown who prey on child actors, traffic to this blogsite increased by almost 400%, not indisputable evidence of widespread popularity of my site but clear proof that all lecherous vultures aren’t in the movie-making biz.

It’s now come to light that the perversion is not confined to Hollywood–as if it ever were.

A highly prestigious medical organization is in process of endorsing, normalizing, and seeking to legalize grossly abnormal and currently illegal acts of adults having sex with children.

The pederastic National Association of Man/Boy Love Association, NAMBLA, and the former homosexual Obama administration “Safe Schools” czar, Kevin Jennings, must be positively ecstatic over the move by the American Psychiatric Association, the APA.

Though still regarded as the virtual bible of shrinks, said APA terminally discredited itself and its DSM, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, almost 40 years ago when it caved under unrelenting pressure from homosexuals to revise the DSM and change its diagnosis of homosexuality from “an abnormal mental disorder” to, well, just a matter of inclinational taste.

(See “Nature or Nurture,” http://bit.ly/pr6dfb, as well as various other pieces on the subject of the APA and how it has transformed psychiatry into pop-science on demand. It’s entirely plausible that the same disordered group which pressured the APA into altering a long-established diagnosis in 1973 now controls the APA.)

It wouldn’t be a stretch to believe that retreat from defending and defining normality to normalizing abnormality may very well represent one of the primary bases for the Western world’s disintegration, a moral disintegration to complement our economic and societal decline.

In 2011, under a somewhat different, also politically-correct pressure, the APA has caved once again.

This time the shrinks in charge are striving to accommodate Muslim inclinations to bugger kids . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=5246)

The Suicidal Leap of Tyler Clemente

The Suicidal Leap of Tyler Clemente

. . . Homosexual activists will no doubt use the death of Tyler Clemente to excoriate so-called homophobes for having caused his death. However, the proximate cause of Tyler’s suicide was his Rutgers’ dorm roommate, Dharun Ravi, and an accomplice, Molly Wei, grossly violating his privacy. They illicitly videotaped and posted to the internet Tyler’s two homosexual encounters at Rutgers within 3 days.

If blame need be assigned, Tyler Clemente would have to be blamed for taking his own life although, no matter the societal and family shame associated with homosexuality, Tyler had to have had other psychological issues to induce him to end his life at 18, issues of self-esteem, perhaps, that led him to a gay life.

As trite as it is, suicide is a needless, permanent solution for what is most often a temporary problem.

Again, if blame need be assigned, two medical groups could also be seen as responsible parties.

Until gay agitators began pressuring the American Psychiatric Association and the American Psychological Association in 1973 to cease describing homosexuality as a sickness, as “an abnormal mental disorder” and homosexuals as “sexual deviants,” that disorder was considered treatable. Once the two APA’s were intimidated into abandoning that long-standing diagnosis, a deviant disorder gradually and unfortunately morphed into a variation on the norm.

What was a politically motivated alteration of a medical diagnosis may have sated the demands of gay agitators and convinced untold numbers of gays that there was nothing wrong with them but did nothing to alleviate the evident anguish of people like Tyler Clemente. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=2033)

Gays Not Much in the News

Distracted by more momentous events, I’ve been neglectful of our gay community in the past month. Gays haven’t been cooperating by providing their usual newsworthy stories, at least stories of national import or of noteworthy garish and sociopathic behaviors, aside from Perez Hilton, of course.

I began to wonder why.

Turns out, since June’s Gay Pride weeks throughout the nation, they’ve been busy little beavers all along, not as much on the national stage where they seem content that they now have their man in the White House, but in various states and localities.

On the federal level, they know their empathic president is moving to dump the offensive Defense of Marriage Act, end Clinton’s misguided “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy for the military, and generally grease the skids, ultimately for full incorporation of homosexuals into the societal mainstream.

Don’t ever say that diligent hard work and determination don’t pay off. In the last three and a half decades, homosexual efforts to convince heteros that homos are normal too have achieved enormous successes, even though the whole gay movement is predicated on a lie.

As I’ve written before, ”After decades of describing homosexuality as ‘an abnormal mental disorder’ and those afflicted with that disorder as ’sexual deviants,’ under severe pressure and threats from gays, [the American Psychiatric Association] amazingly flipflopped beginning in 1973 and ultimately concluded that, Nah, it’s all very normal.”

See http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=635, et al.

Since that flipping 36 years ago, emboldened by their victory over common sense with the APA, gays–dare I say queers?–have been running roughshod advocating their agenda and largely seeing that agenda adopted into law and, their coup de grâce, mandating that agenda in our public schools.

Those busy beavers have also: . . .
(Read the rest at http://genelalor.com)

Nature or Nurture? Who Cares?

Nature or Nurture? Who cares?

(Fourth in a series in recognition of New York City’s “Gay Pride Week”)

I don’t think I have to take a backseat to anyone in my opposition to and condemnation of the gay revolution and agenda now sweeping our country. But, fair is fair and distortions of truths are still unacceptable.

One like-thinker in the quest to expose homosexuals for what they are and for what their aims and intentions are seems to needlessly shade the truth about them in this article: http://greggjackson.com/blog/?p=311.

The facts, the absolute, unvarnished, un-PC truth about gays is much more than sufficient to out them for what they are sans shadings of any sort.

In point of fact, although Gregg Jackson is clearly on the frontlines in seeking to preserve and protect American moral values, the American Psychological Association did not, as Gregg writes, definitively report what he reports as to the question of whether gays are born that way or not.

Gregg quoted the APA: “There is no consensus among scientists about the exact reasons that an individual develops a heterosexual, bisexual, gay, or lesbian orientation. . . no findings have emerged that permit scientists to conclude that sexual orientation is determined by any particular factor or factors,” which is totally correct.

However, it was the American Psychological, not Psychiatric, Association which made that clarification on its website, http://www.apa.org/topics/sorientation.html.

They are both “APA’s” and sister organizations which generally march in lockstep with one another but the Psychological association went on to say, “Many think that nature and nurture both play complex roles; most people experience little or no sense of choice about their sexual orientation.”

However, both APA’s lack credibility. They were previously intimidated into changing their diagnoses on homosexuality. Not coincidentally, the flipflop occurred just a few years after the gay Stonewall riot of 1969.

After decades of describing homosexuality as “an abnormal mental disorder” and those afflicted with that disorder as “sexual deviants,” under severe pressure and threats from gays, they amazingly flipflopped beginning in 1973 and ultimately concluded that, Nah, it’s all very normal. See http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=635.

Since being gay had miraculously been transformed from deviancy to normality, any debate as to its “causes” were moot, to which I would agree but for vastly different reasons.

The point is, Who cares? Nature or nurture, genetics or environment, Who cares?

Few people object to what consenting adults do to and with one another behind closed, preferably locked doors in rooms without windows, . . .

(Read the rest at http://genelalor.com)