Obama's One-Sided Race War, Part One

Obama's One-Sided Race War, Part One

“We know your origin in the world. We know how long you were set to live. And unless you change, your end has come.” (Nation of Islam’s Louis Farrakhan)




“You want freedom? You’re gonna have to kill some crackers! You’re gonna have to kill some of their babies!” (New Black Panther Party Minister King Shamir Ahabaz)



“If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun.” (Candidate Barack Hussein Obama)

In America’s racially-charged society, anyone with half a brain could have guessed in 2008 that any criticism of semi-black President Barack Hussein Obama would be met with allegations of racism–and anyone with a complete brain would have been positive of that eventuality.



Many of us also anticipated that Obama would instigate racial dissension in the United States aimed at achieving his Saul Alinsky-ite goals of destroying this nation.



None of us have been disappointed in our expectations, the upshot of which is an ongoing, one-sided race war, a war which most white people refuse to acknowledge exists either because they prefer to ignore reality or because they are ignorant of the consequences of a majority population trying to survive under the yoke of a militant minority bent on violence.



I know how those views will be received–as the rantings of a confirmed bigot intent on disparaging African-Americans, as vicious invective from someone dedicated to stirring up racial division, as the wild accusations of a white supremacist who harbors a deep animosity toward blacks, none of which are true.



Please read on.



Last Friday’s Rose Garden confrontation between the president and an inquisitive reporter served not only to infuriate the commander-in-chief but to ignite new battles in America’s race war. I’m fully aware we’re not supposed to say things like that, talk about race wars; they strike uncomfortably close to denied truth and are extremely politically incorrect.



On the other hand, it’s acceptable nowadays for black race baiters to make far more incendiary pronouncements, as when Farrakhan threatened the extinction of the white race and the New Black Panther Party issued a call to arms and murder.



Something, many things, are amok in America.



From the outset of his administration, despite his public declarations of the dawning of a new era of racial harmony, President Obama embarked on a concerted effort to divide Americans along class, cultural, and racial lines. November 6th, 2012 will determine the political effectiveness of his class and cultural wars; the race war is already in progress. . .

(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=25640.)

Do George Zimmerman's Witnesses Have NBPP Willies?

Do George Zimmerman's Witnesses Have NBPP Willies?

We already know the New Black Panther Party does an excellent job intimidating voters. Have they now branched out to intimidating witnesses in the George Zimmerman-Trayvon Martin shooting case?




On Election Day, 2008, the NBPP stationed troopers with billy clubs outside at least one Philadelphia polling location and scared away white voters. One member punctuated the intimidation by declaring, “Now you see what it’s like being ruled by a black man, cracker!”



The Bush administration’s Justice Department indicted two Panthers for their criminal actions calculated to help elect Barack Hussein Obama but, despite the fact the DoJ had an open and shut case, Obama’s Attorney General Eric Holder dismissed all charges.



Emboldened by that precedent and with the attitude that Obama owed them one for helping put him in the White House, is it beyond the pale to believe the NBPP would try to intimidate George Zimmerman’s witnesses? It certainly seems that someone spooked them since four have now altered their eyewitness accounts of what happened in Sanford, Florida on February 26th, 2012.



Of course, eyewitnesses can sometimes be wrong and it was getting dark the night of the incident but for four to radically change their recollections of the events suggests something is very fishy.



According to the Orlando Sentinel, one young woman originally stated she saw “two guys running” and a “fistfight.” A month later she changed her story to “I couldn’t tell you if it was a man, a woman, a kid, black or white. I couldn’t tell you because it was dark and because I didn’t have my contacts on or glasses. . . I just know I saw a person out there.”



Another eyewitness, a young mother, initially claimed it was too dark to determine who was on top in the fight but she was certain later: “I know after seeing the TV of what’s happening, comparing their sizes, I think Zimmerman was definitely on top because of his size.”



A third neighbor saw Martin pumeling Zimmerman “throwing down blows on the guy, MMA-style” but on reconsideration couldn’t determine if Martin was throwing any punches.



A fourth spoke to the bloodied Zimmerman immediately after the shooting and told Sanford police Zimmerman simply told him that Martin “was beating up on me, so I had to shoot him” and only subsequently recollected the shooter acted ”like it was nothing.” (http://bit.ly/JuBUZo)



As television’s Columbo might have opined, “Hmmm, that’s interesting.”



One eyewitness first sees two figures fighting who later transmogrify into one person fighting? Another says she . . .


(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=24417.)

Squelched Trayvon and New Black Panther Party Videos

Squelched Trayvon and New Black Panther Party Videos

As often noted in this space, the mainstream media frequently censor news items they deem politically incorrect or politically damaging to their favorite Democrat politicians. Sometimes, a story makes it on the air, onto cable, or into print that doesn’t fit the MSM mold but that’s as rare as transparency in the Obama administration.




Two subjects accorded lamestream P.C. indulgence are Trayvon Martin and the New Black Panther Party.



In their quest to convict if not hang George Zimmerman of something, anything, negative information concerning the late Trayvon Martin is usually buried by the MSM who prefer to depict the teenager as an innocent young man unjustly stalked and brutally murdered instead of as the pothead, thieving, violent gangbanger he actually was.



One detail about Trayvon Martin has recently surfaced that clearly demonstrates the real Trayvon. Don’t expect Diane Sawyer and her buddies to even mention it.



It seems the young Trayvon had maintained a YouTube account on which he proudly featured his photo with the middle finger of both hands raised in contemptuous salute. He also posted videos including one showing him engaged in a brawl with a white or light-skinned hispanic kid.



Understandably, with lawsuits and monetary compensation in their minds, Martin’s family has vehemently denied the boy in the video is Trayvon and family lawyer Ben Crump dutifully denounced it as nothing more than another attack on Trayvon’s character.



However, someone calls out his name, yelling, “Watch out, Trayvon!” 5 seconds into the 66-second vid, the tattoo on Martin’s right arm is clearly visible, and the fight takes place outside his mother’s home.



Now, kids tend to fight, even if they don’t post a videotape on YouTube accounts for all the world to see the violent, amateur Fight Club exhibition.



Trayvon Martin, though, was not your average teen, according to the family and their attorney.



To them, and to Barack Hussein Obama’s/Eric Holder’s Justice Department intent on turning his killing into a hate crime, he was a sweet, mild-mannered boy who couldn’t possibly have pummeled George Zimmerman into the ground before Zimmerman was forced to shoot him in self-defense.



The video was available on YouTube until it was scrubed, allegedly because it was too violent but not before screen captures and the video itself were saved revealing Martin as something less than a flower child.



No one has ever accused members of the racist New Black Panther Party of being flower children.



Heirs to the notorious old Black Panther Party founded by black domestic terrorists Huey Newton and Bobby Seale who thankfully dissolved into nothingness after being exposed for what they were, the NBPP initially presented itself as different from the old BPP.



In fact, the New Black Panthers are just as treacherous, if not more so, as their forebears. The NBPP simply pretends to be more civilized and law-abiding than the oldies, and they consistently fail. . .
(See the videos and read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=24378.)

Who Is the Real George Zimmerman?

Who Is the Real George Zimmerman?

Amid all the twisted, biased reporting, mindless demonstrations and inflammatory rhetoric and the virtual national hysteria over George Zimmerman’s shooting Trayvon Martin, one very relevant factor has been largely overlooked: Who is George Zimmerman?




It’s said that appearances are often deceiving and that adage applies in spades to Zimmerman.



We know for a certainty that he is a killer because he shot and killed 17 year old Trayvon Martin on February 26th, 2012 on a dark, rainy street in a gated, Sanford, Florida community.



Zimmerman freely confessed to killing Martin in self-defense with a single shot from his legally registered Kel-Tec PF-9 9mm handgun, a weapon obtained at a cop’s suggestion, while on his rounds as captain in a neighborhood watch group.



Since that evening, Zimmerman has been demonized by the local and national media, persecuted by racial agitators, and threatened with execution by various radicals. He has had a price put on his head, his family has been forced to relocate, and their lives have devolved into a living hell.



Even with new information trickling out proving the details in the case have been wildly distorted by the MSM which still chooses to feature photos of Martin as a child rather than as a 6 foot 2 inch teenager with a murky background, even as new evidence has emerged supporting Zimmerman’s contention that he was viciously beaten and bloodied, even though it appears his prosecution has been politically motivated in order to bring racial peace to Florida, the demonization and threats persist and the bounty has not been lifted.



George Zimmmerman may have killed another human being but he is anything but a murderer.



With all the attention lavished on the unarmed Martin over the past two months, short shrift has been accorded the other victim in this tragedy, Zimmerman.



Surprisingly, the international news agency Reuters, long known for its liberal slant, has finally provided what has been largely and starkly missing from the tragedy’s picture, the humanization of the shooter.



According to Reuters’ “George Zimmerman: Prelude to a Shooting,” http://reut.rs/IoC8Ku, the prologue to the events of that February night as it relates to Zimmerman stands in marked contrast against his portrayal in much of the MSM as well as by black politicians and by those more interested in dissension than in justice.



Rather than a racist vigilante who stalked and murdered Trayvon Martin in cold blood ”like a rabid dog,” George Zimmerman is shown to be a caring, sensitive, community-minded individual from a very religious and socially-involved family. He had been studying criminal justice and hoped to be a judge down the road.



Seriously puncturing the racist charge, the 28 year old Zimmerman is in fact half Latino with ”black roots through an Afro-Peruvian great-grandfather” and his maternal grandmother babysat two African-American kids who for years took their meals with the Zimmermans and attended school with young George.



At 18, while studying to be a realtor, he worked in Sanford for Lee Ann Benjamin and her husband John Donnelly who said, “George impressed me right off the bat as just a real go-getter. He was working days and taking all these classes at night.” Zimmerman later “partnered with an African-American friend and opened up an Allstate satellite office,” which went bust.



Still, anymore than Trayvon Martin was a saint, George Zimmerman wasn’t saintly either.




(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=22456.)

Radical Racists: Obama, Holder, and the NBPP

Radical Racists: Obama, Holder, and the NBPP

It’s turning out that the president of the United States, the Attorney General of the United States, and the New Black Panther Party have much more in common than race. Call it recompense, call it reparations, that commonality is almost as ugly and damnable as any crimes committed by the Ku Klux Klan.

Barack Hussein Obama has undertaken prodigious efforts to appear the president of all the people regardless of race and an even greater effort to conceal his radical, racist past. Eric Himpton Holder has been more forthcoming in his racism and active discrimination toward white Americans without conceding his bigotry. The New Black Panther Party, founded on black racism and distinguished from the old Black Panthers only by the fact most have not yet been tried and convicted, is more brazenly ingenuous about its radical racism.

No matter Obama’s attempts to hide who and what he is, no matter Holder’s accidental admissions, if nothing else, Obama and Holder could learn a great deal about forthrightness from the NBPP. Their learning curve aside, recent and past revelations have now linked all of them.

After his election, Obama told America he has been running for the presidency since kindergarten. Toward that end, he campaigned in Selma, Alabama in March, 2007. Nothing wrong with that; he campaigned in 57 of America’s 58 states so Alabama most likely was one of them.

What is very wrong is that photos depicting him marching and speaking with NBPP National Chief Malik Zulu Shabazz and other members of the New Black Panther Party were quashed and hidden from the American public for four years by Obama’s mainstream media.

That oversight could readily be attributable to journalistic negligence–or to a covert attempt to portray their hero, their anointed one, as Everyman, a universal man who represented all of America, black, white, yellow and everyone in between, who didn’t have a racist bone in his body. . .

Not unsurprisingly, like those damning 2007 photos, that evidence of “reverse racism” has been suppressed by Obama’s media.

Obama’s appointment of fellow African-American Eric Holder as attorney general should have provided the clue that neither Obama nor his new appointee were on the same page as the majority of Americans.

Eric Holder’s background of facilitating Bill Clinton’s pardon of fugitive Marc Rich, defending the terrorist Ejército Popular Boricua, negotiating a settlement in the case of Chiquita Brands paying off terrorists, his firm’s representation of Guantanomo accused terrorists, etc., were a dead giveaway that Holder was closer to being a terrorist himself than qualified to be the attorney general of the United States.

Obama’s MSM deftly hid those pretty damned relevant details on Holder’s résumé. . . (Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=5645.)

Handwritings on White House Walls?

Handwritings on White House Walls?

It may have foeshadowed 2012 when Obama-idolator Peter Fonda called President Barack Hussein Obama a “f*cking traitor.” It was probably said affectionately by the environmentalist/actor to get some attention from other beautiful people at the Cannes film festival for his enviro-creds but it was still exceptional.

Poor Peter, who hasn’t had a hit movie since “Easy Rider” 42 years ago, had to say something notable to grab some attention from his big sister, Hanoi Jane Fonda, and he only considers the president a “f*cking traitor” because Obama didn’t handle the Gulf oil spill very well. (http://yhoo.it/kW7NAd)

The fact that Obama hasn’t handled very much very well didn’t bother Peter but the fact that such a nasty, verbal attack by a leftist, Hollywood elitist–which is an admitted redundancy–would have been unheard of just a year ago bodes ill for the president.

Is the handwriting on the wall?

More damaging scribbling came from Obama’s mainstream media which, as per his bidding, has been remarkably quiescent for more than 3 years now when it came to vetting his background, interviewing him with other than softball questions, or citing and publicizing his frequent gaffes and misstatements.

The MSM long ago abandoned its moral and ethical responsibilities in that regard and the White House press corps–or, “corpse,” according to the president–has been most lax, according to senior members of that corps/corpse.

Those veterans, including Sander Vanocur, Sid Davis, and Haynes Johnson, believe White House correspondents are “too timid and deferential.” What’s most amazing, in addition to their being critical, is that it took them 26 months to notice.

As Vanocur observed, ”You want to know what’s wrong with the press? The press is what’s wrong with the press.” Washington Post reporter Haynes Johnson chimed in with, ”It’s all very stale, very structured, very pale.” And Sid Davis, who has covered nine presidents, went further than criticizing by resorting to sarcasm in characterizing the press and their demeanor in the president’s presence by saying, ”It looks like they are watching a funeral service at [Washington funeral firm] Joseph Gawler’s and it shouldn’t be that way.” (http://bit.ly/kEFPrA)

No kidding, Messrs. Vanocur, Johnson, and Davis! Where have you been?

More telling than their comments, and more concerning for Obama, is not what those three said, which in itself was remarkable, but that they had the audacity to say it. Lapdogs aren’t supposed to growl and bite and neither they nor their fellow correspondents would have deigned or dared to say it in the past.

More handwriting?

What will undoubtedly be viewed as less a harbinger for Obama’s future as calculated and inconsequential backbiting by evil conservatives is opposition by conservative groups to Obama’s nomination of Berkeley Law Professor Goodwin Liu to serve on the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals despite his “well-qualified” rating from the American Bar Association.

Berkeley is well, Berkeley, and the Ninth Court is as notoriously liberal, and the ABA tends to consider any judicial candidate well-qualified as long as he or she swings politically leftward.

The Loyal Opposition was unable to block tax cheat Tmothy Geithner from taking over as Secretary of the Treasury or such administration luminaries as homosexual activist Harry Knox as a faith counsellor, radical Cass Sunstein as Regulatory Czar, America-hater John Holdren as Obama’s chief science maven, admitted child-abuser Kevin Jennings as his man to insure safe schools, and a scary host of other leftists from taking posts in the administration but considers Liu’s nomination to be even more “ridiculous.”

Obama floated a trial balloon for Jamie Gorelick as FBI Director, the same Jamie Gorelick, aka “The Mistress of Disaster.” who made certain the FBI, the CIA, and other intelligence agencies couldn’t share information before 9/11. However, if nothing else, Gorelick had some related experience. Liu, much like the president before his election, has virtually none nor does he have trial experience on which to evaluate him as qualified to pass down judgments, a requisite heretofore for ABA endorsement. (http://bit.ly/jy0IzU)

Republicans and conservatives drawing a line with Liu may not be equivalent to Peter Fonda’s “f*cking traitor” remark or to veteran White House correspondents outing the White House . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=4503)

That New Black Panther Party Holds AG Holder in its Spell

That New Black Panther Party Holds AG Holder in its Spell

. . . Which brings us full circle, to the ideological successors of the old Black Panthers, the New Black Panther Party and its spell over AG Holder. The NBPP may never be tried and convicted of breaking any federal laws mainly because the Holder-Obama DoJ sees them as exempt from prosecution.

There has been widespread, smoldering resentment against the attorney general for his Department of Justice’s dismissal of the open and shut case against the NBPP’s videotaped voter intimidation by uniformed, armed thugs in Philadelphia on Election Day, 2008.

That resentment was deeply exacerbated last summer when former DoJ attorney J. Christian Adams and current Justice attorney Chris Coates exposed the culture of black racism that prevailed at America’s DoJ which was reflected in its gutting of the intimidation case strictly on racial grounds.

Not surprisingly, the mainstream media largely ignored Adams’ charges and Coates’ sworn testimony to that effect, blockbuster charges and testimony substantiated by numerous others at Justice that should have brought down the attorney general, if not the entire Obama administration.

For more detail on what happened last summer, since it can’t be read in the MSM, see “The MSM, the DoJ, and the Death of Integrity,” http://tiny.cc/erjhy, and similar articles in this space.

J. Christian Adams has now revealed how Holder is utilizing–pimping might be a better word–the Democrat Party’s Paper of Record, the New York Times, to push his misleading propaganda about the DoJ’s breach of duty with regard to the NBPP case and other issues. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=3342)

Update on the New Black Panther Party

Update on the New Black Panther Party

I thought it was curious that the lone New Black Panther Party member who showed up outside a North Philadelphia polling place on Election Day didn’t cause any trouble.

His very presence, standing where he shouln’t have been standing, proudly displaying his NBPP badge and distributing Democrat propaganda in violation of electioneering laws, may have been intimidating but at least there were no billy clubs in sight, no quasi-military uniforms, no overt intimidation of white voters like the New Black Panthers engaged in two years ago.

Since posting my article yesterday, “They’re Baaack!,” (http://tiny.cc/heb9f), that Philly Panther has been identified as none other than Jerry Jackson, one of the defendants in the voter intimidation case thrown out by Obama’s Attorney General. Apparently, he had been dispatched to do his Panther thing on the east coast while others of his ilk went elesewhere.

It turns out the Panthers had simply diverted some of their forces, following Horace Greeley’s suggestion to ”Go west, young man!” and headed to Houston in the great state of Texas and ignoring Texas’ unofficial state motto, “Don’t Tread on Me!” They tread and didn’t tread lightly on Election Day in Houston.

According to an article by J. Christian Adams, the highly-respected Department of Justice attorney who exposed the rampant black racism at the DoJ last summer, members of the NBPP committed “outrageous violations of Texas voting law” yesterday. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=2487)

The New Black Panther Party Is Back!

The New Black Panther Party is Back!

It’s not surprising that the New Black Panther Party would show up on Election Day in Philadelphia.

Armed with billy clubs, they may have been caught engaging in intimidation of white voters in 2008, a violation of federal law, but the Obama administration in the person of Attorney General Eric Holder dropped the case and let them off scot-free as soon as he had the opportunity so why wouldn’t the NBPP try it again?

Fox News had exposed the intimidation two years ago when one NBPP member announced he was sick of white supremacy” and another made the memorable and ominous declaration, “This is what it’s like with a black man [Barack Hussein Obama] in charge.” On Election Day, Fox found another Panther outside a North Philly polling center.

Billy club-less and absent any charges of white voter intimidation at the time Fox was on the scene, the man was ”wearing a pin that indicated his party affiliation, along with a black hat, sunglasses and leather coat.” Whether he was acting within his legal rights to be stationed there is a whole other question.

He was less than forthcoming with the Fox reporters who tried to interview him: . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=2480)

Scary People in the News, Part One

Scary People in the News, Part One

Lots of news is scary nowadays but some news is scarier than other news. My first nomination for last week’s scariest people in the news:

Malik Zulu Shabazz: Readers of this blog and of other conservative websites should be familiar with Shabazz but few others are, and there’s a reason for that.

The rabid, Jew- hater Shabazz is the notorious national chairman of the radical New Black Panther Party which has been on a few news wires of late because of revelations of black racism in our Justice Department and the attempts to muzzle DoJ attorneys J. Christian Adams and Chris Coates in their attempts to expose that racism.

Adams and Coates defied their superiors at Justice and testified to the widespread racism in the DoJ’s civil rights section where the de facto conviction of Shabazz and other members of the NBPP for white voter intimidation in Philadelphia was ignored and buried. Shabazz is believed to have been the NBPP thug who observed to a white observer at that Philly polling place, “Now you see what it’s like to be ruled by a black man, cracker!”

(For more information on the New Black Panther Party case, please see “Our Department of Selective Justice,” http://tiny.cc/rrnae)

Considering the blockbuster news of injustice at the Justice Department, one would have thought that even our leftist-biased mainstream media would have been forced to cover it but one would be hard put to see any coverage on the broadcast or cable networks except, of course, on the Fox News Channel.

One would find it even more challenging to find any coverage of a visit to the White House by a “Malik Shabazz,” . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?page_id=1982)

Senate Censorship and the New Black Panther Party

Senate Censorship and the New Black Panther Party

The chronically dysfunctional United States Senate, formerly “the world’s greatest deliberative body,” and the House of Representatives, have devolved into ultra-exclusive clubs for Democrats where Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi conduct business and wield power as if they are blind, partisan tools of the autocratic Obama regime.

Cesar Chavez, the Castro Duet, and every other world despot would be so very proud.

Acting like a rubber stamp for Obama, the Senate has adopted a policy of shutting out Republican input, such as during the long, volatile health care debate and more recently with the unemployment extension, and then brazenly denouncing the GOP for obstructionism.

Vermont’s Senator Pat Leahy is the latest to demonstrate that we are now living with a government of, by, and for the Democrats who have as much respect for the American people as they do for the loyal opposition which, when they were in control, often chose bi-partisanship over strictly one-party rule.

Fools.

Leahy, Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, last week attempted to squelch and censor further inquiry into the mushrooming scandal surrounding Eric Holder’s Justice Department, the black racist New Black Panther Party, and the dropping of the virtually air-tight case of voter intimidation against the NBPP by the Obama-Holder DOJ. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1822)