The Evil that Is George Soros

The Evil that Is George Soros

Evil has been defined as “morally reprehensible.” That definition fails to do justice to the evil that is George Soros.

There are few words more pejorative and demeaning than the word “evil.” The word conjures up disturbing, devilish visions of unremitting wickedness and abject immorality. ”Evil” should not be used lightly but when deeds or individuals defy more benign description it must be used. György Schwartz, aka George Soros, is evil incarnate.

Variously described as a financier and philanthropist, on his website, and as a bizarre, manipulative, nefarious, soul-less psychopath and criminal anarchist by more objective sources, Schwartz-Soros, a Hungarian-born Jew, actually facilitated the Nazi occupation of his native country and persecution of his fellow Jews, an insidious propensity for treachery and treasonous behavior he later brought to England and America.

Even before young György’s father renounced Judaism, György capitalized on the Holocaust-in-progress by collaborating with the Nazi occupiers in Hungary. Fully aware they were being transported to their deaths, he helped facilitate the shipment of Jews to concentration camps in order to confiscate their property. As if abandoning his heritage, his people, and his nation weren’t sufficiently evil, just last month Soros freely confessed he didn’t give a damn about anything he did and offered no regrets for his actions.

Some 437,000 Hungarian Jews were “deported,” mostly to Auschwitz. See a summary of Soros’ Nazi-era dealings and lack of remorse for the suffering he helped cause here: http://tiny.cc/mr9s9

In an article titled, “George Soros, Nazi Obsessive,” Kyle-Anne Shiver discusses Soros’–and his equally-amoral father’s–financial skullduggeries in Budapest and cites some of György’s recent descents into evil in America. His senseless, repugnant comparisons of President George W. Bush to Hitler, after young György had prospered as a Nazi enabler, and his attack machine, MoveOn.org’s, vicious abuse of General David Petraeus as “General Betrayus” only emphasized Soros’ character flaws and deficits as a human being.

On what basis Soros felt qualified to call himself one of “us,” as an American, is as much an enigmatic evil as Soros.

What Shiver does not emphasize in her excellent article is the overriding danger and threat George Soros poses for the nation he presumptuously calls his own. She goes much too easy on him. She quotes him telling a reporter in 2003 the many reasons he despised GWB and saying, “My experiences under Nazi and Soviet rule have sensitized me” to Bush’s alleged Nazi proclivities: http://tiny.cc/0gd5y

The thought of Soros being “sensitized” to anything aside from Soros is beyond absurd.

Shiver contends that Soros “has a Nazi problem,” which he does, as well as severe and chronic ethical and moral problems. Anyone who can say, as Soros did later in life, that the year 1944 during which he aided, abetted, and profited from the mass . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=3640)