Politics and Profits in the Trayvon Martin Farce

Politics and Profits in the Trayvon Martin Farce

NBC’s Miami affiliate reported last week that “The FBI found no racial bias behind George Zimmerman’s shooting of Miami Gardens teen Trayvon Martin, according to dozens of documents related to the case released Thursday.”




That conclusion and those documents should put an end to an already discredited, central theory in the prosecution of George Zimmerman for the shooting of Trayvon Martin, namely that the 28 year old, mixed-race Zimmerman was motivated to murder Martin on February 26th, 2012 out of racial hatred.



It must have been difficult for Sanford PD lead investigator Chris Serino to make that blockbuster announcement since he had precipitously implied four months ago that Zimmerman was a liar in claiming self-defense in the shooting and had wanted the neighborhood watchman thrown in jail posthaste.



Now, based on his investigation and statements of character witnesses, Serino thinks Zimmerman wasn’t a racist at all but rather an “overzealous” watchman with a “little hero complex.” Again, since we don’t customarily hang people because they are overzealous little heroes, the persistent, highly-political allegations that what happened in February was a hate crime should be put to rest.



Not on your life! There’s too much else at stake, like a national election, placating blacks, and making money!



President Barack Hussein Obama’s Attorney General Eric Holder’s Department of Justice, literally or figuratively intent on hanging Zimmerman as a sop to the black community and racial agitators, will continue its investigation as if Martin’s killing was a hate crime. (http://tinyurl.com/8a8bl34)



When you’re waging a racial vendetta stoked by the mainstream media, why let the truth get in your way!



From the outset and regardless of the facts, George Zimmerman was portrayed by the mainstreamers as a bloodthirsty murderer and when evidence contradictory to that portrayal surfaced it was either ignored or, as in the case of recorded 911 calls, doctored to make him appear a mad racist intent on stalking and killing Trayvon Martin because he was black.



To supplement its Zimmerman distortions, the MSM invariably depicted Martin as an innocent, unarmed, defenseless African-American youth, a fine young man merely strolling at night through the middle class streets of Twin Lakes with a bag of Skittles when he was savagely set upon and brutally attacked.



If you’re gullible . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=26917.)

Signs of the End of Obama's Reign?

Signs of the End of Obama's Reign?

It may be an exercise in wishful thinking, but there are clear indications that Emperor Barack Hussein Obama’s assaults on the Constitution, his wars against the wealthy and middle class, against religion, against women, against prosperity, against Israel are all taking their toll and his despotic rule may be coming to an end.




In about 146 days, to be precise.



The very welcome signs are not just the obvious ones.



Continued economic stagnation, persistently high unemployment, widespread dismay over a raft of broken promises, and public disgust over admistration scandals and the president’s gaffes, lies, vacations, and golf games certainly will play a major part in Obama’s defeat on November 6th.



However, it is the erosion of his political base that must be giving David Axelrod and Company the hebejebes, if not chronic diarrhea, and causing similar reactions for Empress Michelle. She has to be wondering who will pay for her future extravagances and whether she will remain proud of her country should her hubby lose.



Thanks to the president’s sudden evolution on same-sex marriage and his dubious success in repealing the military’s DADT policy, he still has a lock on the homosexual vote. So, too, will a large majority of Latinos, African-Americans, and Jews cast their ballots for Obama.



Blacks will again vote for him in droves primarily because he is “one of their own” and despite complaints he hasn’t done nearly enough for the black community over the past three and a half years. Latinos will again vote for him in the expectation that with more “flexibility” in a second term Obama will legalize undocumented aliens despite the fact he has failed them.



Jews will again vote for Obama mainly because they have almost always voted for Democrats and despite his well-known antagonism toward the state of Israel and its president, Benjamin Netanyahu.



However, the electoral devil is in the ethnic details.



Obama garnered an unprecedented 93% of black votes in 2008 and, assuredly, most African-Americans will follow suit in 2012 but, based on North Carolina and Spike Lee, he won’t enjoy comparable numbers this year.



According to the authoritative BusinessInsider.com, the “Democrat-leaning” Public Policy Polling has found that Republican Mitt Romney would get 20% of the African-American vote and Barack Obama 76%.



That’s a comfortable margin for the president until one considers that in 2008 he won with 95% of the N.C. tally and Romney is now beating Obama 48% to 46% in the state. (http://tinyurl.com/6tux346)



If those figures don’t cause Axelrod to head for the Kaopectate, Spike Lee’s doubts on the re-election results should. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=25503.)

Bullying Is Sometimes Okay

Bullying Is Sometimes Okay

Since it is a newly-created offense against humanity, ”bullying” is difficult to define although usually interpreted as any persistent physical, verbal, or emotional intimidation committed by a person or group against a target perceived to be weaker and more vulnerable.




Like another politically-correct invention, “hate crime,” bullying only applies to selected victims.



Legally, your boss can bully you all he wants since he’s your boss and parents can bully their kids to their hearts’ content since most often they are disciplining them.



Of course, if you happen to be a minority of any stripe–racial, religious, or sexual–you can always allege unwarranted bullying and sue for damages. So, too, can a designated majority, women, claim unfair intimidation. Usually.



Should you not fit comfortably in any of those protected categories, you’re pretty much SOL.



Tanya Dixon-Neely, a black teacher at North Carolina’s North Rowan High School, discovered there are limits to her freedom to bully her white students.



The limitations became apparent after 17 year old Hunter Rogers went public with a video of Ms. Dixon-Neely’s classroom rant in defense of Barack Hussein Obama and her attempt to stifle Rogers’ opinions on Mitt Romney.



Evidently, ignorant of epithets hurled at George W. Bush for eight years and the truth about Obama, her groundless threats that Rogers could be arrested for speaking ill of the president, (“Do you realize that people were arrested for saying things bad about Bush?”), were absolute lies as was her denial that her hero bullied a little girl in Hawaii who had darker skin than he had.



Dixon-Neely was suspended–with pay–but only her ultra-partisan political bullying hit the fan. See details of her assault on a student’s First Amendment rights here http://bit.ly/K5YwwY.



Certain governmental bullying is acceptable, however.



For example, when America’s Attorney General intimidated University of Arkansas at Fort Smith into permiting a transgendered, 38 year old anatomical male to use female potty facilities, it was just fine.



Objections from the young ladies at UAFS went for naught as did the university’s reasonable alternative of allowing “Jennifer” Braly to use “gender neutral” bathrooms after Braly complained to Eric Holder’s Justice Department.



As Braly said, “I am frustrated and highly depressed about all of these unfair restrictions. I live as a woman full time and have been for a year and a half now. I have natural breast development bigger than some normal girls from the hormone treatment. The only thing restricting me is what’s between my legs. Everyone is so concerned with what’s between my legs. I am just as much woman as anyone else.” (http://thedc.com/MJdJWW)



We certainly wouldn’t want Ms/Mister Braly to feel uncomfortable. Personally, I haven’t seen what’s between Braly’s legs nor do I care to but his reference to “normal girls” says a great deal about his normality.



Our DoJ clearly bullied UAFS and the school’s co-eds all in the name of PC. Hopefully, after those co-eds have a sit down next to “Jennifer” Braly’s legs, they . . .




(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=24595.)

Tyler Clementi and Trayvon Martin: Justice Gone Awry?

Tyler Clementi and Trayvon Martin: Justice Gone Awry?








There are tragedies soon forgotten and there are tragedies which become iconic moments in American life because pressure groups and the media want them to be. The suicide of Tyler Clementi on September 22nd, 2010 and the shooting death of Trayvon Martin on February 26th, 2012 are two such moments.























Both resulted in miscarriages of justice due not to the incidents themselves but due to gay and black agitators and the media campaigning for unjust punishments of those deemed responsible for Clementi’s and Martin’s untimely deaths.





















Eighteen year old Tyler Clementi hurled himself 250 feet off the George Washington Bridge into the Hudson River after discovering his Rutgers University roommate, Dharun Revi, and a hallmate, Molly Wei, had videotaped two of his homosexual encounters in the college room he shared with Revi.





















Following endless demonstrations staged by sympathizers in the Lesbian, Gay, Bi-Sexual, Transgendered (LGBT) Movement, Ravi was indicted, tried, and convicted on 15 counts of invading Clementi’s privacy, bias intimidation, tampering with evidence and witnesses, and interfering with his apprehension and prosecution.





















Ravi chose to stand trial. Wei copped a plea, testified against him, and was rewarded with a slap on her wrist.





















Now 20, at sentencing on May 21st, Ravi faces ten years in prison on the bias-hate crime charge alone and deportation to the land of his birth, India, upon his release.





















Few would dispute that what Dahrun Ravi did, particularly Twittering for his friends to view his webcam recording of Clementi’s graphic second tryst, was reprehensible. However, alleging his spying and advertising the tryst constituted a ”hate crime” meriting extended prison time and deportation is ridiculous.














Dahrun Ravi is clearly guilty only of gross indiscretion–and of acting like a college freshman.





















No substantive evidence was ever introduced to demonstrate hatred toward Tyler Clementi because he was gay, which nowadays is a widely-accepted lifestyle especially on collegiate campuses, and Ravi was never even accused of contributing to Clementi’s decision to end his life.





















Aside from the absurdity of the whole concept of a hate/thought crime, various gay rights groups contend the prosecution went way “overboard” in going after Ravi. The admittedly “self-absorbed” Ravi refuses to accept responsibility for Clementi’s suicide and believes his roomie “had bigger problems in his life.” 





















He’s absolutely correct. A talented, young, gay violinist with virtually his entire future ahead of him was undoubtedly struggling with more significant issues than a webcam exhibition in order to motivate him to dive into the Hudson.





















Should Ravi be sentenced to prison for what was essentially a stupid, teenage prank, it will be a major victory not for justice but for the power of fringe groups and the media to dictate American justice.





















A more recent instance of agitators and the MSM falsely determining what’s right and what’s wrong in America is the tragedy that occurred in Sanford, Florida on February 26th, 2012.





















The media and black agitators seized upon and made that tragedy a national farce. Fortunately, the George Zimmerman-Trayvon Martin case should finally be nearing an end with Zimmerman exonerated.





















As detailed here in various articles, the reporting of and reactions to George Zimmerman shooting and killing Trayvon Martin on a darkened, rainy street in Sanford have developed into a racial travesty unrivaled for decades. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=24309.)

Animals in the News, Part Two: Human Animals

Animals in the News, Part Two: Human Animals

Part One of this 2-part series recounted three stories of what most people consider animals: rats infesting the D.C. Occupy encampment, pit bulls chewing off a man’s foot in Chicago, and a pet cat almost killing a Buenos Aires woman when it was tossed out of a fourth-floor window.

As unsettling as those stories are, there is another animal far more capable of arousing disgust, inflicting pain, and causing havoc than rats, dogs, or cats. Of the phylum Chordata, class mammalia, order primate, family Hominidae, sub-family Homininae, tribe Hominini, genus Homo, it’s most commonly known as Homo Sapiens.

As Part One concluded, human beings can act more animalistically than technically-lower species.

Of course, since those lower species never wage mass warfare–except maybe in “Rise of the Planet of the Apes”–some would argue that conducting war is irrefutable evidence of the human animal’s capacity to far exceed any other species’ devastation and carnage, an argument that has some merit.

Also worth consideration as evidencing the brutality of Homo Sapiens are the 50 to 60 million “legal” abortions in the United States since the Supreme Court decided on January 22nd, 1973 that human life was no longer sacred. Roe v. Wade has accounted for a far greater loss of life than all our wars combined and vivid testimony to man’s inhumanity to man.

However, let’s focus on a few less-profound yet equally-nauseating instances of man’s, and woman’s, animalistic inhumanity toward its own kind.

“Animalistic” may be a misnomer, though, because animals are programmed to protect their young. True, some eat their offspring when they’re starving and most abandon them when they are beyond survivability but none ever get drunk and leave them shivering in the cold while their mother goes to Mickey D’s.

Thirty-nine year old Farris Martin, allegedly, did just that in Sacramento, California to her nine and four year old children. Her kids were found huddling for warmth in the bushes as Ms. Martin was scarfing down McDonalds’ delectibles.

Martin was arrested on a felony charge of endangering the life or health of a child, is being held on $60,000 bail, and the kids are now hopefully warm and well-fed.

One example, or a thousand examples, of human neglect of common decency does not condemn our species to Hell but it sure helps. So, too, do glaring instances of convicted criminals using America’s benevolent court system to make a farce of justice not make us animals but they come close.

Four years ago, David Belniak pled guilty in Florida to committing DUI manslaughter . . . (Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=12196.)

Someone Is Killing Blacks!

Someone Is killing Blacks!

The Reverend Al Sharpton went on a tear last winter over a giant New York City billboard featuring an innocent, young black girl and the caption, “The Most Dangerous Place for an African-American Is in the Womb.” When he sees a new video on the same subject, he’s liable to go into uncontrollable paroxysms that could shock him into getting a real job!

In March, he succeeded in having the billboard removed.

It had been strategically situated in NYC’s posh Soho District near a Planned Parenthood facility that boasts of aborting 19,000 pre-born babies in 2010 and offended the Reverend Al not only because of its location and message but due to the harm it could potentially cause to his supporters. He contended it was ”an offensive and condescending effort to stigmatize and shame African-American women while attempting to discredit the work of Planned Parenthood.”

Even worse, it sent ”a message of racial profiling and discourages a woman’s right to choose.”

A lone billboard of a pretty, little African-American apparently can evidently have an amazing number of deleterious effects on Al, Planned Parenthood, and black women.

See “Race, Abortion, and Al Sharpton,” http://bit.ly/qBwFhY, and “Billboards and Al Sharpton’s Black Genocide,” http://bit.ly/h01UGV, for more details on that genocide and Planned Parenthood’s facilitation of it.

Wishful thinking would suggest the new video, titled “The Number One Killer,” would shut Sharpton up at least for while . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=5057)

Riotous Times in America

Riotous Times in America

When is a riot not a riot? When it’s “borderline,” of course. When does civil unrest have a racial component? Hardly ever since that component is rarely reported, of course.

It’s not even summer but things are rapidly heating up in more ways than one, a year before former Clinton adviser, James “The Snake” Carville, has predicted “imminently possible” civil unrest. Feel free to translate that dire prediction as riots in the streets.

Appearing on ”Imus in the Morning,” Carville predicated his remarks on the continuing high unemployment rate and the piddling job growth and despite President Barack Hussein Obama’s efforts to paint the dismal job figures as little more than a bump on the road to recovery. The president didn’t mention VP Joe Biden’s astute description last spring–that would be 2010–that America was set to experience “Recovery Summer.” So much for Biden and recovery.

Certain segments of society are way ahead of Carville insofar as “civil unrest” is concerned but don’t dare call them rioters.

In Bessemer, Alabama, police were forced to temporarily shutter the Alabama Adventure theme park after chaos broke out with numerous fights throughout the park.

One park patron ”described it as a ‘borderline riot.’ He witnessed at least eight different fights, including chair throwing in the water park, and at least three people taken out of the park on gurneys, . . . ’Every time we turned around, there was a fight.’ “

Craig Randolph, vice president and general manager for Alabama Adventure, saw it all differently saying, “We did have a few kids get out hand. We had some scuffles here and there,” and couldn’t speculate on whether anyone was injured or arrested. (http://bit.ly/jivjIu)

Presumably, the ambulances and gurneys were purely precautionary and certainly not indications of injuries sustained during a “borderline riot.”

Were Bessemer the only riot locale, James Carville could be correct, that civil unrest, a euphemism for widespread, uncontrolled violence, isn’t due until next year.

In fact, though not nearly on the scale of the 6-day Watts upheaval in 1965 or the deadly mayhem that followed the assassination of Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. and the Rodney King chaos or the numerous other incidents of unrest in America’s history, smaller scale riots have been occurring with disturbing frequency of late.

They’re all the more disturbing in view of official malfeasance by indifference and distortion and because most of the current violence is being committed by black teens two plus years into President Obama’s proclaimed “post-racial America.”

(Obama also said in Dreams from My Father, pp. 99-100, that he disapproved of what he called, “half-breeds” who gravitated toward whites but that may be a whole other story.)

For example, what are being termed “random attacks” by black Chicago street gangs are becoming less and less random. . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=4757.)

Obama's Re-Election

Obama's Re-Election

From a child’s perspective, seventeen months is a virtual eternity. From an American political perspective, it’s virtually around the corner. November 6th, 2012, when Americans will once again choose who will lead them for four long years, is little more than seventeen months down the road.

America’s choice of a leader has, literally, never been more momentous.

The economy wallows in the doldrums amost a year after Vice President Joe Biden proclaimed 2010′s “Summer of Recovery,” a recovery yet to be experienced by the 14 million jobless. Obama’s “stimulus” has chiefly stimulated government employment, a skyrocketing deficit and national debt, and impending stagflation. Americans have either lost their homes or trillions in home equity. Socialized medicine is now the law.

And, that’s only on the domestic front.

Internationally, we have lost even more, in respect from our allies, increased belligerence from our enemies, and more and more of our brave troops dying in war zones. Months ago, we took up arms under the guise of a NATO operation in the Libyan hellhole in a “kinetic action” which we were promised would involve weeks. The much-reviled terrorist prison at Guantanomo is still open.

Nevertheless, whether one is an avid supporter of Barack Hussein Obama’s re-election or one who regards that prospect as nothing less than the absolute worst eventuality since September 11th, 2001, seventeen months from now President Barack Hussein Obama will again visit Chicago’s Grant Park to announce to screaming worshippers that he had been re-elected.

It doesn’t make sense but no one ever alleged American politics made sense.

What does make sense is Obama’s successful brand of Chicago take-no-prisoners, brook-no-opposition, tell-’em-what-they-wanna-hear-then-do-whatever-you-damned-well-please technique. Couple that philosophy with endless campaigning which has now gone on for at least four years, with creation of an unprecedented national dependency and other policies designed to cement a plurality, with certain constituencies and demographic elements, Obama is a sure winner.

Compounding the challenge for Republicans next year is the fact that no viable candidate has yet emerged although that’s all but incidental in view of the Obama Machine already in full battle mode and dedicated to his re-election at all costs. In fact, too, regardless of all the other elements–although they are all interrelated–it’s those “certain constituencies and demographic elements” that will insure a Republican defeat. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=4707)

Lady Michelle Obama Uplifts Black Souls and Aspirations

Lady Michelle Obama Uplifts Black Souls and Aspirations

The company we keep and the company which keeps us tend to define the kept. That point of popular wisdom may not always be true in real life but in political lives it is a constnt and invariably as valid as political treachery.

As they should, most political wives studiously maintain a low profile. Usually.

First ladies, especially, tend to busy themselves with innocuous causes and projects ranging from Jackie Kennedy’s White House beautification after the dowdy Mamie Eisenhower ruled that roost to former librarian Laura Bush’s campaign for education and literacy to Michelle Obama’s quest to eradicate fat kids from the American landscape.

Michelle, however, despite her childhood obesity fixation and her White House vegetable garden. planned, no doubt, to inspire America’s youth to forego Clintonian Big Macs and to discover the joy of veggies, is a FLOTUS literally and figuratively of a whole different color.

No stranger to controversy before and during her White House tenure, the president’s bride continues to outdo herself. From her “racially-conscious” Princeton undergrad thesis to her stated lack of national pride before Barack ascended to the presidency to her extravagant vacations on the taxpayer dime and borderline bizarre tastes in first lady garb during her personal reign, Mrs. Obama has been a real trip.

Any more than Barack’s gaffes. inanities, and “misquotes” get much MSM play, few of Michelle’s questionably-proper activities and statements get much attention from her husband’s mainstream media, which doesn’t mitigate Michelle’s improprieties any more than they do her husband’s. Both seem to abide by the conviction that they do and say what they do and say because they can.

For example, how many Americans have heard of Mrs. Obama’s electioneering outside a Chicago polling place in 2008? How many have read about such breaches of protocol as her touching Indonesian Information Minister Tifatul Sembiring last year, something which simply is not done with Indonesian men? President George W. Bush was ridiculed for winking at Queen Elizabeth II but Michelle Obama actually slapping a big hug on the Queen of England was attributed to her natural inclination of just being folksy.

Still, those are small potatoes in the greater scheme of political things . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=4418)

Liberal Predictability: Celebs, Blacks, Teachers

Liberal Predictability: Celebs, Blacks, Teachers

Some things are as predictable as showers in April, heat in August, and liberals any time of the year.

HEAD FOR THE HILLS, OF OHIO: For example, for whatever reason, it took almost ten years to enter the realm of public knowledge and even then it had to be revealed by the UK press that three noted libs embarked on a hastily-arranged 500 mile road trip in the immediate aftermath of the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

Not that there was anything wrong with that; anyone living in the City of New York would have loved to flee the city although most were unable for various reasons to escape. The late Michael Jackson, Dame Elizabeth Taylor, and Marlon Brando were able to get out, and get out they did, via a rental car when Jackson was unable to secure a private jet since American air space was shut down because of the attacks.

Reports differ as to details of the trio’s flight to safety but Brando and Jackson seemed to have done all the driving, stopping only to gas up and to fuel up Brando’s insatiable hunger for fast food. They finally ended up in Ohio where, satisfied they were finally secure, they took refuge.

Taylor’s hangers-on deny it all of course, saying she instead went to church, tended to the displaced at some armory, and visited the still-smoldering Ground Zero. Oddly, there were no reports of Liz sightings at any of those locales and no reports of collapsing churches in the days after 9/11. Jackson’s retinue say he arranged safe havens for them in New Jersey. Brando had no apologists. (http://bit.ly/m0Ke4G)

RACE TRUMPS PARTY: In a totally unrelated but equally predictable liberal exhibition, black libs in Missouri have re-defined reapportionment as darkening the political landscape by dumping a white Democrat even though the result was a Republican gain.

It all happened because Republicans controlled both houses of the Missouri legislature, Democrats held the governorship, the Reps gerrymandered the state to strengthen black districts knowing they couldn’t win them, and tossed Dem congressman Russ Carnahan into a 49.5% black district.

The Democrat governor, Jay Nixon, loyal to his party, would have none of it and vetoed the scheme whereupon four black legislators joined the Republicans to override Nixon’s veto and screw the sole white Dem, Carnahan. . .
(Read ore at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=4388)

Race, Abortion, and Al Sharpton

Race, Abortion, and Al Sharpton

A few weeks back, a New York City billboard depicting an innocent, young black girl and the caption, “The Most Dangerous Place for an African American Is in the Womb,” sent Al Sharpton and friends into racial spasms.

He threw around words such as offensive, condescending, racial profiling, stigmatizing, and shameful even though the billboard message was statistically true. Various studies have shown that 42%-60% of black babies in America are aborted annually but don’t confuse Sharpton with facts. He objected because it sought to ”discredit the work of Planned Parenthood” and “discourages a [black] woman’s right to choose:” http://bit.ly/h01UGV

As always, Al the Wordsmith was spot on.

The billboard was trying to discourage black girls and women from continuing to fulfill the black genocidal goals of the racist eugenecist Margaret Sanger, the founder and inspiration for Planned Parenthood. However, the billboard sponsor, ThatsAbortion.com, http://bit.ly/hlO4pC, doesn’t contribute to Sharpton’s various enterprises designed to keep Al from getting a real job.

Poor Al is liable to suffer more spasms over recent news.

Ariana Huffington’s HufPo’s less than objective headline, “Arizona Legislators Pass Paranoid Abortion Bill,” which bill in reality is simply aimed at preventing abortions based on the race or gender of the fetus, was rendered almost moot by an Associated Press report of even more widespread abortion paranoia. The AP reports that dozens of anti-abortion bills are advancing though state legislatures nationwide.

True to Sharpton form, the AP characterizes the measures as “an array of new obstacles–legal, financial and psychological–in the paths of women seeking abortions.”

The AP defines that array as “tactics” which vary and include the underhanded ploys on the parts of pro-life lawmakers to require “mandatory sonograms and anti-abortion counseling, sweeping limits on insurance coverage, bans on abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy:” http://apne.ws/gJH7X0.

Imagine! Those dastardly pro-lifers want women and girls, black and white, to actually see what they’re killing. They want someone to sit down and discuss the termination of the lives of their pre-borns. They want them to pay for the executions. They want them not to murder their fully-formed, often viable fetuses.

How barbaric of them!

Compounding Big Al’s consternation over aborting black babies is yet another report exposing his favorite abortion mills’ and Margaret Sanger’s commitment to exterminating the black race . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=3971)

Obama, "Who the Hell Do You Think You Are?"

Obama, "Who the Hell Do You Think You Are?"

For some while now–about two years or so–I’ve been thinking that things can’t really be as bad as my perceptions tell me, that the United States isn’t respected internationally, that the economy and unemployment rate aren’t improving, that our commander in chief was so far in under his head that he can’t tell which side is up, that he is a committed ideologue whose commitments supersede by far the interests of America, that he is a loser par excellence.

My suspicions are rapidly being confirmed and Rasmussen.com confirms the American people are on to Barack Hussein Obama, the pseudo-American apotheosis, as well.

If they still hold firm to the belief that he is deserving of even minimal respect, witness the disrepectful reflections of an unacknowledged buddy and intimate of his former pastor, Jeremiah “God Damn America” Wright and Moammar “Daffy” Gadhafy, Rev. Louis “Calypso Louis” Farrakhan: http://bit.ly/hKWHwt.

For those not curious enough to click on that story and video, Nation of Islam leader Farrakhan addresses his brother Obama and says, among other things, ”I warn my brother do you [sic] let these wicked demons move you in a direction that will absolutely ruin your future with your people in Africa and throughout the world. . . Why don’t you organize a group of respected Americans and ask for a meeting with Qaddafi, you can’t order him to step down and get out.”

Calypso Louie then totally disses his bro, the President of the United States, with the rhetorical question, “Who the hell do you think you are?”

Disapprobation by one’s bros may be acceptable to fellow bros. Statistics may not be.

The highly-respected pollster Rasmussen.com has tracked Obama’s approval ratings literally from Day One, January 21, 2009 when his approval index was 28 with a whopping 44% of Americans strongly approving the president and 65% in the total approving column and a mere 16% strongly disapproving, 30% total disapproval.

Contrast those numbers with March 19, 2011 . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=3913)

Multiculturalism in Dayton and Midsomer

Multiculturalism in Dayton and Midsomer

We’ve all heard of creeping socialism, especially lately when it’s leaping more than creepting in America. We should hear more about creeping, leaping multiculturalism. The mindless quest for diversity is as much of a threat to sanity and nationhood.

For example, what would or should the average person do if he or she were turned down for a job because he or she was unqualified or underqualified or was just deemed unable to satisfactorily perform the duties of the job description?

One option would be to sulk, but that’s not very productive. Another might be to study and prepare better so that next time around you did make the grade, but that takes time and effort. A third option would be to just look for another job, but that would make sense.

The ultimate recourse would be to complain, complain about everything from unfair employment practices to personality differences with the potential employer, to discrimination of some sort. Blacks and other minorities have often resorted to the latter excuse and have won. In the case of the Dayton Police Department’s test for recruits they didn’t have to complain. Eric Holder’s Department of Justice did it for them.

Without citing any specific reason, aside from the fact black and other minority candidates failed to achieve the exam’s modest passing scores of 66% on part one and 72% on part two, the DoJ ordered the results thrown out and new passing standards to be implemented. According to DaytonNewsSource.com, the DoJ “approved new scoring policy [which] only requires potential police officers to get a 58% and a 63%.” As DNS observed, ”That’s the equivalent of an ‘F’ and a ‘D’.”

After all, what’s more important to a police department? Quality, qualified, competent officers on the job protecting the citizens of Dayton, or multicultural diversity? Apparently, the answer is multicultual diversity regardless of the consequences.

As Dayton Fraternal Order of Police President, Randy Beane, commented, “It becomes a safety issue for the people of our community. It becomes a safety issue to have an incompetent officer next to you in a life and death situation.” While not calling for higher standards, Dayton NAACP President Derrick Foward kind of concurred by saying, “The NAACP does not support individuals failing a test and then having the opportunity to be gainfully employed. If you lower the score for any group of people, you’re not getting the best qualified people for the job:” http://tiny.cc/6q8ty

Yet, that is precisely what’s happening in Dayton . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=3885)

Outrages and Something Else

Outrages and Something Else

There are outrages and then there are outrages.

If you want outrage, more specifically cause for outrage, then take former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin who has been the subject of incessant attacks ever since Sen. John McCain chose her for his VP running mate in 2008.

Demonstrating its gut fear of Palin and what she represents, decency and Christian values, America’s left has been on a media-supported vendetta against her from Day One with charges of ineptitude, stupidity, and worse. Those charges have been led by such proven inept and stupid MSM commentators as Keith Olbermann, Katie Couric, and Chris Matthews and have been supplemented by snide comments from White House operatives.

Eager to let the Left know they’re in the fold, Leno and Letterman also rarely let a night go by without Palin jabs which titillate their audiences into paroxysms of laughter.

Still, sometimes, indeed often, liberals go beyond the pale in their attempts to derogate and demean Sarah Palin.

“30 Rock” actor Tracy Morgan went there on national television. With Alec Baldwin as a co-star on that show, it’s almost understandable that Morgan would be repulsive but he even exceeded that low standard when he said Sarah Palin was “good masturbation material:” http://tiny.cc/8r39f

I wonder how the MSM and the White House would have reacted to that line had it referred to Michelle Obama instead of to Sarah Palin.

On a different note which relates to Tracy Morgan, the 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson decision of the United States Supreme Court upholding segregation under the separate but equal premise was overturned by the another landmark decision fifty eight years later, Brown v. Board of Education. “Brown” ruled that “separate educational facilities are inherently unequal,” the ruling which launched the civil rights movement in America.

Fifty seven years down the line, McCaskey East High School in Lancaster, PA effectively threw out “Brown” and reinstituted a limited form of racial segregation. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=3511)

Reality Checks for the Left on Blacks and Abortion

Reality Checks for the Left on Blacks and Abortion

You may remember Screamin’ Howie Dean.

He’s the doctor-turned-pol who made a fool of himself when he lost the 2004 Democrat Iowa caucuses to two other schleps, John Kerry and John Edwards, then bellowed his “Dean Scream” which effectively ended his campaign for the presidency. Rewarded for bailing out with the chairmanship of the Democrat National Committee, during his 4-year tenure in that job he became so embarrassing to the Dems that he was virtually ignored and was then snubbed by the Obama administration.

Undismayed, Ol’ Howie has been keeping busy the last few years by making speeches hither, thither, and yon on a variety of topics including one to the Christian Science Monitor last week in which he betrayed both his ingrained ignorance and his latent racism.

Echoing the Dem mantra, Dean called the Tea Party the “last gasp” of a 55-year-old generation, a gasping movement in which Tea Partiers are “entirely over 55 and white.” He elaborated on his race card/hate card by adding that they have “trouble with diversity, and the new generation doesn’t. As I am fond of telling college audiences, you all have friends of different races, different religions and different sexual orientations and you all date each other. That’s not how I grew up and not how the Tea Party grew up.”

All I know about how Dean grew up is that he did it as a wealthy East Hamptonite who attended exclusive schools. The liberal guilt factor over that heady upbringing may have resulted in his mind-numbing liberalism.

In any event, black conservatives gave Howie his comeuppance over his Tea Party insults. Project 21, the National Leadership Network of Black Conservatives, called them a “simplistic interpretation” which opens “the new year on a hateful note by playing the race card against ‘tea party’ supporters of limited government.”

“Simplistic” has long been a Howard Dean trademark but Howie outdid himself this time. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=3362)

Van Jones and the Tea Party

Van Jones and the Tea Party

Obama’s nominee for the position of Special Advisor for Green Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation, Anthony K. Jones, withdrew his name from consideration last year after calling Republicans “a**holes” in a speech at Berkeley and then having his racist, radical past outed.

However, as vermin tend to do, he has again crawled out from under the woodwork. A walking, talking testimonial to the patent absurdity and overtly racist policy of affirmative action, the black “green czar” wannabe is in the news again.

This time around he denounced the Tea Party and its threat to all things Obamian with his characteristic lies and distortions. ”If you think things are bad now,” he bellowed, ”what will happen when the people who are screaming and yelling at these Tea Party events are actually in charge of your government, and in charge of your life, and in charge of your kids’ future? . . . I don’t think you want the Tea Party running your community, running your family, running your government. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=2042)

Maybe Obama Really Isn't Black Enough?

Maybe Obama Really Isn't Black Enough?

Time Magazine and the LA Times, among others, posed the daunting question in February 2007, long before the junior senator from Illinois tossed his hat into the presidential ring, “Is Obama Black Enough?” The Time article concluded with the puzzling observation that “Barack Obama’s real problem isn’t that he’s too white–it’s that he’s too black.”

Granted, the biracial Obama wasn’t as black as 50 Cent or Chris Rock but so what? Too black, too white, whatever.

The questions Time and others should have been asking were, Why in God’s holy name was this guy, Barack Hussein Obama, even being considered as “presidential material” after barely a year on the national stage? Why was a woefully inexperienced and untested individual being lionized by the MSM and touted as a possible nominee for the Democrat Party’s next entry into the presidential sweepstakes?

And, the most obvious unasked question of all, Was Obama in fact being considered precisely because he was (partially) black and because he represented the best shot people of color had to win the presidency? Did his fans view his election as a way to finally and definitively expiate their nagging white guilt?

If Obama were to be nominated simply because of the color of his skin and not the content of his character, his qualifications and suitability for the presidency of the United States, wouldn’t that be racist in Martin Luther King Jr.’s lexicon?

The very reverend Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson would later question Obama’s black identity and credentials but at least Joe Biden accepted him for what he was, even if he was the “first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy.”

Wouldn’t it also be racist and blatantly discriminatory to favor any particular group or groups for special treatment because of their color? . . .
(read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=2214)

A Timely Reminder from Barack: Don't Forget that White Guilt!

A Timely Reminder from Barack: Don't Forget that White Guilt!

No one will ever be able to conclusively prove the extent to which white guilt played a role in Barack Hussein Obama’s election to the presidency in 2008. What is definitely known is that 43 of every 100 whites cast their ballots for Obama in that election and that he garnered 96% of the black vote.

White guilt could be defined as that bizarre, much-denied, conscious or subconscious, feeling experienced by an untold number of white Americans that it was time to give the black man a shot at the Oval Office.

After all, white guilters somehow believed, African-Americans had been enslaved for centuries in America and the least whites could do to make amends for that societal evil would be to vote for a black man to clearly demonstrate, first, that they were free of prejudice and, second, to recompense today’s blacks for the sins of our forefathers.

It’s bizarre thinking for any white American today unless he or she were at least 147 years old and former slaveholders and the recipients of that compensation were at least the same age and former slaves since Lincoln, technically, freed the slaves in 1863 with the Emancipation Proclamation.

Our president seems well aware of the white guilt phenomenon, so much so that he’s cashing in his racial chits a month ahead of the mid-term elections on November 2nd. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=2058)

The Bullfrog Croaks Again

The Bullfrog Croaks Again

The title “The Bullfrog Croaks Again” is misleading in that Jeremiah (The Black Racist Bullfrog) Wright hasn’t literally croaked. He has just re-emerged from his racist swamp and is croaking his usual venom.

President Obama’s (former) spiritual mentor hasn’t changed. Then, again, his mentoree, Barack Hussein Obama, hasn’t changed either. The president is just more adept at concealing his deepest and most volatile, racist beliefs.

Da Reverend Jeremiah has been relatively quiescent since his most illustrious parishioner at Trinity United Church of Christ cut him loose when he became an embarrassment during Obama’s campaign for the presidency.

Obama won and Jeremiah lost in 2008. Jeremiah knew very well that he wouldn’t be ostracized permanently. After all, the man he had tutored and called Barry may have gotten the gold ring but that ring was a ring in his nose. Barry just had to hew the Jeremiah line unobtrusively.

Which he did.

Well, Jeremiah bubbled to the surface again at the Chicago Theological Seminary where da reverend spoke to a sell-out crowd of 15 or 20 older African American women, according to Maureen Callahan of the New York Post.

Amazingly, this preacher who spoke nary a negative word about white people . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1761)

The Darkening Face of a Diverse America

The Darkening Face of a Diverse America

Those who have longed for a more diverse America may soon get their wish.

According to a Wall Sreet Journal article, “U.S. Nears Racial Milestone,” whites in America will soon become a minority. That demographic sea change could occur as early as next year, at least among newborns.

Based on a Census report, 48.6% of all newborns coming into the world and into America between July 2008 and July 2009 were non-white. That percentage is up from 46.8% the previous year and the trend seems likely to continue since white women are having fewer children, more minority women are of child-bearing age, and because of the increase in mixed marriages.

Minorities already constitute majorities in 9 states and the District of Columbia: Hawaii (81%), D.C. (78%), New Mexico (72%) and the nation’s largest state, California (71%).

America has long been called a “melting pot,” of sorts, a term that has been in general usage for over a hundred years. However, up until recently, that melding of heterogeneous groups into one homogeneous whole has been mainly a blending of people of European extraction and it’s easier to blend people with some cultural similarities. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1750)