Bullying Susan G. Komen
The huge flap over the Susan G. Komen for the Cure foundation’s decision to cease funding Planned Parenthood of America, PPOA, and then to rescind that recission is nothing more than a tempest in the abortion teapot. It’s also an excellent example of the power of bullying.
Susan G. Komen for the Cure is as dedicated to curing breast cancer as Planned Parenthood is dedicated to killing the pre-born. However, when the foundation pulled its funding of PPOA last week, it was a wake-up call, if one were needed, that libs are far more concerned for preserving abortion rights than they are with preserving the lives of women.
Under a torrent of incensed bullying attacks, the foundation quickly seemed to reverse its decision though not before libs launched a withering onslaught of abuse of Komen.
The bullying died down following the apparent reversal, which is ironic since the foundation simply decided to adhere to its previous commitment to pay PPOA over half a million dollars but would provide no additional funding because, despite its advertising, the nation’s most profitable and prolific abortionists doesn’t give a damn about breast cancer.
Komen caved to the bullying tactics then made it clear it won’t support organizations not engaged in breast cancer research or treatment or if they are proven guilty of criminal activities,
As background, Susan Komen died at age 36 in 1980, a victim of the plague of breast cancer after her sister Nancy Goodman Brinker swore to her that she would do all she could to eradicate that scourge. . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=12591.)
Showing posts with label abortions. Show all posts
Showing posts with label abortions. Show all posts
Monday, February 6, 2012
Thursday, July 21, 2011
Someone Is Killing Blacks!
Someone Is killing Blacks!
The Reverend Al Sharpton went on a tear last winter over a giant New York City billboard featuring an innocent, young black girl and the caption, “The Most Dangerous Place for an African-American Is in the Womb.” When he sees a new video on the same subject, he’s liable to go into uncontrollable paroxysms that could shock him into getting a real job!
In March, he succeeded in having the billboard removed.
It had been strategically situated in NYC’s posh Soho District near a Planned Parenthood facility that boasts of aborting 19,000 pre-born babies in 2010 and offended the Reverend Al not only because of its location and message but due to the harm it could potentially cause to his supporters. He contended it was ”an offensive and condescending effort to stigmatize and shame African-American women while attempting to discredit the work of Planned Parenthood.”
Even worse, it sent ”a message of racial profiling and discourages a woman’s right to choose.”
A lone billboard of a pretty, little African-American apparently can evidently have an amazing number of deleterious effects on Al, Planned Parenthood, and black women.
See “Race, Abortion, and Al Sharpton,” http://bit.ly/qBwFhY, and “Billboards and Al Sharpton’s Black Genocide,” http://bit.ly/h01UGV, for more details on that genocide and Planned Parenthood’s facilitation of it.
Wishful thinking would suggest the new video, titled “The Number One Killer,” would shut Sharpton up at least for while . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=5057)
The Reverend Al Sharpton went on a tear last winter over a giant New York City billboard featuring an innocent, young black girl and the caption, “The Most Dangerous Place for an African-American Is in the Womb.” When he sees a new video on the same subject, he’s liable to go into uncontrollable paroxysms that could shock him into getting a real job!
In March, he succeeded in having the billboard removed.
It had been strategically situated in NYC’s posh Soho District near a Planned Parenthood facility that boasts of aborting 19,000 pre-born babies in 2010 and offended the Reverend Al not only because of its location and message but due to the harm it could potentially cause to his supporters. He contended it was ”an offensive and condescending effort to stigmatize and shame African-American women while attempting to discredit the work of Planned Parenthood.”
Even worse, it sent ”a message of racial profiling and discourages a woman’s right to choose.”
A lone billboard of a pretty, little African-American apparently can evidently have an amazing number of deleterious effects on Al, Planned Parenthood, and black women.
See “Race, Abortion, and Al Sharpton,” http://bit.ly/qBwFhY, and “Billboards and Al Sharpton’s Black Genocide,” http://bit.ly/h01UGV, for more details on that genocide and Planned Parenthood’s facilitation of it.
Wishful thinking would suggest the new video, titled “The Number One Killer,” would shut Sharpton up at least for while . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=5057)
Friday, November 19, 2010
The Prevailing Disparity Between the Number of Horse's Asses and the Number of Horses
The Prevailing Disparity Between the Number of Horse's Asses and the Number of Horses
When there’s a top, there’s always a bottom. When there’s a beginning, there’s always an ending. When there’s a horse, there’s always one horse head and one horse derriere–except that sometimes there are more horse’s asses than there are horses, an odd but all too frequent confluence of improbabilities which seems more prevalent today than usually.
One instance proving the existence of such an improbability is occurring out in Apple Valley, Minnesota where Alicia and Peter Arnold are seeking input via an online poll of the world at large, from strangers and fellow kooks, on whether the couple should keep their 17-week pre-born baby or whether they should terminate its life.
Alicia explained the Twin City suburbanites’ motivation: “We wanted to give people a chance to voice their opinions in a real situation where it makes a difference.” Still recovering from her third miscarriage, she added,”I wanted to wait longer because I was losing weight and living a healthier lifestyle. I wasn’t sure what to do.”
The obvious solution for the Arnold dilemma was to ask a million or so strangers “what to do.”
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=2728)
When there’s a top, there’s always a bottom. When there’s a beginning, there’s always an ending. When there’s a horse, there’s always one horse head and one horse derriere–except that sometimes there are more horse’s asses than there are horses, an odd but all too frequent confluence of improbabilities which seems more prevalent today than usually.
One instance proving the existence of such an improbability is occurring out in Apple Valley, Minnesota where Alicia and Peter Arnold are seeking input via an online poll of the world at large, from strangers and fellow kooks, on whether the couple should keep their 17-week pre-born baby or whether they should terminate its life.
Alicia explained the Twin City suburbanites’ motivation: “We wanted to give people a chance to voice their opinions in a real situation where it makes a difference.” Still recovering from her third miscarriage, she added,”I wanted to wait longer because I was losing weight and living a healthier lifestyle. I wasn’t sure what to do.”
The obvious solution for the Arnold dilemma was to ask a million or so strangers “what to do.”
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=2728)
Tuesday, July 27, 2010
The Gruesome Commitment Of Elena Kagan Part Two
The Gruesome Commitment of Elena Kagan Part Two
Commitment can often be an admirable feature of one’s life and character. It denotes absolute dedication, strong and unshakeable beliefs, and an admirable steadfastness.
However, when that commitment leads one down the road of “disgraceful” and “unethical” conduct, words used by former Surgeon General, C. Everett Koop, to describe the actions of Solicitor General and Supreme Court nominee, Elena Kagan, commitment becomes a markedly negative trait.
As a radical leftist–and the president has a constitutional right to nominate such a person no matter what damage she can ultimately wreak–Ms. Kagan no doubt is committed to any number of causes. Hopefully she does not lie and dissemble to accomplish her goals with respect to those causes as she did with her commitment to the gruesome practice of partial birth abortion.
Medically described as intact dilation and extraction or intact D & X, partial birth abortion involves the barbaric execution of what is often a fully-formed, intact, baby by dilating the uterus of a mother-to-be and extracting said baby. That clinical description avoids the methods of the barbarism, the details of the “extraction.”
Briefly, following dilation, the partial birth abortionist . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1807)
Commitment can often be an admirable feature of one’s life and character. It denotes absolute dedication, strong and unshakeable beliefs, and an admirable steadfastness.
However, when that commitment leads one down the road of “disgraceful” and “unethical” conduct, words used by former Surgeon General, C. Everett Koop, to describe the actions of Solicitor General and Supreme Court nominee, Elena Kagan, commitment becomes a markedly negative trait.
As a radical leftist–and the president has a constitutional right to nominate such a person no matter what damage she can ultimately wreak–Ms. Kagan no doubt is committed to any number of causes. Hopefully she does not lie and dissemble to accomplish her goals with respect to those causes as she did with her commitment to the gruesome practice of partial birth abortion.
Medically described as intact dilation and extraction or intact D & X, partial birth abortion involves the barbaric execution of what is often a fully-formed, intact, baby by dilating the uterus of a mother-to-be and extracting said baby. That clinical description avoids the methods of the barbarism, the details of the “extraction.”
Briefly, following dilation, the partial birth abortionist . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1807)
Thursday, May 27, 2010
Bad and Good News from across the Pond
Bad and Good News from across the Pond
Britain’s day in the sun has largely passed. The glory days of the vaunted British Empire are long gone and the sun regularly sets on it.
Still, in its waning years as Islam continues to gain stronger footholds throughout England in its quest to Islamicize the nation, Great Britain if no longer great still serves as a bellwether for both bad and good trends in America.
For example, Britain has long been a safe haven for abortion and abortionists and the procedure is relatively common though numbers show a very slight decrease in the last year; almost all are funded by the socialized health care program known as the National Health Service or NHS.
Nevertheless, even mad dogs and Englishmen sustained a shock to their sensibilities with the revelation that some British women practice abortion with the same casualness as they approach an afternoon of tea and crumpets.
Of a total of 189,100 abortions (with 2,094 involving girls under 15) in England and Wales in 2009, a shocking 48 were performed on women who have had seven or more abortions and another 3,630 on women who were chalking up their fourth, fifth, or sixth “terminations:” http://tiny.cc/xg7ec
Other methods of birth control are readily available but apparently thousands of women prefer to abort rather than use them, especially since the NHS is picking up the tab.
On the good news front, Britain’s new Work and Pensions Secretary Iian Douglas Smith has declared . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1703)
Britain’s day in the sun has largely passed. The glory days of the vaunted British Empire are long gone and the sun regularly sets on it.
Still, in its waning years as Islam continues to gain stronger footholds throughout England in its quest to Islamicize the nation, Great Britain if no longer great still serves as a bellwether for both bad and good trends in America.
For example, Britain has long been a safe haven for abortion and abortionists and the procedure is relatively common though numbers show a very slight decrease in the last year; almost all are funded by the socialized health care program known as the National Health Service or NHS.
Nevertheless, even mad dogs and Englishmen sustained a shock to their sensibilities with the revelation that some British women practice abortion with the same casualness as they approach an afternoon of tea and crumpets.
Of a total of 189,100 abortions (with 2,094 involving girls under 15) in England and Wales in 2009, a shocking 48 were performed on women who have had seven or more abortions and another 3,630 on women who were chalking up their fourth, fifth, or sixth “terminations:” http://tiny.cc/xg7ec
Other methods of birth control are readily available but apparently thousands of women prefer to abort rather than use them, especially since the NHS is picking up the tab.
On the good news front, Britain’s new Work and Pensions Secretary Iian Douglas Smith has declared . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1703)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)