Whooping Whoopi Whoops Again!
Weeping, whooping Whoopi Goldberg, who doesn’t look even a little bit Jewish and who is virtually idolized by brainless Jews and non-Jews alike during her appearances on “The View,” often gets perturbed.
One would think a Neanderthal would retreat into a cave instead of going public.
A sad excuse for a woman, the Whoopster regularly articulates and reflects her stupidity on ABC’s “The View” and sometimes manages to out-do herself in her efforts at invoking baseless charges of racism at every opportunity, taking umbrage at the truth, and supporting Hollywood pedophiles because they are Hollywood pedophiles.
Goldberg was outraged earlier this year when more civilized African-Americans wisely overlooked her in citing black Oscar winners. She accused black film critics on the New York Times of racism in her omission, an odd accusation unless we consider the source.
She exhibited her ignorance last year when she stormed off “The View” set because she and Joyless Joy Behar disagreed with Bill O’Reilly who had the temerity to suggest Muslims were responsible for 9/11.
She demonstrated her reality-disconnect when she defended child rapist Roman Polanski in 2009 by saying his criminality ”was something else but I don’t believe it was rape-rape.”
Anymore than she could define reasons for her inclusion in the top tier of black Oscar winners or defend her antics with O’Reilly, Goldberg failed to precisely explain what a 45 year old drugging and raping a 13 year old could be called if not “rape-rape.” Consensual?
Once again, the Whoopster has shown her insightful expertise . . . (Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=6835.)
Showing posts with label The View. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The View. Show all posts
Sunday, November 27, 2011
Thursday, March 24, 2011
President The Donald?
President The Donald?
Just who is Donald John Trump, Sr., aka The Donald, aka obnoxious multi-millionaire television personality, aka a business-hotel magnate, aka a maggot to those who despise him? Trump is many things to many people but, right now, he’s an unannounced candidate for the Republican nomination for the presidency in 2012, which means he’s also a lib target.
He has as much chance of achieving the presidency as I do. Ok, maybe a somewhat better chance but not by much. On the other hand, he carries a helluva lot more baggage than I do, so who knows?
Born with a golden spoon in his mouth, compliments of his late father, Fred, the 65 year old Trump has had a chequred personal and financial life but it’s his fortune and political conservatism that will do him in, mainly with liberals who can’t stand the scent of either success or conservatives.
The Donald, as he likes to be called, has been sending out feelers to gauge the sentiment of the electorate and, true to form, his feelers aren’t your average feelers. Most recently, he’s been saying what he thinks about pirates and birth certificates. Also true to form, he doesn’t pull any punches.
We usually think Johnny Depp when we think of pirates. History buffs may think Thomas Jefferson and the Barbary Pirates Wars when Jefferson defeated the Muslims of North Africa on the high seas and on “the shores of Tripoli.” There’s more conflict in and near Tripoli today but Trump directed his attention a little south and west to Somali pirates preying on American and international shipping.
The Donald is blunt about it all: He would obliterate them.
As he said, “Give me one good admiral and a few ships, and I will wipe them out so fast. Can you believe that these guys are taking tankers that are a thousand feet long and cost hundreds of millions of dollars, and just taking them with rowboats? It’s hard to believe. One good admiral, that’s all I want.”
That’s all it would need. His frank addition to that resolve is what makes you love him: “It’s a total lack of respect for this country:” http://bit.ly/h540yV
Our current president seems to lack resolve when it comes to anything, least of all respect for our country.
Trump entered much more turbulent waters than the Indian Ocean when he dared sail into ABC’s ”The View,” where pirates are not an issue but where vicious sharks in the persons of Whoopi and Barbara Walters lay in wait. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=3960)
Just who is Donald John Trump, Sr., aka The Donald, aka obnoxious multi-millionaire television personality, aka a business-hotel magnate, aka a maggot to those who despise him? Trump is many things to many people but, right now, he’s an unannounced candidate for the Republican nomination for the presidency in 2012, which means he’s also a lib target.
He has as much chance of achieving the presidency as I do. Ok, maybe a somewhat better chance but not by much. On the other hand, he carries a helluva lot more baggage than I do, so who knows?
Born with a golden spoon in his mouth, compliments of his late father, Fred, the 65 year old Trump has had a chequred personal and financial life but it’s his fortune and political conservatism that will do him in, mainly with liberals who can’t stand the scent of either success or conservatives.
The Donald, as he likes to be called, has been sending out feelers to gauge the sentiment of the electorate and, true to form, his feelers aren’t your average feelers. Most recently, he’s been saying what he thinks about pirates and birth certificates. Also true to form, he doesn’t pull any punches.
We usually think Johnny Depp when we think of pirates. History buffs may think Thomas Jefferson and the Barbary Pirates Wars when Jefferson defeated the Muslims of North Africa on the high seas and on “the shores of Tripoli.” There’s more conflict in and near Tripoli today but Trump directed his attention a little south and west to Somali pirates preying on American and international shipping.
The Donald is blunt about it all: He would obliterate them.
As he said, “Give me one good admiral and a few ships, and I will wipe them out so fast. Can you believe that these guys are taking tankers that are a thousand feet long and cost hundreds of millions of dollars, and just taking them with rowboats? It’s hard to believe. One good admiral, that’s all I want.”
That’s all it would need. His frank addition to that resolve is what makes you love him: “It’s a total lack of respect for this country:” http://bit.ly/h540yV
Our current president seems to lack resolve when it comes to anything, least of all respect for our country.
Trump entered much more turbulent waters than the Indian Ocean when he dared sail into ABC’s ”The View,” where pirates are not an issue but where vicious sharks in the persons of Whoopi and Barbara Walters lay in wait. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=3960)
Wednesday, November 10, 2010
Black Babies
Black Babies
To hear Whoopi Goldberg and others on “The View” last year reacting to Ann Coulter’s presentation of copious facts and details that substantiate Coulter’s researched contention that 72% of black babies in America are being born to single, unwed mothers is to wonder whether Ol’ Whoop is operating in an alternate universe.
“The View’s” braindead studio audience erupted into applause whenever Whoopi mouthed equally-braindead responses such as, “Umm, not great research since we’ve seen this research discounted time and time again,” while never citing any sources for that discounting.
Goldberg took exception to Coulter’s assumed denigration of single mothers in part because Whoopi is one, as well as a proud, multiple-aborter of a number of her pre-born babies, although she didn’t bring that up. I’m tempted to say those aborted babies were better off in Whoopi’s case, but I won’t.
Coulter ripped not single mothers but the “exalting” of single motherhood by the MSM and Hollywood while allowing single fatherhood and the fathers who fathered all those born and aborted progeny to escape responsibility.
Under cross-examination by Goldberg, Coulter admitted she was neither married nor had she borne children–facts Whoopi knew as well as she knew, maybe, how many babies she had aborted–but Whoops concluded from that that Coulter didn’t know what she was talking about. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=2596)
To hear Whoopi Goldberg and others on “The View” last year reacting to Ann Coulter’s presentation of copious facts and details that substantiate Coulter’s researched contention that 72% of black babies in America are being born to single, unwed mothers is to wonder whether Ol’ Whoop is operating in an alternate universe.
“The View’s” braindead studio audience erupted into applause whenever Whoopi mouthed equally-braindead responses such as, “Umm, not great research since we’ve seen this research discounted time and time again,” while never citing any sources for that discounting.
Goldberg took exception to Coulter’s assumed denigration of single mothers in part because Whoopi is one, as well as a proud, multiple-aborter of a number of her pre-born babies, although she didn’t bring that up. I’m tempted to say those aborted babies were better off in Whoopi’s case, but I won’t.
Coulter ripped not single mothers but the “exalting” of single motherhood by the MSM and Hollywood while allowing single fatherhood and the fathers who fathered all those born and aborted progeny to escape responsibility.
Under cross-examination by Goldberg, Coulter admitted she was neither married nor had she borne children–facts Whoopi knew as well as she knew, maybe, how many babies she had aborted–but Whoops concluded from that that Coulter didn’t know what she was talking about. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=2596)
Saturday, October 16, 2010
Tidbits: Toilets, Whitey, and Whoopi
Tidbits: Toilets, Whitey, and Whoopi
Toilets: Decisions, Decisions, Decisions
Under 3-term Mayor Michael Boomboom/Bloomberg, New York City is fast evolving into the Nanny Capital of America. Smoking is banned virtually everywhere, sodium-salt is restricted in restaurants, and sugary foods are next on the hit list as Bloomberg continues his quest to care for every health need of New Yorkers, at the expense of depriving them of the right to decide when and where they will puff and what they can eat.
Big Mike is watching you!
Perhaps bowing to complaints that the city is becoming a mini-nanny state with arbitrary rules imposed by an supposedly omniscient, authoritarian government, New York is now getting into toilets, actually into all things watery.
Already all the rage in Europe, “dual flush” toilets are coming to a New York bathroom near you.
As part of a wide-ranging water conservation law passed by the City Council this past week, “new toilets will have to be high water efficient or ‘dual-flush,’ which allow users to choose between a high pressure flush for solid waste, and a low-pressure flush for liquid:” http://tiny.cc/ao674
See! Bloomberg can now say, we allow individual decision-making, even if that decision is rather simple except in certain cases when toilet users . . . Well, use your own personal experience and imagination.
No word yet on whether thousands of new city workers will have to be hired to monitor strict compliance with the liquid-solid rules.
Whitey or Whitney?
Speaking of toilets, America’s educational system may be immersed in one but . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=2243)
Toilets: Decisions, Decisions, Decisions
Under 3-term Mayor Michael Boomboom/Bloomberg, New York City is fast evolving into the Nanny Capital of America. Smoking is banned virtually everywhere, sodium-salt is restricted in restaurants, and sugary foods are next on the hit list as Bloomberg continues his quest to care for every health need of New Yorkers, at the expense of depriving them of the right to decide when and where they will puff and what they can eat.
Big Mike is watching you!
Perhaps bowing to complaints that the city is becoming a mini-nanny state with arbitrary rules imposed by an supposedly omniscient, authoritarian government, New York is now getting into toilets, actually into all things watery.
Already all the rage in Europe, “dual flush” toilets are coming to a New York bathroom near you.
As part of a wide-ranging water conservation law passed by the City Council this past week, “new toilets will have to be high water efficient or ‘dual-flush,’ which allow users to choose between a high pressure flush for solid waste, and a low-pressure flush for liquid:” http://tiny.cc/ao674
See! Bloomberg can now say, we allow individual decision-making, even if that decision is rather simple except in certain cases when toilet users . . . Well, use your own personal experience and imagination.
No word yet on whether thousands of new city workers will have to be hired to monitor strict compliance with the liquid-solid rules.
Whitey or Whitney?
Speaking of toilets, America’s educational system may be immersed in one but . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=2243)
Monday, August 23, 2010
Conservatives and Show Biz
Conservatives and Show Biz
“There’s no business like show business like no business I know . . .” (Irving Berlin)
You got that right, Irving, even if your next 2 lines, “Everything about it is appealing, everything that traffic will allow/ Nowhere could you get that happy feeling when you are stealing that extra bow,” no longer apply.
To the average American, show biz in the 21st century is far less appealing than it ever was and is less involved in projecting happy feelings than it is in proselytizing, demeaning our culture, and propagandizing.
Oh, add to that making money, BIG money.
I know that’s an overly broad and subjective allegation which must be tempered by many exceptions but it’s still difficult to refute that in A.D. 2010 the entertainment industry, show business, stage, television, and Hollywood, are more sociopolitically polarized than ever and is almost exclusively dominated by liberal-leftists engaged as deeply in outright or subconscious “educating” as in entertaining.
Consequently, show biz is a hugely challenging life for conservatives.
If a right winger dare advertise his or her politics, social views and mores, he and she are often shut out of entertainment’s inner circles and pathways to success and stardom. It becomes tempting for those wannabes with a conservative bent to either conceal their personal philosophies or to live lives of baldfaced lies.
Again, there are exceptions, there are always exceptions to general rules.
The late Charlton Heston, Clint Eastwood, Jon Voight, Kelsey Grammer, Gary Sinise, Patricia Heaton, and the good Baldwin brother, Stephen, come to mind.
However, they are generally very low key and non-combative in expressing their views–except for Voight of late–and they have earned their star status by virtue of dogged perseverence and talent that would not be denied.
Rumor has it that Robert Downey, Jr. is a closet member of that exclusive club of conservatives but he’s not talking.
Those conservatives made it, they became major and lesser celebs, not because of the welcoming arms of the show business set but in spite of oh-so-tolerant Tinseltown’s and television’s gilded doors that were closed to those who failed to hew to the leftist line. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1856)
“There’s no business like show business like no business I know . . .” (Irving Berlin)
You got that right, Irving, even if your next 2 lines, “Everything about it is appealing, everything that traffic will allow/ Nowhere could you get that happy feeling when you are stealing that extra bow,” no longer apply.
To the average American, show biz in the 21st century is far less appealing than it ever was and is less involved in projecting happy feelings than it is in proselytizing, demeaning our culture, and propagandizing.
Oh, add to that making money, BIG money.
I know that’s an overly broad and subjective allegation which must be tempered by many exceptions but it’s still difficult to refute that in A.D. 2010 the entertainment industry, show business, stage, television, and Hollywood, are more sociopolitically polarized than ever and is almost exclusively dominated by liberal-leftists engaged as deeply in outright or subconscious “educating” as in entertaining.
Consequently, show biz is a hugely challenging life for conservatives.
If a right winger dare advertise his or her politics, social views and mores, he and she are often shut out of entertainment’s inner circles and pathways to success and stardom. It becomes tempting for those wannabes with a conservative bent to either conceal their personal philosophies or to live lives of baldfaced lies.
Again, there are exceptions, there are always exceptions to general rules.
The late Charlton Heston, Clint Eastwood, Jon Voight, Kelsey Grammer, Gary Sinise, Patricia Heaton, and the good Baldwin brother, Stephen, come to mind.
However, they are generally very low key and non-combative in expressing their views–except for Voight of late–and they have earned their star status by virtue of dogged perseverence and talent that would not be denied.
Rumor has it that Robert Downey, Jr. is a closet member of that exclusive club of conservatives but he’s not talking.
Those conservatives made it, they became major and lesser celebs, not because of the welcoming arms of the show business set but in spite of oh-so-tolerant Tinseltown’s and television’s gilded doors that were closed to those who failed to hew to the leftist line. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1856)
Friday, July 30, 2010
Mongrels in the White House!
Mongrels in the White House!
. . . “When asked about his background, which includes a black father and white mother, Obama said of African-Americans: ‘We are sort of a mongrel people.’ ” He elaborated, “I mean we’re all kinds of mixed up. That’s actually true of white people as well, but we just know more about it. “
He further added, “there’s still a reptilian side of our brain” that leads people to not trust others “if somebody sounds different or looks different.” http://tiny.cc/ng72i
Huh? Mongrels? Reptiles? This is the president of the United States speaking?
Those off-the-cuff remarks are notable on a number of levels. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1814)
. . . “When asked about his background, which includes a black father and white mother, Obama said of African-Americans: ‘We are sort of a mongrel people.’ ” He elaborated, “I mean we’re all kinds of mixed up. That’s actually true of white people as well, but we just know more about it. “
He further added, “there’s still a reptilian side of our brain” that leads people to not trust others “if somebody sounds different or looks different.” http://tiny.cc/ng72i
Huh? Mongrels? Reptiles? This is the president of the United States speaking?
Those off-the-cuff remarks are notable on a number of levels. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1814)
Thursday, July 29, 2010
Obama,"The View," and the Boy Scouts
Obama, "The View," and the Boy Scouts
What’s next for Barack Obama? A cameo on Drew Carey’s upcoming show, “WTF!”? A plaintiff role on ”Judge Judy?” A hard-hitting interview with Larry King?
He’s already done “Oprah” and “The Young and the Restless” and “Jerry Springer” seem out of the question so where can he go now to get simpering, fawning attention from vacuous women viewers and brain-dead ”progressives” after his Thursday appearance (taped Wednesday) on ABC’s “The View?”
Obama “made history” by being the first sitting Chief Executive to appear on a daytime television talk show at the same time he further diminished the office he holds, something he does almost every day.
Any number of people, Democrats like Pennsylvania governor Ed Rendell included, felt it was an inappropriate waste of time for a president of the United States to appear with the ladies. They generally spend their time chatting amiably but insubstantially, or spatting, or ganging up on Elisabeth Hasselbeck on such Earth-shaking topics as upcoming weddings, the real housewives of New Jersey, women having affairs, and teenagers giving oral sex.
Not exactly the topics a president should be dealing with, although Obama did manage to elucidate a bit on the personal ”roses” and “thorns” associated with his presidency.
No fool he, Obama knew he had a receptive audience and guesting on “The View” sure beat dealing with press . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1811)
What’s next for Barack Obama? A cameo on Drew Carey’s upcoming show, “WTF!”? A plaintiff role on ”Judge Judy?” A hard-hitting interview with Larry King?
He’s already done “Oprah” and “The Young and the Restless” and “Jerry Springer” seem out of the question so where can he go now to get simpering, fawning attention from vacuous women viewers and brain-dead ”progressives” after his Thursday appearance (taped Wednesday) on ABC’s “The View?”
Obama “made history” by being the first sitting Chief Executive to appear on a daytime television talk show at the same time he further diminished the office he holds, something he does almost every day.
Any number of people, Democrats like Pennsylvania governor Ed Rendell included, felt it was an inappropriate waste of time for a president of the United States to appear with the ladies. They generally spend their time chatting amiably but insubstantially, or spatting, or ganging up on Elisabeth Hasselbeck on such Earth-shaking topics as upcoming weddings, the real housewives of New Jersey, women having affairs, and teenagers giving oral sex.
Not exactly the topics a president should be dealing with, although Obama did manage to elucidate a bit on the personal ”roses” and “thorns” associated with his presidency.
No fool he, Obama knew he had a receptive audience and guesting on “The View” sure beat dealing with press . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1811)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)