Whooping Whoopi Whoops Again!
Weeping, whooping Whoopi Goldberg, who doesn’t look even a little bit Jewish and who is virtually idolized by brainless Jews and non-Jews alike during her appearances on “The View,” often gets perturbed.
One would think a Neanderthal would retreat into a cave instead of going public.
A sad excuse for a woman, the Whoopster regularly articulates and reflects her stupidity on ABC’s “The View” and sometimes manages to out-do herself in her efforts at invoking baseless charges of racism at every opportunity, taking umbrage at the truth, and supporting Hollywood pedophiles because they are Hollywood pedophiles.
Goldberg was outraged earlier this year when more civilized African-Americans wisely overlooked her in citing black Oscar winners. She accused black film critics on the New York Times of racism in her omission, an odd accusation unless we consider the source.
She exhibited her ignorance last year when she stormed off “The View” set because she and Joyless Joy Behar disagreed with Bill O’Reilly who had the temerity to suggest Muslims were responsible for 9/11.
She demonstrated her reality-disconnect when she defended child rapist Roman Polanski in 2009 by saying his criminality ”was something else but I don’t believe it was rape-rape.”
Anymore than she could define reasons for her inclusion in the top tier of black Oscar winners or defend her antics with O’Reilly, Goldberg failed to precisely explain what a 45 year old drugging and raping a 13 year old could be called if not “rape-rape.” Consensual?
Once again, the Whoopster has shown her insightful expertise . . . (Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=6835.)
Showing posts with label bill o'reilly. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bill o'reilly. Show all posts
Sunday, November 27, 2011
Tuesday, September 27, 2011
Bill Maher and Real Time Liberal Racism
Bill Maher and Real Time Liberal Racism
“I thought when we elected a black President, we were going to get a black President. . . . I want a real black president. I want him in a meeting . . . where he lifts up his shirt where you can see the gun in his pants [and says] ’We’ve got a ‘mother@!#$%ing problem here.’ Shoot somebody in the foot.”
The implications in that now infamous spleen-venting were perfectly clear: Real African-Americans packed guns, had foul mouths, were prone to violence, and shoot people. The only racist insults missing are that they’re all lazy and on welfare.
Were Rick Perry or Rick Santorum to utter such slurs during a debate, with or without the mother@!#$%ing, they would be forced to end their candidacies for the Republican nomination for president before you could say mother@!#$%ing. However, the utterer wasn’t a conservative politician but a very liberal loser, Bill Maher and therefore it was perfectly okay and not because Maher wasn’t a politician but because he’s a lib.
You see, liberals aren’t racists, or so they would like us to think. In point of fact, virtually every social policy liberals have articulated, proposed, and passed over the last fifty years has been either race-based, designed to stir the racial or some other pot, or calculated to foster conditions, (unemployment and poverty for example), to exacerbate racial tensions.
The ultimate Democrat goal has been to create a dependency on government and a rock-solid black constituency despite have been the party that fought tooth and nail to defeat Civil Rights legislation in the fifties and sixties. They have largely succeeded and have paved the way for Barack Hussein Obama to carry those goals to fruition.
The chief accomplishment of the granddaddies of social manipulations–LBJ’s Great Society and his War on Poverty–was to substantially destroy once-strong African-American families yet Democrats escaped condemnation for that as well by skillfully employing smoke, mirrors, and an excellent if offensive offense that people like Bill Maher still use today.
It’s believed that the adage “The best defense is a good offense” originated with the 19th century Prussian military theorist, Carl von Clausewitz, but whatever its origins the line has become a staple of countless sports analysts as an observation on how best to win games. It assumes the defense isn’t as porous as that of this year’s Atlanta Falcons.
To be successfully employed in the political arena, the good offense strategy assumes the public won’t scratch beneath the veneer of attack rhetoric and discover all the talk is just a cover for lies and hypocrisy, as with tediously-constant liberal references to conservative racism to conceal liberal bigotry.
Maintaining the good offense while counting on viewers not to look behind the curtain of pretense, just previous to his bigoted description of blacks as gun-slinging hoods, Maher had hypocritically attacked Republicans and Bill O’Reilly . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=5571.)
“I thought when we elected a black President, we were going to get a black President. . . . I want a real black president. I want him in a meeting . . . where he lifts up his shirt where you can see the gun in his pants [and says] ’We’ve got a ‘mother@!#$%ing problem here.’ Shoot somebody in the foot.”
The implications in that now infamous spleen-venting were perfectly clear: Real African-Americans packed guns, had foul mouths, were prone to violence, and shoot people. The only racist insults missing are that they’re all lazy and on welfare.
Were Rick Perry or Rick Santorum to utter such slurs during a debate, with or without the mother@!#$%ing, they would be forced to end their candidacies for the Republican nomination for president before you could say mother@!#$%ing. However, the utterer wasn’t a conservative politician but a very liberal loser, Bill Maher and therefore it was perfectly okay and not because Maher wasn’t a politician but because he’s a lib.
You see, liberals aren’t racists, or so they would like us to think. In point of fact, virtually every social policy liberals have articulated, proposed, and passed over the last fifty years has been either race-based, designed to stir the racial or some other pot, or calculated to foster conditions, (unemployment and poverty for example), to exacerbate racial tensions.
The ultimate Democrat goal has been to create a dependency on government and a rock-solid black constituency despite have been the party that fought tooth and nail to defeat Civil Rights legislation in the fifties and sixties. They have largely succeeded and have paved the way for Barack Hussein Obama to carry those goals to fruition.
The chief accomplishment of the granddaddies of social manipulations–LBJ’s Great Society and his War on Poverty–was to substantially destroy once-strong African-American families yet Democrats escaped condemnation for that as well by skillfully employing smoke, mirrors, and an excellent if offensive offense that people like Bill Maher still use today.
It’s believed that the adage “The best defense is a good offense” originated with the 19th century Prussian military theorist, Carl von Clausewitz, but whatever its origins the line has become a staple of countless sports analysts as an observation on how best to win games. It assumes the defense isn’t as porous as that of this year’s Atlanta Falcons.
To be successfully employed in the political arena, the good offense strategy assumes the public won’t scratch beneath the veneer of attack rhetoric and discover all the talk is just a cover for lies and hypocrisy, as with tediously-constant liberal references to conservative racism to conceal liberal bigotry.
Maintaining the good offense while counting on viewers not to look behind the curtain of pretense, just previous to his bigoted description of blacks as gun-slinging hoods, Maher had hypocritically attacked Republicans and Bill O’Reilly . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=5571.)
Thursday, October 21, 2010
Tough on You, Juan Williams!
Tough on You, Juan Williams!
Boo hoo, Juan Williams! So, you finally came face to face with reality, with a truth that every conservative in America has known for decades, that the ultimately politically correct National Public Radio, NPR, is not much better than Air America, that it is an ideologically-biased not simply slanted to the left but unabashedly, if unadmittedly, leftist in its programming and editorial policies.
Poor Juan must not have received the National Public Radio memo that Muslims and Islam must not in any way be criticized, disparaged, or even feared by its employees either on NPR or while off the clock. That freedom of speech thing doesn’t apply there, even if NPR is heavily subsidized by the American taxpayer.
Williams’ failure to get that memo got him fired, canned, discharged by NPR.
Hollywood and the always irreverent “South Park” have gotten the message that Muslims and Islam are off limits. Why hadn’t Mr. Williams?
Maybe in his appearance on Bill O’Reilly’s “The O’Reilly Factor” (Fox News Channel, 8-9 p.m EDT) on Monday, Williams felt he wasn’t dissing Muslims. The closest he came was agreeing with O’Reilly that “jihad, aided and abetted by some Muslim nations, is the biggest threat on the planet,” a threat recognized by most rational people on that planet.
That reference to a threat led directly to his defensive statement that, “Look, Bill, I’m not a bigot. You know the kind of books I’ve written about the civil rights movement in this country.” Had he stopped there, Williams might still be drawing an NPR check, but he didn’t.
“But when I get on the plane,” he continued, “I got to tell you, if I see people who are in Muslim garb and I think, you know, they are identifying themselves first and foremost as Muslims, I get worried. I get nervous.”
Uh, oh, Juan, that must have done it. . .
(Read more at Boo hoo, Juan Williams! So, you finally came face to face with reality, with a truth that every conservative in America has known for decades, that the ultimately politically correct National Public Radio, NPR, is not much better than Air America, that it is an ideologically-biased not simply slanted to the left but unabashedly, if unadmittedly, leftist in its programming and editorial policies.
Poor Juan must not have received the National Public Radio memo that Muslims and Islam must not in any way be criticized, disparaged, or even feared by its employees either on NPR or while off the clock. That freedom of speech thing doesn’t apply there, even if NPR is heavily subsidized by the American taxpayer.
Williams’ failure to get that memo got him fired, canned, discharged by NPR.
Hollywood and the always irreverent “South Park” have gotten the message that Muslims and Islam are off limits. Why hadn’t Mr. Williams?
Maybe in his appearance on Bill O’Reilly’s “The O’Reilly Factor” (Fox News Channel, 8-9 p.m EDT) on Monday, Williams felt he wasn’t dissing Muslims. The closest he came was agreeing with O’Reilly that “jihad, aided and abetted by some Muslim nations, is the biggest threat on the planet,” a threat recognized by most rational people on that planet.
That reference to a threat led directly to his defensive statement that, “Look, Bill, I’m not a bigot. You know the kind of books I’ve written about the civil rights movement in this country.” Had he stopped there, Williams might still be drawing an NPR check, but he didn’t.
“But when I get on the plane,” he continued, “I got to tell you, if I see people who are in Muslim garb and I think, you know, they are identifying themselves first and foremost as Muslims, I get worried. I get nervous.”
Uh, oh, Juan, that must have done it. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=2321)
Boo hoo, Juan Williams! So, you finally came face to face with reality, with a truth that every conservative in America has known for decades, that the ultimately politically correct National Public Radio, NPR, is not much better than Air America, that it is an ideologically-biased not simply slanted to the left but unabashedly, if unadmittedly, leftist in its programming and editorial policies.
Poor Juan must not have received the National Public Radio memo that Muslims and Islam must not in any way be criticized, disparaged, or even feared by its employees either on NPR or while off the clock. That freedom of speech thing doesn’t apply there, even if NPR is heavily subsidized by the American taxpayer.
Williams’ failure to get that memo got him fired, canned, discharged by NPR.
Hollywood and the always irreverent “South Park” have gotten the message that Muslims and Islam are off limits. Why hadn’t Mr. Williams?
Maybe in his appearance on Bill O’Reilly’s “The O’Reilly Factor” (Fox News Channel, 8-9 p.m EDT) on Monday, Williams felt he wasn’t dissing Muslims. The closest he came was agreeing with O’Reilly that “jihad, aided and abetted by some Muslim nations, is the biggest threat on the planet,” a threat recognized by most rational people on that planet.
That reference to a threat led directly to his defensive statement that, “Look, Bill, I’m not a bigot. You know the kind of books I’ve written about the civil rights movement in this country.” Had he stopped there, Williams might still be drawing an NPR check, but he didn’t.
“But when I get on the plane,” he continued, “I got to tell you, if I see people who are in Muslim garb and I think, you know, they are identifying themselves first and foremost as Muslims, I get worried. I get nervous.”
Uh, oh, Juan, that must have done it. . .
(Read more at Boo hoo, Juan Williams! So, you finally came face to face with reality, with a truth that every conservative in America has known for decades, that the ultimately politically correct National Public Radio, NPR, is not much better than Air America, that it is an ideologically-biased not simply slanted to the left but unabashedly, if unadmittedly, leftist in its programming and editorial policies.
Poor Juan must not have received the National Public Radio memo that Muslims and Islam must not in any way be criticized, disparaged, or even feared by its employees either on NPR or while off the clock. That freedom of speech thing doesn’t apply there, even if NPR is heavily subsidized by the American taxpayer.
Williams’ failure to get that memo got him fired, canned, discharged by NPR.
Hollywood and the always irreverent “South Park” have gotten the message that Muslims and Islam are off limits. Why hadn’t Mr. Williams?
Maybe in his appearance on Bill O’Reilly’s “The O’Reilly Factor” (Fox News Channel, 8-9 p.m EDT) on Monday, Williams felt he wasn’t dissing Muslims. The closest he came was agreeing with O’Reilly that “jihad, aided and abetted by some Muslim nations, is the biggest threat on the planet,” a threat recognized by most rational people on that planet.
That reference to a threat led directly to his defensive statement that, “Look, Bill, I’m not a bigot. You know the kind of books I’ve written about the civil rights movement in this country.” Had he stopped there, Williams might still be drawing an NPR check, but he didn’t.
“But when I get on the plane,” he continued, “I got to tell you, if I see people who are in Muslim garb and I think, you know, they are identifying themselves first and foremost as Muslims, I get worried. I get nervous.”
Uh, oh, Juan, that must have done it. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=2321)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)