Barack Hussein Obama Will Win Re-Election (Part Two)
Part One of this very mini series examined some reasons why Barack Hussein Obama is virtually guaranteed to win his re-election bid.
My opinion–which I pray to God is wrong– was based on the probability of Obama conducting the dirtiest campaign in over a century, his faux-populist platform setting class against class and race against race, and plans to spend a billion dollars or more to fool the American people into giving him four more years.
However, that prediction was made not as much on those factors as on the fact Obama has locked up various constituencies that will cast their ballots for more of the same no matter what the president has done to the country to date or what else he will do before November 6th.
Most African-Americans, Jews, and homosexuals will vote for Obama seven months from now, giving him some 17% of the electorate.
So, too, will a sufficient number of Latinos and those still suffering from the malady of white guilt to give him the 270 electoral votes he needs to be “flexible” in order to accomplish his goal of changing America into a land that would have caused the Founding Fathers to retch.
In addition, many Republican conservatives will choose to shoot themselves in both feet by staying home on Election Day and thereby help re-elect the president out of pique that Mitt Romney isn’t conservative enough or because he has flip-flopped on issues almost as often as Obama.
. Latinos. Due to Obama’s policies and those of his immediate predecessor, George W. Bush, with regard to illegal immigration, hispanics in America now constitute 16.3% of the population, over 50 million people, an estimated 11 million of whom entered the United States illegally.
Regardless of which president is most responsible for the illegal influx, the reality at this point is that they are here and only an unprecedented, massive, federal deportation program will change the situation, and that’s not going to happen under any administration.
Legal or illegal, with notable exceptions Latinos are an industrious, hard-working, religious, and fundamentally conservative group, characteristics that should classify them as Republicans yet 67% voted for Obama in 2008.
The reasons for that majority are multiple and complex but boil down to the successful Democrat Party effort to make hispanics, legal and illegal, feel at home in the U.S., feel that Democrats care and will take care of them, feel they should vote for Obama because Republicans don’t make them feel at home and won’t “take care of them.”
According to a recent poll from the Democrat campaign, 73% of them will vote Obama in November, adding as many as 10 points to Obama’s tally for a total of 27%.
. White Guilt. The “white guilters” are the wild card in the coming election. They consist of Caucasians who were torn in 2008 over the long-ended horrors of slavery, felt guilty that some white guys like Thomas Jefferson owned slaves, and sought absolution for the sins of their long-dead forbears by voting for the son of Marxists.
White guilters rarely admit . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=21745.)
Showing posts with label hispanics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label hispanics. Show all posts
Tuesday, April 17, 2012
Monday, June 20, 2011
Misery Index Doesn't Apply to Barack Obama
Misery Index Doesn't Apply to Barack Obama
It’s fully expected when Rep. Michelle Bachmann criticizes President Barack Hussein Obama but much less anticipated when representatives of two of his prime constituencies, blacks and hispanics, rip into their hero.
Bachmann cited Obama’s miserable record on economic growth and job creation and its impact on blacks and hispanics–16% black unemployment, 12% hispanic, and 40% and 26% among black and hispanic youths, respectively–as bases for concluding, “This president has failed the Hispanic community. He has failed the African-American community. He has failed us all when it comes to jobs.” (http://bit.ly/iua4Qg)
She could easily have listed any number of additional failures on his resume but focused on jobs in her Friday speech to the Republican Leadership Conference.
Instead of demonstrating leadership and vision on employment and the myriad other crises facing the nation, the Obama administration prefers to entertain Americans with an odd brand of humor. This oddity was seen in the president cracking jokes last week about the failure of his trillion-dollar stimulus boondoggle to stimulate shovels and Press Secretary Jay Carney’s riotous yuk on Monday about paying off our multi-trillion budget deficit with the $2 he won from his new golfing buddy, Speaker John Boehner.
Unfortunately, lame jokes don’t go very far for the country or the president, especially when members of his fan club aren’t amused.
Little seems to amuse the Rev. Louis Farrakhan who expressed his displeasure with his “brother” Obama’s treatment of his friend, Libyan dictator, Moammar Qaddafi in March. Calypso Louie then totally dissed his bro, the President of the United States, with the rhetorical question, “Who the hell do you think you are?”
Farrakhan is newly incensed over Obama’s kinetic action in Libya as seen in a May video now all the rage on YouTube: ”We voted for our brother Barack, a beautiful human being with a sweet heart, and now he’s an assassin. They turned him into them.” The antecedent of “them” is unclear although the founder of the black racist Nation of Islam was vividly clear in his denunciation of the “murderer in the White House,” again because of Obama’s actions against Moammar whom Louie considers a decent man.
See the story and video of the alternately grinning and ranting entertainer . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=4844)
It’s fully expected when Rep. Michelle Bachmann criticizes President Barack Hussein Obama but much less anticipated when representatives of two of his prime constituencies, blacks and hispanics, rip into their hero.
Bachmann cited Obama’s miserable record on economic growth and job creation and its impact on blacks and hispanics–16% black unemployment, 12% hispanic, and 40% and 26% among black and hispanic youths, respectively–as bases for concluding, “This president has failed the Hispanic community. He has failed the African-American community. He has failed us all when it comes to jobs.” (http://bit.ly/iua4Qg)
She could easily have listed any number of additional failures on his resume but focused on jobs in her Friday speech to the Republican Leadership Conference.
Instead of demonstrating leadership and vision on employment and the myriad other crises facing the nation, the Obama administration prefers to entertain Americans with an odd brand of humor. This oddity was seen in the president cracking jokes last week about the failure of his trillion-dollar stimulus boondoggle to stimulate shovels and Press Secretary Jay Carney’s riotous yuk on Monday about paying off our multi-trillion budget deficit with the $2 he won from his new golfing buddy, Speaker John Boehner.
Unfortunately, lame jokes don’t go very far for the country or the president, especially when members of his fan club aren’t amused.
Little seems to amuse the Rev. Louis Farrakhan who expressed his displeasure with his “brother” Obama’s treatment of his friend, Libyan dictator, Moammar Qaddafi in March. Calypso Louie then totally dissed his bro, the President of the United States, with the rhetorical question, “Who the hell do you think you are?”
Farrakhan is newly incensed over Obama’s kinetic action in Libya as seen in a May video now all the rage on YouTube: ”We voted for our brother Barack, a beautiful human being with a sweet heart, and now he’s an assassin. They turned him into them.” The antecedent of “them” is unclear although the founder of the black racist Nation of Islam was vividly clear in his denunciation of the “murderer in the White House,” again because of Obama’s actions against Moammar whom Louie considers a decent man.
See the story and video of the alternately grinning and ranting entertainer . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=4844)
Wednesday, June 1, 2011
Obama's Re-Election
Obama's Re-Election
From a child’s perspective, seventeen months is a virtual eternity. From an American political perspective, it’s virtually around the corner. November 6th, 2012, when Americans will once again choose who will lead them for four long years, is little more than seventeen months down the road.
America’s choice of a leader has, literally, never been more momentous.
The economy wallows in the doldrums amost a year after Vice President Joe Biden proclaimed 2010′s “Summer of Recovery,” a recovery yet to be experienced by the 14 million jobless. Obama’s “stimulus” has chiefly stimulated government employment, a skyrocketing deficit and national debt, and impending stagflation. Americans have either lost their homes or trillions in home equity. Socialized medicine is now the law.
And, that’s only on the domestic front.
Internationally, we have lost even more, in respect from our allies, increased belligerence from our enemies, and more and more of our brave troops dying in war zones. Months ago, we took up arms under the guise of a NATO operation in the Libyan hellhole in a “kinetic action” which we were promised would involve weeks. The much-reviled terrorist prison at Guantanomo is still open.
Nevertheless, whether one is an avid supporter of Barack Hussein Obama’s re-election or one who regards that prospect as nothing less than the absolute worst eventuality since September 11th, 2001, seventeen months from now President Barack Hussein Obama will again visit Chicago’s Grant Park to announce to screaming worshippers that he had been re-elected.
It doesn’t make sense but no one ever alleged American politics made sense.
What does make sense is Obama’s successful brand of Chicago take-no-prisoners, brook-no-opposition, tell-’em-what-they-wanna-hear-then-do-whatever-you-damned-well-please technique. Couple that philosophy with endless campaigning which has now gone on for at least four years, with creation of an unprecedented national dependency and other policies designed to cement a plurality, with certain constituencies and demographic elements, Obama is a sure winner.
Compounding the challenge for Republicans next year is the fact that no viable candidate has yet emerged although that’s all but incidental in view of the Obama Machine already in full battle mode and dedicated to his re-election at all costs. In fact, too, regardless of all the other elements–although they are all interrelated–it’s those “certain constituencies and demographic elements” that will insure a Republican defeat. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=4707)
From a child’s perspective, seventeen months is a virtual eternity. From an American political perspective, it’s virtually around the corner. November 6th, 2012, when Americans will once again choose who will lead them for four long years, is little more than seventeen months down the road.
America’s choice of a leader has, literally, never been more momentous.
The economy wallows in the doldrums amost a year after Vice President Joe Biden proclaimed 2010′s “Summer of Recovery,” a recovery yet to be experienced by the 14 million jobless. Obama’s “stimulus” has chiefly stimulated government employment, a skyrocketing deficit and national debt, and impending stagflation. Americans have either lost their homes or trillions in home equity. Socialized medicine is now the law.
And, that’s only on the domestic front.
Internationally, we have lost even more, in respect from our allies, increased belligerence from our enemies, and more and more of our brave troops dying in war zones. Months ago, we took up arms under the guise of a NATO operation in the Libyan hellhole in a “kinetic action” which we were promised would involve weeks. The much-reviled terrorist prison at Guantanomo is still open.
Nevertheless, whether one is an avid supporter of Barack Hussein Obama’s re-election or one who regards that prospect as nothing less than the absolute worst eventuality since September 11th, 2001, seventeen months from now President Barack Hussein Obama will again visit Chicago’s Grant Park to announce to screaming worshippers that he had been re-elected.
It doesn’t make sense but no one ever alleged American politics made sense.
What does make sense is Obama’s successful brand of Chicago take-no-prisoners, brook-no-opposition, tell-’em-what-they-wanna-hear-then-do-whatever-you-damned-well-please technique. Couple that philosophy with endless campaigning which has now gone on for at least four years, with creation of an unprecedented national dependency and other policies designed to cement a plurality, with certain constituencies and demographic elements, Obama is a sure winner.
Compounding the challenge for Republicans next year is the fact that no viable candidate has yet emerged although that’s all but incidental in view of the Obama Machine already in full battle mode and dedicated to his re-election at all costs. In fact, too, regardless of all the other elements–although they are all interrelated–it’s those “certain constituencies and demographic elements” that will insure a Republican defeat. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=4707)
Saturday, March 26, 2011
Muslim France, Hispanic America
Muslim France, Hispanic America
I don’t want to rip France too much since France did help in our Revolution and President Nicolas Sarkozy did step to the Libyan plate while Barry O. begged permission from the United Nations to do something, anything, about Moammar. Nevertheless, let’s face it, France’s glory days are long gone.
France should serve as an object lesson for America in how to surrender national identity, if not sovereignty, without firing a shot.
World War One began the death rattle of French pretensions to significance, World War Two and Vichy confirmed it, De Gaulle simply refused to accept it.
Ironically, France’s next election may see the populist President Sarkozy losing to either a Jewish socialist or to an extreme rightist, which is ironic because it doesn’t really matter who wins. The French Republic is on an irreversible course to becoming the French Islamic Republic as Muslims gradually undermine the country, institute enclaves of sharia law, and the French are, once again, rolling over and playing dead.
With at least 5% of its population Muslim and very fertile Muslims comprising almost 70% of new immigrants, France accelerated the process of national suicide for practical, economic reasons. They needed bodies to man their factories and staff other positions native Frenchmen felt were beneath their dignity. They invited Muslim immigrants to fill that need, and the immigrants obligingly complied.
Now, like guests who overextend their visits, they not only have full intentions of staying indefinitely but are making little effort to comply with house rules.
Sound familiar?
Sarkozy has made some indignant noises as to the Muslim threat to the national and European identity of France declaring that efforts at multiculturalism have been “a failure” insofar as its burgeoning, assimilation-rejecting Islamic population was concerned. Sarkozy was echoing similar warnings from Britain’s Prime Minister David Cameron who unequivocably announced in the same context that “state multiculturalism is dead:” http://bit.ly/f7CxwY
Both Sarkozy and Cameron were attempting too late to stem an inexorable Islamic tide which they could only forestall at this juncture via restrictive immigration and social policies which have little likelihood of implementation due to Muslim resistance and probable rioting which would dwarf earlier experiences.
Sad to say, France, Britain and other European nations, notably Belgium and the Netherlands, deserve what they’re getting.
France, especially, long ago abnegated any claims to national or cultural integrity when it sold out its heritage for expediency . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=3977)
I don’t want to rip France too much since France did help in our Revolution and President Nicolas Sarkozy did step to the Libyan plate while Barry O. begged permission from the United Nations to do something, anything, about Moammar. Nevertheless, let’s face it, France’s glory days are long gone.
France should serve as an object lesson for America in how to surrender national identity, if not sovereignty, without firing a shot.
World War One began the death rattle of French pretensions to significance, World War Two and Vichy confirmed it, De Gaulle simply refused to accept it.
Ironically, France’s next election may see the populist President Sarkozy losing to either a Jewish socialist or to an extreme rightist, which is ironic because it doesn’t really matter who wins. The French Republic is on an irreversible course to becoming the French Islamic Republic as Muslims gradually undermine the country, institute enclaves of sharia law, and the French are, once again, rolling over and playing dead.
With at least 5% of its population Muslim and very fertile Muslims comprising almost 70% of new immigrants, France accelerated the process of national suicide for practical, economic reasons. They needed bodies to man their factories and staff other positions native Frenchmen felt were beneath their dignity. They invited Muslim immigrants to fill that need, and the immigrants obligingly complied.
Now, like guests who overextend their visits, they not only have full intentions of staying indefinitely but are making little effort to comply with house rules.
Sound familiar?
Sarkozy has made some indignant noises as to the Muslim threat to the national and European identity of France declaring that efforts at multiculturalism have been “a failure” insofar as its burgeoning, assimilation-rejecting Islamic population was concerned. Sarkozy was echoing similar warnings from Britain’s Prime Minister David Cameron who unequivocably announced in the same context that “state multiculturalism is dead:” http://bit.ly/f7CxwY
Both Sarkozy and Cameron were attempting too late to stem an inexorable Islamic tide which they could only forestall at this juncture via restrictive immigration and social policies which have little likelihood of implementation due to Muslim resistance and probable rioting which would dwarf earlier experiences.
Sad to say, France, Britain and other European nations, notably Belgium and the Netherlands, deserve what they’re getting.
France, especially, long ago abnegated any claims to national or cultural integrity when it sold out its heritage for expediency . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=3977)
Thursday, November 4, 2010
Whatever Happened to the Golden State?
Whatever Happened to the Golden State?
One of Hollywood’s better thrillers in the 1960′s was “Whatever Happened to Baby Jane?” In the sixties, despite that flick, the state of California could still lay claim to a relative degree of sanity.
Even into the mid-seventies, the Golden State elected and re-elected Ronald Reagan as its governor so it obviously was then functionally sane. Something happened in and to California after that, however and, long before 2010, California began devolving into a laid-back cesspool.
It still has plenty of nice weather but Mother Nature tends to that. Balmy weather in a broke and broken state, however, doesn’t cut it, unless you’re a nouveau hippy pothead in which case nothing much bothers you.
As for the rest of Californians, who sometimes seem straight and normal when they reject gay marriage, as they did in 2008, and reject pot for all, as they did on Election Day, 2010, they just don’t seem able to see those woods with all those damned trees and all that foul pot smoke casting a haze over the view.
California and Californians have changed significantly over the last 3 decades principally in demographics. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=2498)
One of Hollywood’s better thrillers in the 1960′s was “Whatever Happened to Baby Jane?” In the sixties, despite that flick, the state of California could still lay claim to a relative degree of sanity.
Even into the mid-seventies, the Golden State elected and re-elected Ronald Reagan as its governor so it obviously was then functionally sane. Something happened in and to California after that, however and, long before 2010, California began devolving into a laid-back cesspool.
It still has plenty of nice weather but Mother Nature tends to that. Balmy weather in a broke and broken state, however, doesn’t cut it, unless you’re a nouveau hippy pothead in which case nothing much bothers you.
As for the rest of Californians, who sometimes seem straight and normal when they reject gay marriage, as they did in 2008, and reject pot for all, as they did on Election Day, 2010, they just don’t seem able to see those woods with all those damned trees and all that foul pot smoke casting a haze over the view.
California and Californians have changed significantly over the last 3 decades principally in demographics. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=2498)
Sunday, May 9, 2010
Hispanic Enemies in Our Midst
Hispanic Enemies in Our Midst
Toward the end of a 5 minute rant, a Hispanic speaker at a rally for La Raza reveals the philosophical underpinnings of the La Raza movement when he says, “Our enemy is capitalism, imperialism.”
If that sounds like a line from a speech by Cuba’s Fidel Castro or by Venezuela’s Communist despot, Hugo Chavez, it very well could be. However, this speech was not being delivered on the streets of Havana or Caracas but on the leafy campus of UCLA and the Hispanic teacher is preaching revolution.
See and hear the entire 5 minute tirade against America here: http://tiny.cc/ejeq6
La Raza is Spanish for the Race or the People, the Chicano, Mexican, and mestizo people who inhabit much of America’s Southwest and West and are scattered throughout the rest of the country, and numbering some 40 million, according to the speaker. He considers them all forces of “the northern front” in a war to re-conquer all of the “stolen” lands of the mythical Aztlan.
Human Events refers to La Raza and its subsidiary organization MEChA as . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1671)
Toward the end of a 5 minute rant, a Hispanic speaker at a rally for La Raza reveals the philosophical underpinnings of the La Raza movement when he says, “Our enemy is capitalism, imperialism.”
If that sounds like a line from a speech by Cuba’s Fidel Castro or by Venezuela’s Communist despot, Hugo Chavez, it very well could be. However, this speech was not being delivered on the streets of Havana or Caracas but on the leafy campus of UCLA and the Hispanic teacher is preaching revolution.
See and hear the entire 5 minute tirade against America here: http://tiny.cc/ejeq6
La Raza is Spanish for the Race or the People, the Chicano, Mexican, and mestizo people who inhabit much of America’s Southwest and West and are scattered throughout the rest of the country, and numbering some 40 million, according to the speaker. He considers them all forces of “the northern front” in a war to re-conquer all of the “stolen” lands of the mythical Aztlan.
Human Events refers to La Raza and its subsidiary organization MEChA as . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1671)
Thursday, March 11, 2010
Hope and Failure in America's Schools, Part Two
Hope and Failure in America's Schools, Part Two
. . .Today, the bad news for schools, news unfortunately that far outweighs the good.
1) Kevin Jennings, Obama’s “safe schools czar,” is still on the job. Despite all the controversy surrounding Jennings’ past and current actions and philosophy of homosexual activism and plans to use America’s schools to promote homosexuality, he remains in his position of promoting a bizarre idea of safety in those schools.
See previous articles on Assistant Secretary for Safe Schools Jennings.
A founder of GLSEN, the Gay, Lesbian, Straight Education Network and author of a foreward to Queering Elementary Education, Jennings continues to ply his wares and efforts to spread and normalize homosexual behavior in our schools. Most recently he was evasive on whether schools should teach that gay sex is a moral lifestyle: http://bit.ly/au754d
2) Education Secretary Blames Schools for Black Underperformance: Ignoring the realities of black home life, motivation, and crime statistics, Arne Duncan accuses schools of discrimination for their failure to perform miracles with black students. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1558)
. . .Today, the bad news for schools, news unfortunately that far outweighs the good.
1) Kevin Jennings, Obama’s “safe schools czar,” is still on the job. Despite all the controversy surrounding Jennings’ past and current actions and philosophy of homosexual activism and plans to use America’s schools to promote homosexuality, he remains in his position of promoting a bizarre idea of safety in those schools.
See previous articles on Assistant Secretary for Safe Schools Jennings.
A founder of GLSEN, the Gay, Lesbian, Straight Education Network and author of a foreward to Queering Elementary Education, Jennings continues to ply his wares and efforts to spread and normalize homosexual behavior in our schools. Most recently he was evasive on whether schools should teach that gay sex is a moral lifestyle: http://bit.ly/au754d
2) Education Secretary Blames Schools for Black Underperformance: Ignoring the realities of black home life, motivation, and crime statistics, Arne Duncan accuses schools of discrimination for their failure to perform miracles with black students. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1558)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)