Obama's United Nations Is Gutting Our United States

Obama's United Nations Is Gutting Our United States

Bar none–Jimmy Carter, Warren Harding and Millard Fillmore not excluded–Barack Hussein Obama is clearly the worst president in the history of the republic.




Repeatedly exposed as an overachieving fraud, a liar, a Chicago-style thug with established ties to terrorists and other reprobates, none of which ties have been investigated by the mainstream media, Mr. Obama incredibly still expects to win re-election in November.



Just as obvious, it’s evident that our 44th commander in chief has one sincere commitment.



He may have no respect for America’s Constitution, no interest in the future of the United States, and is a proven, gaffe-plagued incompetent but Obama does have a deep and abiding love–an affection not for his lovely wife but for the institution that promises to serve as one of his primary vehicles for accomplishing his ultimate goal of destroying America as we know and love it: the United Nations.



And the slew of socialistic, dictatorial Third World members of the U.N.–the majority membership–are busily, shamelessly working to achieve Obama’s aim.



The United Nations, that last, best hope of mankind has evolved into a power-hungry, anti-Western, anti-American blot on humanity and has long been out of touch with American interests.



The UN now wants to “find resources to finance development needs and address growing global [Third World] challenges, such as combating climate change and is “suggesting various ways to tap resources through international mechanisms, such as coordinated taxes on carbon emissions, air traffic, and financial and currency transactions.”



In other words, just like Obama, the UN wants to tax the bejesus out of those evil rich bastards who create jobs and prosperity to artificially lift third-worlders out of the eighteenth century.



Why bother struggling as Americans did to accomplish what we have when you can legally steal what you need via international taxes on the world’s successful, entreprenurial, capitalist pigs?



And those taxes are just the beginning. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=27086.)

Muslim France, Hispanic America

Muslim France, Hispanic America

I don’t want to rip France too much since France did help in our Revolution and President Nicolas Sarkozy did step to the Libyan plate while Barry O. begged permission from the United Nations to do something, anything, about Moammar. Nevertheless, let’s face it, France’s glory days are long gone.

France should serve as an object lesson for America in how to surrender national identity, if not sovereignty, without firing a shot.

World War One began the death rattle of French pretensions to significance, World War Two and Vichy confirmed it, De Gaulle simply refused to accept it.

Ironically, France’s next election may see the populist President Sarkozy losing to either a Jewish socialist or to an extreme rightist, which is ironic because it doesn’t really matter who wins. The French Republic is on an irreversible course to becoming the French Islamic Republic as Muslims gradually undermine the country, institute enclaves of sharia law, and the French are, once again, rolling over and playing dead.

With at least 5% of its population Muslim and very fertile Muslims comprising almost 70% of new immigrants, France accelerated the process of national suicide for practical, economic reasons. They needed bodies to man their factories and staff other positions native Frenchmen felt were beneath their dignity. They invited Muslim immigrants to fill that need, and the immigrants obligingly complied.

Now, like guests who overextend their visits, they not only have full intentions of staying indefinitely but are making little effort to comply with house rules.

Sound familiar?

Sarkozy has made some indignant noises as to the Muslim threat to the national and European identity of France declaring that efforts at multiculturalism have been “a failure” insofar as its burgeoning, assimilation-rejecting Islamic population was concerned. Sarkozy was echoing similar warnings from Britain’s Prime Minister David Cameron who unequivocably announced in the same context that “state multiculturalism is dead:” http://bit.ly/f7CxwY

Both Sarkozy and Cameron were attempting too late to stem an inexorable Islamic tide which they could only forestall at this juncture via restrictive immigration and social policies which have little likelihood of implementation due to Muslim resistance and probable rioting which would dwarf earlier experiences.

Sad to say, France, Britain and other European nations, notably Belgium and the Netherlands, deserve what they’re getting.

France, especially, long ago abnegated any claims to national or cultural integrity when it sold out its heritage for expediency . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=3977)

Multiculturalism in Dayton and Midsomer

Multiculturalism in Dayton and Midsomer

We’ve all heard of creeping socialism, especially lately when it’s leaping more than creepting in America. We should hear more about creeping, leaping multiculturalism. The mindless quest for diversity is as much of a threat to sanity and nationhood.

For example, what would or should the average person do if he or she were turned down for a job because he or she was unqualified or underqualified or was just deemed unable to satisfactorily perform the duties of the job description?

One option would be to sulk, but that’s not very productive. Another might be to study and prepare better so that next time around you did make the grade, but that takes time and effort. A third option would be to just look for another job, but that would make sense.

The ultimate recourse would be to complain, complain about everything from unfair employment practices to personality differences with the potential employer, to discrimination of some sort. Blacks and other minorities have often resorted to the latter excuse and have won. In the case of the Dayton Police Department’s test for recruits they didn’t have to complain. Eric Holder’s Department of Justice did it for them.

Without citing any specific reason, aside from the fact black and other minority candidates failed to achieve the exam’s modest passing scores of 66% on part one and 72% on part two, the DoJ ordered the results thrown out and new passing standards to be implemented. According to DaytonNewsSource.com, the DoJ “approved new scoring policy [which] only requires potential police officers to get a 58% and a 63%.” As DNS observed, ”That’s the equivalent of an ‘F’ and a ‘D’.”

After all, what’s more important to a police department? Quality, qualified, competent officers on the job protecting the citizens of Dayton, or multicultural diversity? Apparently, the answer is multicultual diversity regardless of the consequences.

As Dayton Fraternal Order of Police President, Randy Beane, commented, “It becomes a safety issue for the people of our community. It becomes a safety issue to have an incompetent officer next to you in a life and death situation.” While not calling for higher standards, Dayton NAACP President Derrick Foward kind of concurred by saying, “The NAACP does not support individuals failing a test and then having the opportunity to be gainfully employed. If you lower the score for any group of people, you’re not getting the best qualified people for the job:” http://tiny.cc/6q8ty

Yet, that is precisely what’s happening in Dayton . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=3885)

UPDATES: Assange, Gore, Multiculturalism

UPDATES: Assange, Gore, Multiculturalism

It’s humbling to be correct all the time, but truth is truth. Some recent developments that reinforce and support recent articles on this website:

JULIAN ASSANGE’S OTHER LEAKS:

Julian Assange’s WikiLeaks has been wreaking havoc within the U.S. State Department and with international relations by publicizing tens of thousands of secret American documents for some months now. Assange has repeatedly proven himself to be a disreputable and irresponsible America-hater who gets off by embarrassing and undermining this country.

Now facing British charges for rape and sexual molestation, he apparently gets off in sundry other ways as well with his imitation of Johnny Appleseed by dropping his seed hither, thither, and yon around Australia. The products of his sexual dalliances with at least four women range in age from six months to 20 years of age.

In a deliciously ironic twist, that news was leaked by British police and substantiated in a tell-all book by a disenchanted former WikiLeak spokesperson Daniel Domsheit-Bergas and by other WikiLeakers. For good measure, Domsheit-Berg also references Assange’s “lack of personal hygiene and table manners [which] suggest he was ‘brought up by wolves’ and reveals his erstwhile good buddy’s “main criteria for a woman:” young and ”aware of her role as a woman,” whatever that means: http://tiny.cc/jrqpk

THE CONTINUING DEFLATION OF THE GOREACLE:

Former VP Albert Arnold Gore was a bust as vice president and in his marriage but scored big time in his crusade to spread the tainted word of global warming and earned a Nobel Peace Prize and an Oscar for his efforts. He has also earned untold riches preaching the evils of greenhouse gasses and the merits of carbon credits even as he toured and polluted the planet in his Lear jet.

Not a guy to be easily dismayed by reality, Gore never misses a climate step. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=3617)

The Slow Death of Multiculturalism

The Slow Death of Multiculturalism

It’s rare, very rare, for a world leader to intentionally expose himself or herself to the slings and arrows of ingrained thought and denounce a feature of that thought as something that has “utterly failed.” It’s the antithesis of political correctness yet German Chancellor Angela Merkel has chosen that rocky and treacherous path in her admission that the international social experiment known as multiculturalism is a total failure.

Multiculturalism was a grand social experiment doomed to failure by a naïveté or by a conscious awareness that it wouldn’t work because it couldn't work.

The social fad of multiculturalism is defined by the Columbia Encyclopedia as “cultural pluralism, a term describing the coexistence of many cultures in a locality, without any one culture dominating the region. By making the broadest range of human differences acceptable to the largest number of people, multiculturalism seeks to overcome racism, sexism, and other forms of discrimination.”

Wikipedia tweaks that definition by adding, “Multiculturalism is the acceptance or promotion of multiple ethnic cultures, . . . multiculturalists advocate extending equitable status to distinct ethnic and religious groups without promoting any specific ethnic, religious, and/or cultural community values as central. The policy of multiculturalism is often contrasted with the concepts assimilationism and social integration. Multiculturalism is seen by its supporters as a fairer system that allows people to truly express who they are within.”

Isn’t multiculturalism really a variation on the Biblical tale of the Tower of Babel? And won’t it inevitably lead to a similar fate?

Both definitions may instill warm, fuzzy feelings but both omit essential factors, notably nationalism, patriotism and realism.

Fully cognizant of those factors but committed to imposing multiculturalism on the hoi polloi anyway,. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=2249)

Multiculturalism = Mediocrity

Multiculturalism = Mediocrity

“Multiculturalism is the acceptance or promotion of multiple ethnic cultures, for practical reasons and/or for the sake of diversity and applied to the demographic make-up of a specific place, . . . multiculturalists advocate extending equitable status to distinct ethnic and religious groups without promoting any specific ethnic, religious, and/or cultural community values as central:” Wikipedia

All that gobbledegook regarding the multisyllabic, favorite liberal buzzword of multiculturalism can be reduced to a simple declarative sentence: It’s a plan to cultivate mediocrity.

As so many left wing precepts, it all sounds very nice in principle; in practice, it’s a dud that, applied to education, fosters the idea that a Tower of Babel is preferable to towers of learning. In its effort to promote many cultures, it serves to denigrate America’s “central” values.

Take Berkeley High School, located in the belly of the beast, Berkeley, California, home to U.C. Berkeley, possibly the most leftist-infested institution of higher learning in the country.

With that influence so close by and pervasive, perhaps it’s no wonder . . .

(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1429)

MUTICULTURALISM AND TERRORISM--2009

AND THE BEAT GOES ON: MULTICULTURALISM AND TERRORISM–2009

No one can ever accuse the government of the United States of having an excess of either intelligence or discretion.

The World Trade Center hasn’t even been rebuilt, in fact it’s far from being re-built, yet our State Department in 2008 extended invites to 3400 residents of nations deemed state sponsors of terrorism to come on in!

Out of a total of 50,000, Cuba, Iran, Syria, and Sudan have been allotted thousands of what are called “diversity visas” furnished to nations with low immigration numbers so that they can beef up their emigration to America. The program was mandated by our Congress and implemented by our Foggy Bottomites: http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=41385.

Nowadays, it’s considered un-American to question the value of further diversification of our population despite any number of studies, and common sense, that indicate such programs are counterproductive and serve to undermine our national integrity.

Whether termed diversity or by its companion buzzword, multiculturalism, the idealistic concept and its implementation have been shown to function not as an enhancement of our melting pot of peoples but rather as a divisive construct, the effects of which is a balkanization into enclaves of foreigners who speak a language other than English and continue foreign practices, traditions, and cultures rather than seeking absorption into our general population.

See this analysis, “The Absurdity of Multiculturalism,” by Ralph S Musgrave, author and social commentator, http://ideas.repec.org/e/pmu56.html.

Writing principally for a U.K. audience, he thoroughly debunks the fatuous, and perilous, underpinnings of a theory much in vogue today but which actually serves to divide, not simply to diversify: http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=41385

We are a nation built on immigration....

(Read the rest of this article @ http://genelalor.com/.)