When the Bullied Become the Bulliers
Bullying in schools, a problem as old as schools, has become the most grievous sin that could be committed, worse than cheating on tests, fighting, and engaging in illicit acts, all of which commonly occur.
Teachers seducing students still ranks higher on the serious scale but bullying is now considered the most damnable offense a student can commit, so vile that the bullied are now being allowed the right to bully as reparation.
The anti-bullying campaign in America has been fostered by no less than the president of the United States and his wife who warned of the destructive consequences of bullying and co-hosted a White House Conference on Bullying Prevention last year.
There have been no White House conferences on the subject of the dire state of American education so, obviously, bullying is a far more critical concern.
Obviously, too, the administration is more concerned over a particular type of bullying than about bullying in general, about geeks being stuffed into lockers or jocks intimidating nerds. The tip-off as to the gay focus of Barack Hussein Obama’s campaign was his bizarre appointment of a homosexual activist and facilitator of child sexual predation, Kevin Jennings, as his “safe schools czar.”
(See “Kevin Jennings and ‘Safe Schools,’ ” http://bit.ly/pcAMPH, and “School Gays Are Busting Out All Over,” http://bit.ly/A7QZTB.)
Bullying has now come full circle as the subjects of Obama and Jennings’ safety have developed into the bulliers.
Public school administrators, never known for their courage or intellect–most went into administration because they couldn’t teach–have been quick to endorse and enforce NEA and Obamian dictates on bullying since to do otherwise would threaten their sinecures.
As a result, we have witnessed countless instances of schools enforcing so-called zero tolerance when it comes to assumed intolerance toward gay students and boundless tolerance of a politically-correct tyrrany by the assumed oppressed.
The latest absurdity happened at Shawano High School in Wisconsin. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=12177.)
Showing posts with label kevin jennings. Show all posts
Showing posts with label kevin jennings. Show all posts
Thursday, January 19, 2012
Friday, January 6, 2012
Galloping Marxism in Our Schools
Galloping Marxism in Our Schools
Karl Heinrich Marx was a brilliant man. The sage co-founder of one of the two principal social scouges of the twentieth century knew the surest path to godless tyranny was centralized control of schools, colleges, and universities.
Marx recognized Communism-Marxism’s critical need to propagandize the young in order to rid them of anti-proletariat ideas inculcated by parents and churches and for public schools to adopt curricula that denies God, morality, traditional family values, the concept of private ownership of property, and to stoke class warfare.
If any of that sounds familiar, it should. America is experiencing Marxism-in-action today as seen not only in tax policies but in the widespread, leftist radicalism on college campuses and public schools becoming hotbeds of social brainwashing to complement the deteriorization of standards and learning.
We are seeing the patently unconstitutional intrusion of the federal government into local education with dictates, mandates, and oversights by the U.S. Department of Education as it rapidly centralizes control of American education.
We are witnessing the leftist National Education Association busily engaged in discouraging parental choice and home-schooling and fully endorsing those federal intrusions while pushing for inclusion and diversity instead of more effective education.
We are burdened with local districts too feckless to denounce governmental encroachments and administrators too imbued with liberal doctrine to resist the leftward lurch toward the Marxist ideals embraced by our president.
To be sure, there were unmistakable signs of controlled centralization- indoctrination long before the election of Barack Hussein Obama.
Since 2009, however, those signs have developed into a full-blown tsunami of Marxist doctrinaires and godless subversives acting under the guise of educators, all of whom were committed adherents to Obama’s twisted Marxist philosophy, many of whom signed on to his carefully-designed cult of personality.
At first, it was comical when schools like one in Hempstead, New York re-named themselves after Obama even before he was elected. Another in Asbury Park, New Jersey did likewise, before it was closed last July.
Throughout the nation, countless schools, localities, school districts, and streets changed names in honor of someone whose primary claim to fame was his (partial) blackness, whose father was a Marxist, and who has governed as if he dreams the collectivist dreams of his father.
Indoctrination of children comes in many colors. One favorite ploy is the use of songs.
A classic was the ditty composed by a black New Jersey teacher in 2009 who forced her class to sing a paean to their new god. Its unmemorable lyrics included, Mmm, mmm, mm!/Barack Hussein Obama/He said that all must lend a hand/To make this country strong again. . .” It gets worse with, ”Mmm, mmm, mm!/ Barack Hussein Obama/Yes!”
The parody is a vast improvement: “Mmm, mmm, mm!/Barack Hussein Obama/He said we must pay the man/To make this country strong again/Taking your money doesn’t matter/’cause we know He can spend it better. . .”
That song is old hat now. Obamamarxists have expanded their musical vistas to incorporate anarchic elements in their efforts to undermine values and seduce children into believing chaos and revolution were superior to order and civilized behavior. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=12029.)
Karl Heinrich Marx was a brilliant man. The sage co-founder of one of the two principal social scouges of the twentieth century knew the surest path to godless tyranny was centralized control of schools, colleges, and universities.
Marx recognized Communism-Marxism’s critical need to propagandize the young in order to rid them of anti-proletariat ideas inculcated by parents and churches and for public schools to adopt curricula that denies God, morality, traditional family values, the concept of private ownership of property, and to stoke class warfare.
If any of that sounds familiar, it should. America is experiencing Marxism-in-action today as seen not only in tax policies but in the widespread, leftist radicalism on college campuses and public schools becoming hotbeds of social brainwashing to complement the deteriorization of standards and learning.
We are seeing the patently unconstitutional intrusion of the federal government into local education with dictates, mandates, and oversights by the U.S. Department of Education as it rapidly centralizes control of American education.
We are witnessing the leftist National Education Association busily engaged in discouraging parental choice and home-schooling and fully endorsing those federal intrusions while pushing for inclusion and diversity instead of more effective education.
We are burdened with local districts too feckless to denounce governmental encroachments and administrators too imbued with liberal doctrine to resist the leftward lurch toward the Marxist ideals embraced by our president.
To be sure, there were unmistakable signs of controlled centralization- indoctrination long before the election of Barack Hussein Obama.
Since 2009, however, those signs have developed into a full-blown tsunami of Marxist doctrinaires and godless subversives acting under the guise of educators, all of whom were committed adherents to Obama’s twisted Marxist philosophy, many of whom signed on to his carefully-designed cult of personality.
At first, it was comical when schools like one in Hempstead, New York re-named themselves after Obama even before he was elected. Another in Asbury Park, New Jersey did likewise, before it was closed last July.
Throughout the nation, countless schools, localities, school districts, and streets changed names in honor of someone whose primary claim to fame was his (partial) blackness, whose father was a Marxist, and who has governed as if he dreams the collectivist dreams of his father.
Indoctrination of children comes in many colors. One favorite ploy is the use of songs.
A classic was the ditty composed by a black New Jersey teacher in 2009 who forced her class to sing a paean to their new god. Its unmemorable lyrics included, Mmm, mmm, mm!/Barack Hussein Obama/He said that all must lend a hand/To make this country strong again. . .” It gets worse with, ”Mmm, mmm, mm!/ Barack Hussein Obama/Yes!”
The parody is a vast improvement: “Mmm, mmm, mm!/Barack Hussein Obama/He said we must pay the man/To make this country strong again/Taking your money doesn’t matter/’cause we know He can spend it better. . .”
That song is old hat now. Obamamarxists have expanded their musical vistas to incorporate anarchic elements in their efforts to undermine values and seduce children into believing chaos and revolution were superior to order and civilized behavior. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=12029.)
Thursday, November 10, 2011
The Trials of PSU
The Trials of PSU
It’s been said that “Scandal is what one half of the world takes pleasure inventing, and the other half in believing.” That observation applies in spades to the ongoing scandal at Penn State University except for the fact those pleasuring in the PSU scandal have been woefully misdirected.
For inexplicable reasons, many people hate Penn State, perhaps for its immense size, its influence, or its football team.
Someone actually published a currently out of print screed on the subject titled, I Hate Penn State: 303 Reasons Why You Should, Too, a screed which may experience a revival in the wake of the events of the past six days in University Park, PA, regrettable events rapidly turning Happy Valley into an unhappy lowland.
It’s very evident neither the PSU child sex scandal nor its repercussions were invented and, at this point, the crimes against children and nature committed by former Nittany Lion defensive coach Jerry Sandusky must be termed ”alleged” until he is, hopefully, tried, convicted, and sentenced to live out his remaining days in some godforsaken Pennsylvania state prison.
(See “Paterno vs Sandusky, Mistakes vs. Predation,” http://tiny.cc/r4lqf.)
As more and more of Sandusky’s victims emerge–the count may reach twenty–media and public venom are developing into a tsunami. However, in a peculiar twist, the venom isn’t being directed against the alleged perpetrator of the vile crimes but against legendary football coach Joe Paterno and Penn State University itself.
With Sandusky long retired, the PSU Board of Trustees peremptorily fired Paterno, by phone, on Wednesday. University president Dr. Graham Spanier was also cashiered. Paterno was dismissed for not doing enough to expose Sandusky’s predations, Spanier for covering them up. Combined with Athletic Director Tim Curley’s leave of absence and Senior PSU VP Gary Schultz’s resignation, that should have put the scandal to rest pending Sandusky’s trial.
Four heads on a platter proved to be nowhere near sufficient to sate the bloodlust of Penn State-haters in the media, however, anymore than the arrest of Jerry Sandusky satisfied them. Sandusky became almost incidental, his guilt as an accused serial homosexual child molestor almost irrelevant to the MSM even as new revelations surfaced.
Classified so far as rumors circulated by long-time PSU critic, Pittsburgh sports writer Mike Madden, Sandusky and his Second Mile Foundation were reputedly “pimping out young boys to rich donors” and Sandusky retired at the unusually young age of 55 ”in exchange for a cover-up” of his illicit activities.
Also seemingly irrelevant are the inactions of then-graduate assistant Mike McQueary.
His action, that is, informing Coach Paterno that he had personally witnessed Sandusky performing a sex act on a 10 year old boy in a shower room, has been duly noted and praised. Paterno reported the incident to Curley the next day yet he was fired.
McQueary’s grievous inactions of failing to intercede, of allowing the assault to continue, of not immediately calling the police–after flattening Sandusky and freeing the boy–speak volumes about McQueary and the Penn State administration.
Now an assistant coach, McQueary was scheduled to be on the sidelines in Saturday’s game with Nebraska alongside interim coach Tom Bradley before he received death threats from overworked fans crazed by Paterno’s dismissal. Aside from his failure to intervene in the first place, questions remain as to why he was not criticized for doing what Paterno did, going by the protocol book, and why he, too, wasn’t fired by PSU higher-ups.
Piling on, . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=5937.)
It’s been said that “Scandal is what one half of the world takes pleasure inventing, and the other half in believing.” That observation applies in spades to the ongoing scandal at Penn State University except for the fact those pleasuring in the PSU scandal have been woefully misdirected.
For inexplicable reasons, many people hate Penn State, perhaps for its immense size, its influence, or its football team.
Someone actually published a currently out of print screed on the subject titled, I Hate Penn State: 303 Reasons Why You Should, Too, a screed which may experience a revival in the wake of the events of the past six days in University Park, PA, regrettable events rapidly turning Happy Valley into an unhappy lowland.
It’s very evident neither the PSU child sex scandal nor its repercussions were invented and, at this point, the crimes against children and nature committed by former Nittany Lion defensive coach Jerry Sandusky must be termed ”alleged” until he is, hopefully, tried, convicted, and sentenced to live out his remaining days in some godforsaken Pennsylvania state prison.
(See “Paterno vs Sandusky, Mistakes vs. Predation,” http://tiny.cc/r4lqf.)
As more and more of Sandusky’s victims emerge–the count may reach twenty–media and public venom are developing into a tsunami. However, in a peculiar twist, the venom isn’t being directed against the alleged perpetrator of the vile crimes but against legendary football coach Joe Paterno and Penn State University itself.
With Sandusky long retired, the PSU Board of Trustees peremptorily fired Paterno, by phone, on Wednesday. University president Dr. Graham Spanier was also cashiered. Paterno was dismissed for not doing enough to expose Sandusky’s predations, Spanier for covering them up. Combined with Athletic Director Tim Curley’s leave of absence and Senior PSU VP Gary Schultz’s resignation, that should have put the scandal to rest pending Sandusky’s trial.
Four heads on a platter proved to be nowhere near sufficient to sate the bloodlust of Penn State-haters in the media, however, anymore than the arrest of Jerry Sandusky satisfied them. Sandusky became almost incidental, his guilt as an accused serial homosexual child molestor almost irrelevant to the MSM even as new revelations surfaced.
Classified so far as rumors circulated by long-time PSU critic, Pittsburgh sports writer Mike Madden, Sandusky and his Second Mile Foundation were reputedly “pimping out young boys to rich donors” and Sandusky retired at the unusually young age of 55 ”in exchange for a cover-up” of his illicit activities.
Also seemingly irrelevant are the inactions of then-graduate assistant Mike McQueary.
His action, that is, informing Coach Paterno that he had personally witnessed Sandusky performing a sex act on a 10 year old boy in a shower room, has been duly noted and praised. Paterno reported the incident to Curley the next day yet he was fired.
McQueary’s grievous inactions of failing to intercede, of allowing the assault to continue, of not immediately calling the police–after flattening Sandusky and freeing the boy–speak volumes about McQueary and the Penn State administration.
Now an assistant coach, McQueary was scheduled to be on the sidelines in Saturday’s game with Nebraska alongside interim coach Tom Bradley before he received death threats from overworked fans crazed by Paterno’s dismissal. Aside from his failure to intervene in the first place, questions remain as to why he was not criticized for doing what Paterno did, going by the protocol book, and why he, too, wasn’t fired by PSU higher-ups.
Piling on, . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=5937.)
Friday, September 23, 2011
Bullying and Teasing, Kevin Jennings and Teen Suicide
Bullying and Teasing, Kevin Jennings and Teen Suicide
I don’t remember being bullied in school and no one I know was ever “bullied” or was a “bullyer,” in the contemporary senses of those terms. Of course, in the interests of full disclosure, having attended parochial school, bullying wasn’t allowed since nuns generally attended to that duty.
I do recall, occasionally, teasing when I was the teaser without intending the teasing to in any way connote threats or intimidation and some dumb older kids sometimes asserting their age and size by being overbearing. At least one of those dumbasses ended up in prison, another became a teacher.
Our version of “bullying” typically involved vain pre- and post-adolescent efforts to gain attention from inattentive girls many of whom surreptitiously loved the attention but felt compelled to maintain the requisite façade of disinterest.
Both genders survived but times have changed.
Today, bullying is considered by the PC crowd as little short of character assassination or attempted murder–and young people are buying into that absurd hyperbole.
Okay, back in my day when we were circling the wagons and trying to survive Indian onslaughts, we had more things on our minds than Mary Jane and her persnickety uppitiness but, still, if Mary Jane had missed our subtle romantic overtures of hiding her hair ribbons, she wouldn’t have ended it all by leaping out of the stagecoach into some abyss.
As I said, times have changed.
Thanks to a super-charged media obsessed over bullying and its disturbed offshoot, cyber-bullying, the subject is front-page news. Compound that media-created awareness with the availability of Facebook and Twitter and emails, some nasty kids are now able to taunt, harass, and threaten vulnerable kids more or less anonymously and often with impunity.
Add to that supercharged hysteria and unsocial media school administrations that post strict anti-bullying guidelines which are largely unenforceable and, if enforced, are ridiculed, too many young people today now take seriously what was formerly ignored or dismissed as irrational, envious, and jealous ad hominem rants by miscreants.
Regrettably, a relatively minuscule number of teens and even pre-teens are unable to deal with the stress created by those miscreants and resort to the ultimate solution for what is invariably a passing problem.
In actuality, teen suicide rates, with one notable exception, haven’t increased appreciably over the last few decades and are in line with the overall numbers of people who opt for that final answer chosen by tens of thousands of Americans.
However, try to explain those stats to some fifteen year old girl who has been nominated for Slut of the Year by a Facebook adversary intent on snatching her boyfriend or to a fourteen year old boy called a pimply queer for all the world to see on Twitter and it’s a lost cause.
For a certain segment of young people, bullying has been catastrophic.
What is rarely noted concerning teen bullying is the above-referenced exception and that the chief impetus of the phenomenon derives not from any grassroots demand for a remedy but from the government of President Barack Obama.
More specifically but not exclusively, the man responsible for exaggerating the problem is the former Assistant Deputy Secretary for the Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools at the U.S. Department of Education, Kevin Jennings. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=5527.)
I don’t remember being bullied in school and no one I know was ever “bullied” or was a “bullyer,” in the contemporary senses of those terms. Of course, in the interests of full disclosure, having attended parochial school, bullying wasn’t allowed since nuns generally attended to that duty.
I do recall, occasionally, teasing when I was the teaser without intending the teasing to in any way connote threats or intimidation and some dumb older kids sometimes asserting their age and size by being overbearing. At least one of those dumbasses ended up in prison, another became a teacher.
Our version of “bullying” typically involved vain pre- and post-adolescent efforts to gain attention from inattentive girls many of whom surreptitiously loved the attention but felt compelled to maintain the requisite façade of disinterest.
Both genders survived but times have changed.
Today, bullying is considered by the PC crowd as little short of character assassination or attempted murder–and young people are buying into that absurd hyperbole.
Okay, back in my day when we were circling the wagons and trying to survive Indian onslaughts, we had more things on our minds than Mary Jane and her persnickety uppitiness but, still, if Mary Jane had missed our subtle romantic overtures of hiding her hair ribbons, she wouldn’t have ended it all by leaping out of the stagecoach into some abyss.
As I said, times have changed.
Thanks to a super-charged media obsessed over bullying and its disturbed offshoot, cyber-bullying, the subject is front-page news. Compound that media-created awareness with the availability of Facebook and Twitter and emails, some nasty kids are now able to taunt, harass, and threaten vulnerable kids more or less anonymously and often with impunity.
Add to that supercharged hysteria and unsocial media school administrations that post strict anti-bullying guidelines which are largely unenforceable and, if enforced, are ridiculed, too many young people today now take seriously what was formerly ignored or dismissed as irrational, envious, and jealous ad hominem rants by miscreants.
Regrettably, a relatively minuscule number of teens and even pre-teens are unable to deal with the stress created by those miscreants and resort to the ultimate solution for what is invariably a passing problem.
In actuality, teen suicide rates, with one notable exception, haven’t increased appreciably over the last few decades and are in line with the overall numbers of people who opt for that final answer chosen by tens of thousands of Americans.
However, try to explain those stats to some fifteen year old girl who has been nominated for Slut of the Year by a Facebook adversary intent on snatching her boyfriend or to a fourteen year old boy called a pimply queer for all the world to see on Twitter and it’s a lost cause.
For a certain segment of young people, bullying has been catastrophic.
What is rarely noted concerning teen bullying is the above-referenced exception and that the chief impetus of the phenomenon derives not from any grassroots demand for a remedy but from the government of President Barack Obama.
More specifically but not exclusively, the man responsible for exaggerating the problem is the former Assistant Deputy Secretary for the Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools at the U.S. Department of Education, Kevin Jennings. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=5527.)
Monday, June 13, 2011
Adoption's Moral Implications
Adoption's Moral Implications
I’m no preacherman and less than qualified to be an arbiter of what’s moral in American society. I’m even less qualified to pass judgment and condemn immorality since that would be God’s prerogative. Is Anthony Weiner’s public display of his private parts immoral? He evidently doesn’t think so. Are gays adopting children acting morally? They seem to believe they are.
Who’s to say?
When our government takes active positions endorsing issues on which millions of Americans hold strong moral convictions, it would seem that people have both the right and responsibility to say something, to speak out. Such an issue is the question of whether children should be offered in adoption to avowed homosexuals, bi-sexuals, and transsexuals.
It’s incontestable that there are millions of American kids in desparate need of being welcomed into loving homes where they can be nurtured into adulthood as upstanding citizens who will lead happy, contented lives and contribute to society. What’s very disputable is whether those homes can be found with people whose private lives give rise to doubts as to their suitability for parenting.
Yes, we’re told that love makes a family and we’re told there are instances of gay parents who furnish stellar upbringing of adopted children but we’re told a lot of things. There is minimal information on how those kids fare later in life after growing up with two mommies or two daddies and a wealth of data that show one of each is most beneficial.
Current estimates indicate that 270,000 kids are living with same-sex couples; 65,000 are legally adopted. Would they be better off in foster care? That would depend on the gay care.
Celebrity homosexuals Neil Patrick Harris, Rosie O’Donnell, and Sir Elton John are among that latter group and they and their families get a great deal of press, and publicity, but what the future holds for those families is very much a mystery.
Less mysterious is what happens when the federal government intrudes itself into strictly local, social issues like adoption. Especially when that government is headed by the most “gay-friendly” president in American history, adoption devils are rooted in the details. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=4797)
I’m no preacherman and less than qualified to be an arbiter of what’s moral in American society. I’m even less qualified to pass judgment and condemn immorality since that would be God’s prerogative. Is Anthony Weiner’s public display of his private parts immoral? He evidently doesn’t think so. Are gays adopting children acting morally? They seem to believe they are.
Who’s to say?
When our government takes active positions endorsing issues on which millions of Americans hold strong moral convictions, it would seem that people have both the right and responsibility to say something, to speak out. Such an issue is the question of whether children should be offered in adoption to avowed homosexuals, bi-sexuals, and transsexuals.
It’s incontestable that there are millions of American kids in desparate need of being welcomed into loving homes where they can be nurtured into adulthood as upstanding citizens who will lead happy, contented lives and contribute to society. What’s very disputable is whether those homes can be found with people whose private lives give rise to doubts as to their suitability for parenting.
Yes, we’re told that love makes a family and we’re told there are instances of gay parents who furnish stellar upbringing of adopted children but we’re told a lot of things. There is minimal information on how those kids fare later in life after growing up with two mommies or two daddies and a wealth of data that show one of each is most beneficial.
Current estimates indicate that 270,000 kids are living with same-sex couples; 65,000 are legally adopted. Would they be better off in foster care? That would depend on the gay care.
Celebrity homosexuals Neil Patrick Harris, Rosie O’Donnell, and Sir Elton John are among that latter group and they and their families get a great deal of press, and publicity, but what the future holds for those families is very much a mystery.
Less mysterious is what happens when the federal government intrudes itself into strictly local, social issues like adoption. Especially when that government is headed by the most “gay-friendly” president in American history, adoption devils are rooted in the details. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=4797)
Friday, May 20, 2011
Handwritings on White House Walls?
Handwritings on White House Walls?
It may have foeshadowed 2012 when Obama-idolator Peter Fonda called President Barack Hussein Obama a “f*cking traitor.” It was probably said affectionately by the environmentalist/actor to get some attention from other beautiful people at the Cannes film festival for his enviro-creds but it was still exceptional.
Poor Peter, who hasn’t had a hit movie since “Easy Rider” 42 years ago, had to say something notable to grab some attention from his big sister, Hanoi Jane Fonda, and he only considers the president a “f*cking traitor” because Obama didn’t handle the Gulf oil spill very well. (http://yhoo.it/kW7NAd)
The fact that Obama hasn’t handled very much very well didn’t bother Peter but the fact that such a nasty, verbal attack by a leftist, Hollywood elitist–which is an admitted redundancy–would have been unheard of just a year ago bodes ill for the president.
Is the handwriting on the wall?
More damaging scribbling came from Obama’s mainstream media which, as per his bidding, has been remarkably quiescent for more than 3 years now when it came to vetting his background, interviewing him with other than softball questions, or citing and publicizing his frequent gaffes and misstatements.
The MSM long ago abandoned its moral and ethical responsibilities in that regard and the White House press corps–or, “corpse,” according to the president–has been most lax, according to senior members of that corps/corpse.
Those veterans, including Sander Vanocur, Sid Davis, and Haynes Johnson, believe White House correspondents are “too timid and deferential.” What’s most amazing, in addition to their being critical, is that it took them 26 months to notice.
As Vanocur observed, ”You want to know what’s wrong with the press? The press is what’s wrong with the press.” Washington Post reporter Haynes Johnson chimed in with, ”It’s all very stale, very structured, very pale.” And Sid Davis, who has covered nine presidents, went further than criticizing by resorting to sarcasm in characterizing the press and their demeanor in the president’s presence by saying, ”It looks like they are watching a funeral service at [Washington funeral firm] Joseph Gawler’s and it shouldn’t be that way.” (http://bit.ly/kEFPrA)
No kidding, Messrs. Vanocur, Johnson, and Davis! Where have you been?
More telling than their comments, and more concerning for Obama, is not what those three said, which in itself was remarkable, but that they had the audacity to say it. Lapdogs aren’t supposed to growl and bite and neither they nor their fellow correspondents would have deigned or dared to say it in the past.
More handwriting?
What will undoubtedly be viewed as less a harbinger for Obama’s future as calculated and inconsequential backbiting by evil conservatives is opposition by conservative groups to Obama’s nomination of Berkeley Law Professor Goodwin Liu to serve on the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals despite his “well-qualified” rating from the American Bar Association.
Berkeley is well, Berkeley, and the Ninth Court is as notoriously liberal, and the ABA tends to consider any judicial candidate well-qualified as long as he or she swings politically leftward.
The Loyal Opposition was unable to block tax cheat Tmothy Geithner from taking over as Secretary of the Treasury or such administration luminaries as homosexual activist Harry Knox as a faith counsellor, radical Cass Sunstein as Regulatory Czar, America-hater John Holdren as Obama’s chief science maven, admitted child-abuser Kevin Jennings as his man to insure safe schools, and a scary host of other leftists from taking posts in the administration but considers Liu’s nomination to be even more “ridiculous.”
Obama floated a trial balloon for Jamie Gorelick as FBI Director, the same Jamie Gorelick, aka “The Mistress of Disaster.” who made certain the FBI, the CIA, and other intelligence agencies couldn’t share information before 9/11. However, if nothing else, Gorelick had some related experience. Liu, much like the president before his election, has virtually none nor does he have trial experience on which to evaluate him as qualified to pass down judgments, a requisite heretofore for ABA endorsement. (http://bit.ly/jy0IzU)
Republicans and conservatives drawing a line with Liu may not be equivalent to Peter Fonda’s “f*cking traitor” remark or to veteran White House correspondents outing the White House . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=4503)
It may have foeshadowed 2012 when Obama-idolator Peter Fonda called President Barack Hussein Obama a “f*cking traitor.” It was probably said affectionately by the environmentalist/actor to get some attention from other beautiful people at the Cannes film festival for his enviro-creds but it was still exceptional.
Poor Peter, who hasn’t had a hit movie since “Easy Rider” 42 years ago, had to say something notable to grab some attention from his big sister, Hanoi Jane Fonda, and he only considers the president a “f*cking traitor” because Obama didn’t handle the Gulf oil spill very well. (http://yhoo.it/kW7NAd)
The fact that Obama hasn’t handled very much very well didn’t bother Peter but the fact that such a nasty, verbal attack by a leftist, Hollywood elitist–which is an admitted redundancy–would have been unheard of just a year ago bodes ill for the president.
Is the handwriting on the wall?
More damaging scribbling came from Obama’s mainstream media which, as per his bidding, has been remarkably quiescent for more than 3 years now when it came to vetting his background, interviewing him with other than softball questions, or citing and publicizing his frequent gaffes and misstatements.
The MSM long ago abandoned its moral and ethical responsibilities in that regard and the White House press corps–or, “corpse,” according to the president–has been most lax, according to senior members of that corps/corpse.
Those veterans, including Sander Vanocur, Sid Davis, and Haynes Johnson, believe White House correspondents are “too timid and deferential.” What’s most amazing, in addition to their being critical, is that it took them 26 months to notice.
As Vanocur observed, ”You want to know what’s wrong with the press? The press is what’s wrong with the press.” Washington Post reporter Haynes Johnson chimed in with, ”It’s all very stale, very structured, very pale.” And Sid Davis, who has covered nine presidents, went further than criticizing by resorting to sarcasm in characterizing the press and their demeanor in the president’s presence by saying, ”It looks like they are watching a funeral service at [Washington funeral firm] Joseph Gawler’s and it shouldn’t be that way.” (http://bit.ly/kEFPrA)
No kidding, Messrs. Vanocur, Johnson, and Davis! Where have you been?
More telling than their comments, and more concerning for Obama, is not what those three said, which in itself was remarkable, but that they had the audacity to say it. Lapdogs aren’t supposed to growl and bite and neither they nor their fellow correspondents would have deigned or dared to say it in the past.
More handwriting?
What will undoubtedly be viewed as less a harbinger for Obama’s future as calculated and inconsequential backbiting by evil conservatives is opposition by conservative groups to Obama’s nomination of Berkeley Law Professor Goodwin Liu to serve on the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals despite his “well-qualified” rating from the American Bar Association.
Berkeley is well, Berkeley, and the Ninth Court is as notoriously liberal, and the ABA tends to consider any judicial candidate well-qualified as long as he or she swings politically leftward.
The Loyal Opposition was unable to block tax cheat Tmothy Geithner from taking over as Secretary of the Treasury or such administration luminaries as homosexual activist Harry Knox as a faith counsellor, radical Cass Sunstein as Regulatory Czar, America-hater John Holdren as Obama’s chief science maven, admitted child-abuser Kevin Jennings as his man to insure safe schools, and a scary host of other leftists from taking posts in the administration but considers Liu’s nomination to be even more “ridiculous.”
Obama floated a trial balloon for Jamie Gorelick as FBI Director, the same Jamie Gorelick, aka “The Mistress of Disaster.” who made certain the FBI, the CIA, and other intelligence agencies couldn’t share information before 9/11. However, if nothing else, Gorelick had some related experience. Liu, much like the president before his election, has virtually none nor does he have trial experience on which to evaluate him as qualified to pass down judgments, a requisite heretofore for ABA endorsement. (http://bit.ly/jy0IzU)
Republicans and conservatives drawing a line with Liu may not be equivalent to Peter Fonda’s “f*cking traitor” remark or to veteran White House correspondents outing the White House . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=4503)
Tuesday, May 3, 2011
Kevin Jennings and "Safe Schools"
Kevin Jennings and "Safe Schools"
How much am I offered for this fine African specimen? All negroes move to the back of the bus! If you’re gay, you’re fired!
Kevin Jennings, America’s “Safe Schools Czar,” officially President Obama’s assistant deputy secretary of the Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools, unofficially government deviant, is as out of place safeguarding schools as Sheriff Bull Connor or David Duke would have been on a Civil Rights panel or Adolph Hitler as a guess lecturer in Jewish studies.
Jennings gave a lecture in which he equated slavery and racial segregation to alleged discrimination against homosexuals. Civil Rights pioneers must wonder how many gays have been sold, lynched, and sent to the backs of buses.
Jennings doesn’t wonder at all. He’s convinced that homosexuals are the modern equivalent of slaves and their treatment the contemporary equivalent of what African-Americans endured during slavery and KKK and Jim Crow days. At least that’s what he told Maryland high school students. How any of his lies relate to the mission of his office is questionable.
Jennings has an interesting resume’.
A former Massachusetts teacher and author of One Teacher in Ten, he admitted to counseling a 16 year old boy to wear a condom when engaging in homosexual sex acts with an adult predator. He is the proud founder of the Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Education Network, GLSEN, which is little involved with heterosexuals but which ”has played an integral role in promoting homosexuality and pushing a pro-homosexual agenda in America’s schools.” He wrote a laudatory foreward for a book, Queering Elementary Education: Advancing the Dialogue About Sexualities and Schooling. He is also an unrepentant alcohol and drug abuser: http://bit.ly/8OpOI8
Jennings was an obvious pick for a gay-friendly president . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=4312)
How much am I offered for this fine African specimen? All negroes move to the back of the bus! If you’re gay, you’re fired!
Kevin Jennings, America’s “Safe Schools Czar,” officially President Obama’s assistant deputy secretary of the Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools, unofficially government deviant, is as out of place safeguarding schools as Sheriff Bull Connor or David Duke would have been on a Civil Rights panel or Adolph Hitler as a guess lecturer in Jewish studies.
Jennings gave a lecture in which he equated slavery and racial segregation to alleged discrimination against homosexuals. Civil Rights pioneers must wonder how many gays have been sold, lynched, and sent to the backs of buses.
Jennings doesn’t wonder at all. He’s convinced that homosexuals are the modern equivalent of slaves and their treatment the contemporary equivalent of what African-Americans endured during slavery and KKK and Jim Crow days. At least that’s what he told Maryland high school students. How any of his lies relate to the mission of his office is questionable.
Jennings has an interesting resume’.
A former Massachusetts teacher and author of One Teacher in Ten, he admitted to counseling a 16 year old boy to wear a condom when engaging in homosexual sex acts with an adult predator. He is the proud founder of the Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Education Network, GLSEN, which is little involved with heterosexuals but which ”has played an integral role in promoting homosexuality and pushing a pro-homosexual agenda in America’s schools.” He wrote a laudatory foreward for a book, Queering Elementary Education: Advancing the Dialogue About Sexualities and Schooling. He is also an unrepentant alcohol and drug abuser: http://bit.ly/8OpOI8
Jennings was an obvious pick for a gay-friendly president . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=4312)
Wednesday, January 26, 2011
Various Obscenities
Various Obscenities
The legal definition of obscenity relates to prurient appeal but obscenity, like beauty, has been decreed to be in the eye of the beholder. Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart once famously said of obscenity that, “I know it when I see it,” a comment which also applies to other strata of the obscene such as that which is patently offensive and repulsive.
The offensive and repulsive black racist Van Jones, anointed by President Obama to be Special Advisor for Green Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation, (Obama’s Black Green Jobs Czar), slunk into the woodwork after his Communist background and rabid racism became public. He was slated for that plum position and could have joined Obama’s resident deviant, homosexual Safe Schools Czar, Kevin Jennings.
However, fate and truth intervened and Jones was exposed for what he is when his various beliefs became known. His reference to Republicans as a**holes, calling suburban White kids mass murderers, and recording a diatribe against Jews and America with convicted cop-killer, Mumia abu-Jamal, resulted in his ignominious departure: http://tiny.cc/2fx0x
Regrettably, Jones periodically emerges into the light to blight the world around him, most recently preaching about “social justice” and asking, “Would you be willing to take your life, write it on a card, throw it in a big pot with everybody else, reach in at random and pull out another life with total confidence that it would be a good life?” He didn’t quite explain how one goes about writing one’s life on a card.
As Van Helsing clarifies Jones on Moonbattery.com: “If so, society has achieved social justice. Note that the individual has been eradicated; one life is more or less the same as another. You can get up at 5:00 AM and work your fingers to the bone or you can roll out of bed at noon and eat cookies in front of the TV: no difference in outcome.”
Van Helsing draws Jones’ conclusion for him: “Don’t bother working hard to give your kids an advantage; under social justice, all advantages are passed out by the government. If the kids are black or Muslim or grow up to have psychosexual identity problems, good for them. Otherwise they go to the back of the bus, and there is nothing you or they can do about it.”
Witness Jones’ Communist rant on the futility of effort in a capitalistic society here: http://tiny.cc/sb1mt
Jones is merely one variety of obscenity infesting the planet today. Another is Kristal Violet Norby.
Graphic details of Norby’s kinky obscenity have been mercifully withheld by Toronto police but which the 25 year old Minneapolis resident Kristal evidently felt were worth sharing on Facebook.
”Detectives in Toronto’s Child Exploitation Unit first noticed the woman on a pedophile file sharing network. She had uploaded photos of herself having sex with two small children and a dog . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=3496)
The legal definition of obscenity relates to prurient appeal but obscenity, like beauty, has been decreed to be in the eye of the beholder. Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart once famously said of obscenity that, “I know it when I see it,” a comment which also applies to other strata of the obscene such as that which is patently offensive and repulsive.
The offensive and repulsive black racist Van Jones, anointed by President Obama to be Special Advisor for Green Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation, (Obama’s Black Green Jobs Czar), slunk into the woodwork after his Communist background and rabid racism became public. He was slated for that plum position and could have joined Obama’s resident deviant, homosexual Safe Schools Czar, Kevin Jennings.
However, fate and truth intervened and Jones was exposed for what he is when his various beliefs became known. His reference to Republicans as a**holes, calling suburban White kids mass murderers, and recording a diatribe against Jews and America with convicted cop-killer, Mumia abu-Jamal, resulted in his ignominious departure: http://tiny.cc/2fx0x
Regrettably, Jones periodically emerges into the light to blight the world around him, most recently preaching about “social justice” and asking, “Would you be willing to take your life, write it on a card, throw it in a big pot with everybody else, reach in at random and pull out another life with total confidence that it would be a good life?” He didn’t quite explain how one goes about writing one’s life on a card.
As Van Helsing clarifies Jones on Moonbattery.com: “If so, society has achieved social justice. Note that the individual has been eradicated; one life is more or less the same as another. You can get up at 5:00 AM and work your fingers to the bone or you can roll out of bed at noon and eat cookies in front of the TV: no difference in outcome.”
Van Helsing draws Jones’ conclusion for him: “Don’t bother working hard to give your kids an advantage; under social justice, all advantages are passed out by the government. If the kids are black or Muslim or grow up to have psychosexual identity problems, good for them. Otherwise they go to the back of the bus, and there is nothing you or they can do about it.”
Witness Jones’ Communist rant on the futility of effort in a capitalistic society here: http://tiny.cc/sb1mt
Jones is merely one variety of obscenity infesting the planet today. Another is Kristal Violet Norby.
Graphic details of Norby’s kinky obscenity have been mercifully withheld by Toronto police but which the 25 year old Minneapolis resident Kristal evidently felt were worth sharing on Facebook.
”Detectives in Toronto’s Child Exploitation Unit first noticed the woman on a pedophile file sharing network. She had uploaded photos of herself having sex with two small children and a dog . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=3496)
Monday, October 4, 2010
The Homosexual Problem with Just Cookies
The Homosexual Problem with Just Cookies
. . . Contemporaneous with gays moving into the mainstream of general American life and society has been a decided muscle-flexing as they have pushed more and more into schools and colleges to advance their agenda of insisted acceptance. That topic has been treated at great length in this space.
Encouraged by their overall success in promoting their agenda, another “push” has been in the area of promoting themselves in the commercial sector. That may be misleading since the gay strategy is more akin to forcing themselves on various businesses, “forced homosexual affirmations,” and destroying some of those enterprises in the process.
A recent instance of forcible affirmation involved a small, family-owned business in Indianapolis. “Just Cookies” had sold, what else, just cookies, (and some cupcakes), for 20 years in its store located in the city-owned City Market Building.
Americans for Truth detailed what happened when a gay group insisted on making a purchase that did not involve just cookies: ”Just Cookies was approached by some local homosexual demands group activists and asked to make a special order of cupcakes designed with homosexual rainbows for the ‘National Coming Out Day.’ This is an event sponsored by the Human Rights Campaign in Washington, DC. It exists solely to encourage homosexual behavior among students and kids.
“The owners of Just Cookies [the Stockton family] declined this special order, which required their design talents being used to embrace this controversial and morally questionable event. The activists could have purchased cookies and other items off the shelf, [or could have shopped elsewhere] but wanted something specific for their event at a local university. The homosexual demands groups saw a ‘no thank you’ as ‘discrimination’ simply because the owners didn’t want any part of promoting homosexuality among kids.
“The issue really exploded this week when this news broke and the Mayor’s office took the side of the homosexual demands . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=2099)
. . . Contemporaneous with gays moving into the mainstream of general American life and society has been a decided muscle-flexing as they have pushed more and more into schools and colleges to advance their agenda of insisted acceptance. That topic has been treated at great length in this space.
Encouraged by their overall success in promoting their agenda, another “push” has been in the area of promoting themselves in the commercial sector. That may be misleading since the gay strategy is more akin to forcing themselves on various businesses, “forced homosexual affirmations,” and destroying some of those enterprises in the process.
A recent instance of forcible affirmation involved a small, family-owned business in Indianapolis. “Just Cookies” had sold, what else, just cookies, (and some cupcakes), for 20 years in its store located in the city-owned City Market Building.
Americans for Truth detailed what happened when a gay group insisted on making a purchase that did not involve just cookies: ”Just Cookies was approached by some local homosexual demands group activists and asked to make a special order of cupcakes designed with homosexual rainbows for the ‘National Coming Out Day.’ This is an event sponsored by the Human Rights Campaign in Washington, DC. It exists solely to encourage homosexual behavior among students and kids.
“The owners of Just Cookies [the Stockton family] declined this special order, which required their design talents being used to embrace this controversial and morally questionable event. The activists could have purchased cookies and other items off the shelf, [or could have shopped elsewhere] but wanted something specific for their event at a local university. The homosexual demands groups saw a ‘no thank you’ as ‘discrimination’ simply because the owners didn’t want any part of promoting homosexuality among kids.
“The issue really exploded this week when this news broke and the Mayor’s office took the side of the homosexual demands . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=2099)
Friday, September 17, 2010
Truthers' Case: Tommyrot or Substantive? The Final Installment
Truthers' Case: Tommyrot or Substantive? The Final Installment
Chiefly due to deference to a good buddy, I’ve tried to be objective over the whole 9/11 controversy, at least insofar as allegations that the United States government in general and the GWB administration in particular were complicit in that unspeakable disaster was concerned.
Not that I’m a government apparatchik or Bush idolator–I think our governments are out of control and that George W. Bush was the worst thing to happen to America and the Republican Party since Harding–but right is right and truth is truth.
Having spent a good deal of time–too much time–on this issue I can say unequivocably, without fear of contradiction, that I still don’t know the truth.
It would seem, however, that a major weapon in the fight to prove a government conspiracy, “Loose Change,” is a load of hogwash conceived originally as a fictional work and later converted into an alleged documentary for the sole purpose of making some big bucks for its writer and producers.
See “Was 9/11 an Inside Job?” http://bit.ly/dp2Hz
In addition, some Truthers take flights of fantasy to the level of absurdity. They would include charges that the Pentagon wasn’t struck by any aircraft and that Flight 93 never did crash in Shanksville and all of its 31 passengers were fellow conspirators whisked away by the government who consented to live somewhere in seclusion for the rest of their days.
Not bloody likely.
That said, much of the rest of the Truthers’ case is, if not gospel truth then at the minimum worthy of further investigation.
For example:
. Why were there hundreds of red-gray chips of “unignited thermite” discovered in every WTC dust sample? That’s a question raised by a highly reputable and professional group, WorldArchitecturalNews.com, http://tiny.cc/iiwzz . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1900)
Chiefly due to deference to a good buddy, I’ve tried to be objective over the whole 9/11 controversy, at least insofar as allegations that the United States government in general and the GWB administration in particular were complicit in that unspeakable disaster was concerned.
Not that I’m a government apparatchik or Bush idolator–I think our governments are out of control and that George W. Bush was the worst thing to happen to America and the Republican Party since Harding–but right is right and truth is truth.
Having spent a good deal of time–too much time–on this issue I can say unequivocably, without fear of contradiction, that I still don’t know the truth.
It would seem, however, that a major weapon in the fight to prove a government conspiracy, “Loose Change,” is a load of hogwash conceived originally as a fictional work and later converted into an alleged documentary for the sole purpose of making some big bucks for its writer and producers.
See “Was 9/11 an Inside Job?” http://bit.ly/dp2Hz
In addition, some Truthers take flights of fantasy to the level of absurdity. They would include charges that the Pentagon wasn’t struck by any aircraft and that Flight 93 never did crash in Shanksville and all of its 31 passengers were fellow conspirators whisked away by the government who consented to live somewhere in seclusion for the rest of their days.
Not bloody likely.
That said, much of the rest of the Truthers’ case is, if not gospel truth then at the minimum worthy of further investigation.
For example:
. Why were there hundreds of red-gray chips of “unignited thermite” discovered in every WTC dust sample? That’s a question raised by a highly reputable and professional group, WorldArchitecturalNews.com, http://tiny.cc/iiwzz . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1900)
Friday, July 16, 2010
School Daze V: Sex Education Run Amuck
School Daze V: Sex Ed Run Amuck
School days, school days, dear ol’ golden rule days. Reading and writing and ‘rithmetic– and anal sex, and scrota, and sexual anxiety, and erotic art, and proper methods of oral sex.
Those latter five topics were scheduled to be in the planbooks of Helena, Montana school teachers.
Ya got a problem with that? If so, then just chill.
Definitions and identification of scrota, testicles, etc. may be part of the Helena kindergarten curriculum but the anal sex section of the curriculum won’t be taught until kids are much older, as in age 10 or so and in the 5th grade. Appreciation of “erotic art” and understanding “sexual anxiety” will be reserved for more mature students, those in the 9th grade and above.
The 62 page document which took 2 years to construct also includes teaching first graders about gay love.
The first reaction to all that news may be that it’s a curriculum devised by some deviates in NAMBLA . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1788)
School days, school days, dear ol’ golden rule days. Reading and writing and ‘rithmetic– and anal sex, and scrota, and sexual anxiety, and erotic art, and proper methods of oral sex.
Those latter five topics were scheduled to be in the planbooks of Helena, Montana school teachers.
Ya got a problem with that? If so, then just chill.
Definitions and identification of scrota, testicles, etc. may be part of the Helena kindergarten curriculum but the anal sex section of the curriculum won’t be taught until kids are much older, as in age 10 or so and in the 5th grade. Appreciation of “erotic art” and understanding “sexual anxiety” will be reserved for more mature students, those in the 9th grade and above.
The 62 page document which took 2 years to construct also includes teaching first graders about gay love.
The first reaction to all that news may be that it’s a curriculum devised by some deviates in NAMBLA . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1788)
Tuesday, April 13, 2010
National Day of Silence
National Day of Silence
To those who haven’t heard of what has become an annual event, this Friday, April 16 has been designated as 2010’s National Day of Silence in the nation’s schools.
Most teachers would welcome a day of silence possibly because they could get more teaching accomplished or just to get their heads together. However, this new tradition wasn’t established for those purposes. Rather, it could be called the National Day of Homosexual Indoctrination of Children.
On Friday in many secondary and middle schools throughout the country, kids will be expected to remain silent as they are bombarded with homosexual propaganda in the form of psychological warfare committed against them by the Gay, Lesbian, Bi-sexual, Transgendered community–all with the willing cooperation of too many schools, administrators, and teachers.
As reported by MassResistance.com, “During the Day of Silence, . . . school officials encourage students to be silent for the entire day as a sign of solidarity with the homosexual activist movement. Students are . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1628)
To those who haven’t heard of what has become an annual event, this Friday, April 16 has been designated as 2010’s National Day of Silence in the nation’s schools.
Most teachers would welcome a day of silence possibly because they could get more teaching accomplished or just to get their heads together. However, this new tradition wasn’t established for those purposes. Rather, it could be called the National Day of Homosexual Indoctrination of Children.
On Friday in many secondary and middle schools throughout the country, kids will be expected to remain silent as they are bombarded with homosexual propaganda in the form of psychological warfare committed against them by the Gay, Lesbian, Bi-sexual, Transgendered community–all with the willing cooperation of too many schools, administrators, and teachers.
As reported by MassResistance.com, “During the Day of Silence, . . . school officials encourage students to be silent for the entire day as a sign of solidarity with the homosexual activist movement. Students are . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1628)
Monday, January 4, 2010
The Size of Media Matters
The Size of Media Matters, Part II
The title of this 2-part series was meant to evoke a bit of a smirk and to draw attention but it’s also very true.
Although the leftist, excuse me, the progressive organization Media Matters, individually isn’t hugely influential, in conjunction with its sister leftists, including the Center for American Progress, it matters.
With its principal supporter, George Soros, this mass of left wing media is imposing and matters.
Just as words are a medium of expression and with the continuing decline in the influence of print and broadcast media, the internet is becoming the most powerful medium in America and Soros, one of the richest and most powerful individuals in the land, is tirelessly attempting to re-shape our nation in his image.
That image isn’t very pleasant except to the ideologues on the extreme-left fringes of our society.
One group trying to fight back against the Sorosites is MassResistance.com, members of which don’t just do their fighting with a keyboard and a modem. They take to the same streets and courthouses and town halls used by “progressives” to give us changes many of us find impossible to believe in.
At the forefront of those changes is the homosexual movement and MassResistance is currently battling against one gay standard bearer, “safe schools czar,” Kevin Jennings, who Obama refuses to dump despite his less than exemplary baggage.
After MassResistance dug into Jenning’s seedy past and revealed him for what he is–a lying gay committed to “homosexualizing” America’s schools and culture–the mainstream media finally picked up the story. . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1407)
The title of this 2-part series was meant to evoke a bit of a smirk and to draw attention but it’s also very true.
Although the leftist, excuse me, the progressive organization Media Matters, individually isn’t hugely influential, in conjunction with its sister leftists, including the Center for American Progress, it matters.
With its principal supporter, George Soros, this mass of left wing media is imposing and matters.
Just as words are a medium of expression and with the continuing decline in the influence of print and broadcast media, the internet is becoming the most powerful medium in America and Soros, one of the richest and most powerful individuals in the land, is tirelessly attempting to re-shape our nation in his image.
That image isn’t very pleasant except to the ideologues on the extreme-left fringes of our society.
One group trying to fight back against the Sorosites is MassResistance.com, members of which don’t just do their fighting with a keyboard and a modem. They take to the same streets and courthouses and town halls used by “progressives” to give us changes many of us find impossible to believe in.
At the forefront of those changes is the homosexual movement and MassResistance is currently battling against one gay standard bearer, “safe schools czar,” Kevin Jennings, who Obama refuses to dump despite his less than exemplary baggage.
After MassResistance dug into Jenning’s seedy past and revealed him for what he is–a lying gay committed to “homosexualizing” America’s schools and culture–the mainstream media finally picked up the story. . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1407)
Wednesday, December 16, 2009
Online Petition to Remove Kevin Jennings, "Safe Schools Czar"
Dec. 16, 2009
MassResistance Update
Pro-family activism
“In a time of universal deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act.”
- George Orwell
Home Page
Blog
FIGHT BACK!
Please DONATE
1. Resolution introduced in Congress to remove “safe schools” czar Kevin Jennings. MassResistance work cited.2. TAKE ACTION: Sign the online petition to remove Kevin Jennings! SUPPORT Congressman Burgess’ resolution. Make a statement to the politicians in Washington!
1. Resolution introduced in Congress to remove “safe schools” czar Kevin Jennings. MassResistance work cited.
MassResistance’s research and activism exposing Obama’s “safe schools” czar Kevin Jennings and has again made it to Congress. Back on October 15, 53 Congressmen signed a letter demanding Jennings be fired. But as more horrible information has surfaced, the pressure to remove Jennings is boiling over.
Read MassResistance’s major report on Kevin Jennings here
Last Friday, Dec. 11, Congressman Michael Burgess (R-TX) introduced a resolution to Congress that Jennings be removed! The resolution cites Jennings’ involvement in the “Fistgate” conference (which we uncovered in 2000) and his admiration of NAMBLA supporter Harry Hay, which the MassResistance blog recently helped bring to light.
111th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. RES. 966Calling on the President and the Secretary of Education to fire Kevin Jennings from his post as ‘Safe Schools Czar’.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
December 11, 2009
Mr. BURGESS submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor
RESOLUTION
Calling on the President and the Secretary of Education to fire Kevin Jennings from his post as ‘Safe Schools Czar’.
Whereas, on December 11, 2009, The Washington Times reported that Kevin Jennings was involved in promoting a reading list for children 13 years old or older that made the most explicit sex between children and adults seem normal and acceptable;
Whereas recorded tapings from conferences previously sponsored by Kevin Jennings had presenters explicitly conveying to adolescents certain types of sexual behavior;
Whereas Kevin Jennings has praised Harry Hay, a vocal supporter of the North American Man Boy Love Association (NAMBLA); and
Whereas Kevin Jennings in his capacity as ‘Safe Schools Czar’ may not promote criminal behavior: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That the House of Representatives–
(1) considers the behavior of a ‘Safe Schools Czar’ promoting sexual relationships between adults and children reprehensible;
(2) supports the belief that any and all who occupy the position of ‘Safe Schools Czar’ should not promote criminal behavior; and
(3) calls on the President and the Secretary of Education to find an immediate replacement for Kevin Jennings.
Read the resolution online here
Rep Burgess’ website describing resolution
VIDEO: Rep. Burgess speaking about resolution before US House
Rep. Burgess’ resolution follows a week of media frenzy on the Kevin Jennings issue. The Washington Times, Fox News, WorldNetDaily, Breitbart, Gateway Pundit, Drudge Report, Michelle Malkin, and numerous radio programs, including a half-hour drive-time interview on WOR, the largest talk station in New York City.
Washington Times Editorial: Obama’s Risky Sex Czar
Washington Times Blog: Kevin Jennings’ longtime foe ‘Mass Resistance’
Latest: WorldNetDaily: Teachers given professional credit at Fistgate
Other recent media coverage
MassResistance began exposing Jennings in mid-1990s
Just a few examples of MassResistance’s groundbreaking work in exposing Jennings: In the mid-1990s, we uncovered his “Framing the Issues” speech admitting how he uses the phony guise of “student safety” to push the homosexual agenda into the public schools. We exposed how Mass. Gov. Paul Cellucci was funding GLSEN’s work in the late 1990s. In 2000 we exposed the infamous “Fistgate” conference where Jennings was the keynote speaker. In 2005 we exposed the “Little Black Book” given to kids at a GLSEN conference. We continued to expose GLSEN’s work in public school “gay straight alliance” clubs and “youth pride” events. Our blog exposed Jennings’ admiration of NAMBLA activist Harry Hay. We exposed Jennings’ involvement in “ACT/UP” and his funding of the blasphemous “ACT/UP” exhibit at Harvard earlier this year. And much more.
And more info to be posted!
We have much more Kevin Jennings material that we haven’t posted yet, including his personal involvement in the strategies to push homosexuality in the schools. Look for it soon.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. TAKE ACTION: Sign the online petition to remove Kevin Jennings! SUPPORT Congressman Burgess’ resolution. Make a statement to the politicians in Washington!
It’s not enough simply to be angry. Every good American must show his support for Rep. Burgess’ resolution. Numbers really count.
You can do something. You can sign the online petition to remove Kevin Jennings. And you can spread the word as far and wide as possible. (We’ve already received nearly a thousand signatures within 24 hours.)
SIGN THE PETITION HERE!
By doing this: (1) we can show our politicians the breadth of outrage. They need to see some numbers. And (2) The people who sign can be further informed about strategic times and methods to contact the politicians Washington, DC about this resolution. In other words, targeted ACTIVISM at work. We’ll make it happen!
The fact that Barack Obama continues to support Kevin Jennings is beyond outrageous. It borders on being demonic that a man like that has a prominent position in the Department of Education affecting kids across the country.
PLEASE sign the petition and spread the word!
See also: “Kevin Jennings, Government Deviant,” http://bit.ly/8OpOI8.
MassResistance Update
Pro-family activism
“In a time of universal deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act.”
- George Orwell
Home Page
Blog
FIGHT BACK!
Please DONATE
1. Resolution introduced in Congress to remove “safe schools” czar Kevin Jennings. MassResistance work cited.2. TAKE ACTION: Sign the online petition to remove Kevin Jennings! SUPPORT Congressman Burgess’ resolution. Make a statement to the politicians in Washington!
1. Resolution introduced in Congress to remove “safe schools” czar Kevin Jennings. MassResistance work cited.
MassResistance’s research and activism exposing Obama’s “safe schools” czar Kevin Jennings and has again made it to Congress. Back on October 15, 53 Congressmen signed a letter demanding Jennings be fired. But as more horrible information has surfaced, the pressure to remove Jennings is boiling over.
Read MassResistance’s major report on Kevin Jennings here
Last Friday, Dec. 11, Congressman Michael Burgess (R-TX) introduced a resolution to Congress that Jennings be removed! The resolution cites Jennings’ involvement in the “Fistgate” conference (which we uncovered in 2000) and his admiration of NAMBLA supporter Harry Hay, which the MassResistance blog recently helped bring to light.
111th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. RES. 966Calling on the President and the Secretary of Education to fire Kevin Jennings from his post as ‘Safe Schools Czar’.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
December 11, 2009
Mr. BURGESS submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor
RESOLUTION
Calling on the President and the Secretary of Education to fire Kevin Jennings from his post as ‘Safe Schools Czar’.
Whereas, on December 11, 2009, The Washington Times reported that Kevin Jennings was involved in promoting a reading list for children 13 years old or older that made the most explicit sex between children and adults seem normal and acceptable;
Whereas recorded tapings from conferences previously sponsored by Kevin Jennings had presenters explicitly conveying to adolescents certain types of sexual behavior;
Whereas Kevin Jennings has praised Harry Hay, a vocal supporter of the North American Man Boy Love Association (NAMBLA); and
Whereas Kevin Jennings in his capacity as ‘Safe Schools Czar’ may not promote criminal behavior: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That the House of Representatives–
(1) considers the behavior of a ‘Safe Schools Czar’ promoting sexual relationships between adults and children reprehensible;
(2) supports the belief that any and all who occupy the position of ‘Safe Schools Czar’ should not promote criminal behavior; and
(3) calls on the President and the Secretary of Education to find an immediate replacement for Kevin Jennings.
Read the resolution online here
Rep Burgess’ website describing resolution
VIDEO: Rep. Burgess speaking about resolution before US House
Rep. Burgess’ resolution follows a week of media frenzy on the Kevin Jennings issue. The Washington Times, Fox News, WorldNetDaily, Breitbart, Gateway Pundit, Drudge Report, Michelle Malkin, and numerous radio programs, including a half-hour drive-time interview on WOR, the largest talk station in New York City.
Washington Times Editorial: Obama’s Risky Sex Czar
Washington Times Blog: Kevin Jennings’ longtime foe ‘Mass Resistance’
Latest: WorldNetDaily: Teachers given professional credit at Fistgate
Other recent media coverage
MassResistance began exposing Jennings in mid-1990s
Just a few examples of MassResistance’s groundbreaking work in exposing Jennings: In the mid-1990s, we uncovered his “Framing the Issues” speech admitting how he uses the phony guise of “student safety” to push the homosexual agenda into the public schools. We exposed how Mass. Gov. Paul Cellucci was funding GLSEN’s work in the late 1990s. In 2000 we exposed the infamous “Fistgate” conference where Jennings was the keynote speaker. In 2005 we exposed the “Little Black Book” given to kids at a GLSEN conference. We continued to expose GLSEN’s work in public school “gay straight alliance” clubs and “youth pride” events. Our blog exposed Jennings’ admiration of NAMBLA activist Harry Hay. We exposed Jennings’ involvement in “ACT/UP” and his funding of the blasphemous “ACT/UP” exhibit at Harvard earlier this year. And much more.
And more info to be posted!
We have much more Kevin Jennings material that we haven’t posted yet, including his personal involvement in the strategies to push homosexuality in the schools. Look for it soon.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. TAKE ACTION: Sign the online petition to remove Kevin Jennings! SUPPORT Congressman Burgess’ resolution. Make a statement to the politicians in Washington!
It’s not enough simply to be angry. Every good American must show his support for Rep. Burgess’ resolution. Numbers really count.
You can do something. You can sign the online petition to remove Kevin Jennings. And you can spread the word as far and wide as possible. (We’ve already received nearly a thousand signatures within 24 hours.)
SIGN THE PETITION HERE!
By doing this: (1) we can show our politicians the breadth of outrage. They need to see some numbers. And (2) The people who sign can be further informed about strategic times and methods to contact the politicians Washington, DC about this resolution. In other words, targeted ACTIVISM at work. We’ll make it happen!
The fact that Barack Obama continues to support Kevin Jennings is beyond outrageous. It borders on being demonic that a man like that has a prominent position in the Department of Education affecting kids across the country.
PLEASE sign the petition and spread the word!
See also: “Kevin Jennings, Government Deviant,” http://bit.ly/8OpOI8.
Friday, December 11, 2009
Kevin Jennings, Government Deviant
Kevin Jennings, Government Deviant
We live in an increasingly diverse nation and in an even more diverse world but, for even the most tolerant, diversity has its limits.
Most of us can deal with people whose thinking and lifestyles are different from our own but when that thinking and those lifestyles are so far off the norm charts, it’s time to sit up and take notice.
President Obama’s choice for “Safe Schools Czar,” Kevin Jennings, is so far off those charts it’s a wonder he’s capable of subsisting on our planet, no mind serving the country as the individual whose assigned mission is the safety and well-being of America’s schoolchildren.
I have already paid more attention here to Assistant Deputy Secretary for Safe and Drug-Free Schools Jennings than he deserves and would refer the reader to previous posts on this radically dangerous homosexual.
He may be getting paid by the government to make and keep our schools safe and secure but, his assigned duties aside, Jennings personal mission involves anything but the safety and security of America’s kids.
That’s the bad news.
Very fortunately and thanks to the conservative, pro-American activism of MassResistance.com, the good news is that the country is becoming aware of just how much a threat Jennings poses.
Even better news is that before he does any more damage Jennings may soon go the route of another Obama czar, “Green Czar,” Van Jones who was forced to resign when his wildly black racist past was exposed: http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1205
Though Jones finally cashed in his chips after a nationwide uproar against his racist views–people got more than a tad upset when he referred to Republicans as a**holes–but he still gets a paycheck from Uncle Sam, compliments of Uncle Barack.
Another groundswell has been slowly building against Jennings and his tenure only depends on how adamantly obstinate Obama is in keeping his incredibly awful picks on the taxpayer payroll.
Never shy about pouncing on Fox News . . .
(Read the rest at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1370)
We live in an increasingly diverse nation and in an even more diverse world but, for even the most tolerant, diversity has its limits.
Most of us can deal with people whose thinking and lifestyles are different from our own but when that thinking and those lifestyles are so far off the norm charts, it’s time to sit up and take notice.
President Obama’s choice for “Safe Schools Czar,” Kevin Jennings, is so far off those charts it’s a wonder he’s capable of subsisting on our planet, no mind serving the country as the individual whose assigned mission is the safety and well-being of America’s schoolchildren.
I have already paid more attention here to Assistant Deputy Secretary for Safe and Drug-Free Schools Jennings than he deserves and would refer the reader to previous posts on this radically dangerous homosexual.
He may be getting paid by the government to make and keep our schools safe and secure but, his assigned duties aside, Jennings personal mission involves anything but the safety and security of America’s kids.
That’s the bad news.
Very fortunately and thanks to the conservative, pro-American activism of MassResistance.com, the good news is that the country is becoming aware of just how much a threat Jennings poses.
Even better news is that before he does any more damage Jennings may soon go the route of another Obama czar, “Green Czar,” Van Jones who was forced to resign when his wildly black racist past was exposed: http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1205
Though Jones finally cashed in his chips after a nationwide uproar against his racist views–people got more than a tad upset when he referred to Republicans as a**holes–but he still gets a paycheck from Uncle Sam, compliments of Uncle Barack.
Another groundswell has been slowly building against Jennings and his tenure only depends on how adamantly obstinate Obama is in keeping his incredibly awful picks on the taxpayer payroll.
Never shy about pouncing on Fox News . . .
(Read the rest at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1370)
Sunday, November 1, 2009
"Queering American Education"
“Queering American Education,” and Other Edifying Thoughts
“Nowhere is this failure [of education] more evident than when it comes to antigay prejudice, and nowhere is that particular failure more manifest than it is in our elementary schools.”
“Acknowledging children as sexual beings or allowing males (particularly homosexuals) to teach in elementary grades dislodges the classroom from the ‘safe haven’ of heteronormativity.”
“Boys don’t have to stand to urinate (nor do girls have to sit–they could squat), that’s just how they got conditioned.”
“Assumptions about children’s ‘innocence’ regarding sexuality are outdated.”
All of the above quotations are taken from Queering Elementary Education: Advancing the Dialogue about Sexualities and Schooling, a 1999 book for which Obama’s “safe schools czar,” Kevin Jennings, assistant deputy secretary for education who heads the Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools, wrote a foreword.
Jennings “called for elementary school children to explore their sexual identities, for teachers to incorporate homosexual themes in grades K-5, for discarding a ‘hetero-normative’ approach to education and for ‘acknowledging children as sexual beings:’ ” http://bit.ly/3b3GGU.
Jennings is the founder and president of the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network.
The lead quotation above is also taken from his foreword, the other three from contributors to Queering . . .
If I may be so presumptuous as to summarize the contents of a book I’ve never read, it’s a work intended to subvert the innocence of children in the interests of furthering the agenda of the homosexual lobby.
I base that presumption on a passing acquaintance with Jennings in the sense of knowing his history. See previous articles about this gem of an Obamaczar, http://bit.ly/3kkzGt and http://bit.ly/Loo9u.
Not on his resume’ is his advising a 15 year old boy to wear a condom during his assignations with an adult, male pervert while Jennings was a teacher in Barney Frank’s Massachusetts. . .
(Read the rest at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1301)
“Nowhere is this failure [of education] more evident than when it comes to antigay prejudice, and nowhere is that particular failure more manifest than it is in our elementary schools.”
“Acknowledging children as sexual beings or allowing males (particularly homosexuals) to teach in elementary grades dislodges the classroom from the ‘safe haven’ of heteronormativity.”
“Boys don’t have to stand to urinate (nor do girls have to sit–they could squat), that’s just how they got conditioned.”
“Assumptions about children’s ‘innocence’ regarding sexuality are outdated.”
All of the above quotations are taken from Queering Elementary Education: Advancing the Dialogue about Sexualities and Schooling, a 1999 book for which Obama’s “safe schools czar,” Kevin Jennings, assistant deputy secretary for education who heads the Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools, wrote a foreword.
Jennings “called for elementary school children to explore their sexual identities, for teachers to incorporate homosexual themes in grades K-5, for discarding a ‘hetero-normative’ approach to education and for ‘acknowledging children as sexual beings:’ ” http://bit.ly/3b3GGU.
Jennings is the founder and president of the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network.
The lead quotation above is also taken from his foreword, the other three from contributors to Queering . . .
If I may be so presumptuous as to summarize the contents of a book I’ve never read, it’s a work intended to subvert the innocence of children in the interests of furthering the agenda of the homosexual lobby.
I base that presumption on a passing acquaintance with Jennings in the sense of knowing his history. See previous articles about this gem of an Obamaczar, http://bit.ly/3kkzGt and http://bit.ly/Loo9u.
Not on his resume’ is his advising a 15 year old boy to wear a condom during his assignations with an adult, male pervert while Jennings was a teacher in Barney Frank’s Massachusetts. . .
(Read the rest at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1301)
Thursday, October 22, 2009
National Paranoia II
National Paranoia–Part 2
Ok, go ahead and scoff at paranoia and the truism that paranoiacs sometimes really do have someone after them who may want to do them serious bodily and/or psychological harm.
In the case of national paranoia, perhaps you have been misinterpreting the words and actions of people plotting to alter your life as you’ve known it and our nation’s principles as we’ve long understood and revered them.
Oops, that sounds paranoid.
As strongly suggested in “National Paranoia, Part One,” http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1273, ominous, dark storm clouds of a change few anticipated on November 4th, 2008 have been gathering and theatening both America’s and our individual status quos.
With abject apologies to Robert Browning, How do I count those changes? Let me count the ways.
We could start the count of the undermining of American’s life and values on President Obama’s Inauguration Day, January 20th, 2008, when he promised the universe as the minorities who elected him all but became orgasmic and trashed his predecessor.
However, fast forward to four days ago when the White House Communications Directress, Anita Dunn, recent FoxNews dunner and Mao Tse Dung aficionado, who let slip the quip in a Dominican Republic speech that, “Very rarely did we [Obamians] communicate through the press anything that we didn’t absolutely control.”
Dunn added, “We just put that out there and made them write what [David] Plouffe [Obama’s campaign manager] had said as opposed to Plouffe doing an interview with a reporter. So it was very much we controlled it as opposed to the press controlled it [sic]:” http://bit.ly/4F8XTi.
Media control is the essence of any modern dictatorship.
Throw in the end run being plotted to re-establish the so-called Fairness Doctrine to eliminate conservative talk radio and recent attacks on Fox News aimed at marginalizing/blackballing that network and Obama will have a virtual monopoly over the airwaves.
Still not convinced that this adminstration . . .
(Read the rest at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1276)
Ok, go ahead and scoff at paranoia and the truism that paranoiacs sometimes really do have someone after them who may want to do them serious bodily and/or psychological harm.
In the case of national paranoia, perhaps you have been misinterpreting the words and actions of people plotting to alter your life as you’ve known it and our nation’s principles as we’ve long understood and revered them.
Oops, that sounds paranoid.
As strongly suggested in “National Paranoia, Part One,” http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1273, ominous, dark storm clouds of a change few anticipated on November 4th, 2008 have been gathering and theatening both America’s and our individual status quos.
With abject apologies to Robert Browning, How do I count those changes? Let me count the ways.
We could start the count of the undermining of American’s life and values on President Obama’s Inauguration Day, January 20th, 2008, when he promised the universe as the minorities who elected him all but became orgasmic and trashed his predecessor.
However, fast forward to four days ago when the White House Communications Directress, Anita Dunn, recent FoxNews dunner and Mao Tse Dung aficionado, who let slip the quip in a Dominican Republic speech that, “Very rarely did we [Obamians] communicate through the press anything that we didn’t absolutely control.”
Dunn added, “We just put that out there and made them write what [David] Plouffe [Obama’s campaign manager] had said as opposed to Plouffe doing an interview with a reporter. So it was very much we controlled it as opposed to the press controlled it [sic]:” http://bit.ly/4F8XTi.
Media control is the essence of any modern dictatorship.
Throw in the end run being plotted to re-establish the so-called Fairness Doctrine to eliminate conservative talk radio and recent attacks on Fox News aimed at marginalizing/blackballing that network and Obama will have a virtual monopoly over the airwaves.
Still not convinced that this adminstration . . .
(Read the rest at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1276)
Friday, September 25, 2009
Kevin Jennings: Safe Schools???
What if, say, Karl Rove a year ago got up at a gay pride event and said something akin to, “Queers should all just drop dead,” and added just for effect, “F**k them all!”
Aside from the fact many homosexuals would be positively thrilled at the latter prospect, few would be enamored of the former. Then again, some of them may wish for the former as well, those with a death wish as a consequence of their regretted lifestyle.
In any event, neither Rove nor anyone else associated with GWB would have spoken such words. If Rove or any other Bush-ite had dared even think such dastardly thoughts, they would have been found out and crucified upon the media cross of political correctness.
In the case of Kevin Jennings, Obama’s appointed “Safe Schools Czar,” officially, Assistant Deputy Secretary at the Department of Education for the Office of Safe and Drug Free Schools (OSDFS), he’s a whole other thing.
He can do and be and say anything he damned well pleases with not a peep out of the gay-friendly mainstream media crowd.
He may also have a death wish or, worse, a wish for millions of American kids to join him in his quest for damnation in his death spiral.
Unofficially, Jennings is another Obamian avowed homosexual appointee committed to advocating the spread of gay thinking and gay life in the nation’s schools, as sick and perverted as that thinking and life are.
He gets a free ride.
What Jennings’, a former teacher, concept of a safe school or even of the nature of civil discourse is eludes me given his background of articulated bile and outright, spoken hatred of all things decent.
Did I mention he’s homosexual?
One has to wonder just whom is being made safe by this safe schools czar. It may be the gay kids he sees as born in his own image but he sure isn’t planning to protect the mass of heterosexual kids under his domain.
Jennings is on record as having said what Karl Rove dared not say, in a church, no less, and to laughter, no less: ”We have to quit being afraid of the religious right. We also have to quit–I’m trying to find a way to say this. I’m trying not to say, ‘[F—] ‘em!’ which is what I want to say, because I don’t care what they think! [audience laughter] Drop dead!” (http://bit.ly/OZZUO)
(Incidentally, he didn’t use brackets in his 2002 speech.)
He has “advocated promoting homosexuality in schools, written about his past drug abuse, expressed his contempt for religion and detailed an incident in which he did not report an underage student who told him he was having sex with older men:” http://bit.ly/1aghzO
So?
Jennings in his role as a Massachusetts teacher and model to his students would think nothing of older pervs buggering young boys, so why report it, and why put it on his resume’?
Let’s review parts of the rest of that resume’ which so impressed Obama that he would appoint Jennings to be, in effect, the safety director of the nation’s public schools.
Part of the job description is battling the drug infestation in schools but his only qualification in that regard is being a former druggie so one would think he must possess other “assets.”
(Read the rest at http://genelalor.com)
Aside from the fact many homosexuals would be positively thrilled at the latter prospect, few would be enamored of the former. Then again, some of them may wish for the former as well, those with a death wish as a consequence of their regretted lifestyle.
In any event, neither Rove nor anyone else associated with GWB would have spoken such words. If Rove or any other Bush-ite had dared even think such dastardly thoughts, they would have been found out and crucified upon the media cross of political correctness.
In the case of Kevin Jennings, Obama’s appointed “Safe Schools Czar,” officially, Assistant Deputy Secretary at the Department of Education for the Office of Safe and Drug Free Schools (OSDFS), he’s a whole other thing.
He can do and be and say anything he damned well pleases with not a peep out of the gay-friendly mainstream media crowd.
He may also have a death wish or, worse, a wish for millions of American kids to join him in his quest for damnation in his death spiral.
Unofficially, Jennings is another Obamian avowed homosexual appointee committed to advocating the spread of gay thinking and gay life in the nation’s schools, as sick and perverted as that thinking and life are.
He gets a free ride.
What Jennings’, a former teacher, concept of a safe school or even of the nature of civil discourse is eludes me given his background of articulated bile and outright, spoken hatred of all things decent.
Did I mention he’s homosexual?
One has to wonder just whom is being made safe by this safe schools czar. It may be the gay kids he sees as born in his own image but he sure isn’t planning to protect the mass of heterosexual kids under his domain.
Jennings is on record as having said what Karl Rove dared not say, in a church, no less, and to laughter, no less: ”We have to quit being afraid of the religious right. We also have to quit–I’m trying to find a way to say this. I’m trying not to say, ‘[F—] ‘em!’ which is what I want to say, because I don’t care what they think! [audience laughter] Drop dead!” (http://bit.ly/OZZUO)
(Incidentally, he didn’t use brackets in his 2002 speech.)
He has “advocated promoting homosexuality in schools, written about his past drug abuse, expressed his contempt for religion and detailed an incident in which he did not report an underage student who told him he was having sex with older men:” http://bit.ly/1aghzO
So?
Jennings in his role as a Massachusetts teacher and model to his students would think nothing of older pervs buggering young boys, so why report it, and why put it on his resume’?
Let’s review parts of the rest of that resume’ which so impressed Obama that he would appoint Jennings to be, in effect, the safety director of the nation’s public schools.
Part of the job description is battling the drug infestation in schools but his only qualification in that regard is being a former druggie so one would think he must possess other “assets.”
(Read the rest at http://genelalor.com)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)