Sarah Palin in the Crosshairs

Sarah Palin in the Crosshairs

Ok, we’ve known since she was nominated as McCain’s pick for VP that the Left was salivating to get at Sarah Palin, in more ways than one.

They had a presumed Republican novice in their sights and they collectively zoned in on the governor of Alaska.

Even they felt uncomfortable trashing an American hero, John McCain, aside from saying he was an old fart who didn’t know the internet from a hairnet, much like Joe Biden who thought websites have phone numbers.

However, Palin was more than fair game and they proceeded with vicious ad hominem, family, and political attacks since, closet-sexists as Lefties are, they felt they could freely pummel her and she would roll over and play dead or roll over and let them have their figurative will with her.

They failed in both ambitions.

Sarah Palin proved to be the best choice McCain could have made, drawing far bigger and far more enthusiastic crowds of true Republicans, true conservatives than the wishy-washy war hero.

The so-called “women’s movement” became more a bowel movement when it came to supporting a conservative woman candidate.

Give us your tired, your poor, your huddled masses but don’t even think of giving us a woman who revels in her husband and her womanhood, despises abortion, and who professes conservative values.

Sarah Palin scared the Democratic Left to its rotten core in 2008. In 2009, with the publication of Going Rogue: An American Life, she has petrified them.

With the able assistance of fellow McCain RINOS who are still seeking a scapegoat for their ignominious loss and disastrous screw-ups, the campaign to destroy Sarah Palin, begun 15 months ago, has intensified.

McCain strategist Steve Schmidt joined the Left in lambasting Going Rogue.

With a history of masterfully strategizing defeat on state and national levels, (cf. Tim Leslie, Matt Fong, and Lamar Alexander), Schmidt should have slunk off to the Home for Loser Strategists last November 5th.

Instead, he chose to lie in wait and to snipe at Palin in an attempt to save his sorry rep.

“Total fiction” and disappointing, bleated Schmidt about Going Rogue. This from the same man who undermined Palin’s candidacy from the start by alleging she suffered from post-partum depression.

He went on to almost single-handedly guide the McCain-Palin ticket into a humiliating electoral nosedive last year. Sore loser extraordinaire Schmidt is now whining because Palin had the fortitude to out him and his failures.

Is it any wonder he would be p*ssed?

Schmidt’s getting his nose out of joint over Going Rogue is paled by the Left’s anticipated antipathy toward Palin and her book. It is as if it were a revised edition of Mein Kampf.

Epitomized by the rush to publication of Going Rouge: An American Nightmare, the lividity of the Left over Palin is as transparent as their hero, Obama, is opaque.

Palin may not snag . . .

(Read the rest at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1340)

An Overview of an Overview on Palin's Book: Part II

An Overview of an Overview of Palin’s Book–Part II

You can always tell a Leftist. You can’t tell them much but you can always tell them.

Ok, that’s an old line but a line as true with regard to the Left as the day it was first uttered.

Sarah Palin’s book, Going Rogue: An American Life, due for public release on November 17th was probably targeted by the Forces of Darkness, the Left/liberals/mainstream media/Democratic Party, as soon as HarperCollins announced its publication.

Ever on the alert to discover conservative flaws and errors, the Associated Press assigned no less than eleven attack dogs to fact check the book and came up with little ammunition–6 alleged inaccuracies in the memoir’s 413 pages. Fact-checking the AP fact checkers, the revelations are exposed as mostly reporter opinions and misrepresentations.

For the outing of the outers, see http://bit.ly/21NPol.

As Moonbattery.com illustrates, Sarah Palin is right on target:

Part One of Jeffrey A. Trachtenberg’s overview of the book’s six chapters was previously overviewed here. (http://bit.ly/wdUqw) What follows are other tidbits gleaned from Trachtenberg’s commentary:

The Saturday Night Live Appearance: Palin bodaciously admits that as a teen, she snuck around under her parents’ radar to catch ”SNL” and jumped at the opportunity to appear on the show where Tina Fey had been surreally impersonating her. She was to experience “a nice mom moment” with Fey and Fey’s daughter. To her credit, she snubbed another guest on the show that night, director and re-interpreter of history, Oliver Stone, because of his hero-worship for Hugo Chavez. Why she didn’t also snub another guest, Alec Baldwin, is a mystery but I guess she figured she had to talk to someone on the SNL set.

Palin’s Wardrobe: . . .

(Read the rest at http://genelalor.com)