Obama's Class Warfare--Mission Accomplished?
Anyone who has closely or even cursorily followed the actions, declarations, and proposals of candidate Barack Hussein Obama and the enacted socio-economic policies of the Obama presidency has to be aware that he represents the greatest threat to domestic and international tranquility in the history of the United States.
Obama’s slip-of-the-lip to Joe the Plumber in 2008 that his intent was to “share the wealth” should have alerted Americans to his radical Marxist inclinations, but it didn’t.
His repeated statements pitting rich against the poor, the haves against those who haven’t, should have informed the electorate that he was launching class warfare, but they didn’t.
His Justice Department’s black racist decisions and his demeaning of white Americans should have shown he was fostering racial antagonisms and pitting race against race, but they didn’t.
His foisting of Obamacare on the American people, a socialistic scheme designed to kill off the sick and elderly patterned on Britain’s failed NHS, should have proven he was far more committed to his legacy than to the well-being of Americans, but it didn’t.
His enthusiastic support for the revolutionist Occupy movement intent on subverting the capitalist system that has made America great should have been a giveaway that Obama wasn’t a real American, but it didn’t.
None of that evidence was sufficient to convince Obama idolators who still mindlessly subscribed to their illusion of Barack was their dream rather than what he is, a nightmare and a fraud.
The president’s designated apologist, Press Secretary Jay Carney, was hit with an easy question at his Monday press briefing, a simple query as to whether a picture of Saul Alinsky hangs in the White House. The reporter was motivated to ask since Newt Gingrich has reasonably claimed Obama’s vision comes from the man who coined the term, “community organizer,” Saul David Alinsky.
Amid titters, Carney scoffed, waffled, defended his boss’s background as a Chicago “community organizer,” and replied without answering the qustion, ”I’ll just leave it at that.”
See Carney dance around Saul Alinsky here http://bit.ly/y0KKJn.
I doubt there’s a framed portrait of Alinsky in the executive mansion. There would be no need since Alinsky extremist socialism is firmly embedded in this president’s psyche and philosophy so who needs a picture?
Alinsky never became a registered Communist. He was so full of chutzpa that he refused to be bound by Communism’s “doctrinaire, humorless and intellectually constipated” rigidity. Instead, he blazed his own trail of doctrinaire, humorless, intellectually constipated independence that served to supplement Communism’s and which, if anything, was more radical.
He virtually invented the job of community organizer, a euphemism for a rabble-rouser engaged in stirring social discontent and societal revolution and developed that profession on the streets of Chicago, the same streets on which his disciple Obama later practiced Alinskyite tactics.
As Linn and Ari Armstrong noted, “Beneath his [Alinsky's] platitudes about democracy and the ‘importance and worth in the individual,’ Alinsky reveals his core goal: to ‘use power for a more equitable distribution of the means of life for all people.’ “
Sound familiar? It should because Obama said much the same thing when he told Joe the Plumber that his aim was to “spread the wealth around” through political force.
In another relevant observation, . . . (Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=12244.)
Showing posts with label saul alinsky. Show all posts
Showing posts with label saul alinsky. Show all posts
Tuesday, January 24, 2012
Monday, February 28, 2011
Serious Conundra on Nukes and Murder
Serious Conundra on Nukes and Murder
You just never know about nukes and murder and the issues they are capable of causing.
National Geographic reported recently on a real conundrum for Al Gore and his global warming set: Global warming could be easily alleviated with just a little nuclear war. The planet wouldn’t even have to endure a nuclear winter resulting in massive starvation and disease, just a relatively non-catastrophic explosion of, say, 15 million tons of tnt-equivalent bombs.
There would, though, be significant negatives associated with those mini-nukes namely that, “Even a regional nuclear war could spark ‘unprecedented’ global cooling and reduce rainfall for years, according to U.S. government computer models. Widespread famine and disease would likely follow, experts speculate:” http://tiny.cc/pswsr
The title of the National Geographic piece, “Small Nuclear War Could Reverse Global Warming for Years,” almost suggests Al and his cohorts would relish that scenario, since reversal of global warming is their goal, no? However, such an eventuality would also put them out of business, thereby creating that conundrum. The Warmists would have to weigh the global benefits of nuclear detonations against the detriments to their wallets.
Then, again, they’re a flexible bunch. They can even twist cold winters into proofs of a warming planet, They would probably establish a start-up dedicated to reaping profits from the nuclear devastation.
What WILL Al and his jolly warmists do?
And what will the country do if President Barack Hussein Obama were ever shot?
That bodacious query . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=3760)
You just never know about nukes and murder and the issues they are capable of causing.
National Geographic reported recently on a real conundrum for Al Gore and his global warming set: Global warming could be easily alleviated with just a little nuclear war. The planet wouldn’t even have to endure a nuclear winter resulting in massive starvation and disease, just a relatively non-catastrophic explosion of, say, 15 million tons of tnt-equivalent bombs.
There would, though, be significant negatives associated with those mini-nukes namely that, “Even a regional nuclear war could spark ‘unprecedented’ global cooling and reduce rainfall for years, according to U.S. government computer models. Widespread famine and disease would likely follow, experts speculate:” http://tiny.cc/pswsr
The title of the National Geographic piece, “Small Nuclear War Could Reverse Global Warming for Years,” almost suggests Al and his cohorts would relish that scenario, since reversal of global warming is their goal, no? However, such an eventuality would also put them out of business, thereby creating that conundrum. The Warmists would have to weigh the global benefits of nuclear detonations against the detriments to their wallets.
Then, again, they’re a flexible bunch. They can even twist cold winters into proofs of a warming planet, They would probably establish a start-up dedicated to reaping profits from the nuclear devastation.
What WILL Al and his jolly warmists do?
And what will the country do if President Barack Hussein Obama were ever shot?
That bodacious query . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=3760)
Friday, February 25, 2011
America Blowing in the Impeachment Wind
America Blowing in the Impeachment Wind
The lyrics of Bob Dylan’s 1963 ambiguous anti-war song of protest, “Blowin’ in the Wind,” conclude with the lines, “The answer, my friend, is blowin’ in the wind/The answer is blowin’ in the wind.” Regrettably, although Dylan posed some questions, he never provided any answers to the satisfaction of my obtuse mind.
It’s all the more regrettable since, if Dylan’s mind hadn’t been boiled in drugs, he would still be rambling on today and could tell us the answer when there are more winds blowing than ever before in American history.
Those winds are blowing everywhere in 2011, winds of war in the Mideast, winds of upheaval in America’s schools and streets, winds of despair and confusion in America’s economy and stock market, winds of change in Washington that only President Obama’s most ardent acolytes could ever have foreseen.
One can’t help but think that today’s winds, if not all orchestrated and manipulated from Washington, are being cultivated and fanned by the Obama administration to accomplish its near and short term goals of Obama’s re-election followed by Obama’s ultimate change, the transformation of America into the dream of his father and of his mentor, Saul Alinsky.
The precise nature of that dream has yet to be revealed although we know it involves a socialistic “workers’ paradise” predicated on a nightmarish existence in which a tyrannical Big Barack and his minions call all the shots. A rudimentary rule for any tyrant is to dictate designated exceptions in laws or to order by executive fiat an existing law null and void.
The administration’s latest effort in that regard was to undermine the rule of law in the country by “deciding” not to defend an established statute, the Defense of Marriage Act, DOMA.
That action, or inaction, was not only an abrogation of Constitutional mandates but also a reinforcement of a precedent previously set when Obama’s Attorney General Eric Holder “decided” that civil rights laws and penalties only attach to white people and not to black revolutionaries in the New Black Panther Party.
When the Obama administration announced on Wednesday that it had withdrawn its legal support for DOMA and stated that the law is unconstitutional and therefore the Justice Department is under no obligation to defend it, Obama and Holder effectively threw out a law on the books for 15 years. Hypocritically contending he was still “grappling” with the concept of gay marriage instead of forthrightly admitting he was actually catering to the demands of his gay constituency, the Grappler in Chief thus assumed the role of a one-man Supreme Court.
Chief DoJ lackey, AG Holder, explained the president’s position . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=3726)
The lyrics of Bob Dylan’s 1963 ambiguous anti-war song of protest, “Blowin’ in the Wind,” conclude with the lines, “The answer, my friend, is blowin’ in the wind/The answer is blowin’ in the wind.” Regrettably, although Dylan posed some questions, he never provided any answers to the satisfaction of my obtuse mind.
It’s all the more regrettable since, if Dylan’s mind hadn’t been boiled in drugs, he would still be rambling on today and could tell us the answer when there are more winds blowing than ever before in American history.
Those winds are blowing everywhere in 2011, winds of war in the Mideast, winds of upheaval in America’s schools and streets, winds of despair and confusion in America’s economy and stock market, winds of change in Washington that only President Obama’s most ardent acolytes could ever have foreseen.
One can’t help but think that today’s winds, if not all orchestrated and manipulated from Washington, are being cultivated and fanned by the Obama administration to accomplish its near and short term goals of Obama’s re-election followed by Obama’s ultimate change, the transformation of America into the dream of his father and of his mentor, Saul Alinsky.
The precise nature of that dream has yet to be revealed although we know it involves a socialistic “workers’ paradise” predicated on a nightmarish existence in which a tyrannical Big Barack and his minions call all the shots. A rudimentary rule for any tyrant is to dictate designated exceptions in laws or to order by executive fiat an existing law null and void.
The administration’s latest effort in that regard was to undermine the rule of law in the country by “deciding” not to defend an established statute, the Defense of Marriage Act, DOMA.
That action, or inaction, was not only an abrogation of Constitutional mandates but also a reinforcement of a precedent previously set when Obama’s Attorney General Eric Holder “decided” that civil rights laws and penalties only attach to white people and not to black revolutionaries in the New Black Panther Party.
When the Obama administration announced on Wednesday that it had withdrawn its legal support for DOMA and stated that the law is unconstitutional and therefore the Justice Department is under no obligation to defend it, Obama and Holder effectively threw out a law on the books for 15 years. Hypocritically contending he was still “grappling” with the concept of gay marriage instead of forthrightly admitting he was actually catering to the demands of his gay constituency, the Grappler in Chief thus assumed the role of a one-man Supreme Court.
Chief DoJ lackey, AG Holder, explained the president’s position . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=3726)
Sunday, September 26, 2010
The Attempted Deconstruction of Christine O'Donnell
The Attempted Deconstruction of Christine O'Donnell
Imitation may be the sincerest form of flattery, and vile slander and vicious bile may be the surest evidence of fear, at least on the part of leftists.
We saw that trick played out with Sarah Palin in 2008, a tactical pattern which continues to this day demonstrating continued terror of her presidential candidacy in 2012. We’re witnessing comparable leftist slander and bile now with respect to the Republican candidate for the U.S. Senate from the state of Delaware, Christine O’Donnell and, indeed, of the whole Tea Party Movement.
That tactic of marginalization, defamation, and demonization of opponents is excerpted from the Saul Alinsky playbook. It’s not mere coincidence that our president was an ardent admirer of Alinsky during his days as director of the Developing Communities Project in Chicago and earlier when he wrote an article which became chapter four in After Alinsky: Community Organizing in Illinois.
Like stealth assassins, the Alinsky-ites move from candidate to candidate, from intended victim to intended victim, and it’s not surprising that, with the aid and comfort of the mainstream media, the left has now drawn a bead on Christine O’Donnell in what can only be called a literal witch hunt.
“At the prompting of New Age guru Jean Houston, [she] engaged in fantasy chats with [Eleanor] Roosevelt and Mahatma Gandhi, two of [her] heroes:” http://tiny.cc/r14ityc3bh
No, that wasn’t Ms. O’Donnell who conversed with people long dead, that was former First Lady, current Secretary of State, and perpetual wannabe president, Hillary Rodham Clinton. Those “chats,” seances, if you will, were conducted by Mrs. Clinton in the White House when she was in her mid-forties or early fifties.
I mention age only because Christine O’Donnell has admitted to her grave sin of “dabbling” in Wicca, in witchcraft–while she was a teenager in high school, those years when teenagers “dabble” in the most godawful, silly ideas and activities for which their natural immaturity is a valid defense.
Hillary was a full-fledged adult with no adolescent defense for being weird yet she escaped any serious derision or calumny. Christine is being defamed and ridiculed for her youthful silliness of a quarter century ago while she was studying earth science and intermediate algebra and sheepishly giggling in the school library when the school jocks strolled by. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1975)
Imitation may be the sincerest form of flattery, and vile slander and vicious bile may be the surest evidence of fear, at least on the part of leftists.
We saw that trick played out with Sarah Palin in 2008, a tactical pattern which continues to this day demonstrating continued terror of her presidential candidacy in 2012. We’re witnessing comparable leftist slander and bile now with respect to the Republican candidate for the U.S. Senate from the state of Delaware, Christine O’Donnell and, indeed, of the whole Tea Party Movement.
That tactic of marginalization, defamation, and demonization of opponents is excerpted from the Saul Alinsky playbook. It’s not mere coincidence that our president was an ardent admirer of Alinsky during his days as director of the Developing Communities Project in Chicago and earlier when he wrote an article which became chapter four in After Alinsky: Community Organizing in Illinois.
Like stealth assassins, the Alinsky-ites move from candidate to candidate, from intended victim to intended victim, and it’s not surprising that, with the aid and comfort of the mainstream media, the left has now drawn a bead on Christine O’Donnell in what can only be called a literal witch hunt.
“At the prompting of New Age guru Jean Houston, [she] engaged in fantasy chats with [Eleanor] Roosevelt and Mahatma Gandhi, two of [her] heroes:” http://tiny.cc/r14ityc3bh
No, that wasn’t Ms. O’Donnell who conversed with people long dead, that was former First Lady, current Secretary of State, and perpetual wannabe president, Hillary Rodham Clinton. Those “chats,” seances, if you will, were conducted by Mrs. Clinton in the White House when she was in her mid-forties or early fifties.
I mention age only because Christine O’Donnell has admitted to her grave sin of “dabbling” in Wicca, in witchcraft–while she was a teenager in high school, those years when teenagers “dabble” in the most godawful, silly ideas and activities for which their natural immaturity is a valid defense.
Hillary was a full-fledged adult with no adolescent defense for being weird yet she escaped any serious derision or calumny. Christine is being defamed and ridiculed for her youthful silliness of a quarter century ago while she was studying earth science and intermediate algebra and sheepishly giggling in the school library when the school jocks strolled by. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1975)
Thursday, September 24, 2009
"Umm, Umm, Umm, Barack Hussein Obama," the Song
“Umm, Umm, Umm, Barack Hussein Obama:” The Song
Isn’t it just great hearing kids sing? I mean, there’s nothing like innocent, young voices joined in chorus singing their lil hearts out, is there?
Well, yes there is, when their sweet voices are being directed and joined together in an elementary school as part of an orchestrated attempt to indoctrinate the kidlets via song to praise of Barack Hussein Obama.
That, in fact, is part of the refrain being taught them in at least one school: “Umm, Umm, Umm, Barack Hussein Obama!” Hear it for yourself here on YouTube, http://bit.ly/18dCgk.
The 2 boys on the right in that video would have been better served by a lesson teaching them how to overcome their ADHD rather than participating in this brainwashing session.
Funny, I can’t recall any other president being the subject of a school song, but maybe I missed “Umm, Umm, Umm, George Dubya Bush,” although I can imagine “Umm, Umm, Umm, Great Joe Stalin ” being a popular ditty in the Gulag.
“The Barack Song” is all part of this administration’s pattern of indoctrinating America’s youth according to the precepts of anarchist, Saul Alinsky, and is even a facet of Obamacare.
Chuck Norris points out in a TownHall.com article that brainwashing youngsters is one of the many “dirty little secrets” secreted in Obamacare: “Obamacare is about the government’s coming into homes and usurping parental rights over child care and development.
“It’s outlined in sections 440 and 1904 of the House bill (Page 838), under the heading ‘home visitation programs for families with young children and families expecting children.’
“The programs . . . would educate parents on child behavior and parenting skills: ‘well-trained and competent staff’ would ‘provide parents with knowledge of age-appropriate child development in cognitive, language, social, emotional, and motor domains . . . modeling, consulting, and coaching on parenting practices.’ ” (http://bit.ly/2kNxUe.
Well, isn’t that just peachy!
Hillary previously set the stage for this development with her ghost-written tome, It Takes a Village . . .
Read the rest at http://genelalor.com)
Isn’t it just great hearing kids sing? I mean, there’s nothing like innocent, young voices joined in chorus singing their lil hearts out, is there?
Well, yes there is, when their sweet voices are being directed and joined together in an elementary school as part of an orchestrated attempt to indoctrinate the kidlets via song to praise of Barack Hussein Obama.
That, in fact, is part of the refrain being taught them in at least one school: “Umm, Umm, Umm, Barack Hussein Obama!” Hear it for yourself here on YouTube, http://bit.ly/18dCgk.
The 2 boys on the right in that video would have been better served by a lesson teaching them how to overcome their ADHD rather than participating in this brainwashing session.
Funny, I can’t recall any other president being the subject of a school song, but maybe I missed “Umm, Umm, Umm, George Dubya Bush,” although I can imagine “Umm, Umm, Umm, Great Joe Stalin ” being a popular ditty in the Gulag.
“The Barack Song” is all part of this administration’s pattern of indoctrinating America’s youth according to the precepts of anarchist, Saul Alinsky, and is even a facet of Obamacare.
Chuck Norris points out in a TownHall.com article that brainwashing youngsters is one of the many “dirty little secrets” secreted in Obamacare: “Obamacare is about the government’s coming into homes and usurping parental rights over child care and development.
“It’s outlined in sections 440 and 1904 of the House bill (Page 838), under the heading ‘home visitation programs for families with young children and families expecting children.’
“The programs . . . would educate parents on child behavior and parenting skills: ‘well-trained and competent staff’ would ‘provide parents with knowledge of age-appropriate child development in cognitive, language, social, emotional, and motor domains . . . modeling, consulting, and coaching on parenting practices.’ ” (http://bit.ly/2kNxUe.
Well, isn’t that just peachy!
Hillary previously set the stage for this development with her ghost-written tome, It Takes a Village . . .
Read the rest at http://genelalor.com)
Tuesday, September 8, 2009
Saul, Saul, Why Did You Persecute Us?
Saul, Saul, Why Did You Persecute Us?
And the risen Jesus spoke to Saul of Tarsus, later St. Paul, and asked, “Saul, Saul, why do you persecute Me?”
The primary subject of this article is a different Saul, one Saul of Chicago, Saul Alinsky. Before his untimely but fortunate death in 1972, Saul Alinsky closely resembled the much earlier, pre-conversion Saul.
Our president is as much a long-term student of the Saul Alinsky slash and burn, destroy and maim political philosophy as he is an adherent of his former pastor’s, Rev. Jeremiah “God damn America” Wright’s, vile anti-American bile.
Saul of Tarsus was a hateful individual who persecuted early Christians, imprisoned them, and sought to have them put to death for their beliefs.
I don’t know if Saul Alinsky despised Christians but his hatefulness toward Americans and all that is good in America is suggestive of vile venom.
If Alinsky didn’t hate Christians, he sure as hell hated the most fundamental Christian principles.
Who Was Saul Alinsky? He was many things to many people: radical liberal, pseudo-mobster, brilliant academic, noted agitator, community organizer, committed atheist, closet Communist, successful author.
He was also the inspiration for the young Hillary Rodham and Barack Hussein Obama. As such, with Hillary Clinton now serving as Secretary of State and Barack Obama as president, Alinsky is more influential now than he was in his lifetime.
That’s not to say he didn’t have a great deal of influence when he was alive.
Born in Chicago to immigrant, Russian Jewish parents, Alinsky shared his religious heritage with Hungarian immigrant, George Soros, of MoveOn.org fame, another America-hater.
Instead of actively persecuting Christians, Saul Alinsky, like Soros, unashamedly spent most of his adult life engaged in a concerted effort to undermine America’s democratic republic traditions and our way of life.
He appropriately dedicated his book, Rules for Radicals, to “the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom–Lucifer.”
It’s ironic that both Clinton and Obama were devoted students of the “Alinsky Method” and went head to head in their quests for the presidency. From an Alinsky point of view, it would have been more productive to have a Clinton-Obama or Obama-Clinton Democratic ticket.
Either way, they would have beaten McCain-Palin, given the state of the economy, given McCain’s ineptitude, and given the idolatrous state media.
It turned out that Obama was a more astute student and effectively out-Alinskyed Clinton in the Democratic campaign for president, as pointed out in an article on AmericanThinker,com, “Obama’s Alinsky Jujitsu:” http://bit.ly/1atxQJ...
(Read the rest at http://genelalor.com)
And the risen Jesus spoke to Saul of Tarsus, later St. Paul, and asked, “Saul, Saul, why do you persecute Me?”
The primary subject of this article is a different Saul, one Saul of Chicago, Saul Alinsky. Before his untimely but fortunate death in 1972, Saul Alinsky closely resembled the much earlier, pre-conversion Saul.
Our president is as much a long-term student of the Saul Alinsky slash and burn, destroy and maim political philosophy as he is an adherent of his former pastor’s, Rev. Jeremiah “God damn America” Wright’s, vile anti-American bile.
Saul of Tarsus was a hateful individual who persecuted early Christians, imprisoned them, and sought to have them put to death for their beliefs.
I don’t know if Saul Alinsky despised Christians but his hatefulness toward Americans and all that is good in America is suggestive of vile venom.
If Alinsky didn’t hate Christians, he sure as hell hated the most fundamental Christian principles.
Who Was Saul Alinsky? He was many things to many people: radical liberal, pseudo-mobster, brilliant academic, noted agitator, community organizer, committed atheist, closet Communist, successful author.
He was also the inspiration for the young Hillary Rodham and Barack Hussein Obama. As such, with Hillary Clinton now serving as Secretary of State and Barack Obama as president, Alinsky is more influential now than he was in his lifetime.
That’s not to say he didn’t have a great deal of influence when he was alive.
Born in Chicago to immigrant, Russian Jewish parents, Alinsky shared his religious heritage with Hungarian immigrant, George Soros, of MoveOn.org fame, another America-hater.
Instead of actively persecuting Christians, Saul Alinsky, like Soros, unashamedly spent most of his adult life engaged in a concerted effort to undermine America’s democratic republic traditions and our way of life.
He appropriately dedicated his book, Rules for Radicals, to “the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom–Lucifer.”
It’s ironic that both Clinton and Obama were devoted students of the “Alinsky Method” and went head to head in their quests for the presidency. From an Alinsky point of view, it would have been more productive to have a Clinton-Obama or Obama-Clinton Democratic ticket.
Either way, they would have beaten McCain-Palin, given the state of the economy, given McCain’s ineptitude, and given the idolatrous state media.
It turned out that Obama was a more astute student and effectively out-Alinskyed Clinton in the Democratic campaign for president, as pointed out in an article on AmericanThinker,com, “Obama’s Alinsky Jujitsu:” http://bit.ly/1atxQJ...
(Read the rest at http://genelalor.com)
Sunday, September 6, 2009
A Teachable Moment or an Alinsky Seduction?
On the surface, there’s nothing really inappropriate for the president of the United States to address America’s children on their first day of school, Tuesday, September 8th. After all, he is the president, a role demanding leadership of all citizens, including kids.
Education Secretary Arne Duncan in his letter to the principals of every school in the country writes that the speech represents an ”historic moment” and that its primary purpose “is to challenge students to set goals, work hard and stay in school. This isn’t a policy speech:” http://bit.ly/YPFH2
All well and good, so far, but here the problems start.
First Problem: The text of the 15-20 minute address won’t be released until Monday, September 7th, which just happens to be Labor Day, a national holiday.
That release date smacks of the tactics near and dear to the hearts of this “transparent” administration, . . .
(Read the rest at http://genelalor.com)
Education Secretary Arne Duncan in his letter to the principals of every school in the country writes that the speech represents an ”historic moment” and that its primary purpose “is to challenge students to set goals, work hard and stay in school. This isn’t a policy speech:” http://bit.ly/YPFH2
All well and good, so far, but here the problems start.
First Problem: The text of the 15-20 minute address won’t be released until Monday, September 7th, which just happens to be Labor Day, a national holiday.
That release date smacks of the tactics near and dear to the hearts of this “transparent” administration, . . .
(Read the rest at http://genelalor.com)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)