Revolting Muslims
Islam, “The Religion of Peace,” has a peculiar approach to demonstrating the applicability of that description–unless firebombing a French newspaper, raping Norwegian women, and threatening and stabbing British MP’s are now condoned by the “Holy Prophet.”
Muslims have been revolting, in every sense of the word, for decades and not only during the Arab Spring. They are wreaking havoc throughout the Western world as well and the greatest irony in those upheavals is that the havoc is occurring in nations which welcomed them with open arms and open borders.
So much for misguided cultural diversity, so much for destructive multiculturalism, so much for fantasies of assimilation.
In France, Islamic terrorists showed their contempt for free speech by firebombing the offices of the leftist satirical publication Charlie Hebdo, (Charlie Weekly), in reaction to the weekly’s announced special edition to be titled, Sharia Hebdo “guest-edited” by none other than Muhammad, the “Holy Prophet” himself.
The editors had planned to satirize the first and probably last democratic Tunisian elections; Islamic sharia law was destined to become the dominant force in Tunisia and sharia has as much regard for democracy as it does for women. As for the proposed guest-editor, Muhammad had a great regard for war, mayhem, and his 8 year old child bride Aisha but “democracy” was a somewhat foreign concept to him.
It may have been an audacious idea for Charlie Hebdo and proved to be perilous as well when their office was hit with a Molotov cocktail and its website was hacked with a message criticizing irreverance toward “Islam’s almighty Prophet.”
Incidentally, one of America’s Leftist rags, Time magazine, chimed in on the fire bombing by attacking not the fire-bombers but Charlie Hebdo for “Islamophobic antics [which are] futile and childish.”
There may great sense of futility in Norway over its open invite to Muslims to come on over, become one of them, become a Norwegian, join their Nordic culture, and scrap their historic tendency for violence and the Qu’ran’s repugnance for and discrimination against the female gender.
The social experiment by ultra-liberal Norway isn’t working very well and the women of Oslo can attest to the fact that Muslim immigrants in Norway are far from childish. Brutal, violent, Muslim-ish, yes, childish, no.
A virtual rape-epidemic is in process in Oslo, already doubling 2010 incidents.
One member of the Norwegian Parliament, Oktay Dahl of the Conservative Party, risked a firebomb tossed by one of Norway’s new Muslim residents . . . (Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=5902.)
Showing posts with label muhammad. Show all posts
Showing posts with label muhammad. Show all posts
Saturday, November 5, 2011
Friday, September 9, 2011
Newsday Puffs Muslims
Newsday Puffs Muslims
Newsday, Long Island’s default daily newspaper due to its status as the only Long Island daily paper, published a commentary on Tuesday that must have been a failed attempt at twisted humor, an excursion into fantasy, an Islamic puff piece, or all of the above. (http://bit.ly/npGBJ2)
In a few hundred words, Ibrahim Negm, described as “senior adviser to the grand mufti of Egypt, the second-highest cleric among Sunni Muslims, and a visiting scholar at the Islamic Center of Long Island,” managed to incorporate dark humor, fantastical flights of disturbed fancy, and an unabashed puffery not as much for himself as for his religion, Islam.
Practicing its typical distortions, the ultra-liberal Newsday titled the piece, “Negm: American Muslims, American Goals,” as if its readers would be familiar with the ”senior adviser to the grand mufti of Egypt,” as if they would buy into the premise of the title, as if they would accept the idea that an Egyptian could speak for Americans and believe he would speak the truth.
Published just days before the tenth anniversary of the day when Muslim terrorists screaming “Allahu akbar!” attacked the United States and murdered 2,977 innocent people, the Newsday article reached a new low–even for Newsday–in its contempt for its readership and its country.
Negm begins his piece with what has to be the most preposterously-amusing and bizarre lies that, “The Prophet Muhammad is a model for all observant Muslims, . . . Muslims not only revere the personality of the prophet, but they strive to emulate him. The Quran describes him as a ‘mercy to the world.’ His compassion and magnanimity are immortalized in Islamic culture through both poetic expression and the everyday stories parents tell their children.”
Muhammad may be a Muslim model but that doesn’t say much for Muslims.
I would pity those kids if not . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=5392.)
Newsday, Long Island’s default daily newspaper due to its status as the only Long Island daily paper, published a commentary on Tuesday that must have been a failed attempt at twisted humor, an excursion into fantasy, an Islamic puff piece, or all of the above. (http://bit.ly/npGBJ2)
In a few hundred words, Ibrahim Negm, described as “senior adviser to the grand mufti of Egypt, the second-highest cleric among Sunni Muslims, and a visiting scholar at the Islamic Center of Long Island,” managed to incorporate dark humor, fantastical flights of disturbed fancy, and an unabashed puffery not as much for himself as for his religion, Islam.
Practicing its typical distortions, the ultra-liberal Newsday titled the piece, “Negm: American Muslims, American Goals,” as if its readers would be familiar with the ”senior adviser to the grand mufti of Egypt,” as if they would buy into the premise of the title, as if they would accept the idea that an Egyptian could speak for Americans and believe he would speak the truth.
Published just days before the tenth anniversary of the day when Muslim terrorists screaming “Allahu akbar!” attacked the United States and murdered 2,977 innocent people, the Newsday article reached a new low–even for Newsday–in its contempt for its readership and its country.
Negm begins his piece with what has to be the most preposterously-amusing and bizarre lies that, “The Prophet Muhammad is a model for all observant Muslims, . . . Muslims not only revere the personality of the prophet, but they strive to emulate him. The Quran describes him as a ‘mercy to the world.’ His compassion and magnanimity are immortalized in Islamic culture through both poetic expression and the everyday stories parents tell their children.”
Muhammad may be a Muslim model but that doesn’t say much for Muslims.
I would pity those kids if not . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=5392.)
Monday, May 16, 2011
The Dirty Old Dude of Abbottabad and His Holy Prophet, Muhammad
The Dirty Old Dude of Abbottabad and His Holy Prophet, Muhammad
The Muslim world has rejected as more filthy propaganda from the Great Satan that their hero who now swims with the fishes was, in fact, a dirty old man.
The treasure trove of computer data removed from Osama bin Laden’s less than sumptuous pad in Abbottabad two weeks ago by our Navy SEALs after President Obama killed him included other goodies besides Al Qaeda terrorist booty. It seems the Lion Sheikh Al-Mujahid, better known as the Butcher of 9/11, had other booty on his terrorist mind and computers, namely a “fairly extensive” trove of pornography.
According to the DailyBeast.com, porn, “Called fuhsha in Arabic, . . . is considered haram, or illegal . . . because it publically exposes a person’s awrah, the Arabic word for the zones forbidden from public eye” although Georgetown University’s Christine Fair points out, “Some of the Muslim societies that are the most repressive toward women . . . also have some of the highest rates of pornography usage in the world:” http://bit.ly/mE1yjf.
Demonstrating a total lack of respect and deference to the deceased, the New York Post, with no input from either the SEALs or our intelligence community, postulated what IOwntheWorld.com disrespectfully characterized as a ”tongue in goat cheek” listing of OBL’s fave porn files. Among them are “Talibuns,” “Debbie Does Abbottabad,” ”Oral Qaeda,” and “Behind the Green Burqa.” (http://bit.ly/mC6yyR)
So reprehensible!
And so we face a creeping, creepy conundrum, If Osama, despite all his admirable attributes, was a closet porn freak or if he dabbled in fuhsha mainly to entice his youngest wife into sareer (bed) and forget he was a perv, is he guilty of haram?
In any event, Muslim fans of the mass murderer the world over were inflamed by the allegation that their guy was a dirty old man instead of being a 24/7 committed, murder mastermind. Of course, it doesn’t take much to inflame that very flammable people who can erupt into flames at the drop of a bomb.
Others, principally those who don’t know which side of the War on Terror they are on, among whom is Wired’s Spencer Abraham, suggest the CIA planted the salacious stash: http://yhoo.it/ioeXw5.
That doesn’t make a whole lot of sense considering the effect such a planting would certainly have on those fiery Muslims.
If the other curious conspiratorial suggestion–that it was all a scam designed to effect our enemy’s disenchantment with OBL by exposing how he spent his free time in his hovel–had any validity, that’s even dumber since it would take a helluva lot more than dirty pictures to dissuade Islamists from loving him or to alter their dedication to destroying the West.
I, however, am willing to give Osama the benefit of a doubt, not with regard to the fact he sucks and should be eaten by trash fish then by sharks and regurgitated or that he was evidently as much interested, or more, in naked Westerners showing and utilizing their private parts. I will afford him that benefit since he was merely following comparable tradition set by his “Holy Prophet,” Mohammad, Muhammad, or plain ol’ Mo, as I like to call him.
Mo or Muhammad ibn ‘Abdullāh was a real trip in his day almost 15 centuries ago. Founder of of Islam, messenger and prophet of his god, Allah, last law-bearer in a series of Muslims, last prophet of Islam as taught by the Qur’an, aka the Holy Koran, Mo was also a statesman, of sorts, a warrior, conqueror, orator, philosopher, reformer, and many other great things, or says Wikipedia.
That “free encyclopedia” doesn’t say much about Mo’s being a merciless, bloody murderer of his opponents and of any innocents who stood in his way.
Mo was fortunate enough to have Allah speak to him directly to reveal his truths and is probably best known to Americans as the inspiration, in conjunction with Allah, for Mohammed Atta plunging an airliner into the World Trade Center . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=4467)
The Muslim world has rejected as more filthy propaganda from the Great Satan that their hero who now swims with the fishes was, in fact, a dirty old man.
The treasure trove of computer data removed from Osama bin Laden’s less than sumptuous pad in Abbottabad two weeks ago by our Navy SEALs after President Obama killed him included other goodies besides Al Qaeda terrorist booty. It seems the Lion Sheikh Al-Mujahid, better known as the Butcher of 9/11, had other booty on his terrorist mind and computers, namely a “fairly extensive” trove of pornography.
According to the DailyBeast.com, porn, “Called fuhsha in Arabic, . . . is considered haram, or illegal . . . because it publically exposes a person’s awrah, the Arabic word for the zones forbidden from public eye” although Georgetown University’s Christine Fair points out, “Some of the Muslim societies that are the most repressive toward women . . . also have some of the highest rates of pornography usage in the world:” http://bit.ly/mE1yjf.
Demonstrating a total lack of respect and deference to the deceased, the New York Post, with no input from either the SEALs or our intelligence community, postulated what IOwntheWorld.com disrespectfully characterized as a ”tongue in goat cheek” listing of OBL’s fave porn files. Among them are “Talibuns,” “Debbie Does Abbottabad,” ”Oral Qaeda,” and “Behind the Green Burqa.” (http://bit.ly/mC6yyR)
So reprehensible!
And so we face a creeping, creepy conundrum, If Osama, despite all his admirable attributes, was a closet porn freak or if he dabbled in fuhsha mainly to entice his youngest wife into sareer (bed) and forget he was a perv, is he guilty of haram?
In any event, Muslim fans of the mass murderer the world over were inflamed by the allegation that their guy was a dirty old man instead of being a 24/7 committed, murder mastermind. Of course, it doesn’t take much to inflame that very flammable people who can erupt into flames at the drop of a bomb.
Others, principally those who don’t know which side of the War on Terror they are on, among whom is Wired’s Spencer Abraham, suggest the CIA planted the salacious stash: http://yhoo.it/ioeXw5.
That doesn’t make a whole lot of sense considering the effect such a planting would certainly have on those fiery Muslims.
If the other curious conspiratorial suggestion–that it was all a scam designed to effect our enemy’s disenchantment with OBL by exposing how he spent his free time in his hovel–had any validity, that’s even dumber since it would take a helluva lot more than dirty pictures to dissuade Islamists from loving him or to alter their dedication to destroying the West.
I, however, am willing to give Osama the benefit of a doubt, not with regard to the fact he sucks and should be eaten by trash fish then by sharks and regurgitated or that he was evidently as much interested, or more, in naked Westerners showing and utilizing their private parts. I will afford him that benefit since he was merely following comparable tradition set by his “Holy Prophet,” Mohammad, Muhammad, or plain ol’ Mo, as I like to call him.
Mo or Muhammad ibn ‘Abdullāh was a real trip in his day almost 15 centuries ago. Founder of of Islam, messenger and prophet of his god, Allah, last law-bearer in a series of Muslims, last prophet of Islam as taught by the Qur’an, aka the Holy Koran, Mo was also a statesman, of sorts, a warrior, conqueror, orator, philosopher, reformer, and many other great things, or says Wikipedia.
That “free encyclopedia” doesn’t say much about Mo’s being a merciless, bloody murderer of his opponents and of any innocents who stood in his way.
Mo was fortunate enough to have Allah speak to him directly to reveal his truths and is probably best known to Americans as the inspiration, in conjunction with Allah, for Mohammed Atta plunging an airliner into the World Trade Center . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=4467)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)