Obama's United Nations Is Gutting Our United States

Obama's United Nations Is Gutting Our United States

Bar none–Jimmy Carter, Warren Harding and Millard Fillmore not excluded–Barack Hussein Obama is clearly the worst president in the history of the republic.




Repeatedly exposed as an overachieving fraud, a liar, a Chicago-style thug with established ties to terrorists and other reprobates, none of which ties have been investigated by the mainstream media, Mr. Obama incredibly still expects to win re-election in November.



Just as obvious, it’s evident that our 44th commander in chief has one sincere commitment.



He may have no respect for America’s Constitution, no interest in the future of the United States, and is a proven, gaffe-plagued incompetent but Obama does have a deep and abiding love–an affection not for his lovely wife but for the institution that promises to serve as one of his primary vehicles for accomplishing his ultimate goal of destroying America as we know and love it: the United Nations.



And the slew of socialistic, dictatorial Third World members of the U.N.–the majority membership–are busily, shamelessly working to achieve Obama’s aim.



The United Nations, that last, best hope of mankind has evolved into a power-hungry, anti-Western, anti-American blot on humanity and has long been out of touch with American interests.



The UN now wants to “find resources to finance development needs and address growing global [Third World] challenges, such as combating climate change and is “suggesting various ways to tap resources through international mechanisms, such as coordinated taxes on carbon emissions, air traffic, and financial and currency transactions.”



In other words, just like Obama, the UN wants to tax the bejesus out of those evil rich bastards who create jobs and prosperity to artificially lift third-worlders out of the eighteenth century.



Why bother struggling as Americans did to accomplish what we have when you can legally steal what you need via international taxes on the world’s successful, entreprenurial, capitalist pigs?



And those taxes are just the beginning. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=27086.)

Gay "Existential Emptiness"

Lesbian "Existential Emptiness"

Some homosexuals can be publicly amusing, shocking, pathetic, and sometimes all three at the same time. Others are only able to strut their proclivities in private settings and, lately, still others like to loudly proclaim their aberrant lifestyle as if it were normal.




Retiring 72 year old Democrat Congressman Barney Frank who proudly showed off his man boobs on the floor of the House of Representatives and recently “married” his long-term 42 year old “partner,” Jim Ready, consistently won the trifecta prize of being concurrently amusing, shocking, and pathetic.



Capturing the shock award, Maurice Sendak, acclaimed author of the childrens’ favorite Where the Wild Things Are, may have thought he was making peace with his Maker, if he believed in a Maker, when he confessed in one of his last interviews that he fantasized about murdering George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, their wives, and everyone around them.



Male homosexuals clearly have the corner on gay amusement and revulsion but lesbians are almost always the pathos winners.



Country singer Chely Wright could be an exception to that general rule since she firmly believes Jesus Christ condones her “Christian lesbianism” because He hasn’t struck her dead. Then, again, Christ didn’t strike Adolph Hitler dead and hasn’t struck Perez or Paris Hilton dead, either.



The perfect exemplar of gay pathos is MSNBC’s chief resident lesbian, Rachel Maddow.



By her own admission, MSNBC’s extreme leftist, atheistic, lesbian Maddow isn’t a happy camper, not an unusual state of mind for extreme leftist, atheistic lesbians. As Maddow confessed to Rolling Stone last month, she has long suffered from a “cyclical depression,” from an “existential emptiness” that often causes her to lose focus resulting in repetitive failure.



As she put it, “I see my job as making a TV show. I fail at it–constantly.”



Anyone who has witnessed . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=26719.)

Obama and His Fellow Hypocrites, Masterful Poseurs

Obama and His Fellow Hypocrites, Masterful Poseurs

The following recent news stories have been covered on CNS.com but may or may not have been reported by President Barack Hussein Obama’s mainstream media. Probably not since, after all, they are Obama’s MSM.




1. Bill Clinton’s former pollster Stanley Greenberg commented on the possibility of Gov. Mitt Romney picking Condoleeza Rice for his vice presidential running mate.



Greenberg fulfilled his role as an Obamian poseur by comparing the prospect of a Republican choosing a pro-choice VP candidate to the Democrats choosing a segregationist.



Greenberg’s obvious racial/racist reference to Ms. Rice’s African-American heritage betrayed either his gross historical ignorance or his intentional effort to adhere to the Obama’s campaign’s strategy of distorting realities.



The Republican Party was the party of blacks in America from the time Republican Abe Lincoln freed the slaves up until FDR convinced them his raw deal was in their best interests and it was the GOP that stood up against segregationist Democrats such as KKK Grand Kliegel Robert Byrd and Al Gore’s daddy to pass the Civil Rights Act of 1964.



LBJ’s Great Society, which virtually obliterated millions of black family units and rendered more millions of blacks as economic slaves dependent on the government for survival, may have solidified the African-American bloc for Democrats. However, for Greenberg to suggest the Democrat Party is not the Segregation Party is as ludicrous as suggesting Democrats give a damn about the welfare of African-Americans.



2. Clueless and devious White House Press Secretary Jay Carney made the outlandish observation last week that his boss’s 2009 $831 billion economic stimulus package is “widely recognized to have broken the back of the recession.” . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=26959.)

Politics and Profits in the Trayvon Martin Farce

Politics and Profits in the Trayvon Martin Farce

NBC’s Miami affiliate reported last week that “The FBI found no racial bias behind George Zimmerman’s shooting of Miami Gardens teen Trayvon Martin, according to dozens of documents related to the case released Thursday.”




That conclusion and those documents should put an end to an already discredited, central theory in the prosecution of George Zimmerman for the shooting of Trayvon Martin, namely that the 28 year old, mixed-race Zimmerman was motivated to murder Martin on February 26th, 2012 out of racial hatred.



It must have been difficult for Sanford PD lead investigator Chris Serino to make that blockbuster announcement since he had precipitously implied four months ago that Zimmerman was a liar in claiming self-defense in the shooting and had wanted the neighborhood watchman thrown in jail posthaste.



Now, based on his investigation and statements of character witnesses, Serino thinks Zimmerman wasn’t a racist at all but rather an “overzealous” watchman with a “little hero complex.” Again, since we don’t customarily hang people because they are overzealous little heroes, the persistent, highly-political allegations that what happened in February was a hate crime should be put to rest.



Not on your life! There’s too much else at stake, like a national election, placating blacks, and making money!



President Barack Hussein Obama’s Attorney General Eric Holder’s Department of Justice, literally or figuratively intent on hanging Zimmerman as a sop to the black community and racial agitators, will continue its investigation as if Martin’s killing was a hate crime. (http://tinyurl.com/8a8bl34)



When you’re waging a racial vendetta stoked by the mainstream media, why let the truth get in your way!



From the outset and regardless of the facts, George Zimmerman was portrayed by the mainstreamers as a bloodthirsty murderer and when evidence contradictory to that portrayal surfaced it was either ignored or, as in the case of recorded 911 calls, doctored to make him appear a mad racist intent on stalking and killing Trayvon Martin because he was black.



To supplement its Zimmerman distortions, the MSM invariably depicted Martin as an innocent, unarmed, defenseless African-American youth, a fine young man merely strolling at night through the middle class streets of Twin Lakes with a bag of Skittles when he was savagely set upon and brutally attacked.



If you’re gullible . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=26917.)

When Is a Baby Not a Baby? Never!

When Is a Baby Not a Baby?  Never!

Some newborns emerge from their mother’s womb all scrunched-up, some scratched by forceps or by their own, delicate fingernails, all covered in amniotic goo, most with a cry, a rare few looking as if they were ready, willing, and able to take on the world.




However they make their grand entrance, their moment of birth, all babies have one important feature in common: They have been babies for about 280 days, from the moment of conception, a fact abortionists choose to ignore in the interests of maintaining the illusion that they aren’t baby murderers.



Among many other pro-abort liberals, DNC chairwoman Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.) has said that contending human life begins at conception is “extreme and radical,” an opinion now vividly shown to be extreme and radical, assuming human appearances are not de-facto proof of humanity.



The truth that libs are terminating a human life has been confirmed once again in a BBC first, amazing time-lapse evidence of the development of the human face.



See first ever still pictures and a 43 second video, as well as the first ever MRI footage of twins’ activity in the womb and another of an actual birth at http://tinyurl.com/7658l87.



Notably but not at all surprisingly, the BBC narrator refers only to the face of an “embryo,” not to the visage of a human baby. Too much reality would probably upset the BBC audience if they came to understand abortion doesn’t simply involve the removal of a blob of tissue.



Some blob!



Something else neither the BBC nor the American mainstream media never feature are reports that abortionists, as liberal as they are, often engage in markedly illiberal violent assaults on pro-lifers as sick complements to their violent assaults on the pre-born.



For example, soon after Newsweek and The Daily Beast profiled Personhood USA leaders Keith and Jennifer Mason and a Beast commenter posted . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=26887.)

Obama's "Problem" with Romney's Mormon Religion

Obama's "Problem" with Romney's Mormon Religion

The desperate Obama Slime Machine has been getting nowhere with its character assassinations of Mitt Romney, except maybe in the mainstream media.


Attacking Romney’s success at Bain Capital, shamelessly abusing Ann Romney, libelously alleging Romney is a felon, rudely calling him a liar, and falsely accusing him of everything just shy of committing crimes against humanity and nature, all in a vain attempt to deflect public attention from the real issues in this campaign, have failed miserably.

At all costs, the president and his blindly-dedicated slimers don’t want the electorate focusing on the moribund economy, the Fast and Furious debacle, and all the other Barack Hussein Obama’s failures, screw-ups, and gaffes.

Therefore, true to form, more and more of Obama’s faithful acolytes are resorting to suggesting the presumptive Republican candidate’s Mormon faith is a sinister religion and that Romney is unfit for the presidency because of his religious “problem.”

In May, Obama senior advisor David Axelrod dutifully indicated that Romney’s Mormonism would be “off-limits” in the campaign, a lie quickly buttressed by Dem spokesman Ben Labolt who said, “Attacking a candidate’s religion is out of bounds, and our campaign will not engage in it.”

“Off limits” and “out of bounds” apparently were secret code words sent to Obama lackeys instructing them to hammer both Romney and his Christianity.

Democrats, of course, are deeply committed to defending religion as we know from the fact that they have often praised Obama’s 20 year membership in Rev. Jeremiah “God Damn America” Wright’s church.

Axelrod’s and Labolt’s sly calls to religious bigotry weren’t necessary anyway. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=26859.)

Where Is the Heterosexual Outrage Over Benjamin Balter's Suicide?

Where Is the Heterosexual Outrage Over Benjamin Balter's Suicide?

When 18 year old, aspiring violinist Tyler Clementi committed suicide by jumping off the George Washington Bridge into the Hudson River on September 10th, 2010 after discovering his roommate had videotaped and publicized his homosexual liaisons, Clementi’s death inspired widespread sincere tributes and outraged condemnation.




The outrage came from those who had known and from those who hadn’t known the Rutgers University freshman as well as from non-Rutgers students nationwide, from an empathetic mass media and, mainly, from the homosexual community.



The condemnation–of Clementi’s alleged murderers Dharun Ravi and Molly Wei–emanated from the same sources whose fury intensified when a New Jersey judge gave Ravi a slap-on-the wrist jail sentence of 30 days and Wei copped a plea.



Regardless of the merits of the Ravi-Wei case, the question has now arisen as to why college students, the mass media, and gays aren’t outraged by the 2009 suicide of Benjamin Balter who was driven to that ultimate resolution of his personal angst because of homosexual molestation at the elite, private Horace Mann School in Riverdale, the Bronx.



Horace Mann’s school anthem, “Great is the truth and it prevails; mighty the youth the morrow hails. Lives come and go; stars cease to glow; but great is the truth and it prevails”, is as much a joke as the idea the school is “prestigious.” Truth is a foreign concept at Mann especially when it’s ugly truth.



Last Wednesday, Ben Balter’s mother, Kathy Howard, currently a teacher at Horace Mann and now in fear of losing her position, finally went public with a letter written by her son 19 years ago.



In his 1993 letter, then 16 year old Ben wrote, “I am writing concerning the faculty member Johannes Somary, chairman of the arts department. Recently, Mr. Somary has made grossly inappropriate sexual advances towards me,” once on a school trip and also during music lessons. Ben added that Somary had “kissed him, French kissed him, put his tongue in his mouth and that he put his hands down his pants.”



After receiving her son’s claim of clearly homosexual child sexual abuse, Howard confronted Somary, indignantly demanding, “How dare you put your tongue in my son’s mouth!” to which the gay pedophile blithely responded, ”That’s how we Swiss kiss.”



Subsequently, Howard met with Horace Mann trustees who bullied her and told her “to forget it, that I would not have a case because it would always be Ben’s word against Somary’s word and I would’ve had to have had the abuse on tape.” (



Had Ben Balter’s experiences at Mann been exceptional or unusual we could dismiss his allegations . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=26784.)