Gay "Existential Emptiness"

Lesbian "Existential Emptiness"

Some homosexuals can be publicly amusing, shocking, pathetic, and sometimes all three at the same time. Others are only able to strut their proclivities in private settings and, lately, still others like to loudly proclaim their aberrant lifestyle as if it were normal.




Retiring 72 year old Democrat Congressman Barney Frank who proudly showed off his man boobs on the floor of the House of Representatives and recently “married” his long-term 42 year old “partner,” Jim Ready, consistently won the trifecta prize of being concurrently amusing, shocking, and pathetic.



Capturing the shock award, Maurice Sendak, acclaimed author of the childrens’ favorite Where the Wild Things Are, may have thought he was making peace with his Maker, if he believed in a Maker, when he confessed in one of his last interviews that he fantasized about murdering George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, their wives, and everyone around them.



Male homosexuals clearly have the corner on gay amusement and revulsion but lesbians are almost always the pathos winners.



Country singer Chely Wright could be an exception to that general rule since she firmly believes Jesus Christ condones her “Christian lesbianism” because He hasn’t struck her dead. Then, again, Christ didn’t strike Adolph Hitler dead and hasn’t struck Perez or Paris Hilton dead, either.



The perfect exemplar of gay pathos is MSNBC’s chief resident lesbian, Rachel Maddow.



By her own admission, MSNBC’s extreme leftist, atheistic, lesbian Maddow isn’t a happy camper, not an unusual state of mind for extreme leftist, atheistic lesbians. As Maddow confessed to Rolling Stone last month, she has long suffered from a “cyclical depression,” from an “existential emptiness” that often causes her to lose focus resulting in repetitive failure.



As she put it, “I see my job as making a TV show. I fail at it–constantly.”



Anyone who has witnessed . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=26719.)

क्य्न्थिया निक्सों रिलेस गेस विथ थे Truth

Cynthia Nixon Riles Gays with the Truth

Liberals don’t seem to like much and gay liberals like even less.

True, liberals like other libs and defend them at all costs to reason and support everything associated with liberalism but outside of those delights they seem to be extremely discontented people who find little if any real joy in life and tend to react strongly when their illusory balloons are punctured with truth.

Actress Cynthia Nixon recently raised the ire of the homosexual community, including the famously flaming Perez Hilton, when she hurled a spear through the very heart of the gay ethos. Nixon confessed she chose to go lesbian and that her decision was not dictated by any genetic predisposition.

Nixon’s radical admission flies in the face of the fundamental gay mantra that they are “born that way” and don’t become homosexuals due to outside influences such as being momma’s boys or girls rejected by males. Undoubtedly, some are genetically programmed toward their own gender but studies have shown that nurture and not nature is a determinant in many instances.

Best known for her role as Amanda Hobbes on the raunchy “Sex and the City” HBO series and currently appearing as a cancer patient in the Broadway production “Wit,” Nixon in effect supports the nurture theory, contradicting contentions of the Gay Lobby which demands people believe their inclinations are beyond their control.

The award-winning Nixon is nothing if not in control of her decisions and choices.

She had a 15-year heterosexual relationship with English professor Danny Mozes which produced two children and dumped Prof. Mozes of her own volition. She is now engaged to “education activist” Christine Marinoni who gave birth to “their” son last year.

She infuriated gays throughout the planet by being honest about consciously choosing a gay lifestyle, thereby . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=12321.)

The Gay Seduction of 10 Year Olds

The Gay Seduction of 10 Year Olds

Some things are better left unsaid and unelucidated. Among them are details on which Hollywood starlet is sleeping with which director, why Ashton Kutcher married Demi Moore–and sensationalized tripe on the sex lives of 10 year old girls.

The Gay Lobby, however, wants everything elucidated and out there when it comes to what segment of the population it is in process of seducing lately in hopes that more kids will do it, try it, because, as per the newest homosexual catchphrase, “It gets better.”

(See http://bit.ly/oOGDIl for further information on the import of how life allegedly “gets better” for youngsters who are hit on by gay adult predators– as told from the vantage point of degenerate homosexual activist, Dan Savage.)

Now 10 year old tomboyish girls come to the realization, at least in the unhinged perceptions of some film writers and producers, that “it gets better.” And thus we have the multi-award-winning “Tomboys,” a French film by Parisian Celine Sciamma.
Dispense with the antiquated idea that tomboys are only young girls who reject dolls and frilly dresses in favor of footballs and dirt encrusted Levis which, nowadays, isn’t all that unusual anyway. Based on the trailers, Sciamma’s movie incorporates scenes of similar, innocuous gender-blending but merely as background for more salacious content.

Sciamma also features in her seamy yet critically-acclaimed cinematic excursion into predatory child exploitation is the story of a confused, re-located child who finds comfort and sexual release in lesbianism and a self-constructed Play-Doh dildo.

A convicted serial deviate couldn’t make this stuff up! . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=5579.)

When Is a Violent, Sexual Assault not a Violent, Sexual Assault?

When Is a Violent, Sexual Assault not a Violent, Sexual Assault?

When is a violent, sexual assault not a violent, sexual assault? Why, when the assault is committed by a protected species, of course!

The powerful LGBT Lobby, which stands for the lesbians, gays, bisexuals, transgenders and which sometimes throws in a “Q” in its designated acronym for “Queer” and “Questioning” to encompass as many people, especially sexually confused young people as possible, agitated for and received legally protected status.

That protection is afforded the LGBT(Q)’s in the nation according to federal law which also incorporates blacks, hermaphrodites, Mormons, Ugandans, anyone over 40, cross dressers, and veterans, a goodly chunk of Americans.

Related but different legislation in covered many, not all, of those groups under “hate crimes” which are defined ”as a violent act causing death or bodily injury because of the actual or perceived race, color, religion, national origin, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity or disability of the victim.”

Little agitation for the law, seconded by the United Nations, came from religious or nationality groups or the disabled who were thrown into that thought crime mix to make the legislation more palatable and seem as if it weren’t catering to the LGBT(Q) set, which it was.

Noteworthy in what is called the Matthew Shepard Act is the provision that enables federal authorities to intervene in alleged hate crimes that local enforcement authorities choose not to pursue and mandates FBI involvement in statistically tracking alleged gender and gender identity (B and T) crimes.

All of that brings us to a school bus in Kellogg, Idaho, a 17 year old high school softball player, and three teammates who may or may not have had gender identity issues but who clearly engaged in, if not a hate crime under current definitions, a sex crime and possibly a reverse lesbian sex crime committed out of anything but love . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=4533)

MSNBC, Ethics, and Keith Olbermann?

MSNBC, Ethics, and Keith Olbermann?

It takes a hell of a lot for MSNBC, the cable news station of NBC established in partnership with Microsoft, to suspend someone for violating its ethics policy. It’s a challenge to try to determine whether MSNBC, dubbed PMSNBC by Rush Limbaugh, has any ethics at all considering its programming and commentators.

As the left’s response to Fox News, MSNBC has been beyond lame. As the left’s entry into the ethics sweepstakes, MSNBC finished as an also-ran.

However, someone has been suspended, indefinitely and without pay, for violating that vague policy. None other than Keith Olbermann, former sports maven and now former political pundit in MSNBC’s 8 pm slot, the man who proved that one host was able to sink a cable network almost single-handedly, has, possibly, been handed his pink slip.

Actually, that’s hyperbolic since Olbermann had a lot of help in that regard from such people as the raving, leftist lesbian, Rachel Maddow. As of today, though, Rachel is still in and Keith’s “Countdown with Keith Olbermann” is being counted out. It remains to be seen if Maddow survives longer than MSNBC. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=2521)

The Naked Hypocrisy of NOW

The Naked Hypocrisy of NOW

The National Organization for Women (NOW) prides itself on its membership of 500,000 and its 550 chapters in 50 states and the District of Columbia. That’s very impressive.

According to its website, the 44 year old organization defines its goal as “to take action to bring about equality for all women. NOW works to eliminate discrimination and harassment in the workplace, schools, the justice system, and all other sectors of society; secure abortion, birth control and reproductive rights for all women; end all forms of violence against women; eradicate racism, sexism and homophobia; and promote equality and justice in our society.”

An impressive and wide-ranging mission, indeed.

Among other recent “hot topics,” NOW posted an endorsement of the recent march on Washington by tens of thousands of bused-in union demonstrators, its opposition to the military’s “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy toward homosexuals, and a rousing cheer of congratulation to “Carolyn Maloney, Ann McLane Kuster and All Endorsed Winners from Tuesday [September 14th] Primaries.”

The part of that cheer that explains who and what NOW and its women really are is contained in the three words, “all endorsed winners.”

The National Organization for Women may be in the business of promoting women but they don’t support or endorse just any women. Recipients of their support must fit its left wing template or else they’re shunned.

When NOW vows ”to take action to bring about equality for all women,” it doesn’t really mean all women but rather those women who tow the line, who fit that template, who believe in abortion, who love homosexuals because they’re homosexuals, and, should they be candidates for political office, love Obama, Obamacare, and Obamanomics.

Many other non-conforming women candidates, usually Republicans, were consigned to NOW oblivion. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=2165)

Close the Doors, They're Coming Through the Windows!

Close the Doors, They're Coming through the Windows!

The antiquated expression, “Close the doors, they’re coming through the windows,” derives from a hit 1950’s song by the Stargazers; it referred to the chaos when too much happens at the same time.

We’re experiencing that superfluity today, that overkill with regard to the sound of squeaky closet doors being opened wide and gays, lesbians, homosexuals, queers, bi-sexuals, transgenders, and God knows what else emerging into the normal world and proclaiming their normality, denouncing the meanness of heterosexuals, and demanding their acceptance by one and all.

They may not yet be coming through the windows but give them time. When this new breed of gays is confronted with closed doors, they will use any avenue of ingress available in order to gain entry.

The latest ingressor is Sara Gilbert, the pasty-faced thing on the old, trailer-trashy, 80’s sitcom, “Roseann.”

As if the world cares about whom she takes to bed, or to the rafters, or to a chandelier, . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1813)

More School Daze

More School Daze

Bye, honey. You sure you have your lunch money?

Bye, mom, yup, I do.

Ok and be sure to bundle up if it gets colder later, ok?

I will, mom. Sheesh, I’m not a kid, mom!

I know, pumpkin, I know, I know, and don’t forget to call if you’re gonna be late.

Don’t I always?

Yes, you do, mostly, and one last thing, if they send you for an abortion, call me at work, ok?

Oh, God! Yes, MOM! Bye!

Slam!

Most of that parting conversation would be pretty typical of households with teen girls today–except for the mom’s last request.

Maybe it should be part of the morning routine.

It’s doubtful a mother, or a father, asked their teen to give a call if she went for an abortion that day but a mom in Seattle may now wish she had.

“Jill’s” 15 year old daughter went off to school one recent morning without that request, went to her high school’s onsite clinic, took a pregnancy test, found out she was carrying a baby, was dispatched via a cab to a nearby abortion facility, and aborted her baby, all during school hours when kids are expected to be learning something other than how to murder the pre-born.

Understandably, “Jill” was furious that all this had happened while she believed her daughter was attending Ballard High School in Seattle, maybe doing a little readin’, writin’, and ‘rithmetic, probably gossiping with her girl friends about boys, eating some lunch, and maybe going to band practice.

Instead, the public employees at the Ballard school clinic sent her daughter, an avid pro-life supporter, to be aborted without even the common courtesy of a call to Jill: http://bit.ly/c24sZp

This is the world we live in today, folks, and we all deserve what we get if we, even tacitly, supported the culture of abortion death by voting for the most pro-abortion president in America’s history.

In related news, . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1586)

Two Firings: Two Sad Signs of Our Times

Two Firings: Two Sad Signs of Our Times

As a cocky college kid working part time, I once told a supervisor at Met Life who was letting a bunch of us go that I’d been fired from better jobs than this, which may or may not have been true.

Getting fired, canned, dismissed, discharged, terminated, let go from a job, part or full time, is often a shot to the ego and and the wallet. Today, especially, it’s no joking matter since decent positions are hard to come by.

Getting fired, etc. for your religious beliefs at any time is even less a subject for jocularity.

Even if you’re working at Home Depot, not the ultimate career for most people, but, hey, a job is a job and a buck is a buck, a guy shouldn’t expect to be sent packing for wearing a pin.

However, college kid/cashier Trevor Keezor was canned for his pin which read, “One nation under God, indivisible,” which happen to be words excerpted from the Pledge of Allegiance. Said pin also featured the American flag, which may have offended some illegals at his Okeechobee, Florida Home Depot.

He merely wanted to express his sense of patriotism and support for his brother, a National Guardsman who was scheduled for his second tour in Iraq next month.

No, no, no, said Home Depot. We will tolerate none of that folderol! We may (or may not) concur with your sentiments but trash the pin or you’re gone to the unemployment line!

Trevor chose unemployment over surrendering his constitutional rights and love of country, and his support for his brother.

Company spokesman Craig Fishel contended Keezor had violated company policy and the Home Depot dress code by sporting the pin, which Keezor had worn for a year and a half before anyone noticed, or cared, or complained.

Perhaps what really precipitated the kid’s dismissal was his recent habit of toting his Bible to work and reading it on his lunch hour.

Either way, Trevor’s gone and won’t be able to ever again pollute Home Depot with his patriotic and God-loving fervor.

The good news is that he plans to sue on the basis of religious discrimination. The bad news is that the ACLU effectively said, “Fat chance” since a private corporation such as Home Depot is within its rights to disregard an American’s right to free speech and worship: http://bit.ly/4pAx8s.

Another notable canning occurred up in Barney Frank-land.

Peter Vidala’s infraction? Failure to comply with political correctness . . .

(Read the rest at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1302)

Feminazis and Feminists

Feminists and Feminazis

The title epithet, “feminazis,” is a word popularized by Rush Limbaugh to describe extremist feminists who have adopted feminism as a last resort to conceal a basic lack of attractiveness and for whom the rite and right of abortion border on the sacramental. Rush is sometimes a tad less kind and, after three wives, he may be a tad jaded so we’ll leave it at that.

I don’t know if Jessica Valenti quite fits that definition; she certainly doesn’t when contrasted with the late Betty Friedan whose book, The Feminine Mystique, had to have been written with a ton of input from women who were endowed with much more feminity and mystique than God gave Betty.

Valenti, however, does add an odd, new fillip to the decades-old struggle for . . . I’m actually not really sure just what modern feminists are struggling for. In apparent frustration, Freud said, “What do women want?” and I’m just as confused as to what feminists want.

Valenti’s stimulating contribution to the feminist evolution concerns virginity as pointed out in ” ‘Today’ Show Feature: ‘There’s No Such Thing As Virginity,’ ” by Warner Todd Huston: http://www.americanconservativedaily.com/2009/04/today-show-feature-theres-no-such-thing-as-virginity/.

To males, female virginity is a skitchy topic but unless feminazis have banished us to an underclass due to our gender I think we’re entitled to an opinion on the subject. After all, the “myopic feminist” Valenti’s opinion begs challenge. I would only add to that ”myopic feminist” is a clear redundancy.

Ms. Valenti is an ardent left-wing blogger, posting on Feministing.com as well as writing for NARAL Pro-Choice America. NARAL, originally founded in 1968 as the National Association for Repeal of Anti-abortion Laws by that same Betty Friedan and arch abortion apologist, Bernard Nathanson, changed its name after their victory in Roe v Wade in ‘73 and after the number of little dead abortion victims began to grow exponentially.

With her NARAL affiliation, it’s not much of a stretch to say Jessica Valenti is probably an ardent pro-abortionist and also probably a committed lesbian, leftist believer in the sacramental nature of extinguishing the lives of pre-born human beings in the name of feminism.

For that ilk, turkey basters work just fine for procreation and without all the fuss and muss of normal baby-making and if the product isn’t perfect, as in female, they can always just dismember and flush it and start all over again. No biggie.

The thirty year old Valenti, marital status unknown, appeared on the “Today” show to promote her new book, The Purity Myth, How America’s Obsession with Virginity Is Hurting Young Women. . . .

(Read the rest at http://genelalor.com/)