In Semi-Defense of an Abortionist
As Pro-Life Republicans and one Democrat in the House of Representatives prepare to introduce HR 3, the No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act, designed “to prevent federal funding for abortion procedures by codifying the Hyde Amendment, which has long barred federal agencies from paying for abortions,” the pro-abortion lobby is equally prepared to defeat it.
NARAL, which regularly changes the meaning of that acronym, (National Association for the Repeal of Abortion Laws, National Abortion Rights Action League, National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League), predictably attacked the measure as astoundingly hypocritical.
Nancy Keenan, NARAL president, claimed “It seems that they’re fine with government intrusion, as long as it involves interfering in women’s personal, private decisions.” Her logic is that, “These same lawmakers voted to repeal a health-care law that provides prenatal care and the promise of no-cost birth control to women. Now, they want to make it even harder for women to purchase private health insurance that includes abortion coverage with their own money:” http://tiny.cc/1aw7a
Keenan’s statement is incorrect and is a misrepresentation for a number of reasons. First, Right to Lifers opposed Obamacare provisions to clandestinely use taxpayer funding, not for prenatal care and birth control but to pay for abortions. Secondly, whether taxpayer-funded or individually-funded, whatever the source of monies to pay for it, abortion is still an abomination.
It’s also interesting to note that NARAL rarely uses the term, “abortion,” opting instead to refer to “reproductive rights” and other less honest euphemisms to describe the taking of a pre-born human being’s rights.
However, lies and euphemisms aside, West Philadelphia, PA abortionist Dr. Kermit Gosnell is getting a bad rap simply because he used a scissors to complete seven abortions rather than the far more politically correct scalpel, suction aspiration, chemical burning, or other legally and socially-approved methods of terminating life in utero. If Dr. Gosnell had done the grisly job right in the first place, he wouldn’t have had to resort to scissors in the second place but whether he should now be charged with murder is debatable.
Gosnell, whose “abortion clinic was described as a filthy, foul-smelling ‘house of horrors,’ ” according to one account, was also charged with an eighth murder for overdosing a pregnant mother with pain killers, but that’s a whole other story. So, too, are the facts he lacked any obstetrical or gynecological training or credentials and that he became a millionaire from his butchery.
Pennsylvania authorities were shocked . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=3456)
Showing posts with label partial birth abortion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label partial birth abortion. Show all posts
Thursday, January 20, 2011
Tuesday, July 27, 2010
The Gruesome Commitment Of Elena Kagan Part Two
The Gruesome Commitment of Elena Kagan Part Two
Commitment can often be an admirable feature of one’s life and character. It denotes absolute dedication, strong and unshakeable beliefs, and an admirable steadfastness.
However, when that commitment leads one down the road of “disgraceful” and “unethical” conduct, words used by former Surgeon General, C. Everett Koop, to describe the actions of Solicitor General and Supreme Court nominee, Elena Kagan, commitment becomes a markedly negative trait.
As a radical leftist–and the president has a constitutional right to nominate such a person no matter what damage she can ultimately wreak–Ms. Kagan no doubt is committed to any number of causes. Hopefully she does not lie and dissemble to accomplish her goals with respect to those causes as she did with her commitment to the gruesome practice of partial birth abortion.
Medically described as intact dilation and extraction or intact D & X, partial birth abortion involves the barbaric execution of what is often a fully-formed, intact, baby by dilating the uterus of a mother-to-be and extracting said baby. That clinical description avoids the methods of the barbarism, the details of the “extraction.”
Briefly, following dilation, the partial birth abortionist . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1807)
Commitment can often be an admirable feature of one’s life and character. It denotes absolute dedication, strong and unshakeable beliefs, and an admirable steadfastness.
However, when that commitment leads one down the road of “disgraceful” and “unethical” conduct, words used by former Surgeon General, C. Everett Koop, to describe the actions of Solicitor General and Supreme Court nominee, Elena Kagan, commitment becomes a markedly negative trait.
As a radical leftist–and the president has a constitutional right to nominate such a person no matter what damage she can ultimately wreak–Ms. Kagan no doubt is committed to any number of causes. Hopefully she does not lie and dissemble to accomplish her goals with respect to those causes as she did with her commitment to the gruesome practice of partial birth abortion.
Medically described as intact dilation and extraction or intact D & X, partial birth abortion involves the barbaric execution of what is often a fully-formed, intact, baby by dilating the uterus of a mother-to-be and extracting said baby. That clinical description avoids the methods of the barbarism, the details of the “extraction.”
Briefly, following dilation, the partial birth abortionist . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1807)
Monday, July 26, 2010
The Gruesome Commitment of Elena Kagan Part One
The Gruesome Commitment of Elena Kagan
Not that it makes any difference at this point since Solicitor General Elena Kagan will certainly be confirmed next week by the Democrat-controlled Senate as the next associate justice of the United States Supreme Court, but Americans should fully comprehend who and what they’re getting in the person of Ms. Kagan.
I don’t just mean that she’s liberal to her core and I don’t refer to her antipathy toward the military nor to the rumors that she’s a lesbian. I refer to her commitment to murdering defenseless babies.
Now I know that such a damning statement raises the hackles of “progressives,” (liberals, leftists, and most Democrats), who tend to rise up en masse to defend a woman’s “right to choose” and deny en masse that aborting “the product of conception” is tantamount to killing babies.
However, when a fetus is 20 or more weeks old, is viable outside the womb, and possesses all of the God-given human features of an infant, when it looks like a baby, sucks its thumb like a baby, reacts to external stimuli, has a fully-formed brain, heart, lungs, and all the other organs of a tiny human being, only those deeply committed to eradicating its life at all costs can deny it is a living person.
Elena Kagan is such an individual and a female individual at that, a member of the female gender which is specially engineered to be emotional, caring, nurturing as opposed to dispassionate, detached, and murderous. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1805)
Not that it makes any difference at this point since Solicitor General Elena Kagan will certainly be confirmed next week by the Democrat-controlled Senate as the next associate justice of the United States Supreme Court, but Americans should fully comprehend who and what they’re getting in the person of Ms. Kagan.
I don’t just mean that she’s liberal to her core and I don’t refer to her antipathy toward the military nor to the rumors that she’s a lesbian. I refer to her commitment to murdering defenseless babies.
Now I know that such a damning statement raises the hackles of “progressives,” (liberals, leftists, and most Democrats), who tend to rise up en masse to defend a woman’s “right to choose” and deny en masse that aborting “the product of conception” is tantamount to killing babies.
However, when a fetus is 20 or more weeks old, is viable outside the womb, and possesses all of the God-given human features of an infant, when it looks like a baby, sucks its thumb like a baby, reacts to external stimuli, has a fully-formed brain, heart, lungs, and all the other organs of a tiny human being, only those deeply committed to eradicating its life at all costs can deny it is a living person.
Elena Kagan is such an individual and a female individual at that, a member of the female gender which is specially engineered to be emotional, caring, nurturing as opposed to dispassionate, detached, and murderous. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1805)
Sunday, July 4, 2010
More Outrageous News
More Outrageous News
A few outrageous even if anticipated recent news items:
Kagan Endorses Brain Suctioning: As her senate confirmation hearings draw to a close, Elena Kagan is a sure thing to become the next Supreme Court associate justice.
She will join Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor on the liberal wing, the pro-abortion wing, the infanticide wing of the High Court. That was a given before the Senate hearings since Kagan had confirmed it during her tenure with the Clinton administration when she advocated abortion policies to the left of Bill Clinton.
Clinton was ambivalent on the subject of partial birth abortions, that procedure in which a viable, often full term baby is partially born with only its head still in the womb.
The birth is pre-empted by a doctor who thrusts a scissors or other sharp instrument into the baby’s brain and then a suction device is used to suck the brain out and collapse the head to enable easy passage through the birth canal.
The gruesome procedure, . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1769)
A few outrageous even if anticipated recent news items:
Kagan Endorses Brain Suctioning: As her senate confirmation hearings draw to a close, Elena Kagan is a sure thing to become the next Supreme Court associate justice.
She will join Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor on the liberal wing, the pro-abortion wing, the infanticide wing of the High Court. That was a given before the Senate hearings since Kagan had confirmed it during her tenure with the Clinton administration when she advocated abortion policies to the left of Bill Clinton.
Clinton was ambivalent on the subject of partial birth abortions, that procedure in which a viable, often full term baby is partially born with only its head still in the womb.
The birth is pre-empted by a doctor who thrusts a scissors or other sharp instrument into the baby’s brain and then a suction device is used to suck the brain out and collapse the head to enable easy passage through the birth canal.
The gruesome procedure, . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1769)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)