The Persecution of Hank Williams Jr.

The Persecution of Hank Williams Jr.

He’s a Nazi! He hates white people and wants them dead! He’s a chimp!

Chill. Those repugnant charges haven’t been hurled against President Barack Hussein Obama over the past three years but they were repeatedly used to describe President George W. Bush for eight years by his virulent critics who substituted “black” for “white” and without the slightest objection from the mainstream media.

As Kathleen Parker pointed out on WashingtonPost.com, Google “George W. Bush, Hitler” and you get almost 14 million links.

“Nazi” and “chimp” were the preferred Bush pejoratives on the blogosphere and elsewhere and the drug-addled Kanye West outrageously accused Bush of hating blacks because West, son of racist Black Panther, Ray West, thought Bush didn’t do enough for Hurricane Katrina victims. He and the MSM were strangely silent when President Obama ignored mostly white people suffering in the Midwest following the horrendous spring 2009 floods.

Then, again, I guess it’s not so strange. It all depends on whose ox is being gored and who’s doing the goring.

Virtually no one was silent, however, after Hank Williams, Jr. ventured into politics during an appearance on “Fox and Friends” Monday morning and undiplomatically voiced his opinions on the oddity of a Democrat president and vice president enjoying a golf outing with Republicans John Boehner and John Kasich last summer.

The fact Congress and Obama were embroiled in the critical national debt limit debate as they teed up struck Williams–and a number of other people–as weirdly anachronistic and he said so, though his choice of words was unfortunate for him.

Hank Jr.’s song “All My Rowdy Friends Are Coming Over Tonight,” which has opened ESPN’s “Monday Night Football” for 20 years, will be heard no more after the singer blurted out on Fox that the Republicans and the Democrats shooting a round of golf at that time was ”like Hitler playing golf with [Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin] Netanyahu.”

Williams might have escaped opprobium had he stopped there but the obviously-dense “Fox and Friends” co-host Brian Kilmeade said he didn’t understand what Williams meant. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=5659.)

Obama's Latest Gaffe: Jews and Janitors

Obama's Latest Gaffe: Jews and Janitors

There’s long been more than a sneaking suspicion that President Barack Hussein Obama is a dyed-in-the-wool anti-Semite although there’s no doubt he is more prone to gaffes than even George W. Bush. His closet anti-Semitism may have met his “gaffery” over the weekend at the Congressional Black Caucus awards in Washington.

Quickly scrubbed from the official transcript of Obama’s speech advocating class warfare–technically, he was addressing what he called a growing disparity of wealth in the United States–the president mixed up Jews and janitors before he realized his Freudian slip but he had already been caught by the tale of the (video)tape.

I guess it’s easy to confuse the two. After all, both words begin with a “J.”

Not that much of the mainstream media will make mention of Obama’s “Jews janitors” flub; they’re still more interested in Bush gaffes.

The Jewish vote is, of course, critical to his re-election, not as critical as the black, union, and homosexual votes but very significant nonetheless. He needs money from all of them to hit his goal of a billion dollar campaign chest.

Blacks, unionists, and gays are guaranteed supporters but those Jewish backers have been slip, slip, slipping away in view of the administration’s policies on the Mideast and his kowtowing to Arab potentates and catering to Muslim interests at home. The last thing he needed at this point was to demean Jews but he did so anyway, assuming that confusing Jews with janitors is demeaning.

In Obama’s talk to the CBC, he was in the middle of another rant against the rich when he blurted out, “If asking a billionaire to pay the same tax rate as a Jew uhh as a janitor . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=5558)

Richard Goldstone's Gaza Epiphany

Richard Goldstone's Gaza Epiphany

Richard Goldstone isn’t exactly a familiar household name in America. However, in Israel, Goldstone was very well known until very recently as a Jewish apostate, a label he tried to shuck when he issued a retraction of his previous allegations of Israeli atrocities commited during the Gaza war of 2008-2009.

Briefly, Goldstone, an eminent Jewish South African judge, saw his name affixed to a United Nations’ report on that 3-week war. As a result of the Goldstone Report, commisioned by the U.N. Human Rights Council, he was reviled in Israel and elsewhere by Israel supporters as a wayward jurist suffering from a “moral inversion” who “preserved his judicial reputation while perpetrating a blood libel against Israel” and with worse epithets because he had dared to expose Israeli war crimes in Gaza.

The Goldstone Report charged Israel’s IDF with a systematic, official policy to inflict punishment on civilians in Gaza. Titled, “Human Rights in Palestine and Other Occupied Arab Territories: Report of the United Nations Fact Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict,” the English language pdf version may be read here in its entirety: http://bit.ly/1BjEXr

The final version issued by the anti-Semitic U.N. HRC deleted most references to Hamas atrocities and focused on the disproportionality of Israel’s retaliation. Fourteen Israeli settlers had been killed in unprovoked Hamas missile attacks; some 700 enemy combatants were killed by the IDF as well as 714 Gaza civilians including at least 412 children. (Hamas claimed 1200 dead children.)

The Goldstone Report concluded that Israel, which touts itself as having “the most moral army in the world,” committed the most heinous crimes imaginable against defenseless Gazan non-combatatants.

There was no question that the IDF was battling a grossly amoral enemy which had secreted weaponry in mosques, hospitals, and schools and had launched missile atttacks from private homes, and Israel contends it gave advance warnings, none of which mitigates Israeli war crimes.

On April 1, 2011, coincidentally April Fools Day, Goldstone issued a retraction of the Goldstone Report. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=4151)

A Jew Defends Christianity

A Jew Defends Christianity

Since many Christians don’t seem to have the gumption or wherewithal to do it, it’s refreshing to see anyone defending Christianity. When the defender happens to be a jew, it approaches breathtaking.

Emeritus professor of political science and former head of the Intelligence Studies Section of the International Studies Association, Abraham H. Miller does just that in “Christianity: First Line of Defense for the West?” Published on PajamasMedia.com, the article posits a rarely-seen truth, that ”The one solid, inescapable organizing principle that stands as the bulwark against radical Islam is Christianity.”

Miller defends Christianity and Christians, real Christians, that is, people who “who get up every morning and genuinely reflect on how they could become better people by becoming more like Jesus,” on many bases. Those bases include exposing the hypocrisy and intolerance which allows pseudo-sophisticates like late night comics and even his fellow jews to preach tolerance for Muslims at the same time they ridicule the “moral clarity” and “moral precision” of Christianity on such matters as abortion and racial discrimination.

As Miller writes, ”I have never seen a Christian blow himself up on a bus full of innocent people, declare holy war on the unbeliever, or stone a congregant for adultery.” Nor has he seen “Jesus followers that crashed airplanes into the World Trade Center . . . [nor] Jesus followers who attack Jews on the streets of Paris so frequently and violently.”

Yet, Christians and never Muslims are pilloried and mocked regularly by America’s and Europe’s pseudo-sophisticates.

Miller points the finger of hypocrisy at members of his own faith . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=2382)

Ezekiel Emanuel--the Jewish Mengele

The Brothers Emanuel. Part One: Ezekiel–the Jewish Mengele

All successful, high achievers, all activists, all leftist ideologues in the Saul Alinsky mold, and all Chicago Democrats, the brothers Emanuel–Ezekiel, Rahm, and Ari–are easily the most politically influential trio in the history of America.

Rahm Emanuel may be the most visible as President Obama’s ruthless Chief of Staff but behind the scenes in his capacity as Obama’s “Deadly Doctor,” Ezekiel, an oncologist and “medical bioethicist,” also wields enormous power as the president’s Special Advisor for Health Policy.

Ari, the baby brother, a prominent Hollywood talent agent, is on the political periphery.

This band of brothers, all of whom studied ballet in their youth, spring from the marriage of Benjamin Emanuel and Marsha Smulevitz. Their father was an Israeli-born pediatrician and former member of Irgun, an Israeli terrorist organization, their mother the daughter of a radical union organizer.

Those nuts rarely fall far from those trees.

There’s no shortage of chutzpa in the Emanuel clan. It could also be termed Odyssian hubris or arrogance, as in, We know what’s best for you so just shut up, sit down, and keep your opinions to yourself!

According to Wikipedia and other sources, the family patriarch changed his surname from Auerbach and adopted Emanuel, meaning, God is with us. In Hebrew, Rahm means high or lofty, Ezekiel strength of God, Ari lion or eagle.

Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, “architect of Obamacare” who takes issue with the Hippocratic Oath, is remarkable in that his views on health care are eerily reminiscent of Hitler and the “Angel of Death,” Josef Mengele.

For a Jew, that actually exceeds remarkable and enters the realm of bizarre.

Last month, Rep. Ron Paul posted an article on his website on Zeke’s views on his health care architecture, including a video on Obamacare’s “depopulation policy:” . . .

(Read the rest at http://genelalor.com)

BURY THE USS LIBERTY STORY? I THINK NOT!

THE USS LIBERTY AND JEWISH CONSTERNATION

What is it about the story of the USS Liberty and the 1967 Israeli attack on that unarmed, American intelligence vessel that so riles people of the Jewish-American community?

Because I posted my previous article, “The Shame of the USS Liberty,” on other websites I have been inundated with accusations of anti-Semitism, threats of expulsion from those sites, and even revocation, sans explanation, of my posting privileges by one, FreeRepublic.com.

That revocation was disappointing but with some 200 million other websites available on the internet it is hardly devastating.

What is devastating is the realization that there are so many people out there who not only resist hearing/reading the truth about Israeli influence on American foreign policy but who then actively campaign to muzzle those who only seek to place a very significant issue on the table, that issue being, What really happened on June 8, 1967 and whether the actions of Israel’s military were by design or simply a gross, and bloody, “mistake.”

If I were the only one “dredging” up the issue, I’d cease my inquiry.

However, I’m far from unique in my quest for an ultimate answer and for a final resolution. Such individuals as Admiral Thomas H. Moorer, United States Navy (Retired), former Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff, also want definitive answers: http://www.gtr5.com/evidence/moorer.htm.

That resolution cannot be expected shortly, considering the forty-one year old cover-up by our government and by our military, but this names-redacted exchange with the webmaster of one website gives some inkling as to how pervasive that cover-up is and the reasons for it:

(My response to that webmaster precedes his query.)...

(Read the interchange at http://genelalor.com/.)

JEWS IN AMERICA II

JEWS IN AMERICA II: WHAT THEY HAVE IN COMMON

Part One of this series dealt with some notable Jews and with great Jewish contributions to America and posed the question, Since the Jewish people as a group have contributed so much to this country, why does such animosity toward them still exist?

That’s a difficult question to answer but Part Two offers one explanation, the nature of the Jew.

Attempting to categorize an entire people, a very ancient people, attempting to pigeonhole millions of individuals into a box, a category, is an effort fraught with land mines–and is even more a presumptuous undertaking when a non-Jew makes that attempt.

Is it even fair to try to do it? Does it reflect bias to suggest categorization? Is labelling tantamount to discriminating? Does anyone dare to suggest that the Irish, the Russians, the Poles, Hispanics, African Americans, Orientals are homogeneous groups open to being easily labelled?

I believe it is fair and it need not be a product of bias. And, actually and allowing for fine distinctions, those latter nationalities and races are often linked and categorized, based on tastes, behaviors, interests, activities, and even public records.

The Irish tend to celebrate life more than most, Russians tend to be dour, Poles are more often carefree, Hispanics are mostly industrious, Blacks are more likely to have issues with law enforcement, and Orientals tend to be studious and serious and to over-achieve.

All of those are generalized stereotypes, obviously, but generalizations founded on reasonable and fair observations and statistical proofs, although there are always exceptions.

Jews are unique in that almost to the person, male or female, younger or older, they are a driven people. The reasons for that I will leave to genetic experts. I can only speculate based on personal experiences while living in New York City, a town which includes as many Jews as Tel Aviv and Jerusalem combined.

Point is, I have met, known, and “experienced” many people of the Jewish persuasion and I know, at least to some extent, what Jews have in common.

I will admit that during my youth in the South Bronx,...

(Read the rest of this article at http://genelalor.com/.)