What Do You Get When You Fall in Love . . .?
Burt Bacharach musically asked, “What do you get when you fall in love?” and cynically answered, ”A girl with a pin to burst your bubble That’s what you get for all your trouble.” He added, “What do you get when you fall in love? You only get lies and pain and sorrow for at least until tomorrow. I’ll never fall in love again.”
Poor Burt.
Most people above the age of 12 or 13 have fallen in love. Call it puppy love or some other term that is considered demeaning to the emotion being experienced by the puppy lovers, it’s still love, of a sort.
We’re being told today, after decades of politically correct indoctrination by a mass media, a mass media whose sexual inclinations are suspect and who seem intent on convincing America’s heterosexual dolts that it’s all good, that males copulating with other males and women making whoopie with other women is not only normal but cool.
With the enthusiastitc support of the MSM, we’re being indoctrinated into a gay culture which is preaching that those of us who think that gay culture is sick and perverted and that we who believe the gay cultures is a sham are brain-dead imbeciles.
What follows must therefore be the imbecilic ramblings of, umm, an imbecile.
New York’s Republican candidate for governor, 64 year old successful Buffalo businessman Carl Pasquale Paladino, took a deep dip into imbecilic political hot water last week by saying that he opposes ”pandering to the pornographers and perverts. I just think my children and your children would be much better off and much more successful getting married and raising a family, and I don’t want them brainwashed into thinking that homosexuality is an equally valid and successful option– it isn’t:” http://tiny.cc/e3ylu . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=2206)
Showing posts with label love. Show all posts
Showing posts with label love. Show all posts
Friday, October 15, 2010
Sunday, March 7, 2010
Are There Love Crimes, Too?
Are There Love Crimes, Too?
For every yin there’s a yang, no? For every plus there’s a minus, no? For every good there’s an evil, no? So, why shouldn’t there be love crimes for every hate crime?
Well, no. Love crimes are only punishable by a face slap or a firm adieu.
The whole concept of “hate crimes” is an absurdity cooked up by minorities who pretend to believe that every insult, every malocchio, every slight infraction constitutes a crime of hate and must be punished by more severe retributive justice than your run of the mill, average crime.
Thus, if one gets knocked to the ground by a mugger who punches one’s face, kicks one’s ribs, steals one’s wallet but who never says a word in process, that’s just a crime. If someone is tripped and falls and the tripper says, “Take that, you filthy honkie!” then the tripper has committed a hate crime.
Hate crimes, though, only seem to happen to black and homosexual victims.
Go figure.
It’s all silliness, politically correct silliness that has the potential of condemning people to much longer prison terms than they deserve and, when they reach prison, woe unto him when other inmates learn they committed a crime of hate!
That’s almost as horrendous as being a child molestor and they will be manhandled accordingly.
Where is the ACLU when you need them?
Chances are that someday hate crime laws will be declared unconstitutional since they are targeted laws written and passed to mollify certain segments of the population spelled out in Wikipedia as “racial group, religion, sexual orientation, disability, class, ethnicity, nationality, age, gender, gender identity, or political affiliation.”
With all those categories, hate crime rates occurred at the rate of 47 per every 100,000 people through 2006, hardly epidemic proportions even though hate crime laws were on the books in at least 45 states. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1545)
For every yin there’s a yang, no? For every plus there’s a minus, no? For every good there’s an evil, no? So, why shouldn’t there be love crimes for every hate crime?
Well, no. Love crimes are only punishable by a face slap or a firm adieu.
The whole concept of “hate crimes” is an absurdity cooked up by minorities who pretend to believe that every insult, every malocchio, every slight infraction constitutes a crime of hate and must be punished by more severe retributive justice than your run of the mill, average crime.
Thus, if one gets knocked to the ground by a mugger who punches one’s face, kicks one’s ribs, steals one’s wallet but who never says a word in process, that’s just a crime. If someone is tripped and falls and the tripper says, “Take that, you filthy honkie!” then the tripper has committed a hate crime.
Hate crimes, though, only seem to happen to black and homosexual victims.
Go figure.
It’s all silliness, politically correct silliness that has the potential of condemning people to much longer prison terms than they deserve and, when they reach prison, woe unto him when other inmates learn they committed a crime of hate!
That’s almost as horrendous as being a child molestor and they will be manhandled accordingly.
Where is the ACLU when you need them?
Chances are that someday hate crime laws will be declared unconstitutional since they are targeted laws written and passed to mollify certain segments of the population spelled out in Wikipedia as “racial group, religion, sexual orientation, disability, class, ethnicity, nationality, age, gender, gender identity, or political affiliation.”
With all those categories, hate crime rates occurred at the rate of 47 per every 100,000 people through 2006, hardly epidemic proportions even though hate crime laws were on the books in at least 45 states. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1545)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)