Trayvon and Crystal Mangum
“Trayvon and Tawana,” (http://bit.ly/HskbLq), drew a number of parallels between the shooting of Trayvon Martin and the 1987 racial hoax perpetrated by Tawana Brawley and aided and abetted by career African-American agitator, Rev. Al Sharpton.
Just as Martin’s shooting by George Zimmerman has created a firestorm of protests against assumed racist profiling and bigotry, Brawley’s case was accompanied by the involvement of Sharpton and others of his ilk seeking publicity and an unquenchable thirst for racial unrest.
Just as with Trayvon Martin, the bases of Brawley’s claims were false, a tissue of lies that unraveled under official scrutiny.
Both Tawana Brawley’s inflammatory and destructively false accusations and those of Crystal Mangum provided templates for the never-ending campaign to tar white Americans as hateful bigots in the face of facts that prove the exact reverse.
Crystal Gail Mangum, an enterprising, black 27 year old student at North Carolina Central University, helped pay the bills by working as an “escort” and stripper for her pimps at the Allure Escort Service.
Long, seamy story short: Mangum was hired by members of the Duke University lacrosse team to “perform” for them at their off-campus residence for $800. She showed up gloriously drunk, and engaged in 5 minutes of lesbian groping with another “escort,” an Asian-American named Kim Roberts.
Mangum proceeded to exchange words with the team, exited in a huff, stormed around the house shouting and half-naked before driving off into the night with her associate whom she soon tried to kick out of the car, and was subsequently taken into custody by Durham, N.C. police.
Actually, that wasn’t the end of the story. It was more the beginning of a misbegotten tale of fantasy rape, manufactured deceit, and baseless charges of racism and violence, all of which were later disproven.
It was also the disgraceful tale of a district attorney who lied repeatedly and a prestigious university that opted to believe a prostitute rather than its own students in the interests of political correctness. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=21148.)
Showing posts with label duke university. Show all posts
Showing posts with label duke university. Show all posts
Monday, April 9, 2012
Tuesday, May 3, 2011
Doubting and Handwringing over OBL
Doubting and Handwringing over OBL
The old comedian Jimmy Durante had a stock line, “Everybody wants to get into the act” and now, as Osama bin Laden sleeps with his 72 virgin fishes, it seems everybody wants a piece of the OBL action with many bemoaning the success of America’s elite Navy SEALs.
Reactions from the Muslim world were predictable. Pakistan’s former president Musharraf denounced the American violation of Pakistan’s territorial integrity, as if that country had any true territorial integrity and was anything but a terrorist sanctuary. The government in Islamabad denied any knowledge of the mission, which is probably true since they also had no knowledge that bin Laden was a resident for six years; they called it a “unilateral action,” which is fortunate and all but insured its success.
The Taliban and much of the rest of the Muslim world doubted the 6 foot, 4 inch man who was shot twice and killed in the opulent, million dollar compound and residence then dumped, excuse me, lowered into the Arabian Sea, was actually their hero. They will probably still be doubting Ahmeds even after Osama’s death picture is released; they may contend it is a fake because the Osama they knew and loved had an intact head.
Perhaps the most amusing response came from an unidentified imam at Jerusalem’s Al-Aqsa Mosque who posted an anonymous YouTube threat: “The dogs will not rejoice too much for killing the lions. The dogs will remain dogs and the lion, even if he is dead, will remain a lion. We are a nation of billions, a good nation. We’ll teach you about politics and military ways very soon, with god’s help.”
Big mouth, big nation, and the dead lion sleeps tonight.
The overseas reaction to the successful mission was almost as predictable as the Muslim response.
The UK’s Sky News immediately demanded incontrovertible proof of the identity of the corpse dumped, excuse me, lowered, into the water was indeed the late Osama bin Laden. Germany’s Der Spiegel charged the entire operation was illegal and that, instead of dispatching OBL to the arms of Allah, he should have been captured alive and put on trial before an international tribunal, which would have given him a public platform to spout his venom and instigate his jihadist followers.
At home, the United Nations, not wanting to feel left out, felt compelled to chime in on the issue. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=4314)
The old comedian Jimmy Durante had a stock line, “Everybody wants to get into the act” and now, as Osama bin Laden sleeps with his 72 virgin fishes, it seems everybody wants a piece of the OBL action with many bemoaning the success of America’s elite Navy SEALs.
Reactions from the Muslim world were predictable. Pakistan’s former president Musharraf denounced the American violation of Pakistan’s territorial integrity, as if that country had any true territorial integrity and was anything but a terrorist sanctuary. The government in Islamabad denied any knowledge of the mission, which is probably true since they also had no knowledge that bin Laden was a resident for six years; they called it a “unilateral action,” which is fortunate and all but insured its success.
The Taliban and much of the rest of the Muslim world doubted the 6 foot, 4 inch man who was shot twice and killed in the opulent, million dollar compound and residence then dumped, excuse me, lowered into the Arabian Sea, was actually their hero. They will probably still be doubting Ahmeds even after Osama’s death picture is released; they may contend it is a fake because the Osama they knew and loved had an intact head.
Perhaps the most amusing response came from an unidentified imam at Jerusalem’s Al-Aqsa Mosque who posted an anonymous YouTube threat: “The dogs will not rejoice too much for killing the lions. The dogs will remain dogs and the lion, even if he is dead, will remain a lion. We are a nation of billions, a good nation. We’ll teach you about politics and military ways very soon, with god’s help.”
Big mouth, big nation, and the dead lion sleeps tonight.
The overseas reaction to the successful mission was almost as predictable as the Muslim response.
The UK’s Sky News immediately demanded incontrovertible proof of the identity of the corpse dumped, excuse me, lowered, into the water was indeed the late Osama bin Laden. Germany’s Der Spiegel charged the entire operation was illegal and that, instead of dispatching OBL to the arms of Allah, he should have been captured alive and put on trial before an international tribunal, which would have given him a public platform to spout his venom and instigate his jihadist followers.
At home, the United Nations, not wanting to feel left out, felt compelled to chime in on the issue. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=4314)
Sunday, March 27, 2011
A Preview of Obama's Libya Speech
A Preview of Obama's Libya Speech
Our president plans, finally, to address the nation on his actions, and inactions, regarding Moammar Khadafy, Libya, maybe the United Nations, maybe NATO, maybe Hillary, maybe the price of keffiyehs in Tripoli.
Speech well-prepared, trusty teleprompters at the ready, President Barack Hussein Obama will take the Oval Office seat, long disinfected of Clinton droppings, and try to explain . . .
It was amusing when Prissy famously said in GWTW, ”I don’t know nothin’ ’bout birthin’ babies.” It’s terrifying when an American president effectively says, ”I don’t know nothin’ ’bout what tha hell is goin’ on in the world.” He also knows nothin’ ’bout being president.
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=3984)
Our president plans, finally, to address the nation on his actions, and inactions, regarding Moammar Khadafy, Libya, maybe the United Nations, maybe NATO, maybe Hillary, maybe the price of keffiyehs in Tripoli.
Speech well-prepared, trusty teleprompters at the ready, President Barack Hussein Obama will take the Oval Office seat, long disinfected of Clinton droppings, and try to explain . . .
It was amusing when Prissy famously said in GWTW, ”I don’t know nothin’ ’bout birthin’ babies.” It’s terrifying when an American president effectively says, ”I don’t know nothin’ ’bout what tha hell is goin’ on in the world.” He also knows nothin’ ’bout being president.
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=3984)
Thursday, July 9, 2009
Homosexuality and Child Abuse at Duke University
Homosexuals on the March at Duke University
I keep trying to avoid the issue of homosexuality, I really do, but homosexuals, and Obama, keep pushing their sick agenda, so I can’t.
I know how their ilk interprets avoidance– as weakness, subservience, and acquiescence– and I refuse to feed their egos, or whatever they feed on, by ignoring or minimizing what they’re up to of late.
The hetero-homo war has been going on for decades even if the 98% of straights are oblivious of the fact and nature of the conflict and that the 2% of gays are winning.
Case in point relates to the 2006 Duke Debacle in which a bunch of rich, white college kids on the Duke University lacrosse team were accused, tried, and convicted in the mass media and in the Duke community of raping a poor, black stripper.
The sordid details of that lie are not worth repeating but can be found here, with comments, for those who tend to relegate such lies to the back burner: http://www.moonbattery.com/archives/2006/04/the_duke_lacros.html.
Whoa! What does that have to do with “homosexuals on the march?”
Duke University prides itself on being a 171 year old outstanding institution of learning when in fact it’s a prime and twisted example of the devolution of America’s universities into a rancid, liberal, homosexual cesspool, that’s what.
Duke rushed to justice, leapt to unfounded conclusions, when it came to alleged iniquities of those perverted, rich, white lacrosse boys. When it came to a far more perverted one-of-its-own, the school closed ranks and defended its resident perv and accused pederast, Frank M. Lombard.
Lombard, Duke prof, committed “partner” of his gay lover Ken Shipp, another Duke staff member, “loving” dad of two adopted young, African-American boys, lived in an advertised, “paradise for children.”
A paradise must be a subjective concept since Lombard seems to have made it a hell for “his” child. . . .
(Read the rest at http://genelalor.com)
I keep trying to avoid the issue of homosexuality, I really do, but homosexuals, and Obama, keep pushing their sick agenda, so I can’t.
I know how their ilk interprets avoidance– as weakness, subservience, and acquiescence– and I refuse to feed their egos, or whatever they feed on, by ignoring or minimizing what they’re up to of late.
The hetero-homo war has been going on for decades even if the 98% of straights are oblivious of the fact and nature of the conflict and that the 2% of gays are winning.
Case in point relates to the 2006 Duke Debacle in which a bunch of rich, white college kids on the Duke University lacrosse team were accused, tried, and convicted in the mass media and in the Duke community of raping a poor, black stripper.
The sordid details of that lie are not worth repeating but can be found here, with comments, for those who tend to relegate such lies to the back burner: http://www.moonbattery.com/archives/2006/04/the_duke_lacros.html.
Whoa! What does that have to do with “homosexuals on the march?”
Duke University prides itself on being a 171 year old outstanding institution of learning when in fact it’s a prime and twisted example of the devolution of America’s universities into a rancid, liberal, homosexual cesspool, that’s what.
Duke rushed to justice, leapt to unfounded conclusions, when it came to alleged iniquities of those perverted, rich, white lacrosse boys. When it came to a far more perverted one-of-its-own, the school closed ranks and defended its resident perv and accused pederast, Frank M. Lombard.
Lombard, Duke prof, committed “partner” of his gay lover Ken Shipp, another Duke staff member, “loving” dad of two adopted young, African-American boys, lived in an advertised, “paradise for children.”
A paradise must be a subjective concept since Lombard seems to have made it a hell for “his” child. . . .
(Read the rest at http://genelalor.com)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)