The Homosexual-Abortionist Symbiosis
Symbiosis or symbiotic behavior is usually regarded as relationships confined to the animal, insect, and plant worlds such as is seen with suckerfish attached to sharks, plovers feeding on leeches embedded in crocodile gums, pea aphids draining the juices from a host plant.
However, symbiotic behavior also exists in the human species as, for example, in mother-infant interaction and other relationships in which two fundamentally dissimilar organisms or groups exist together to their mutual benefit although symbiosis most often benefits one more than the other. In psychiatry, two people dependent on and reinforced by one another, for better or worse, are said to be symbiotic.
I’m not qualified to speculate on the specific nature of the symbiosis that exists between the homosexual community and the Abortion Lobby but I can definitely say that both groups feed off one another. Which benefits most is difficult to say. I’d call it a dead heat.
Symbiosis, loosely defined as close and often long-term interactions between different biological species, seems to advantage both gays and abortionists in that both thrive by being linked by their abnormal behavior and, with strength in greater numbers, are therefore able to suffer the slings and arrows of societal disapprobation.
Admittedly, those slings and arrows are becoming more and more rare, which fact can be credited to their union, their promotion by the entertainment and mass media, and inroads being made into their route to eventual, universal acceptance as normal, through America’s youth and in our schools.
A recent, loud, demonstration on the streets of Chicago strongly reinforces the contention that gays and abortionists, though of different genders, transgenders, and appearances, are one and the same. Gays are dedicated to the natural sterility of the homosexual lifestyle, abortionists committed to unnaturally aborting pre-born life.
In a sense. it’s reasonable that gays and pro-abortionists form an alliance: Homosexuals can’t procreate, abortionists may or may not be able to procreate but advocate the killing of an already-created human being. Both groups . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=4130)
Showing posts with label abortionists. Show all posts
Showing posts with label abortionists. Show all posts
Thursday, April 14, 2011
Tuesday, January 25, 2011
What Right to Life March?
What Right to Life March?
In a sane world, there would be no need for an annual Right to Life March on Washington.
The God-given right to life in Natural Law was declared in the Declaration of Independence as among the 3 most basic tenets of that document: “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” It was reinforced in the Fourteenth Amendment to our Constitution: “nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.”
The fact that abortion was legalized thirty eight years ago by the Supreme Court in no way negates Natural Law nor the clear intent in the Declaration or in the Constitution. As with the Dred Scott Decision, Roe v. Wade merely reflected the climate of the times and the agitation of certain elements in society which succeeded in using the subterfuge of questioning personhood as the basis for overturning a fundamental right.
Scott was determined to be a non-person in Dred Scott v. Sandford in 1857 and pre-born human beings were deprived of their status as persons by Roe v. Wade in 1973. Both judgements represented indelible and shameful stains on the integrity of the Supreme Court. The 1857 decision resulted in the Civil War, the 1973 decision necessitated the annual Right to Life March.
Braving bitter cold, that march of tens of thousands took place in Washington on January 24th but unless careful attention was paid, few Americans aside from the marchers would have noticed. Demonstrating the continuing power of pro-abortionists, the national media, with the exception of Fox News, all but totally ignored it.
If the march were a protest by tens of thousands against Pro-Lifers, it would have been front page news and the lead story on every television network in the land.
Nevertheless, the Right to Life Movement continues the good, the just and moral fight against a grave wrong in our country which has already claimed in excess of 52,000,000 innocent lives with 1,200,000 abortions still being performed every year, according to the Guttmacher Institute, a semi-autonomous division of Planned Parenthood.
Fortunately for the pre-born and for the nation’s soul, that battle has been bolstered by the presence and support of some very good people . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=3490)
In a sane world, there would be no need for an annual Right to Life March on Washington.
The God-given right to life in Natural Law was declared in the Declaration of Independence as among the 3 most basic tenets of that document: “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” It was reinforced in the Fourteenth Amendment to our Constitution: “nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.”
The fact that abortion was legalized thirty eight years ago by the Supreme Court in no way negates Natural Law nor the clear intent in the Declaration or in the Constitution. As with the Dred Scott Decision, Roe v. Wade merely reflected the climate of the times and the agitation of certain elements in society which succeeded in using the subterfuge of questioning personhood as the basis for overturning a fundamental right.
Scott was determined to be a non-person in Dred Scott v. Sandford in 1857 and pre-born human beings were deprived of their status as persons by Roe v. Wade in 1973. Both judgements represented indelible and shameful stains on the integrity of the Supreme Court. The 1857 decision resulted in the Civil War, the 1973 decision necessitated the annual Right to Life March.
Braving bitter cold, that march of tens of thousands took place in Washington on January 24th but unless careful attention was paid, few Americans aside from the marchers would have noticed. Demonstrating the continuing power of pro-abortionists, the national media, with the exception of Fox News, all but totally ignored it.
If the march were a protest by tens of thousands against Pro-Lifers, it would have been front page news and the lead story on every television network in the land.
Nevertheless, the Right to Life Movement continues the good, the just and moral fight against a grave wrong in our country which has already claimed in excess of 52,000,000 innocent lives with 1,200,000 abortions still being performed every year, according to the Guttmacher Institute, a semi-autonomous division of Planned Parenthood.
Fortunately for the pre-born and for the nation’s soul, that battle has been bolstered by the presence and support of some very good people . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=3490)
Thursday, October 1, 2009
Last Late-Term Abortionist Standing
Last Late-Term Abortionist Standing
Except for the gravity of the subject, I would get a kick out of feminist objections to the female of the species objecting to men opposing the practice of abortion.
After all, feminists contend, we have no right, as men, to object to or interfere with a woman’s or a teen’s prerogative to terminate the lives of innocent, living, human bodies and souls growing within their wombs. Men don’t have wombs so how can they understand?
Nevertheless, it’s perfectly acceptable to feminists and other pro-abortionists for male doctors to act as terminators.
Perhaps they figure males are more proficient than females in killing babies?
The age old Hippocratic Oath to do no harm was long ago trashed, by the United States Supreme Court in 1973 with its Roe v. Wade decision which gave doctors the legal right to perform abortions.
Substituted as the new oath, ”Do whatever is needed to keep a pregnant patient content, and then proceed to slice, dice, or burn to death her innocent pre-born child.”
One of the two doctors in America who specialized in aborting the lives of full-term, fully developed fetuses was Dr. Joseph Tiller who was murdered in his church by a maniacal fruitcake, http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1043
Taking up the slack is the last doctor standing in the USA who takes pride in executing babies on the verge of birth, Warren Hern, M.D., owner and only practitioner at the Boulder (CO) Abortion Clinic.
Far be it from me to try to comprehend what motivates any individual to commit abortions let alone specialize in aborting full-grown infants in a procedure best known as partial birth abortions. Some are afflicted with congenital “birth defects,” some are not, but to Doctors Hern and Tiller it never mattered. . .
(Read the rest at http://genelalor.com)
Except for the gravity of the subject, I would get a kick out of feminist objections to the female of the species objecting to men opposing the practice of abortion.
After all, feminists contend, we have no right, as men, to object to or interfere with a woman’s or a teen’s prerogative to terminate the lives of innocent, living, human bodies and souls growing within their wombs. Men don’t have wombs so how can they understand?
Nevertheless, it’s perfectly acceptable to feminists and other pro-abortionists for male doctors to act as terminators.
Perhaps they figure males are more proficient than females in killing babies?
The age old Hippocratic Oath to do no harm was long ago trashed, by the United States Supreme Court in 1973 with its Roe v. Wade decision which gave doctors the legal right to perform abortions.
Substituted as the new oath, ”Do whatever is needed to keep a pregnant patient content, and then proceed to slice, dice, or burn to death her innocent pre-born child.”
One of the two doctors in America who specialized in aborting the lives of full-term, fully developed fetuses was Dr. Joseph Tiller who was murdered in his church by a maniacal fruitcake, http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1043
Taking up the slack is the last doctor standing in the USA who takes pride in executing babies on the verge of birth, Warren Hern, M.D., owner and only practitioner at the Boulder (CO) Abortion Clinic.
Far be it from me to try to comprehend what motivates any individual to commit abortions let alone specialize in aborting full-grown infants in a procedure best known as partial birth abortions. Some are afflicted with congenital “birth defects,” some are not, but to Doctors Hern and Tiller it never mattered. . .
(Read the rest at http://genelalor.com)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)