Breivik vs. Hasan and Abdo, Patriotic vs. Treasonous Terrorism
Anders Behring Breivik, the accused murderer of 76 people in Oslo and on the island of Utoya, will have unique advantages if and when he ever comes to trial. He will not be subject to American law or our penal system but instead to far less punitive Norwegian law and a maximum sentence of 21 years in a prison which more closely resembles a Club Med resort.
As an article in PajamasMedia.com observed, the Norwegian mass murderer faces a “Gentle Justice,” the Nordic belief being, “If you treat people badly, they will behave badly. Anyone can be a citizen if we treat them well, respect them, and give them challenges and demands.” (http://bit.ly/nYi1Vc)
Norway’s is an operable philosophy only if the citizenry and inmate population adhere to civilized principles and only when predicated on extended experience with immigrant influxes, which homogeneous Norway is not. Their system of “gentle justice” presupposes civil criminals and has yet to be tested on a wide scale.
Norway considers itself very progressive when it comes to punishment and in many other ways, including not permitting most of its police force to carry lethal weapons since Nordic countries don’t want people to get hurt.
In a very real sense, Breivik deserves better treatment than America’s homegrown lowlives.
As reprehensible as his murderous spree was, Breivik committed his atrocities out of a love for his country, albeit a distorted love but love nevertheless. He detested his exceedingly benevolent, socialistic Labor government for its immigration policies and, more specifically, for undermining Norway’s national integrity and culture by welcoming and indulging hordes of Muslim immigrants.
In America, we have a similar approach. We welcome and indulge large scale multiculturalism and diversity–and we’re reaping the whirlwind as a result.
In custody are Nidal Malik Hasan, the Army major who allegedly slaughtered 13 people at Fort Hood in 2009, and Naser Jason Abdo, who apparently was plotting to become a Hasan wannabe. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=5131)
Showing posts with label hasan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label hasan. Show all posts
Sunday, July 31, 2011
Monday, October 18, 2010
Major Malik Nidal Hasan, Soldier, Psychiatariast, Muslim. Mass Murderer
Major Malik Nidal Hasan, Soldier, Psychiatrist, Muslim, Mass Murderer
Calmly, methodically, United States Army psychiatrist Major Nidal Malik Hasan echoed Muhamma Atta’s final words, “Allahu Akbar,” (God, Allah, is great), as he trained his laser-guided, Army-issue weapon on his innocent victims at Fort Hood in Texas on November 5th, 2009 and mercilessly, allegedly, shot them.
Before being brought down, he, allegedly, managed to slaughter 13 of those victims–14 if one considers a pre-born baby a person–and wound, many severely, another 32.
Hasan, crippled by return fire, now confined to a wheelchair and facing a possible death penalty, is presently on trial at Fort Hood for his alleged crimes.
This will not be an effort to recount the sick, gory details of the deadliest attack on a U.S. military base in history nor an account of the Obama administration’s calculated downplaying of that horrific event nor an effort to single out Muslim soldiers, airmen, or naval personnel as people dedicated to killing their fellow servicepeople and to destroying the United States.
Nor will it be an effort to condemn Major Hasan even though the evidence against him is overwhelming.
The unprovoked attack was indeed sick, gory and deadly, the administration has indeed sought to especially minimize Hasan’s Islamic connection, and there undoubtedly are many–far from all–Muslim-Major-Hasan like-thinkers in our military but there are larger issues related to that slaughter, principally the issue of the prevailing political correctness as it concerns the reactions of some Fort Hood personnel following the attack.
Sgt. Alonzo Lunsford was there, in that brief, bloody battlezone. He witnessed the massacre, he heard Hasan scream “Allahu akbar,” locked eyes with him, saw the laser light focused on him, then closed his eyes and waited for the inevitable.
The worst inevitability didn’t come to pass. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=2262)
Calmly, methodically, United States Army psychiatrist Major Nidal Malik Hasan echoed Muhamma Atta’s final words, “Allahu Akbar,” (God, Allah, is great), as he trained his laser-guided, Army-issue weapon on his innocent victims at Fort Hood in Texas on November 5th, 2009 and mercilessly, allegedly, shot them.
Before being brought down, he, allegedly, managed to slaughter 13 of those victims–14 if one considers a pre-born baby a person–and wound, many severely, another 32.
Hasan, crippled by return fire, now confined to a wheelchair and facing a possible death penalty, is presently on trial at Fort Hood for his alleged crimes.
This will not be an effort to recount the sick, gory details of the deadliest attack on a U.S. military base in history nor an account of the Obama administration’s calculated downplaying of that horrific event nor an effort to single out Muslim soldiers, airmen, or naval personnel as people dedicated to killing their fellow servicepeople and to destroying the United States.
Nor will it be an effort to condemn Major Hasan even though the evidence against him is overwhelming.
The unprovoked attack was indeed sick, gory and deadly, the administration has indeed sought to especially minimize Hasan’s Islamic connection, and there undoubtedly are many–far from all–Muslim-Major-Hasan like-thinkers in our military but there are larger issues related to that slaughter, principally the issue of the prevailing political correctness as it concerns the reactions of some Fort Hood personnel following the attack.
Sgt. Alonzo Lunsford was there, in that brief, bloody battlezone. He witnessed the massacre, he heard Hasan scream “Allahu akbar,” locked eyes with him, saw the laser light focused on him, then closed his eyes and waited for the inevitable.
The worst inevitability didn’t come to pass. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=2262)
Thursday, November 19, 2009
"I Know We Are at War," and Other DC Fables
“I Know We Are at War,” and Other DC Fables
As more and more cracks appear in the previously-impenetrable Wall of Obamian MSM Idolators, the president must be wondering if he could get away with bailouts for all of his driveby media whether they need it or not.
When “SNL” feels free to take potshots at Obama, the Times prints truthful news about him, and even Theonion.com no longer feels he is sacrosanct and beyond reproach, something may be a-brewing that could approach even-handed treatment of the president.
Some queasiness just might be settling in on the banks of the Potomac and within the White House walls as the administration gets a tad nervous.
In an appearance before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Attorney General Eric Holder attempted to defend his decision to try 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and his co-conspirators in a federal civilian court in Manhattan, within virtual spitting distance from Ground Zero.
Committee Chairman Pat Leahy (D. VT) wasn’t able to shield Holder from some hard questions concerning his decision, a decision he has contended he alone made, which is as preposterous as it is damning.
Would the President of the United States have had absolutely no input in the matter of by-passing military tribunals? If so, he is more out of touch with reality than it has seemed and once more he has contradicted himself.
Holder surprisingly admitted something Obama has long avoided by saying: “I know that we are at war. I know that we are at war with a vicious enemy who targets our soldiers on the battlefield in Afghanistan and our civilians in the streets here at home:” http://bit.ly/2OUdSp
He held fast to the Obama position that the war is not against Islamic terrorism by never mentioning that abhorrent phrase. . . .
(Read the rest at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1333)
As more and more cracks appear in the previously-impenetrable Wall of Obamian MSM Idolators, the president must be wondering if he could get away with bailouts for all of his driveby media whether they need it or not.
When “SNL” feels free to take potshots at Obama, the Times prints truthful news about him, and even Theonion.com no longer feels he is sacrosanct and beyond reproach, something may be a-brewing that could approach even-handed treatment of the president.
Some queasiness just might be settling in on the banks of the Potomac and within the White House walls as the administration gets a tad nervous.
In an appearance before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Attorney General Eric Holder attempted to defend his decision to try 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and his co-conspirators in a federal civilian court in Manhattan, within virtual spitting distance from Ground Zero.
Committee Chairman Pat Leahy (D. VT) wasn’t able to shield Holder from some hard questions concerning his decision, a decision he has contended he alone made, which is as preposterous as it is damning.
Would the President of the United States have had absolutely no input in the matter of by-passing military tribunals? If so, he is more out of touch with reality than it has seemed and once more he has contradicted himself.
Holder surprisingly admitted something Obama has long avoided by saying: “I know that we are at war. I know that we are at war with a vicious enemy who targets our soldiers on the battlefield in Afghanistan and our civilians in the streets here at home:” http://bit.ly/2OUdSp
He held fast to the Obama position that the war is not against Islamic terrorism by never mentioning that abhorrent phrase. . . .
(Read the rest at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1333)
Thursday, November 12, 2009
Terrible Terror, Terrible Terrorist: Part Three
Terrible Terror, Terrible Terrorist: Part Three
This final installment of “Terrible Terror, Terrible Terrorist” was postponed in deference to the obsequies for the casualties conducted at Fort Hood and the commemoration of Veterans Day. I chose not to pollute either with the evolving, sickening details surrounding the senseless Muslim murders in Texas which made the Texas Chainsaw murders almost child play.
That evolution becomes more sickening by the day.
Our president, with wife Michelle in tow, made a duty-appearance at those services on Tuesday appearing very somber as he read the names of the 13 dead, declaring them heroes, promising “the killer will be met with justice–in this world and the next.”
Obama incorporated brief and touching biographical notes on each victim, including a newlywed and a pregnant mother, whose death brought the body count to fourteen.
He lamented “the twisted logic that led to this tragedy. But this much we do know: No faith justifies these murderous and craven acts.”
His very presidential speech omitted 2 significant references. There was no mention of the dreaded T-word, Terrorism, nor of the suspected perpetrator of those “murderous and craven acts:” http://bit.ly/XBMIE
Obama out of pique had passed on attending the celebrations in Berlin remembering “the fall of the wall” and had postponed his jaunt to China in order to squeeze in his trip to Fort Hood but his omissions of the T-word and any reference to Hasan’s Islamic-terrorist connections were very telling.
They were in line with his efforts to play those connections down even as the facts continue to pile up. . . .
(Read the rest at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1318)
This final installment of “Terrible Terror, Terrible Terrorist” was postponed in deference to the obsequies for the casualties conducted at Fort Hood and the commemoration of Veterans Day. I chose not to pollute either with the evolving, sickening details surrounding the senseless Muslim murders in Texas which made the Texas Chainsaw murders almost child play.
That evolution becomes more sickening by the day.
Our president, with wife Michelle in tow, made a duty-appearance at those services on Tuesday appearing very somber as he read the names of the 13 dead, declaring them heroes, promising “the killer will be met with justice–in this world and the next.”
Obama incorporated brief and touching biographical notes on each victim, including a newlywed and a pregnant mother, whose death brought the body count to fourteen.
He lamented “the twisted logic that led to this tragedy. But this much we do know: No faith justifies these murderous and craven acts.”
His very presidential speech omitted 2 significant references. There was no mention of the dreaded T-word, Terrorism, nor of the suspected perpetrator of those “murderous and craven acts:” http://bit.ly/XBMIE
Obama out of pique had passed on attending the celebrations in Berlin remembering “the fall of the wall” and had postponed his jaunt to China in order to squeeze in his trip to Fort Hood but his omissions of the T-word and any reference to Hasan’s Islamic-terrorist connections were very telling.
They were in line with his efforts to play those connections down even as the facts continue to pile up. . . .
(Read the rest at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1318)
Tuesday, November 10, 2009
Terrible Terror, Terrible Terrorist: Part Two
Terrible Terror, Terrible Terrorist: Part Two
Amid new allegations that the Obama administration is withholding “critical information” concerning the murders at Fort Hood, ranking Republican Pete Hoekstra is demanding the CIA and the FBI release full details on what he calls “a terrorism attack” at our military facility in Texas.
Why a congressman would have to insist the government inform the governed of such information is beyond me. It smacks of Whitewater–and whitewash: http://bit.ly/3W73Fk.
However, there’s much more about those murders.
Todd Huston on AmericanConservative.com outed something the Obama administration would very much like to keep under wraps, the connection between the alleged murderer, Major Nidal Malik Hasan, and the Obamians.
Handwriting on a wall is one thing, often equivalent to scrawled grafitti. Messages chiseled into a wall by a dedicated terrorist are something else again. . .
(Read the rest at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1315)
Amid new allegations that the Obama administration is withholding “critical information” concerning the murders at Fort Hood, ranking Republican Pete Hoekstra is demanding the CIA and the FBI release full details on what he calls “a terrorism attack” at our military facility in Texas.
Why a congressman would have to insist the government inform the governed of such information is beyond me. It smacks of Whitewater–and whitewash: http://bit.ly/3W73Fk.
However, there’s much more about those murders.
Todd Huston on AmericanConservative.com outed something the Obama administration would very much like to keep under wraps, the connection between the alleged murderer, Major Nidal Malik Hasan, and the Obamians.
Handwriting on a wall is one thing, often equivalent to scrawled grafitti. Messages chiseled into a wall by a dedicated terrorist are something else again. . .
(Read the rest at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1315)
Monday, November 9, 2009
Terrible Terror, Terrible Terrorist: Part One
Terrible Terror, Terrible Terrorist: Part One
Though it was in full swing prior to 9/11/2001, few Americans paid much attention to the reality of terroristic activity around the globe.
In the intervening 8 years, after a flurry of outrage and alarm, and two ongoing wars, many of us–too many of us–have retreated into a comfortable cocoon of terrorism-denial.
With mushrooming unemployment and with so many other personal and domestic problems on our plates, why bother worrying ourselves over something we can’t individually do anything about?
That denial, that gut refusal to come to terms with the truth that America is engaged in a worldwide struggle against the Islamic jihad, is almost as dangerous as the terrorism itself.
One individual who has adopted a blase’ demeanor toward the all-important issue is our terrorism-averse president who also happens to be the Commander-in-Chief of our armed forces, our chief line of defense from enemy attack.
Obama campaigned against the Iraq War, banned “harsh” interrogation techniques to elicit life-saving information from prisoners, promised to shutter GITMO, and banned the use of the term War on Terror.
Mr. President, point of information: Ignoring the threat of continuing terrorism and, worse, minimizing it to the point of absurdity, won’t make it go away.
I’ve long suspected the motivations of President Obama . . .
(Read the rest at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=
Though it was in full swing prior to 9/11/2001, few Americans paid much attention to the reality of terroristic activity around the globe.
In the intervening 8 years, after a flurry of outrage and alarm, and two ongoing wars, many of us–too many of us–have retreated into a comfortable cocoon of terrorism-denial.
With mushrooming unemployment and with so many other personal and domestic problems on our plates, why bother worrying ourselves over something we can’t individually do anything about?
That denial, that gut refusal to come to terms with the truth that America is engaged in a worldwide struggle against the Islamic jihad, is almost as dangerous as the terrorism itself.
One individual who has adopted a blase’ demeanor toward the all-important issue is our terrorism-averse president who also happens to be the Commander-in-Chief of our armed forces, our chief line of defense from enemy attack.
Obama campaigned against the Iraq War, banned “harsh” interrogation techniques to elicit life-saving information from prisoners, promised to shutter GITMO, and banned the use of the term War on Terror.
Mr. President, point of information: Ignoring the threat of continuing terrorism and, worse, minimizing it to the point of absurdity, won’t make it go away.
I’ve long suspected the motivations of President Obama . . .
(Read the rest at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)