UPDATES: Gays, Pervs, and Al Gore
. . . Gore would have been better off had he simply fabricated some facts to bolster his argument as he did with his “An Inconvenient Truth.” Other options to increase child survivability rates might be advising lesbians such as Elese Lebsack not to ride motorcycles in gay pride parades and suggesting to Professor David Epstein that having sexual relations with his daughter wasn’t a very good idea.
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=4922)
Showing posts with label columbia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label columbia. Show all posts
Wednesday, June 29, 2011
Sunday, April 10, 2011
Obama's Birth Certificate and College Transcripts Theories
Obama's Birth Certificate and College Transcript Theories
It’s far too early to tell how history will regard the presidency of Barack Hussein Obama, although there are clear indices it will be as an abject failure, but we already know he will go down as the most secretive and controversial president since Richard Nixon. The controversies over two issues, his birth certificate and his college transcripts, continue to swirl and cloud his office and that swirling and clouding are Obama’s own doing.
These may or not be new news concerning those documents to many readers but they’re relatively new theories to me. Since Obama has adamantly refused to release either a valid birth certificate or his transcripts–or his medical records–and since both theories make a great deal of sense and are entirely feasible, I’m sharing them.
THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE QUESTIONS: Even after so-called “Birthers” have been dismissed for years as fruitcakes by the MSM, they have very much in the news lately thanks largely to Donald Trump, a quasi-birther. True birthers express very serious reservations concerning Obama’s origins–Kenya or Hawaii. The Donald simply says he doesn’t know.
He cites the millions Obama has spent to suppress the information, the silliness of his offering a useless Hawaiian “certificate of live birth,” the inability of the Democrat governor and friend of the Obama family to locate a real birth certificate, and his hope that it doesn’t become an issue in the 2012 election when Trump may be the Republican nominee.
That last is as likely as Dennis Kucinich being the Dem nominee but the issues Trump raises are all valid and amount to the same question Birthers have: Is Obama constitutionally qualified to serve as President of the United States?
THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE THEORY: Obama was, probably, born in the United States which raises the question that, if he were, why all the subterfuge and evasion? . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=4115)
It’s far too early to tell how history will regard the presidency of Barack Hussein Obama, although there are clear indices it will be as an abject failure, but we already know he will go down as the most secretive and controversial president since Richard Nixon. The controversies over two issues, his birth certificate and his college transcripts, continue to swirl and cloud his office and that swirling and clouding are Obama’s own doing.
These may or not be new news concerning those documents to many readers but they’re relatively new theories to me. Since Obama has adamantly refused to release either a valid birth certificate or his transcripts–or his medical records–and since both theories make a great deal of sense and are entirely feasible, I’m sharing them.
THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE QUESTIONS: Even after so-called “Birthers” have been dismissed for years as fruitcakes by the MSM, they have very much in the news lately thanks largely to Donald Trump, a quasi-birther. True birthers express very serious reservations concerning Obama’s origins–Kenya or Hawaii. The Donald simply says he doesn’t know.
He cites the millions Obama has spent to suppress the information, the silliness of his offering a useless Hawaiian “certificate of live birth,” the inability of the Democrat governor and friend of the Obama family to locate a real birth certificate, and his hope that it doesn’t become an issue in the 2012 election when Trump may be the Republican nominee.
That last is as likely as Dennis Kucinich being the Dem nominee but the issues Trump raises are all valid and amount to the same question Birthers have: Is Obama constitutionally qualified to serve as President of the United States?
THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE THEORY: Obama was, probably, born in the United States which raises the question that, if he were, why all the subterfuge and evasion? . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=4115)
Friday, December 10, 2010
Teachers in Action, in Inaction, in Perversions
Teachers in Action, in Inaction, in Perversions
Teachers, like other human beings, tend to come in all stripes and in all types. In recent decades, however, the once-esteemed teaching profession, including university profs down to elementary school instructors, seems to be attracting more and more oddballs, incompetents–and perverts than ever before.
Take, for example, 57 year old Raymond Devaughn Taylor, an adjunct at Kennesaw State University of Georgia. You are free to take him since Kennesaw no longer seems to want him after, for unknown reasons, he stripped naked in front of his accounting students who, understandably, reacted as if they were sorely in need of a barf bag.
As TrueCrimeReports.com posed the question, “Let’s say you’re the dean of the business school at Kennesaw State University in Georgia. And let’s say you need someone to teach accounting. Do you: A) sign up [the first applicant] even though he looks like he enjoys molesting small children and farm animals, or B) activate the university’s Perv Alert System (TM) and place the school on lockdown. The logical response is B. But for some reason, the real dean chose A. And it naturally didn’t turn out so well.”
That’s a classic understatement. Students ratted Taylor out, he was fired, arrested, and charged with public indecency: http://bit.ly/gnDY7g He was not charged with inducing the gag reflex in his coed students.
Then we have an unidentified teacher in Palm Beach, Florida Jaega Middle School who apparently is a devotee of extreme sports . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=3000)
Teachers, like other human beings, tend to come in all stripes and in all types. In recent decades, however, the once-esteemed teaching profession, including university profs down to elementary school instructors, seems to be attracting more and more oddballs, incompetents–and perverts than ever before.
Take, for example, 57 year old Raymond Devaughn Taylor, an adjunct at Kennesaw State University of Georgia. You are free to take him since Kennesaw no longer seems to want him after, for unknown reasons, he stripped naked in front of his accounting students who, understandably, reacted as if they were sorely in need of a barf bag.
As TrueCrimeReports.com posed the question, “Let’s say you’re the dean of the business school at Kennesaw State University in Georgia. And let’s say you need someone to teach accounting. Do you: A) sign up [the first applicant] even though he looks like he enjoys molesting small children and farm animals, or B) activate the university’s Perv Alert System (TM) and place the school on lockdown. The logical response is B. But for some reason, the real dean chose A. And it naturally didn’t turn out so well.”
That’s a classic understatement. Students ratted Taylor out, he was fired, arrested, and charged with public indecency: http://bit.ly/gnDY7g He was not charged with inducing the gag reflex in his coed students.
Then we have an unidentified teacher in Palm Beach, Florida Jaega Middle School who apparently is a devotee of extreme sports . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=3000)
Monday, November 16, 2009
Black Liberation Theology in Action?
Black Liberation Theology in Action?
“Black Liberation Theology,” is a term supposedly coined by James H. Cone who actually glommed it from the South American Marxist “Liberation Theology” movement of the fifties.
Cone synthesized his American meaning when he said, “The Christian faith has been interpreted largely by those who enslaved black people, and by the people who segregated them.” It goes far beyond a disaffection with Christianity.
As one observer wrote, it is “a product of the dreary, leftist politics of the twentieth century” to which “Militancy is important. It’s the sword dangled over the head of society. Either fork over more tax dollars, government services and patronage or else. . . [under threat of} Civil unrest. Disruptions in cities. Riot in the streets:” http://bit.ly/4EYouE.
Sound familiar? It should. We have witnessed that civil unrest, that militancy, those disruptions, those riots for decades. They are intrinsic to black liberation and civil rights movements. Ironically, they are often promulgated from the pulpits of supposedly Christian churches.
Two recent race-tinged stories may reflect a very feasible relationship to Black Liberation Theology follow:
ONE: The following dialogue is fabricated. The facts of the incident–involving 3 people in a Harlem bar, a black man, a white woman, and a white man–are not.
Black Man: “Don’t you think that white privilege has gone on long enough in this country?”
White woman: “What exactly do you mean by ‘white privilege?’ “
“You know goddamned well what I mean! Now I’ll show you some black privilege!”
With that, a 59 year old Columbia University prof hauled off and sucker-punched the white woman in the face and then for good measure took a swing at the white man who intervened.
As reported by the New York Post, the black man, Professor Lionel MacIntyre, and the white woman, Ms. Camille Davis, had been involved a racial disagreement a few weeks earlier. Last Friday, it ignited into a “fiery discussion” at the bar, Toast.
MacIntyre concluded that chat by shoving and punching Davis . . .
(Read the rest at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1321)
“Black Liberation Theology,” is a term supposedly coined by James H. Cone who actually glommed it from the South American Marxist “Liberation Theology” movement of the fifties.
Cone synthesized his American meaning when he said, “The Christian faith has been interpreted largely by those who enslaved black people, and by the people who segregated them.” It goes far beyond a disaffection with Christianity.
As one observer wrote, it is “a product of the dreary, leftist politics of the twentieth century” to which “Militancy is important. It’s the sword dangled over the head of society. Either fork over more tax dollars, government services and patronage or else. . . [under threat of} Civil unrest. Disruptions in cities. Riot in the streets:” http://bit.ly/4EYouE.
Sound familiar? It should. We have witnessed that civil unrest, that militancy, those disruptions, those riots for decades. They are intrinsic to black liberation and civil rights movements. Ironically, they are often promulgated from the pulpits of supposedly Christian churches.
Two recent race-tinged stories may reflect a very feasible relationship to Black Liberation Theology follow:
ONE: The following dialogue is fabricated. The facts of the incident–involving 3 people in a Harlem bar, a black man, a white woman, and a white man–are not.
Black Man: “Don’t you think that white privilege has gone on long enough in this country?”
White woman: “What exactly do you mean by ‘white privilege?’ “
“You know goddamned well what I mean! Now I’ll show you some black privilege!”
With that, a 59 year old Columbia University prof hauled off and sucker-punched the white woman in the face and then for good measure took a swing at the white man who intervened.
As reported by the New York Post, the black man, Professor Lionel MacIntyre, and the white woman, Ms. Camille Davis, had been involved a racial disagreement a few weeks earlier. Last Friday, it ignited into a “fiery discussion” at the bar, Toast.
MacIntyre concluded that chat by shoving and punching Davis . . .
(Read the rest at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1321)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)