Things Our "Flexible" President May Do When He Is Re-elected
Barack Hussein Obama is so cocksure of re-election that he is making plans for 2013-2016.
Obama made that surety obvious when he pulled yet another gaffe in South Korea by not realizing he was speaking with a hot mike as he whispered to the outgoing Russian figurehead President Dmitry Medvedev.
The surreptitious exchange:
Obama: On all these issues, but particularly missile defense, this, this can be solved but it’s important for him to give me space.
Medvedev: Yeah, I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you…
Obama: (reaching over and putting his hand on Mr. Medvedev’s knee): This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility.
Medvedev: I understand. I will transmit this information to Vladimir.
America’s commander-in-chief essentially promised to give away America’s European missile defense secrets to Russia after he wins in November, that he would share vital, military information with the incoming Russian fraudulent President Vladimir Putin since he will have fooled the American electorate once again.
That treasonous plot with the nation against which we waged a decades-long Cold War and which Mitt Romney called America’s “number one geopolitical foe” has raised suspicions on what else Obama has hidden up his sleeve, as if outright presidential treason were not enough.
Based on the president’s words and actions over the past four years, here are some educated guesses on what Americans can expect by 2016 or sooner should he win four more years to perpetrate more treason, wreak havoc with our economy, undermine our international standing, and convert the country into a Third World nation:
. Israel will be abandoned despite Obama’s pledges to the contrary, Venezuela will become a trusted ally, and the 50 year old sanctions against Cuba will be lifted. (Obama and his administration have frequently demonstrated an antipathy to Israel and an affinity for all things Islamic, have indicated they want Hugo Chavez to be a buddy, and have a special affection for Communism.)
. The United Nations will be recognized as the preeminent authority to dictate America’s foreign and domestic policy. (Obama is a professed “One-Worlder” who sees the U.N. as the one organization capable of insuring peace and tranquility throughout the planet.)
. Attorney General Eric Holder’s racist and corrupt DoJ . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=19397.)
Showing posts with label treason. Show all posts
Showing posts with label treason. Show all posts
Thursday, March 29, 2012
Sunday, July 17, 2011
Jane Fonda Gets Another Whiff of Mortality
Jane Fonda Gets Another Whiff of Mortality
As we age, either like fine wines or rancid vinegar, most of us human animals begin to contemplate what we’ve done, where we’ve been, what we’ve said, whom we’ve offended, and how family, friends, and the world at large will regard us after we shuffle off this very mortal coil.
Seventy-three year old Jane Vadim-Hayden-Turner-Fonda, born with the presumptuous given name Lady Jane Seymour Fonda, has done and said many things, has been to many places, has gravely offended millions of people, and is currently in process of setting her remembrance stage. She is evidently experiencing a desparate need to tidy up her legacy as a traitor.
I have some bad news for Lady Jane: You’re going to die eventually. Lies and subterfuge will never cover up your seditionist activities, pictures, and utterances during the Vietnam War all of which have been fully documented so stop all the BS! Why not clear your conscience while you can and before you become a suicide like your mom?
Regardless of the facts that misbegotten war launched by Democrat presidents Kennedy and Johnson should never have happened and that it was ignominiously lost by politicians, Jane Fonda provided shameless aid and comfort to Hanoi and the Vietcong by her July, 1972 visit to North Vietnam.
With a big grin on her face, she not only posed for pictures with an enemy in the midst of killing our soldiers but betrayed POWs to that enemy and, ala Tokyo Rose, recorded broadcasts on behalf of the Communist North Vietnamese “in which she called American military leaders ‘war criminals’ and, following the return home of some POWs who described mistreatment by the North Vietnamese, saying that Americans should ’not hail the POWs as heroes, because they are hypocrites and liars.’ “
See “Revisioning Jane Fonda,” http://bit.ly/pvuT2h
Fonda seems to have forgotten all that and, typical liberal that she was and is, assumes the American public is so stupid that they don’t remember it either.
Reflecting her senior forgetfulness, . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=5022)
As we age, either like fine wines or rancid vinegar, most of us human animals begin to contemplate what we’ve done, where we’ve been, what we’ve said, whom we’ve offended, and how family, friends, and the world at large will regard us after we shuffle off this very mortal coil.
Seventy-three year old Jane Vadim-Hayden-Turner-Fonda, born with the presumptuous given name Lady Jane Seymour Fonda, has done and said many things, has been to many places, has gravely offended millions of people, and is currently in process of setting her remembrance stage. She is evidently experiencing a desparate need to tidy up her legacy as a traitor.
I have some bad news for Lady Jane: You’re going to die eventually. Lies and subterfuge will never cover up your seditionist activities, pictures, and utterances during the Vietnam War all of which have been fully documented so stop all the BS! Why not clear your conscience while you can and before you become a suicide like your mom?
Regardless of the facts that misbegotten war launched by Democrat presidents Kennedy and Johnson should never have happened and that it was ignominiously lost by politicians, Jane Fonda provided shameless aid and comfort to Hanoi and the Vietcong by her July, 1972 visit to North Vietnam.
With a big grin on her face, she not only posed for pictures with an enemy in the midst of killing our soldiers but betrayed POWs to that enemy and, ala Tokyo Rose, recorded broadcasts on behalf of the Communist North Vietnamese “in which she called American military leaders ‘war criminals’ and, following the return home of some POWs who described mistreatment by the North Vietnamese, saying that Americans should ’not hail the POWs as heroes, because they are hypocrites and liars.’ “
See “Revisioning Jane Fonda,” http://bit.ly/pvuT2h
Fonda seems to have forgotten all that and, typical liberal that she was and is, assumes the American public is so stupid that they don’t remember it either.
Reflecting her senior forgetfulness, . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=5022)
Thursday, December 30, 2010
Revisioning Jane Fonda
Revisioning Jane Fonda
. . . Less well-known and even more damning are Fonda’s seditious radio broadcasts on behalf of the Communist North Vietnamese “in which she called American military leaders ‘war criminals” and, following the return home of some POWs who described mistreatment by the North Vietnamese, saying that Americans should ’not hail the POWs as heroes, because they are hypocrites and liars:’ “ http://tiny.cc/217ka
Fonda’s half-hearted, non-apologetic apologies for some–far from all–of her actions and statements during that time have failed to cut it for most Americans who still regard her as a traitor.
Therefore, as the former Barbarella enters her dotage, a little revisionism was in order lest her memory be forever tainted, lest she be historically regarded as worse than Tokyo Rose, which she was.
TruthorFiction.com,which provided the above quotations, addressed what it calls, “an erumor” currently being circulated which purports that President Obama is considering honoring Fonda and which cites statements by various POW’s attesting to their maltreatment by their captors. Obama’s plan to confer honors on Fonda as one of the “100 Women of the Century” has not been verified but, given that he’s Obama, is entirely within the realm of possibility.
However,TruthorFiction.com, which printed 3 versions of the “erumor,” two from 2005 and the 2010 version, contends, “This story [of the POWs] hearkens to a real visit to North Vietnam by Jane Fonda in July of 1972, but the stories about betraying POWs is [sic] not true. . . This particular email includes three stories, two of which have been denied by the POWs who are named, and one of which has been confirmed as true by the source, although he was not named in the email. . ."
(read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=3243)
. . . Less well-known and even more damning are Fonda’s seditious radio broadcasts on behalf of the Communist North Vietnamese “in which she called American military leaders ‘war criminals” and, following the return home of some POWs who described mistreatment by the North Vietnamese, saying that Americans should ’not hail the POWs as heroes, because they are hypocrites and liars:’ “ http://tiny.cc/217ka
Fonda’s half-hearted, non-apologetic apologies for some–far from all–of her actions and statements during that time have failed to cut it for most Americans who still regard her as a traitor.
Therefore, as the former Barbarella enters her dotage, a little revisionism was in order lest her memory be forever tainted, lest she be historically regarded as worse than Tokyo Rose, which she was.
TruthorFiction.com,which provided the above quotations, addressed what it calls, “an erumor” currently being circulated which purports that President Obama is considering honoring Fonda and which cites statements by various POW’s attesting to their maltreatment by their captors. Obama’s plan to confer honors on Fonda as one of the “100 Women of the Century” has not been verified but, given that he’s Obama, is entirely within the realm of possibility.
However,TruthorFiction.com, which printed 3 versions of the “erumor,” two from 2005 and the 2010 version, contends, “This story [of the POWs] hearkens to a real visit to North Vietnam by Jane Fonda in July of 1972, but the stories about betraying POWs is [sic] not true. . . This particular email includes three stories, two of which have been denied by the POWs who are named, and one of which has been confirmed as true by the source, although he was not named in the email. . ."
(read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=3243)
Wednesday, August 26, 2009
Treasonous Teddy Kennedy
Treasonous Teddy Kennedy
I’ve been chastised! By my 29 year old daughter, no less!
She admonished me about “speaking ill of the dead” because of my previous article, “Ted Kennedy, ‘Liberal Lion’ and Murderer is Dead.”
And here I thought I was being fairly gracious in that piece, taking some pains to avoid detailing the events of 40 years ago when Ted ran his car off a bridge and into a murky tidal channel on Chappaquiddick Island and swam or walked away, leaving 29 year old Mary Jo Kopechne to drown.
I even offered the sentiment that I hoped Ted had made peace with his Maker before he succumbed to brain cancer.
Apparently, generally relating the factual and sad tale of the death of Mary Jo at this point in time is considered by some to be unkind to the memory of Senator Kennedy.
I would have to disagree and, in fact, there was much more I could have written about the personal and political life of the senator, but I chose not to.
Others have been less discreet than I and, on second thought, there were other Kennedy “incidents” which demand mention, namely his subversive machinations with the Soviet Union. They reflect dismally on the career of the senator, almost on a par with the curious circumstances surrounding the death of Mary Jo.
Indeed, from a political and perhaps moral, perspective, they were worse.
Those incidents won’t be discussed in liberal media retrospectives on Ted Kennedy which have a vested and emotional interest in the Camelot Era of President John Fitzgerald Kennedy and which studiously avoid tarnishing its image in any way, including citing any negativity surrounding the last remaining Kennedy brother.
Case in point was Wednesday evening’s coverage of Ted Kennedy’s death on ABC.
No mention was made of his expulsion from Harvard for cheating, his legendary philandering, or his more legendary imbibing. Regarding Chappaquiddick, ABC merely referred, twice, to “a female” who died in his car that fateful night.
ABC cares much for Kennedy memories but when it came to according recognition to that female, her name wasn’t worth mentioning.
As for ABC and other networks referencing his treasonous activities, are you kidding?
On his own, Ted himself greatly tarnished–disgraced is a better word–the Kennedy mystique when he conspired and collaborated with the leaders of the Soviet Union against his own country.
If his actions did not constitute treason, they came damned close.
Ted didn’t like Ronald Reagan any more than he liked Jimmy Carter. He also didn’t like Reagan’s foreign policy toward the U.S.S.R. and detested Reagan’s plan for the SDI. Ted came from the rapprochement school of international relations, a variation on the peace at any price, make nice to thine enemies, school in hopes they will reciprocate in kind.
The SDI, the Strategic Defense Initiative, derided by the media as “Star Wars,” was probably the single most significant strategical move that brought down that wall in Berlin, leading to the collapse of the Soviet Union.
The Soviets tried to counter SDI but its corrupt communist society and moribund economy couldn’t compete and the U.S.S.R. went bankrupt trying.
It was only after KGB archives were made public that it was revealed that Senator Ted Kennedy, during the height of the Cold War, had conspired against his own country. . . .
(Read the rest at http://genelalor.com)
I’ve been chastised! By my 29 year old daughter, no less!
She admonished me about “speaking ill of the dead” because of my previous article, “Ted Kennedy, ‘Liberal Lion’ and Murderer is Dead.”
And here I thought I was being fairly gracious in that piece, taking some pains to avoid detailing the events of 40 years ago when Ted ran his car off a bridge and into a murky tidal channel on Chappaquiddick Island and swam or walked away, leaving 29 year old Mary Jo Kopechne to drown.
I even offered the sentiment that I hoped Ted had made peace with his Maker before he succumbed to brain cancer.
Apparently, generally relating the factual and sad tale of the death of Mary Jo at this point in time is considered by some to be unkind to the memory of Senator Kennedy.
I would have to disagree and, in fact, there was much more I could have written about the personal and political life of the senator, but I chose not to.
Others have been less discreet than I and, on second thought, there were other Kennedy “incidents” which demand mention, namely his subversive machinations with the Soviet Union. They reflect dismally on the career of the senator, almost on a par with the curious circumstances surrounding the death of Mary Jo.
Indeed, from a political and perhaps moral, perspective, they were worse.
Those incidents won’t be discussed in liberal media retrospectives on Ted Kennedy which have a vested and emotional interest in the Camelot Era of President John Fitzgerald Kennedy and which studiously avoid tarnishing its image in any way, including citing any negativity surrounding the last remaining Kennedy brother.
Case in point was Wednesday evening’s coverage of Ted Kennedy’s death on ABC.
No mention was made of his expulsion from Harvard for cheating, his legendary philandering, or his more legendary imbibing. Regarding Chappaquiddick, ABC merely referred, twice, to “a female” who died in his car that fateful night.
ABC cares much for Kennedy memories but when it came to according recognition to that female, her name wasn’t worth mentioning.
As for ABC and other networks referencing his treasonous activities, are you kidding?
On his own, Ted himself greatly tarnished–disgraced is a better word–the Kennedy mystique when he conspired and collaborated with the leaders of the Soviet Union against his own country.
If his actions did not constitute treason, they came damned close.
Ted didn’t like Ronald Reagan any more than he liked Jimmy Carter. He also didn’t like Reagan’s foreign policy toward the U.S.S.R. and detested Reagan’s plan for the SDI. Ted came from the rapprochement school of international relations, a variation on the peace at any price, make nice to thine enemies, school in hopes they will reciprocate in kind.
The SDI, the Strategic Defense Initiative, derided by the media as “Star Wars,” was probably the single most significant strategical move that brought down that wall in Berlin, leading to the collapse of the Soviet Union.
The Soviets tried to counter SDI but its corrupt communist society and moribund economy couldn’t compete and the U.S.S.R. went bankrupt trying.
It was only after KGB archives were made public that it was revealed that Senator Ted Kennedy, during the height of the Cold War, had conspired against his own country. . . .
(Read the rest at http://genelalor.com)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)